Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2024-12-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 185 315 | 27.44% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 141 124 | 20.9% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 104 237 | 15.44% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 94 413 | 13.98% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 59 580 | 8.82% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 898 | 2.06% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 519 | 1.71% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 440 | 1.25% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 139 | 0.91% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 863 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 723 | 0.7% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 568 | 0.68% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 160 | 0.62% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 315 | 0.49% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 2 870 | 0.43% |
| 16 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 797 | 0.41% |
| 17 | Beget (RU) | 2 791 | 0.41% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 376 | 0.35% |
| 19 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 636 | 0.24% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 603 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 546 | 0.23% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 485 | 0.22% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 453 | 0.22% |
| 24 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 295 | 0.19% |
| 25 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 203 | 0.18% |
| 26 | ProtonMail | 1 172 | 0.17% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 125 | 0.17% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 752 | 0.11% |
| 29 | Reg.ru | 696 | 0.1% |
| 30 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 669 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 33 712 | 5.38% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 28 804 | 4.6% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 25 716 | 4.1% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 24 305 | 3.88% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 24 125 | 3.85% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 23 372 | 3.73% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 15 465 | 2.47% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 11 852 | 1.89% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 472 | 1.19% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 261 | 0.68% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 923 | 0.63% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 596 | 0.57% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 837 | 0.45% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 681 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 273 | 0.36% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 231 | 0.36% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 600 | 0.26% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 318 | 0.21% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 228 | 0.2% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 724 | 0.12% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 708 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 549 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 326 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 308 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Intercom | 24 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 17 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 9 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 318 | 1.01% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 248 | 0.68% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 274 | 0.52% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 074 | 0.33% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 847 | 0.29% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 443 | 0.23% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 170 | 0.19% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 074 | 0.17% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 1 054 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 921 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Lark / Feishu | 837 | 0.13% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 794 | 0.13% |
| 13 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 783 | 0.12% |
| 14 | Sage Intacct | 779 | 0.12% |
| 15 | ConnectWise | 758 | 0.12% |
| 16 | Oracle Cloud | 750 | 0.12% |
| 17 | ClickDimensions | 749 | 0.12% |
| 18 | PayPal Braintree | 669 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 663 | 0.11% |
| 20 | Greenhouse | 655 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 497 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 495 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 490 | 0.08% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 428 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 332 | 0.05% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 328 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 241 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 232 | 0.04% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 182 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 153 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 38 054 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 786 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 4 087 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 773 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 660 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 568 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 051 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 959 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 753 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 353 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 2 194 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 122 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 096 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 724 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 706 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 695 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 608 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 537 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 503 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 439 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 419 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 358 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 233 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 093 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 056 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 992 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 838 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 658 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 648 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 628 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 586 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 580 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 578 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 532 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 458 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 448 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 422 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 421 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 421 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 415 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 411 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 403 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 388 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 381 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 351 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 348 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 339 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 332 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 326 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 324 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 319 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 313 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 313 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 308 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 300 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 299 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 290 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1 | 290 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 260 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 251 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 244 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 238 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 213 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 208 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 195 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 192 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 191 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 190 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 189 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 188 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 184 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 181 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 178 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 177 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 176 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 174 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 171 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 170 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 168 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 166 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 165 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 163 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 161 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 161 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 156 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 155 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 153 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 145 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 144 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 143 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 140 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 139 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 138 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 134 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 131 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 129 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 129 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 127 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 124 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 838 |
| 2 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 836 |
| 3 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 834 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 826 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 807 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 072 |
| 7 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 071 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 068 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 450 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 440 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 3 747 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 3 727 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 446 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 422 |
| 15 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 063 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 056 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 048 |
| 18 | nan | 1 937 |
| 19 | park-mx.above.com | 1 781 |
| 20 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 640 |
| 21 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 632 |
| 22 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 618 |
| 23 | dmail.kagoya.net | 1 508 |
| 24 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 471 |
| 25 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 471 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 470 |
| 27 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 044 |
| 28 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 033 |
| 29 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 030 |
| 30 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 991 |
| 31 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 986 |
| 32 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 975 |
| 33 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 974 |
| 34 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 974 |
| 35 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 925 |
| 36 | mx1.hostinger.in | 912 |
| 37 | mx2.hostinger.in | 898 |
| 38 | mail.eye-mail.net | 852 |
| 39 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 808 |
| 40 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 806 |
| 41 | mxjp1.nospamcloud.com | 799 |
| 42 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 794 |
| 43 | mxjp2.nospamcloud.com | 789 |
| 44 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 787 |
| 45 | localhost | 767 |
| 46 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 764 |
| 47 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 762 |
| 48 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 759 |
| 49 | mx.stackmail.com | 741 |
| 50 | mx.spamexperts.com | 722 |
| 51 | mx.securemx.jp | 721 |
| 52 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 716 |
| 53 | mx1.csof.net | 675 |
| 54 | mx2.csof.net | 675 |
| 55 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 674 |
| 56 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 663 |
| 57 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 651 |
| 58 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 650 |
| 59 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 644 |
| 60 | smtpin.rzone.de | 632 |
| 61 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 607 |
| 62 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 607 |
| 63 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 606 |
| 64 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 596 |
| 65 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 587 |
| 66 | mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp | 565 |
| 67 | mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp | 563 |
| 68 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 535 |
| 69 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 534 |
| 70 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 533 |
| 71 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 520 |
| 72 | mail.h-email.net | 516 |
| 73 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 515 |
| 74 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 513 |
| 75 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 505 |
| 76 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 480 |
| 77 | mail.register.it | 471 |
| 78 | mx1.feishu.cn | 452 |
| 79 | mx2.feishu.cn | 450 |
| 80 | mx3.feishu.cn | 449 |
| 81 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 448 |
| 82 | mc.planbnow.co | 435 |
| 83 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 419 |
| 84 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 417 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 378 |
| 86 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 377 |
| 87 | vlmx-air.secure.ne.jp | 367 |
| 88 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 362 |
| 89 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 358 |
| 90 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 354 |
| 91 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 352 |
| 92 | mx01.udag.de | 347 |
| 93 | mx00.udag.de | 345 |
| 94 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 306 |
| 95 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 305 |
| 96 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 304 |
| 97 | mwbgw1.ocn.ad.jp | 302 |
| 98 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 302 |
| 99 | mwbgw2.ocn.ad.jp | 295 |
| 100 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 292 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 997 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 473 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 7 145 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 5 970 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 5 666 |
| 6 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 5 438 |
| 7 | _spf.mlsend.com | 4 959 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 377 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 244 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 3 900 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 650 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 135 |
| 13 | beget.com | 3 031 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 813 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 723 |
| 16 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 658 |
| 17 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 637 |
| 18 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 490 |
| 19 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 391 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 304 |
| 21 | zcsend.net | 2 233 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 229 |
| 23 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 203 |
| 24 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 105 |
| 25 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 855 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | kagoya.net | 1 793 |
| 27 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 791 |
| 28 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 779 |
| 29 | transmail.net | 1 725 |
| 30 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 499 |
| 31 | musvc.com | 1 443 |
| 32 | _spf.onamae.ne.jp | 1 434 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 418 |
| 34 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 405 |
| 35 | spf.crsend.com | 1 399 |
| 36 | spf-00303601.pphosted.com | 1 396 |
| 37 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 393 |
| 38 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 381 |
| 39 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 349 |
| 40 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 345 |
| 41 | spf.titan.email | 1 322 |
| 42 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 301 |
| 43 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 290 |
| 44 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 272 |
| 45 | spf.163.com | 1 251 |
| 46 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 239 |
| 47 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 216 |
| 48 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 192 |
| 49 | spf.dynect.net | 1 138 |
| 50 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 100 |
| 51 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 098 |
| 52 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 036 |
| 53 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 028 |
| 54 | authsmtp.com | 1 000 |
| 55 | relay.mailbaby.net | 992 |
| 56 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 991 |
| 57 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 988 |
| 58 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 973 |
| 59 | _spf.perfora.net | 952 |
| 60 | _spf.aruba.it | 949 |
| 61 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 939 |
| 62 | spf.brevo.com | 938 |
| 63 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 912 |
| 64 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 905 |
| 65 | one.zoho.com | 904 |
| 66 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 901 |
| 67 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 864 |
| 68 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 839 |
| 69 | ispgateway.de | 837 |
| 70 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 822 |
| 71 | spfa.mailendo.com | 802 |
| 72 | zohomail.com | 777 |
| 73 | cmail1.com | 777 |
| 74 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 749 |
| 75 | spf.stackmail.com | 743 |
| 76 | spf.improvmx.com | 728 |
| 77 | spf.securemx.jp | 723 |
| 78 | _spf.mwprem.net | 721 |
| 79 | spf.bmv.jp | 717 |
| 80 | turbo-smtp.com | 715 |
| 81 | _spf.kmitd.com | 711 |
| 82 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 690 |
| 83 | spfa.cpmails.com | 687 |
| 84 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 680 |
| 85 | mailcontrol.com | 677 |
| 86 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 660 |
| 87 | spf.haihaimail.jp | 659 |
| 88 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 658 |
| 89 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 654 |
| 90 | spf.afas.online | 654 |
| 91 | spf.mindbox.ru | 650 |
| 92 | zoho.in | 644 |
| 93 | bluehost.com | 641 |
| 94 | agenturserver.de | 641 |
| 95 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 631 |
| 96 | e2ma.net | 625 |
| 97 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 621 |
| 98 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 617 |
| 99 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 615 |
| 100 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 598 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.