Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-01-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 180 717 | 26.8% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 143 002 | 21.21% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 104 999 | 15.57% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 93 347 | 13.85% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 60 386 | 8.96% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 389 | 2.13% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 188 | 1.66% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 332 | 1.24% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 352 | 0.94% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 947 | 0.73% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 855 | 0.72% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 475 | 0.66% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 339 | 0.64% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 333 | 0.49% |
| 15 | Beget (RU) | 2 929 | 0.43% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 911 | 0.43% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 844 | 0.42% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 403 | 0.36% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 671 | 0.25% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 651 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Gandi Mail | 1 626 | 0.24% |
| 22 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 514 | 0.22% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 488 | 0.22% |
| 24 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 324 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 215 | 0.18% |
| 26 | ProtonMail | 1 214 | 0.18% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 129 | 0.17% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 775 | 0.11% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 701 | 0.1% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 700 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 33 856 | 5.41% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 28 962 | 4.63% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 25 754 | 4.11% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 482 | 3.91% |
| 5 | Mandrill | 24 403 | 3.9% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 24 122 | 3.85% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 15 387 | 2.46% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 12 228 | 1.95% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 573 | 1.21% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 380 | 0.7% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 856 | 0.62% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 747 | 0.6% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 885 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 678 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 280 | 0.36% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 127 | 0.34% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 615 | 0.26% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 378 | 0.22% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 261 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 728 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 723 | 0.12% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 550 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 326 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 322 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Intercom | 24 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 16 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 10 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 5 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | ActiveCampaign | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 113 | 0.98% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 580 | 0.73% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 226 | 0.52% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 054 | 0.33% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 915 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 493 | 0.24% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 155 | 0.18% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 130 | 0.18% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 069 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 917 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Lark / Feishu | 878 | 0.14% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 802 | 0.13% |
| 13 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 789 | 0.13% |
| 14 | Sage Intacct | 785 | 0.13% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 757 | 0.12% |
| 16 | ClickDimensions | 730 | 0.12% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 672 | 0.11% |
| 18 | ConnectWise | 668 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Greenhouse | 650 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 606 | 0.1% |
| 21 | Zendesk | 491 | 0.08% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 484 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 470 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Shoptet | 444 | 0.07% |
| 25 | FormAssembly | 431 | 0.07% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 328 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 244 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 226 | 0.04% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 195 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 149 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 39 762 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 868 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 4 512 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 822 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 771 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 555 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 075 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 000 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 889 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 413 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 2 207 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 119 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 050 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 819 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 782 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 738 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 654 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 588 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 463 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 397 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 363 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 325 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 306 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 130 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 056 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 054 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 808 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 657 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 641 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 637 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 632 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 573 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 572 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 549 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 453 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 443 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 442 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 436 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 422 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 421 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 413 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 409 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 379 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 359 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 355 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 354 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 341 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 333 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 327 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 326 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 323 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 321 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 313 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 312 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 308 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 299 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1 | 293 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 289 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 266 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 265 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 253 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 245 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 213 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 212 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 205 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 205 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 202 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 199 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 192 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 191 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 188 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 188 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 186 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 181 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 180 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 177 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 175 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 172 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 170 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 167 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 163 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 163 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 161 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 158 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 158 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 157 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 156 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 155 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 151 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 146 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 142 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email,mailto:postmaster@wix.com | 142 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 140 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 136 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 134 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 134 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 134 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 132 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;""p=none; | 128 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 10 034 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 10 030 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 10 028 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 10 018 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 997 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 355 |
| 7 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 354 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 351 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 473 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 453 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 025 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 006 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 364 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 347 |
| 15 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 199 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 197 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 186 |
| 18 | nan | 1 995 |
| 19 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 691 |
| 20 | park-mx.above.com | 1 683 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 677 |
| 22 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 597 |
| 23 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 546 |
| 24 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 546 |
| 25 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 545 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 113 |
| 27 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 104 |
| 28 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 100 |
| 29 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 994 |
| 30 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 990 |
| 31 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 977 |
| 32 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 974 |
| 33 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 973 |
| 34 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 972 |
| 35 | mx1.hostinger.in | 911 |
| 36 | mx2.hostinger.in | 897 |
| 37 | mail.eye-mail.net | 890 |
| 38 | mx.stackmail.com | 860 |
| 39 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 846 |
| 40 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 846 |
| 41 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 829 |
| 42 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 822 |
| 43 | localhost | 798 |
| 44 | mx1.csof.net | 780 |
| 45 | mx2.csof.net | 780 |
| 46 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 751 |
| 47 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 748 |
| 48 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 746 |
| 49 | mx.spamexperts.com | 739 |
| 50 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 733 |
| 51 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 688 |
| 52 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 674 |
| 53 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 665 |
| 54 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 662 |
| 55 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 654 |
| 56 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 652 |
| 57 | smtpin.rzone.de | 649 |
| 58 | dmail.kagoya.net | 646 |
| 59 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 645 |
| 60 | mx.securemx.jp | 616 |
| 61 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 597 |
| 62 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 584 |
| 63 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 578 |
| 64 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 557 |
| 65 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 539 |
| 66 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 533 |
| 67 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 530 |
| 68 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 530 |
| 69 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 526 |
| 70 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 525 |
| 71 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 522 |
| 72 | mail.register.it | 489 |
| 73 | mx1.feishu.cn | 486 |
| 74 | mx3.feishu.cn | 482 |
| 75 | mx2.feishu.cn | 481 |
| 76 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 464 |
| 77 | mail.h-email.net | 427 |
| 78 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 424 |
| 79 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 421 |
| 80 | mc.planbnow.co | 419 |
| 81 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 388 |
| 82 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 383 |
| 83 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 365 |
| 84 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 361 |
| 85 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 359 |
| 86 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 338 |
| 87 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 325 |
| 88 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 313 |
| 89 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 311 |
| 90 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 308 |
| 91 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 308 |
| 92 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 306 |
| 93 | mx01.udag.de | 300 |
| 94 | mx00.udag.de | 298 |
| 95 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 290 |
| 96 | mailgw.nic.in | 286 |
| 97 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 283 |
| 98 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 279 |
| 99 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 278 |
| 100 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 275 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 190 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 748 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 7 497 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 335 |
| 5 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 5 803 |
| 6 | zoho.com | 5 786 |
| 7 | _spf.mlsend.com | 5 206 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 554 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 078 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 3 950 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 691 |
| 12 | beget.com | 3 185 |
| 13 | emailsrvr.com | 3 173 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 820 |
| 15 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 766 |
| 16 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 707 |
| 17 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 618 |
| 18 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 494 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 357 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 291 |
| 21 | zcsend.net | 2 222 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 196 |
| 23 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 174 |
| 24 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 1 920 |
| 25 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 854 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 787 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 761 |
| 28 | transmail.net | 1 738 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 504 |
| 30 | musvc.com | 1 484 |
| 31 | spf.crsend.com | 1 445 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 422 |
| 33 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 410 |
| 34 | spf-00303601.pphosted.com | 1 407 |
| 35 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 380 |
| 36 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 378 |
| 37 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 376 |
| 38 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 370 |
| 39 | spf.titan.email | 1 343 |
| 40 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 336 |
| 41 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 320 |
| 42 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 312 |
| 43 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 305 |
| 44 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 303 |
| 45 | spf.163.com | 1 255 |
| 46 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 190 |
| 47 | spf.dynect.net | 1 121 |
| 48 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 083 |
| 49 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 082 |
| 50 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 077 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 061 |
| 52 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 058 |
| 53 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 044 |
| 54 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 044 |
| 55 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 1 013 |
| 56 | authsmtp.com | 1 000 |
| 57 | spf.brevo.com | 998 |
| 58 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 979 |
| 59 | _spf.perfora.net | 976 |
| 60 | _spf.aruba.it | 962 |
| 61 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 924 |
| 62 | one.zoho.com | 907 |
| 63 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 892 |
| 64 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 881 |
| 65 | zohomail.com | 871 |
| 66 | spf.stackmail.com | 867 |
| 67 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 859 |
| 68 | ispgateway.de | 848 |
| 69 | spfa.mailendo.com | 836 |
| 70 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 834 |
| 71 | kagoya.net | 814 |
| 72 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 785 |
| 73 | cmail1.com | 772 |
| 74 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 757 |
| 75 | spf.improvmx.com | 751 |
| 76 | _spf.kmitd.com | 750 |
| 77 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 723 |
| 78 | turbo-smtp.com | 719 |
| 79 | spfa.cpmails.com | 714 |
| 80 | mailcontrol.com | 706 |
| 81 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 705 |
| 82 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 701 |
| 83 | zoho.in | 678 |
| 84 | spf.afas.online | 662 |
| 85 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 658 |
| 86 | spf.mindbox.ru | 657 |
| 87 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 653 |
| 88 | agenturserver.de | 653 |
| 89 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 651 |
| 90 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 642 |
| 91 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 629 |
| 92 | bluehost.com | 628 |
| 93 | spf.securemx.jp | 619 |
| 94 | spf.bmv.jp | 619 |
| 95 | spf.webapps.net | 618 |
| 96 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 615 |
| 97 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 608 |
| 98 | e2ma.net | 608 |
| 99 | spf.nl2go.com | 604 |
| 100 | eu.zcsend.net | 602 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.