Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-02-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 187 905 | 26.98% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 146 607 | 21.05% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 108 394 | 15.57% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 97 043 | 13.94% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 62 456 | 8.97% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 515 | 2.08% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 459 | 1.65% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 636 | 1.24% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 486 | 0.93% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 5 045 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 907 | 0.7% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 655 | 0.67% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 457 | 0.64% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 323 | 0.48% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 3 038 | 0.44% |
| 16 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 006 | 0.43% |
| 17 | Beget (RU) | 2 775 | 0.4% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 487 | 0.36% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 726 | 0.25% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 690 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Gandi Mail | 1 674 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 575 | 0.23% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 570 | 0.23% |
| 24 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 326 | 0.19% |
| 25 | ProtonMail | 1 271 | 0.18% |
| 26 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 241 | 0.18% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 213 | 0.17% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 806 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 765 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 751 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 34 332 | 5.33% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 29 470 | 4.57% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 26 374 | 4.09% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 772 | 3.84% |
| 5 | Mandrill | 24 700 | 3.83% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 24 692 | 3.83% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 15 686 | 2.43% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 12 501 | 1.94% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 695 | 1.19% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 467 | 0.69% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 921 | 0.61% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 701 | 0.57% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 886 | 0.45% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 717 | 0.42% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 270 | 0.35% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 231 | 0.35% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 650 | 0.26% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 399 | 0.22% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 312 | 0.2% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 752 | 0.12% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 742 | 0.12% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 550 | 0.09% |
| 23 | GetResponse | 348 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 335 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Intercom | 26 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 17 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 10 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Beehiiv | 2 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 177 | 0.96% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 744 | 0.74% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 361 | 0.52% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 074 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 940 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 522 | 0.24% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 172 | 0.18% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 144 | 0.18% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 131 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 941 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Lark / Feishu | 922 | 0.14% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 837 | 0.13% |
| 13 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 836 | 0.13% |
| 14 | Sage Intacct | 834 | 0.13% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 769 | 0.12% |
| 16 | ClickDimensions | 744 | 0.12% |
| 17 | ConnectWise | 687 | 0.11% |
| 18 | PayPal Braintree | 680 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Greenhouse | 655 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 627 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 503 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 493 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 484 | 0.08% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 458 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 382 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 332 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 259 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 224 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 199 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 154 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 42 227 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 32 898 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 4 812 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 4 016 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 860 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 593 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 178 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 047 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 019 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 620 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 335 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 185 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 856 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 825 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 798 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 771 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 675 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 563 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 481 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 380 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 347 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 337 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 160 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 106 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 076 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 837 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 694 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 692 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 668 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 667 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 611 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 575 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 551 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 526 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 475 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 468 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 466 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 457 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 450 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 447 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 438 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 424 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 420 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 395 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 368 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 365 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 363 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 341 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 337 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 337 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 327 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 327 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 321 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 317 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1 | 307 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 307 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 296 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 285 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 279 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 265 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 258 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 256 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 240 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 222 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 216 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 215 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 207 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 200 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 193 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 192 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 192 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 189 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 188 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 185 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 176 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 175 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 175 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 174 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 174 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 174 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 168 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 166 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 165 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 162 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 160 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 159 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 154 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 152 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 151 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 145 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 144 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 144 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 143 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 141 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 136 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1;""p=none; | 132 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 131 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 131 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 130 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 973 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 972 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 966 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 957 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 935 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 736 |
| 7 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 735 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 733 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 712 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 695 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 274 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 254 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 522 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 502 |
| 15 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 407 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 403 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 393 |
| 18 | park-mx.above.com | 2 252 |
| 19 | nan | 2 117 |
| 20 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 777 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 762 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 691 |
| 23 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 690 |
| 24 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 688 |
| 25 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 469 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mail.eye-mail.net | 1 100 |
| 27 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 078 |
| 28 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 073 |
| 29 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 043 |
| 30 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 037 |
| 31 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 032 |
| 32 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 032 |
| 33 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 018 |
| 34 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 013 |
| 35 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 007 |
| 36 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 006 |
| 37 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 005 |
| 38 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 915 |
| 39 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 903 |
| 40 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 894 |
| 41 | dmail.kagoya.net | 891 |
| 42 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 876 |
| 43 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 870 |
| 44 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 805 |
| 45 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 803 |
| 46 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 799 |
| 47 | mx.spamexperts.com | 748 |
| 48 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 743 |
| 49 | mx1.csof.net | 709 |
| 50 | mx2.csof.net | 709 |
| 51 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 698 |
| 52 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 696 |
| 53 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 695 |
| 54 | localhost | 693 |
| 55 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 688 |
| 56 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 686 |
| 57 | smtpin.rzone.de | 683 |
| 58 | mx.securemx.jp | 658 |
| 59 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 646 |
| 60 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 642 |
| 61 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 595 |
| 62 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 583 |
| 63 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 581 |
| 64 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 576 |
| 65 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 565 |
| 66 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 561 |
| 67 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 560 |
| 68 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 555 |
| 69 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 538 |
| 70 | mx1.feishu.cn | 514 |
| 71 | mx2.feishu.cn | 512 |
| 72 | mx3.feishu.cn | 511 |
| 73 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 508 |
| 74 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 508 |
| 75 | mail.register.it | 498 |
| 76 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 494 |
| 77 | mail.h-email.net | 459 |
| 78 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 455 |
| 79 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 453 |
| 80 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 448 |
| 81 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 446 |
| 82 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 403 |
| 83 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 400 |
| 84 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 392 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 386 |
| 86 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 366 |
| 87 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 322 |
| 88 | mc.planbnow.co | 316 |
| 89 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 315 |
| 90 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 315 |
| 91 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 303 |
| 92 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 299 |
| 93 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 294 |
| 94 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 290 |
| 95 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 287 |
| 96 | mx01.udag.de | 282 |
| 97 | vlmx-air.secure.ne.jp | 281 |
| 98 | mx00.udag.de | 279 |
| 99 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 275 |
| 100 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 274 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 133 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 172 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 7 958 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 713 |
| 5 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 253 |
| 6 | zoho.com | 5 835 |
| 7 | _spf.mlsend.com | 5 429 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 767 |
| 9 | websitewelcome.com | 4 188 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 169 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 717 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 321 |
| 13 | beget.com | 3 057 |
| 14 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 014 |
| 15 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 836 |
| 16 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 814 |
| 17 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 727 |
| 18 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 481 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 464 |
| 20 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 309 |
| 21 | stspg-customer.com | 2 286 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 282 |
| 23 | zcsend.net | 2 272 |
| 24 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 016 |
| 25 | transmail.net | 1 808 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 798 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 791 |
| 28 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 787 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 586 |
| 30 | musvc.com | 1 493 |
| 31 | spf.crsend.com | 1 482 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 471 |
| 33 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 429 |
| 34 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 422 |
| 35 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 402 |
| 36 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 395 |
| 37 | spf.titan.email | 1 384 |
| 38 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 377 |
| 39 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 375 |
| 40 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 364 |
| 41 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 358 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 342 |
| 43 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 332 |
| 44 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 291 |
| 45 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 223 |
| 46 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 184 |
| 47 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 159 |
| 48 | spf.dynect.net | 1 139 |
| 49 | kagoya.net | 1 105 |
| 50 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 093 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 092 |
| 52 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 084 |
| 53 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 080 |
| 54 | spf.brevo.com | 1 079 |
| 55 | authsmtp.com | 1 042 |
| 56 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 032 |
| 57 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 1 031 |
| 58 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 005 |
| 59 | spf.stackmail.com | 1 002 |
| 60 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 980 |
| 61 | _spf.aruba.it | 976 |
| 62 | zohomail.com | 959 |
| 63 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 957 |
| 64 | one.zoho.com | 951 |
| 65 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 922 |
| 66 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 916 |
| 67 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 916 |
| 68 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 882 |
| 69 | ispgateway.de | 878 |
| 70 | spfa.mailendo.com | 838 |
| 71 | spfa.cpmails.com | 786 |
| 72 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 783 |
| 73 | cmail1.com | 781 |
| 74 | spf.improvmx.com | 773 |
| 75 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 738 |
| 76 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 726 |
| 77 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 725 |
| 78 | zoho.in | 721 |
| 79 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 720 |
| 80 | bluehost.com | 719 |
| 81 | _spf.kmitd.com | 710 |
| 82 | mailcontrol.com | 708 |
| 83 | turbo-smtp.com | 701 |
| 84 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 698 |
| 85 | agenturserver.de | 693 |
| 86 | spf.afas.online | 689 |
| 87 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 685 |
| 88 | spf.bmv.jp | 669 |
| 89 | spf.mindbox.ru | 659 |
| 90 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 659 |
| 91 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 655 |
| 92 | spf.securemx.jp | 654 |
| 93 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 650 |
| 94 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 642 |
| 95 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 640 |
| 96 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 638 |
| 97 | e2ma.net | 636 |
| 98 | eu.zcsend.net | 628 |
| 99 | spf.webapps.net | 620 |
| 100 | spf.nl2go.com | 617 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.