Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-04-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 185 034 | 26.35% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 151 052 | 21.51% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 112 938 | 16.08% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 95 767 | 13.64% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 62 885 | 8.95% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 697 | 2.09% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 375 | 1.62% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 609 | 1.23% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 721 | 0.96% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 5 050 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 973 | 0.71% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 621 | 0.66% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 524 | 0.64% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 334 | 0.47% |
| 15 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 144 | 0.45% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 3 075 | 0.44% |
| 17 | Beget (RU) | 2 570 | 0.37% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 543 | 0.36% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 742 | 0.25% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 701 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 672 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 626 | 0.23% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 601 | 0.23% |
| 24 | ProtonMail | 1 374 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 276 | 0.18% |
| 26 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 241 | 0.18% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 149 | 0.16% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 822 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 773 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 759 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 35 497 | 5.45% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 30 485 | 4.68% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 26 777 | 4.11% |
| 4 | Mailgun | 25 439 | 3.9% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 25 177 | 3.86% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 25 107 | 3.85% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 16 309 | 2.5% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 12 978 | 1.99% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 729 | 1.19% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 599 | 0.71% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 3 974 | 0.61% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 946 | 0.61% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 979 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 809 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 307 | 0.35% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 289 | 0.35% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 653 | 0.25% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 543 | 0.24% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 363 | 0.21% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 782 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 741 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 557 | 0.09% |
| 23 | GetResponse | 449 | 0.07% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 338 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Intercom | 29 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 25 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 11 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Beehiiv | 3 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 315 | 0.97% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 884 | 0.75% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 568 | 0.55% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 110 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 970 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 625 | 0.25% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 1 215 | 0.19% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 1 191 | 0.18% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 159 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 978 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Lark / Feishu | 962 | 0.15% |
| 12 | Sage Intacct | 923 | 0.14% |
| 13 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 882 | 0.14% |
| 14 | Oracle Cloud Email | 880 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 804 | 0.12% |
| 16 | ClickDimensions | 751 | 0.12% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 703 | 0.11% |
| 18 | ConnectWise | 688 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Greenhouse | 672 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 639 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 531 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 500 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 493 | 0.08% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 474 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 363 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 351 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 302 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 225 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 188 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 153 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 44 978 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 33 037 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 5 393 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 4 271 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 030 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 773 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 436 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 384 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 963 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 651 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 451 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 395 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 2 148 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 987 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 760 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 752 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 621 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 605 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 507 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 430 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 375 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 370 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 184 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 159 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 075 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 856 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 800 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 765 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 708 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 671 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 667 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 616 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 586 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 563 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 505 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 502 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 486 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 478 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 457 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 457 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 454 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 443 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 402 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 398 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 393 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarcreports.facebook.com; | 392 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 376 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 369 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 356 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 352 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 342 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 339 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 314 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 303 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 299 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 296 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 296 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 295 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1 | 287 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 267 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 253 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 251 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 248 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 232 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 218 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 214 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 213 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 203 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 202 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 201 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 196 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 194 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 189 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 181 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 180 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 175 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 175 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 173 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 173 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 170 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 164 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 164 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 163 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 157 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:ewqfa0eu@ag.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewqfa0eu@fr.dmarcian.com; fo=1 | 157 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=0;rua=mailto:dmarc@vercom.pl | 156 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=none; | 155 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 151 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 151 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 149 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 149 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;""p=none; | 146 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 146 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.microsoft;ruf=mailto:ruf@dmarc.microsoft;fo=1:s:d | 146 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 145 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s | 145 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 145 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 145 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 104 |
| 2 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 104 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 096 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 091 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 070 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 072 |
| 7 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 069 |
| 8 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 069 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 759 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 736 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 330 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 300 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 627 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 610 |
| 15 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 347 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 345 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 336 |
| 18 | nan | 2 329 |
| 19 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 837 |
| 20 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 818 |
| 21 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 655 |
| 22 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 655 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 653 |
| 24 | park-mx.above.com | 1 501 |
| 25 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 257 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 103 |
| 27 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 097 |
| 28 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 075 |
| 29 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 073 |
| 30 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 068 |
| 31 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 067 |
| 32 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 062 |
| 33 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 047 |
| 34 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 010 |
| 35 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 008 |
| 36 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 008 |
| 37 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 948 |
| 38 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 917 |
| 39 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 913 |
| 40 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 895 |
| 41 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 887 |
| 42 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 789 |
| 43 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 787 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 785 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 747 |
| 46 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 740 |
| 47 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 735 |
| 48 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 734 |
| 49 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 726 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 696 |
| 51 | smtpin.rzone.de | 696 |
| 52 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 685 |
| 53 | mx1.csof.net | 646 |
| 54 | mx2.csof.net | 646 |
| 55 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 616 |
| 56 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 614 |
| 57 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 611 |
| 58 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 603 |
| 59 | mx.securemx.jp | 603 |
| 60 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 598 |
| 61 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 593 |
| 62 | localhost | 581 |
| 63 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 581 |
| 64 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 579 |
| 65 | dmail.kagoya.net | 578 |
| 66 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 574 |
| 67 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 566 |
| 68 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 554 |
| 69 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 552 |
| 70 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 540 |
| 71 | mx1.feishu.cn | 539 |
| 72 | mx2.feishu.cn | 537 |
| 73 | mx3.feishu.cn | 536 |
| 74 | mail.register.it | 513 |
| 75 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 508 |
| 76 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 492 |
| 77 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 490 |
| 78 | mail.h-email.net | 476 |
| 79 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 464 |
| 80 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 462 |
| 81 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 436 |
| 82 | mail.eye-mail.net | 429 |
| 83 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 407 |
| 84 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 405 |
| 85 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 404 |
| 86 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 346 |
| 87 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 325 |
| 88 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 320 |
| 89 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 316 |
| 90 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 316 |
| 91 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 313 |
| 92 | mx01.udag.de | 298 |
| 93 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 298 |
| 94 | mx00.udag.de | 296 |
| 95 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 295 |
| 96 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 294 |
| 97 | mx-02-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 291 |
| 98 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 284 |
| 99 | mx01.cloud.vadesecure.com | 273 |
| 100 | mx02.cloud.vadesecure.com | 272 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 299 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 513 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 8 351 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 854 |
| 5 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 346 |
| 6 | zoho.com | 5 918 |
| 7 | _spf.mlsend.com | 5 799 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 865 |
| 9 | websitewelcome.com | 4 351 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 273 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 771 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 387 |
| 13 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 945 |
| 14 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 899 |
| 15 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 864 |
| 16 | beget.com | 2 854 |
| 17 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 818 |
| 18 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 577 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 544 |
| 20 | zcsend.net | 2 406 |
| 21 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 398 |
| 22 | stspg-customer.com | 2 359 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 309 |
| 24 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 1 994 |
| 25 | transmail.net | 1 922 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 851 |
| 27 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 846 |
| 28 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 829 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 657 |
| 30 | musvc.com | 1 525 |
| 31 | spf.crsend.com | 1 506 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 446 |
| 33 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 435 |
| 34 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 430 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 397 |
| 36 | spf.titan.email | 1 384 |
| 37 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 377 |
| 38 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 375 |
| 39 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 355 |
| 40 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 332 |
| 41 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 328 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 275 |
| 43 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 271 |
| 44 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 270 |
| 45 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 240 |
| 46 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 203 |
| 47 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 193 |
| 48 | spf.brevo.com | 1 186 |
| 49 | zohomail.com | 1 170 |
| 50 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 157 |
| 51 | spf.dynect.net | 1 142 |
| 52 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 132 |
| 53 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 118 |
| 54 | authsmtp.com | 1 082 |
| 55 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 074 |
| 56 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 065 |
| 57 | one.zoho.com | 1 047 |
| 58 | spf.stackmail.com | 1 046 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 027 |
| 60 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 023 |
| 61 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 977 |
| 62 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 976 |
| 63 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 973 |
| 64 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 934 |
| 65 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 906 |
| 66 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 905 |
| 67 | spfa.cpmails.com | 888 |
| 68 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 886 |
| 69 | ispgateway.de | 884 |
| 70 | spfa.mailendo.com | 864 |
| 71 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 840 |
| 72 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 814 |
| 73 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 791 |
| 74 | cmail1.com | 790 |
| 75 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 784 |
| 76 | spf.improvmx.com | 779 |
| 77 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 741 |
| 78 | agenturserver.de | 739 |
| 79 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 737 |
| 80 | kagoya.net | 735 |
| 81 | turbo-smtp.com | 725 |
| 82 | bluehost.com | 724 |
| 83 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 720 |
| 84 | spf.afas.online | 720 |
| 85 | zoho.in | 717 |
| 86 | _spf.kmitd.com | 714 |
| 87 | mailcontrol.com | 706 |
| 88 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 697 |
| 89 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 686 |
| 90 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 684 |
| 91 | spf.mindbox.ru | 668 |
| 92 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 666 |
| 93 | eu.zcsend.net | 664 |
| 94 | spf.flowmailer.net | 663 |
| 95 | spf.webapps.net | 661 |
| 96 | spf.us.exclaimer.net | 653 |
| 97 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 650 |
| 98 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 649 |
| 99 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 644 |
| 100 | spf.nl2go.com | 642 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.