Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-06-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 182 305 | 26.05% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 152 935 | 21.85% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 115 204 | 16.46% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 93 624 | 13.38% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 62 129 | 8.88% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 996 | 2.0% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 431 | 1.63% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 522 | 1.22% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 895 | 0.99% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 5 136 | 0.73% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 674 | 0.67% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 657 | 0.67% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 567 | 0.65% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 261 | 0.47% |
| 15 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 122 | 0.45% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 3 078 | 0.44% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 509 | 0.36% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 355 | 0.34% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 774 | 0.25% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 720 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 679 | 0.24% |
| 22 | Gandi Mail | 1 664 | 0.24% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 624 | 0.23% |
| 24 | ProtonMail | 1 376 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 258 | 0.18% |
| 26 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 195 | 0.17% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 192 | 0.17% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 822 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 820 | 0.12% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 757 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 36 404 | 5.61% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 31 066 | 4.79% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 26 990 | 4.16% |
| 4 | Mailgun | 26 228 | 4.04% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 25 713 | 3.96% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 25 146 | 3.87% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 16 601 | 2.56% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 13 273 | 2.05% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 783 | 1.2% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 641 | 0.72% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 4 006 | 0.62% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 894 | 0.6% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 979 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 833 | 0.44% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 275 | 0.35% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 262 | 0.35% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 670 | 0.26% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 645 | 0.25% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 365 | 0.21% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 760 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 744 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 555 | 0.09% |
| 23 | GetResponse | 499 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 334 | 0.05% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 39 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Intercom | 32 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 11 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Pipedrive | 2 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 237 | 0.96% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 159 | 0.79% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 677 | 0.57% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 122 | 0.33% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 2 029 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 708 | 0.26% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 1 230 | 0.19% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 1 209 | 0.19% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 188 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Lark / Feishu | 1 047 | 0.16% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 983 | 0.15% |
| 12 | Sage Intacct | 969 | 0.15% |
| 13 | Oracle Cloud Email | 917 | 0.14% |
| 14 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 913 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 817 | 0.13% |
| 16 | ClickDimensions | 729 | 0.11% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 702 | 0.11% |
| 18 | ConnectWise | 688 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Greenhouse | 678 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 618 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 547 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 499 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 496 | 0.08% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 469 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 374 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 356 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 316 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 227 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 187 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 147 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 47 740 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 33 171 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 5 949 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 4 443 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 177 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 885 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 415 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 215 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 920 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 652 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 630 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 332 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 087 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 879 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 815 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 797 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 538 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 518 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 516 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 423 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 382 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 358 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 233 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 150 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 038 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 979 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 927 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 817 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 732 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 714 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 709 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 689 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 638 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 596 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 583 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 575 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 512 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 494 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 494 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 489 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 480 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 471 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 446 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@bounces.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc-reports@bounces.amazon.com | 439 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 420 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 417 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 405 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 395 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarcreports.facebook.com; | 392 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 387 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 365 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 364 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 356 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 342 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 335 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 326 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1 | 319 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 318 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 297 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 296 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 281 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; | 278 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 263 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 258 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 257 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 256 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 240 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 237 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 225 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 225 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 221 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 218 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 211 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 205 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 204 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 204 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 198 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 194 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 190 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 187 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 181 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 171 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 171 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 170 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 168 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 167 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 166 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 165 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 163 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 162 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 160 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=0;rua=mailto:dmarc@vercom.pl | 159 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 157 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 155 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=none; | 155 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 153 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 151 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 149 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; ruf=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; | 149 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 8 852 |
| 2 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 8 852 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 8 845 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 8 839 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 8 818 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 380 |
| 7 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 377 |
| 8 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 377 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 753 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 724 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 405 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 381 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 605 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 584 |
| 15 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 245 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 243 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 240 |
| 18 | nan | 2 207 |
| 19 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 828 |
| 20 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 815 |
| 21 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 688 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 687 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 686 |
| 24 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 131 |
| 25 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 125 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 112 |
| 27 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 059 |
| 28 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 050 |
| 29 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 046 |
| 30 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 025 |
| 31 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 017 |
| 32 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 994 |
| 33 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 992 |
| 34 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 992 |
| 35 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 990 |
| 36 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 986 |
| 37 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 963 |
| 38 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 955 |
| 39 | mx.stackmail.com | 939 |
| 40 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 937 |
| 41 | park-mx.above.com | 926 |
| 42 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 805 |
| 43 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 802 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 801 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 763 |
| 46 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 721 |
| 47 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 720 |
| 48 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 712 |
| 49 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 710 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 709 |
| 51 | smtpin.rzone.de | 709 |
| 52 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 695 |
| 53 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 659 |
| 54 | mx1.csof.net | 654 |
| 55 | mx2.csof.net | 654 |
| 56 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 641 |
| 57 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 631 |
| 58 | mx.securemx.jp | 611 |
| 59 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 610 |
| 60 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 610 |
| 61 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 609 |
| 62 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 605 |
| 63 | mx1.feishu.cn | 602 |
| 64 | mx2.feishu.cn | 600 |
| 65 | mx3.feishu.cn | 599 |
| 66 | dmail.kagoya.net | 591 |
| 67 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 586 |
| 68 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 573 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 567 |
| 70 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 565 |
| 71 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 564 |
| 72 | localhost | 556 |
| 73 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 547 |
| 74 | mail.register.it | 533 |
| 75 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 497 |
| 76 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 494 |
| 77 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 489 |
| 78 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 478 |
| 79 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 478 |
| 80 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 445 |
| 81 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 406 |
| 82 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 399 |
| 83 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 399 |
| 84 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 353 |
| 85 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 335 |
| 86 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 333 |
| 87 | mail.mailerhost.net | 332 |
| 88 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 330 |
| 89 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 317 |
| 90 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 312 |
| 91 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 301 |
| 92 | mx-02-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 295 |
| 93 | mx01.udag.de | 294 |
| 94 | mx1.larksuite.com | 292 |
| 95 | mx2.larksuite.com | 292 |
| 96 | mx00.udag.de | 292 |
| 97 | mx3.larksuite.com | 291 |
| 98 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 291 |
| 99 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 290 |
| 100 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 285 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 046 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 830 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 8 578 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 815 |
| 5 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 289 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 6 071 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 918 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 955 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 263 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 4 117 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 760 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 406 |
| 13 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 998 |
| 14 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 899 |
| 15 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 857 |
| 16 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 791 |
| 17 | beget.com | 2 627 |
| 18 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 529 |
| 19 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 518 |
| 20 | zcsend.net | 2 453 |
| 21 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 396 |
| 22 | stspg-customer.com | 2 351 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 346 |
| 24 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 052 |
| 25 | transmail.net | 1 957 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 855 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 843 |
| 28 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 754 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 668 |
| 30 | spf.crsend.com | 1 532 |
| 31 | musvc.com | 1 514 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 480 |
| 33 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 422 |
| 34 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 409 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 390 |
| 36 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 387 |
| 37 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 381 |
| 38 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 368 |
| 39 | spf.titan.email | 1 365 |
| 40 | zohomail.com | 1 347 |
| 41 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 336 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 324 |
| 43 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 322 |
| 44 | spf.brevo.com | 1 316 |
| 45 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 303 |
| 46 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 241 |
| 47 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 238 |
| 48 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 178 |
| 49 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 165 |
| 50 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 153 |
| 51 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 125 |
| 52 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 123 |
| 53 | spf.dynect.net | 1 116 |
| 54 | one.zoho.com | 1 087 |
| 55 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 075 |
| 56 | authsmtp.com | 1 073 |
| 57 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 064 |
| 58 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 1 018 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 014 |
| 60 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 009 |
| 61 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 986 |
| 62 | spfa.cpmails.com | 974 |
| 63 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 968 |
| 64 | spf.stackmail.com | 952 |
| 65 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 916 |
| 66 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 910 |
| 67 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 891 |
| 68 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 886 |
| 69 | ispgateway.de | 881 |
| 70 | spfa.mailendo.com | 870 |
| 71 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 862 |
| 72 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 826 |
| 73 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 819 |
| 74 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 799 |
| 75 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 799 |
| 76 | cmail1.com | 782 |
| 77 | spf.improvmx.com | 778 |
| 78 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 764 |
| 79 | kagoya.net | 752 |
| 80 | agenturserver.de | 741 |
| 81 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 735 |
| 82 | spf.afas.online | 724 |
| 83 | zoho.in | 714 |
| 84 | _spf.kmitd.com | 712 |
| 85 | turbo-smtp.com | 706 |
| 86 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 705 |
| 87 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 704 |
| 88 | eu.zcsend.net | 689 |
| 89 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 684 |
| 90 | spf.webapps.net | 684 |
| 91 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 680 |
| 92 | mailcontrol.com | 680 |
| 93 | spf.us.exclaimer.net | 679 |
| 94 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 663 |
| 95 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 656 |
| 96 | spf.flowmailer.net | 654 |
| 97 | bluehost.com | 653 |
| 98 | spf.mindbox.ru | 651 |
| 99 | spf.bmv.jp | 643 |
| 100 | eu.transmail.net | 641 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.