Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-08-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 176 573 | 25.89% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 150 383 | 22.05% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 115 074 | 16.87% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 89 004 | 13.05% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 61 208 | 8.97% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 12 017 | 1.76% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 129 | 1.63% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 477 | 1.24% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 7 057 | 1.03% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 5 038 | 0.74% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | OVH Mail | 4 541 | 0.67% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 429 | 0.65% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 963 | 0.58% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 176 | 0.47% |
| 15 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 147 | 0.46% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 958 | 0.43% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 434 | 0.36% |
| 18 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 2 102 | 0.31% |
| 19 | Beget (RU) | 2 021 | 0.3% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 697 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 656 | 0.24% |
| 22 | Gandi Mail | 1 614 | 0.24% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 520 | 0.22% |
| 24 | ProtonMail | 1 344 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 214 | 0.18% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 175 | 0.17% |
| 27 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 053 | 0.15% |
| 28 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 846 | 0.12% |
| 29 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 790 | 0.12% |
| 30 | CSC (corporate) | 729 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 36 342 | 5.75% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 30 351 | 4.8% |
| 3 | Mailgun | 26 022 | 4.11% |
| 4 | Mailchimp | 25 772 | 4.07% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 25 314 | 4.0% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 24 141 | 3.82% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 16 457 | 2.6% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 13 117 | 2.07% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 612 | 1.2% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 580 | 0.72% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 772 | 0.6% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 573 | 0.56% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 837 | 0.45% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 784 | 0.44% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 228 | 0.35% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 114 | 0.33% |
| 17 | MailerSend | 1 692 | 0.27% |
| 18 | Freshdesk | 1 619 | 0.26% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 346 | 0.21% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 712 | 0.11% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 701 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 524 | 0.08% |
| 23 | GetResponse | 514 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 319 | 0.05% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 42 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Intercom | 30 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 12 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Omnisend | 3 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 944 | 0.94% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 600 | 0.89% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 598 | 0.57% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 052 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 2 016 | 0.32% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 659 | 0.26% |
| 7 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 194 | 0.19% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 1 179 | 0.19% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 1 170 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Lark / Feishu | 1 098 | 0.17% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Sage Intacct | 1 045 | 0.17% |
| 12 | Docebo (LMS) | 975 | 0.15% |
| 13 | Oracle Cloud Email | 943 | 0.15% |
| 14 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 913 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 803 | 0.13% |
| 16 | ConnectWise | 703 | 0.11% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 685 | 0.11% |
| 18 | ClickDimensions | 681 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Greenhouse | 658 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 642 | 0.1% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 556 | 0.09% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 476 | 0.08% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 469 | 0.07% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 432 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 349 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Shoptet | 345 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Odoo | 317 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 225 | 0.04% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 185 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 143 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 48 896 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 33 307 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 6 287 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 4 293 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 182 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 748 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 455 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 366 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 809 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 624 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 511 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 499 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 163 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 795 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 769 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 631 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 523 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 500 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 482 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 454 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 340 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 293 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 290 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 279 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 122 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 013 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 004 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 943 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 814 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 738 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 713 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 628 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 609 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 601 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 577 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 545 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 517 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 513 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 491 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 484 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 480 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 477 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 453 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 444 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 433 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 398 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 390 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 382 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 368 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 349 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 346 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 328 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 325 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1 | 322 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 305 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 297 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 277 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 273 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 259 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 254 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 243 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 243 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 241 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 229 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 228 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 227 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 225 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 223 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 223 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email,mailto:DMARC_Reports@playtika.com | 220 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 219 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 215 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 213 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:; ruf=mailto:; | 206 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 206 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 203 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 197 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 196 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 194 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 182 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-domains@votresite.ca;ri=86400;aspf=r;adkim=r;fo=1 | 180 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 175 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 174 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 171 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 169 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 167 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@newsletters.visualsoft.co.uk; aspf=r; adkim=r; ri=86400; fo=1 | 163 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 162 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 160 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 157 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=0;rua=mailto:dmarc@vercom.pl | 156 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 155 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 155 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 153 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 152 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 152 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 151 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 151 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 150 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 8 313 |
| 2 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 8 310 |
| 3 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 8 309 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 8 303 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 8 287 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 466 |
| 7 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 463 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 462 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 768 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 765 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 837 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 807 |
| 13 | nan | 3 091 |
| 14 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 630 |
| 15 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 611 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 273 |
| 17 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 273 |
| 18 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 269 |
| 19 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 829 |
| 20 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 816 |
| 21 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 731 |
| 22 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 729 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 728 |
| 24 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 126 |
| 25 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 119 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 067 |
| 27 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 061 |
| 28 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 1 013 |
| 29 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 1 012 |
| 30 | mx.plingest.com | 999 |
| 31 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 991 |
| 32 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 987 |
| 33 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 980 |
| 34 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 980 |
| 35 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 977 |
| 36 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 967 |
| 37 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 965 |
| 38 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 964 |
| 39 | mx.stackmail.com | 918 |
| 40 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 887 |
| 41 | park-mx.above.com | 798 |
| 42 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 787 |
| 43 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 787 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 786 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 751 |
| 46 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 703 |
| 47 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 691 |
| 48 | smtpin.rzone.de | 689 |
| 49 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 671 |
| 50 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 662 |
| 51 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 655 |
| 52 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 654 |
| 53 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 652 |
| 54 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 646 |
| 55 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 645 |
| 56 | mx1.feishu.cn | 615 |
| 57 | mx2.feishu.cn | 615 |
| 58 | mx3.feishu.cn | 615 |
| 59 | mx1.csof.net | 610 |
| 60 | mx2.csof.net | 610 |
| 61 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 599 |
| 62 | dmail.kagoya.net | 598 |
| 63 | mx.securemx.jp | 598 |
| 64 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 567 |
| 65 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 565 |
| 66 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 555 |
| 67 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 555 |
| 68 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 547 |
| 69 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 543 |
| 70 | mail.register.it | 500 |
| 71 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 483 |
| 72 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 476 |
| 73 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 473 |
| 74 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 470 |
| 75 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 470 |
| 76 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 470 |
| 77 | mail.h-email.net | 468 |
| 78 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 466 |
| 79 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 463 |
| 80 | localhost | 416 |
| 81 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 416 |
| 82 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 403 |
| 83 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 398 |
| 84 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 385 |
| 85 | 381 | |
| 86 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 372 |
| 87 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 371 |
| 88 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 362 |
| 89 | mx2.larksuite.com | 338 |
| 90 | mx1.larksuite.com | 337 |
| 91 | mx3.larksuite.com | 337 |
| 92 | alltheemails.com | 307 |
| 93 | in.arubabusiness.it | 299 |
| 94 | mx01.udag.de | 295 |
| 95 | mx00.udag.de | 293 |
| 96 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 292 |
| 97 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 291 |
| 98 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 288 |
| 99 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 288 |
| 100 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 287 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | secureserver.net | 9 175 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 931 |
| 3 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 8 536 |
| 4 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 854 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 544 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 6 024 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 813 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 5 023 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 025 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 3 952 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 569 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 324 |
| 13 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 925 |
| 14 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 826 |
| 15 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 809 |
| 16 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 763 |
| 17 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 504 |
| 18 | zcsend.net | 2 452 |
| 19 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 432 |
| 20 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 332 |
| 21 | stspg-customer.com | 2 313 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 274 |
| 23 | beget.com | 2 232 |
| 24 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 187 |
| 25 | transmail.net | 1 938 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 788 |
| 27 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 748 |
| 28 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 695 |
| 29 | zohomail.com | 1 593 |
| 30 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 580 |
| 31 | musvc.com | 1 531 |
| 32 | spf.crsend.com | 1 524 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 468 |
| 34 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 388 |
| 35 | spf.brevo.com | 1 385 |
| 36 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 379 |
| 37 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 373 |
| 38 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 367 |
| 39 | spf.titan.email | 1 358 |
| 40 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 334 |
| 41 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 321 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 300 |
| 43 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 251 |
| 44 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 232 |
| 45 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 214 |
| 46 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 166 |
| 47 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 159 |
| 48 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 135 |
| 49 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 108 |
| 50 | one.zoho.com | 1 096 |
| 51 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 093 |
| 52 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 083 |
| 53 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 083 |
| 54 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 070 |
| 55 | spf.dynect.net | 1 057 |
| 56 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 047 |
| 57 | spfa.cpmails.com | 1 045 |
| 58 | authsmtp.com | 1 032 |
| 59 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 1 027 |
| 60 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 019 |
| 61 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 006 |
| 62 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 962 |
| 63 | spf.stackmail.com | 948 |
| 64 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 897 |
| 65 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 896 |
| 66 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 896 |
| 67 | spfa.mailendo.com | 890 |
| 68 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 881 |
| 69 | ispgateway.de | 872 |
| 70 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 851 |
| 71 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 831 |
| 72 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 819 |
| 73 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 807 |
| 74 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 804 |
| 75 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 791 |
| 76 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 787 |
| 77 | kagoya.net | 760 |
| 78 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 759 |
| 79 | cmail1.com | 753 |
| 80 | zoho.in | 748 |
| 81 | spf.improvmx.com | 741 |
| 82 | agenturserver.de | 727 |
| 83 | _spf.kmitd.com | 708 |
| 84 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 703 |
| 85 | turbo-smtp.com | 699 |
| 86 | eu.zcsend.net | 694 |
| 87 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 684 |
| 88 | spf.afas.online | 684 |
| 89 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 679 |
| 90 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 675 |
| 91 | bluehost.com | 674 |
| 92 | spf.webapps.net | 672 |
| 93 | spf.us.exclaimer.net | 666 |
| 94 | eu.transmail.net | 654 |
| 95 | mailcontrol.com | 648 |
| 96 | spf.bmv.jp | 647 |
| 97 | spf.flowmailer.net | 634 |
| 98 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 630 |
| 99 | sendersrv.com | 624 |
| 100 | spf.nl2go.com | 621 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.