Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-03-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 176 095 | 25.76% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 147 224 | 21.54% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 113 144 | 16.55% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 94 305 | 13.8% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 62 716 | 9.18% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 12 524 | 1.83% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 150 | 1.48% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 836 | 1.15% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 895 | 1.01% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 904 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | OVH Mail | 4 755 | 0.7% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 737 | 0.69% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 200 | 0.61% |
| 14 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 286 | 0.48% |
| 15 | Cisco IronPort | 2 969 | 0.43% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 615 | 0.38% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 341 | 0.34% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 282 | 0.33% |
| 19 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 791 | 0.26% |
| 20 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 731 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 673 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 612 | 0.24% |
| 23 | ProtonMail | 1 588 | 0.23% |
| 24 | Gandi Mail | 1 520 | 0.22% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 354 | 0.2% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 311 | 0.19% |
| 27 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 192 | 0.17% |
| 28 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 1 021 | 0.15% |
| 29 | CSC (corporate) | 995 | 0.15% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 803 | 0.12% |
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 37 856 | 5.92% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 29 999 | 4.69% |
| 3 | Mailgun | 25 758 | 4.03% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 537 | 3.84% |
| 5 | Mailchimp | 24 298 | 3.8% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 22 404 | 3.5% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 16 182 | 2.53% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 13 491 | 2.11% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 104 | 1.11% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 544 | 0.71% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 3 976 | 0.62% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 491 | 0.55% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 851 | 0.45% |
| 14 | SparkPost | 2 746 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Constant Contact | 1 880 | 0.29% |
| 16 | MailerSend | 1 839 | 0.29% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 779 | 0.28% |
| 18 | Freshdesk | 1 597 | 0.25% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 254 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 732 | 0.11% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 648 | 0.1% |
| 22 | GetResponse | 617 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Customer.io | 486 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 285 | 0.04% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 47 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Intercom | 36 | 0.01% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 31 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 9 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Omnisend | 6 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Dotdigital | 5 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 353 | 0.84% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 159 | 0.81% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 522 | 0.55% |
| 4 | Trustpilot | 1 967 | 0.31% |
| 5 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 939 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 738 | 0.27% |
| 7 | Lark / Feishu | 1 254 | 0.2% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 203 | 0.19% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 170 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 1 166 | 0.18% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Sage Intacct | 1 087 | 0.17% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 1 061 | 0.17% |
| 13 | Docebo (LMS) | 952 | 0.15% |
| 14 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 905 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 827 | 0.13% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 661 | 0.1% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 639 | 0.1% |
| 18 | ClickDimensions | 629 | 0.1% |
| 19 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 566 | 0.09% |
| 20 | ConnectWise | 563 | 0.09% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 533 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 452 | 0.07% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 432 | 0.07% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 426 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 410 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Odoo | 394 | 0.06% |
| 27 | Chargebee | 339 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 210 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 159 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 131 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 55 656 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 33 560 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 7 880 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 625 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 4 103 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 899 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 885 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 567 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 460 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 849 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 472 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 444 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 345 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 344 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 815 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 806 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 753 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 509 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 425 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 414 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 288 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 281 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 231 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 167 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 150 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 115 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 093 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 070 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 064 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 754 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 730 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 729 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 720 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 637 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 620 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 613 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 602 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 588 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 577 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:xlcat@rua.agari.com,mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:xlcat@ruf.agari.com | 523 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 513 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 500 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 488 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 472 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 458 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 449 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 447 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 394 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 390 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 389 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 364 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 361 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 356 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 354 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 353 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 351 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 351 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 335 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1 | 329 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 328 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 312 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 292 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 282 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 271 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 270 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 269 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 269 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 261 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 260 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 252 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 241 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 238 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 236 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 230 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 217 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 216 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 206 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 200 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 200 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 195 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 183 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 183 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 176 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 176 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 174 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 172 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 169 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 166 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 163 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 162 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 158 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarcreports.facebook.com; | 157 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 156 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 156 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 156 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 616 |
| 2 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 614 |
| 3 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 614 |
| 4 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 7 436 |
| 5 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 7 430 |
| 6 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 7 427 |
| 7 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 7 427 |
| 8 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 7 417 |
| 9 | mx1.hostinger.com | 5 995 |
| 10 | mx2.hostinger.com | 5 970 |
| 11 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 194 |
| 12 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 181 |
| 13 | nan | 2 697 |
| 14 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 641 |
| 15 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 639 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 624 |
| 17 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 148 |
| 18 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 134 |
| 19 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 769 |
| 20 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 768 |
| 21 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 764 |
| 22 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 749 |
| 23 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 734 |
| 24 | park-mx.above.com | 1 152 |
| 25 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 1 104 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 1 101 |
| 27 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 079 |
| 28 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 1 075 |
| 29 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 071 |
| 30 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 1 067 |
| 31 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 067 |
| 32 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 991 |
| 33 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 947 |
| 34 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 945 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 945 |
| 36 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 923 |
| 37 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 911 |
| 38 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 909 |
| 39 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 853 |
| 40 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 838 |
| 41 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 824 |
| 42 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 823 |
| 43 | smtpin.rzone.de | 791 |
| 44 | mx1.hostinger.in | 760 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 753 |
| 46 | mx2.hostinger.in | 751 |
| 47 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 738 |
| 48 | mx2.feishu.cn | 734 |
| 49 | mx1.feishu.cn | 732 |
| 50 | mx3.feishu.cn | 731 |
| 51 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 728 |
| 52 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 703 |
| 53 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 702 |
| 54 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 700 |
| 55 | mx1.csof.net | 688 |
| 56 | mx2.csof.net | 688 |
| 57 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 684 |
| 58 | mx.plingest.com | 637 |
| 59 | dmail.kagoya.net | 594 |
| 60 | mx.securemx.jp | 592 |
| 61 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 581 |
| 62 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 580 |
| 63 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 566 |
| 64 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 558 |
| 65 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 556 |
| 66 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 548 |
| 67 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 520 |
| 68 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 510 |
| 69 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 510 |
| 70 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 508 |
| 71 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 506 |
| 72 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 506 |
| 73 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 504 |
| 74 | mail.register.it | 479 |
| 75 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 422 |
| 76 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 422 |
| 77 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 416 |
| 78 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 408 |
| 79 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 399 |
| 80 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 398 |
| 81 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 386 |
| 82 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 386 |
| 83 | mx1.larksuite.com | 381 |
| 84 | mx2.larksuite.com | 381 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 381 |
| 86 | mx3.larksuite.com | 379 |
| 87 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 375 |
| 88 | mx.mgovcloud.in | 341 |
| 89 | mx2.mgovcloud.in | 340 |
| 90 | mx3.mgovcloud.in | 339 |
| 91 | mxext1.mailbox.org | 338 |
| 92 | mxext2.mailbox.org | 335 |
| 93 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 329 |
| 94 | in.arubabusiness.it | 328 |
| 95 | mxext3.mailbox.org | 328 |
| 96 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 322 |
| 97 | localhost | 319 |
| 98 | mx01.udag.de | 316 |
| 99 | mx-02-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 315 |
| 100 | mx00.udag.de | 314 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 10 010 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 8 649 |
| 3 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 7 617 |
| 4 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 7 496 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 944 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 6 377 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 364 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 5 262 |
| 9 | websitewelcome.com | 4 213 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 733 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 246 |
| 12 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 128 |
| 13 | emailsrvr.com | 3 043 |
| 14 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 984 |
| 15 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 862 |
| 16 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 612 |
| 17 | beget.com | 2 499 |
| 18 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 493 |
| 19 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 481 |
| 20 | zcsend.net | 2 423 |
| 21 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 249 |
| 22 | stspg-customer.com | 2 197 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 146 |
| 24 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 133 |
| 25 | zohomail.com | 1 965 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.brevo.com | 1 847 |
| 27 | transmail.net | 1 803 |
| 28 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 776 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 663 |
| 30 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 626 |
| 31 | spf.crsend.com | 1 620 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 530 |
| 33 | musvc.com | 1 504 |
| 34 | spf.163.com | 1 474 |
| 35 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 457 |
| 36 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 380 |
| 37 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 360 |
| 38 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 1 336 |
| 39 | spf.titan.email | 1 335 |
| 40 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 332 |
| 41 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 329 |
| 42 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 326 |
| 43 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 310 |
| 44 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 287 |
| 45 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 242 |
| 46 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 1 240 |
| 47 | one.zoho.com | 1 234 |
| 48 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 224 |
| 49 | spfa.cpmails.com | 1 220 |
| 50 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 181 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 170 |
| 52 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 120 |
| 53 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 110 |
| 54 | spf.stackmail.com | 1 104 |
| 55 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 091 |
| 56 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 090 |
| 57 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 086 |
| 58 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 066 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 057 |
| 60 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 052 |
| 61 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 1 012 |
| 62 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 011 |
| 63 | authsmtp.com | 993 |
| 64 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 976 |
| 65 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 976 |
| 66 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 965 |
| 67 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 935 |
| 68 | spf.dynect.net | 918 |
| 69 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 906 |
| 70 | ispgateway.de | 899 |
| 71 | zoho.in | 889 |
| 72 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 880 |
| 73 | spfa.mailendo.com | 876 |
| 74 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 825 |
| 75 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 823 |
| 76 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 816 |
| 77 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 779 |
| 78 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 771 |
| 79 | agenturserver.de | 765 |
| 80 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 763 |
| 81 | eu.zcsend.net | 752 |
| 82 | kagoya.net | 739 |
| 83 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 731 |
| 84 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 731 |
| 85 | _spf.kmitd.com | 713 |
| 86 | spf.improvmx.com | 702 |
| 87 | cmail1.com | 691 |
| 88 | spf.afas.online | 684 |
| 89 | spf.webapps.net | 675 |
| 90 | sendersrv.com | 675 |
| 91 | eu.transmail.net | 674 |
| 92 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 673 |
| 93 | spf.bmv.jp | 666 |
| 94 | zohomail.eu | 664 |
| 95 | spf.flowmailer.net | 661 |
| 96 | spf.unisender.ru | 656 |
| 97 | spf.mindbox.ru | 649 |
| 98 | spf.sendsay.ru | 647 |
| 99 | turbo-smtp.com | 634 |
| 100 | spf.nl2go.com | 633 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.