← Look up another domain · Domain statistics hub

Email infrastructure of nanohub.org

According to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan (July 28, 2026), nanohub.org (Tranco rank #146,917) sends through Salesforce. Its DMARC record is syntactically invalid.

Last updated: July 28, 2026.

Mailbox provider (MX)	no MX / not classified
ESPs in SPF	Salesforce
SaaS senders in SPF	none detected
DMARC policy	p=invalid
DMARC record	`v=DMARC1`
Tranco rank	#146,917
Snapshot	2026-07-28 (updated daily)

How to interpret these observations

MX identifies the observed inbound mailbox or gateway. SPF includes identify services authorised to send for the domain. DMARC shows the published authentication policy. The dataset currently contains 2 populated signal groups for this page.

Observed deliverability context: based on the available observations, this page describes DNS configuration only. It does not represent a complete audit of nanohub.org and does not prove that a particular message reaches the inbox or spam folder.

Frequently asked questions

What email provider does nanohub.org use?

nanohub.org has no classifiable MX record as of July 28, 2026, per Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan.

What ESP does nanohub.org use?

nanohub.org authorises Salesforce in its SPF record as of July 28, 2026.

Does nanohub.org enforce DMARC?

No — the DMARC record of nanohub.org is syntactically invalid (as of July 28, 2026).

How nanohub.org compares

Same daily dataset, three views: how its mailbox provider is trending, how strict DMARC is at its position in the list, and where its own policy sits among all DMARC publishers in the dataset.

DMARC enforced by list position

Policy maturity of all DMARC publishers

SPF diagnostics

The two ways an SPF record silently stops working. Counted from the published record; include chains are resolved one level deep, so the lookup count is a lower bound.

1DNS lookups — 9 left before the limit of 10

-allhard fail — anything not listed is rejected

59 Brecord length · mixed mechanisms

Modern mail security across the dataset

Adoption of the records that go beyond SPF and DMARC. Shown for the whole snapshot — per-domain detail lives on the security posture report.

0.00%publish MTA-STS

0.00%publish TLS-RPT

0.00%publish BIMI

Where nanohub.org stands

The same snapshot cut by zone, by list position and by how alive the published policies are.

At this list position the top three mailbox providers hold 55.8% of domains (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Unknown / Other).
Across the dataset 25.0% of DMARC records are inert — policy does nothing and no reports are collected.
nanohub.org is one of 27,979 domains with a strict -all SPF and a DMARC record that enforces nothing — the sending side is locked down while the policy side is not.

Related domain statistics

Nearby domains in the Tranco ranking: esfahanhost.com · g30.se · yaustal.com · csell.co

Browse provider data · Compare historical periods · Run an inbox placement test

Your message may perform differently. Run a controlled inbox placement test to evaluate your own message, sender and creative.

Test My Email