Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-04-27.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 173 331 | 26.06% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 143 333 | 21.55% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 110 885 | 16.67% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 89 145 | 13.4% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 60 509 | 9.1% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 12 093 | 1.82% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 053 | 1.51% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 534 | 1.13% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 671 | 1.0% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 826 | 0.73% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 816 | 0.72% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 4 510 | 0.68% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 012 | 0.6% |
| 14 | 1&1 IONOS | 3 311 | 0.5% |
| 15 | Cisco IronPort | 2 863 | 0.43% |
| 16 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 362 | 0.36% |
| 17 | Rackspace Email | 2 361 | 0.35% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 269 | 0.34% |
| 19 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 791 | 0.27% |
| 20 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 706 | 0.26% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 625 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 590 | 0.24% |
| 23 | ProtonMail | 1 574 | 0.24% |
| 24 | Gandi Mail | 1 446 | 0.22% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 419 | 0.21% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 324 | 0.2% |
| 27 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 114 | 0.17% |
| 28 | CSC (corporate) | 1 009 | 0.15% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 998 | 0.15% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 805 | 0.12% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 38 053 | 6.09% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 29 872 | 4.78% |
| 3 | Mailgun | 25 319 | 4.05% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 058 | 3.85% |
| 5 | Mailchimp | 23 376 | 3.74% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 21 443 | 3.43% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 16 124 | 2.58% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 13 354 | 2.14% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 6 779 | 1.09% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 349 | 0.7% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 3 949 | 0.63% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 382 | 0.54% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 882 | 0.46% |
| 14 | SparkPost | 2 733 | 0.44% |
| 15 | MailerSend | 1 844 | 0.3% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 824 | 0.29% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 693 | 0.27% |
| 18 | Freshdesk | 1 555 | 0.25% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 229 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 751 | 0.12% |
| 21 | GetResponse | 648 | 0.1% |
| 22 | Sailthru | 639 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Customer.io | 465 | 0.07% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 274 | 0.04% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 54 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Klaviyo | 42 | 0.01% |
| 27 | Intercom | 36 | 0.01% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 9 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Omnisend | 8 | 0.0% |
| 30 | ConvertKit | 7 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 127 | 0.82% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 016 | 0.8% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 506 | 0.56% |
| 4 | Trustpilot | 1 919 | 0.31% |
| 5 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 910 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 736 | 0.28% |
| 7 | Lark / Feishu | 1 241 | 0.2% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 237 | 0.2% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 159 | 0.19% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 1 125 | 0.18% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Sage Intacct | 1 110 | 0.18% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 1 040 | 0.17% |
| 13 | Docebo (LMS) | 947 | 0.15% |
| 14 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 895 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 837 | 0.13% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 649 | 0.1% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 600 | 0.1% |
| 18 | ClickDimensions | 600 | 0.1% |
| 19 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 537 | 0.09% |
| 20 | UKG / UltiPro | 526 | 0.08% |
| 21 | ConnectWise | 520 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 431 | 0.07% |
| 23 | FormAssembly | 424 | 0.07% |
| 24 | HappyFox | 411 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Odoo | 394 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Shoptet | 379 | 0.06% |
| 27 | Chargebee | 330 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 199 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 149 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 121 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 927 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 762 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 043 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 763 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 902 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 776 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 676 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 287 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 208 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 869 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 706 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 349 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 268 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 134 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 822 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 765 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 731 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 465 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 367 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 326 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 302 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 293 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 233 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 219 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 063 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 057 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 042 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 040 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 986 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 886 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 880 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 790 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 761 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 701 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 696 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 616 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 604 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 582 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 571 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 555 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 511 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 501 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 480 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 470 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 463 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 437 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 435 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 384 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 383 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 376 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 362 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 361 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 354 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 343 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 341 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 335 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1 | 327 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 326 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 325 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 324 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 313 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 311 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 270 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 267 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 260 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 251 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 249 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 245 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 234 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 226 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 226 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 205 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 202 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 197 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 191 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 188 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 184 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 183 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 179 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 178 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 176 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 175 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 171 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 171 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 170 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 157 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 9 148 |
| 2 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 9 146 |
| 3 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 9 144 |
| 4 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 6 578 |
| 5 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 6 577 |
| 6 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 6 573 |
| 7 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 6 571 |
| 8 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 6 564 |
| 9 | mx1.hostinger.com | 5 862 |
| 10 | mx2.hostinger.com | 5 850 |
| 11 | smtp.secureserver.net | 4 948 |
| 12 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 4 941 |
| 13 | nan | 4 409 |
| 14 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 401 |
| 15 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 393 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 382 |
| 17 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 085 |
| 18 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 067 |
| 19 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 828 |
| 20 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 827 |
| 21 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 825 |
| 22 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 705 |
| 23 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 691 |
| 24 | park-mx.above.com | 1 320 |
| 25 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 1 234 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 1 227 |
| 27 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 1 197 |
| 28 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 1 188 |
| 29 | smtpin.rzone.de | 1 050 |
| 30 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 994 |
| 31 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 989 |
| 32 | mx.stackmail.com | 972 |
| 33 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 927 |
| 34 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 925 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 925 |
| 36 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 897 |
| 37 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 880 |
| 38 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 878 |
| 39 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 871 |
| 40 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 868 |
| 41 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 866 |
| 42 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 786 |
| 43 | mx2.feishu.cn | 719 |
| 44 | mx.spamexperts.com | 719 |
| 45 | mx1.feishu.cn | 717 |
| 46 | mx3.feishu.cn | 717 |
| 47 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 706 |
| 48 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 698 |
| 49 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 673 |
| 50 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 659 |
| 51 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 655 |
| 52 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 654 |
| 53 | mx1.csof.net | 652 |
| 54 | mx2.csof.net | 652 |
| 55 | mx.securemx.jp | 622 |
| 56 | mx1.hostinger.in | 615 |
| 57 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 612 |
| 58 | mx2.hostinger.in | 607 |
| 59 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 588 |
| 60 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 586 |
| 61 | dmail.kagoya.net | 554 |
| 62 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 496 |
| 63 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 495 |
| 64 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 491 |
| 65 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 491 |
| 66 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 489 |
| 67 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 485 |
| 68 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 484 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 483 |
| 70 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 483 |
| 71 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 475 |
| 72 | mail.register.it | 433 |
| 73 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 424 |
| 74 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 423 |
| 75 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 415 |
| 76 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 408 |
| 77 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 386 |
| 78 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 386 |
| 79 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 386 |
| 80 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 385 |
| 81 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 377 |
| 82 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 373 |
| 83 | mx2.larksuite.com | 366 |
| 84 | mx1.larksuite.com | 365 |
| 85 | mx3.larksuite.com | 364 |
| 86 | mxext1.mailbox.org | 355 |
| 87 | mxext2.mailbox.org | 353 |
| 88 | mx01.udag.de | 352 |
| 89 | mx00.udag.de | 351 |
| 90 | localhost | 347 |
| 91 | mxext3.mailbox.org | 346 |
| 92 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 345 |
| 93 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 344 |
| 94 | mx-01-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 343 |
| 95 | mx.mgovcloud.in | 342 |
| 96 | mx.plingest.com | 341 |
| 97 | mx2.mgovcloud.in | 340 |
| 98 | mx3.mgovcloud.in | 340 |
| 99 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 337 |
| 100 | mx-02-eu-central-1.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 335 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 10 547 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 8 352 |
| 3 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 7 222 |
| 4 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 6 773 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 635 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 6 204 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 120 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 5 006 |
| 9 | websitewelcome.com | 3 999 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 631 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 100 |
| 12 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 985 |
| 13 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 870 |
| 14 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 853 |
| 15 | emailsrvr.com | 2 809 |
| 16 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 645 |
| 17 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 490 |
| 18 | beget.com | 2 488 |
| 19 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 408 |
| 20 | zcsend.net | 2 380 |
| 21 | stspg-customer.com | 2 174 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 130 |
| 23 | spf.brevo.com | 2 020 |
| 24 | zohomail.com | 2 014 |
| 25 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 014 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 1 995 |
| 27 | spf.crsend.com | 1 760 |
| 28 | transmail.net | 1 751 |
| 29 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 731 |
| 30 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 669 |
| 31 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 606 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 550 |
| 33 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 505 |
| 34 | musvc.com | 1 498 |
| 35 | spf.163.com | 1 496 |
| 36 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 454 |
| 37 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 1 446 |
| 38 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 1 343 |
| 39 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 335 |
| 40 | spfa.cpmails.com | 1 307 |
| 41 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 302 |
| 42 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 301 |
| 43 | one.zoho.com | 1 295 |
| 44 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 265 |
| 45 | spf.titan.email | 1 243 |
| 46 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 207 |
| 47 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 199 |
| 48 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 192 |
| 49 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 178 |
| 50 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 137 |
| 51 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 122 |
| 52 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 116 |
| 53 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 1 088 |
| 54 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 080 |
| 55 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 073 |
| 56 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 070 |
| 57 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 1 062 |
| 58 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 060 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 047 |
| 60 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 036 |
| 61 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 035 |
| 62 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 985 |
| 63 | spf.stackmail.com | 976 |
| 64 | authsmtp.com | 974 |
| 65 | ispgateway.de | 955 |
| 66 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 930 |
| 67 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 910 |
| 68 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 901 |
| 69 | spf.dynect.net | 870 |
| 70 | zoho.in | 860 |
| 71 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 854 |
| 72 | spfa.mailendo.com | 854 |
| 73 | agenturserver.de | 853 |
| 74 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 845 |
| 75 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 818 |
| 76 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 813 |
| 77 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 775 |
| 78 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 770 |
| 79 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 763 |
| 80 | eu.zcsend.net | 753 |
| 81 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 733 |
| 82 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 732 |
| 83 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 716 |
| 84 | _spf.kmitd.com | 703 |
| 85 | zohomail.eu | 698 |
| 86 | kagoya.net | 697 |
| 87 | spf.flowmailer.net | 688 |
| 88 | sendersrv.com | 686 |
| 89 | spf.nl2go.com | 681 |
| 90 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 677 |
| 91 | spf.improvmx.com | 674 |
| 92 | cmail1.com | 670 |
| 93 | spf.afas.online | 661 |
| 94 | eu.transmail.net | 660 |
| 95 | spf.unisender.ru | 658 |
| 96 | spf.bmv.jp | 657 |
| 97 | spf.sendsay.ru | 656 |
| 98 | spf.securemx.jp | 632 |
| 99 | spf.mindbox.ru | 632 |
| 100 | spf.kasserver.com | 630 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.