← Look up another domain · Domain statistics hub
Email infrastructure of nacex.com
According to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan (August 29, 2026), nacex.com (Tranco rank #135,396) receives mail via Cisco IronPort and sends through Forcepoint MailControl. The dataset currently contains no DMARC record for this snapshot. That is an authentication observation, not an inbox-placement result.
Last updated: .
| Mailbox provider (MX) | Cisco IronPort |
|---|---|
| ESPs in SPF | Forcepoint MailControl |
| SaaS senders in SPF | none detected |
| DMARC policy | no record |
| Tranco rank | #135,396 |
| Snapshot | 2026-08-29 (updated daily) |
How to interpret these observations
MX identifies the observed inbound mailbox or gateway. SPF includes identify services authorised to send for the domain. DMARC shows the published authentication policy. The dataset currently contains 2 populated signal groups for this page.
Observed deliverability context: based on the available observations, this page describes DNS configuration only. It does not represent a complete audit of nacex.com and does not prove that a particular message reaches the inbox or spam folder.
Frequently asked questions
What email provider does nacex.com use?
nacex.com uses Cisco IronPort for inbound mail (detected from its primary MX record) as of August 29, 2026, per Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan.
What ESP does nacex.com use?
nacex.com authorises Forcepoint MailControl in its SPF record as of August 29, 2026.
Does nacex.com enforce DMARC?
No — nacex.com publishes no DMARC record at all (as of August 29, 2026).
How nacex.com compares
Same daily dataset, three views: how its mailbox provider is trending, how strict DMARC is at its position in the list, and where its own policy sits among all DMARC publishers in the dataset.
Market share of Cisco IronPort
DMARC enforced by list position
Policy maturity of all DMARC publishers
SPF diagnostics
The two ways an SPF record silently stops working. Counted from the published record; include chains are resolved one level deep, so the lookup count is a lower bound.
Modern mail security across the dataset
Adoption of the records that go beyond SPF and DMARC. Shown for the whole snapshot — per-domain detail lives on the security posture report.
Historical reverse DNS observation
No current PTR conclusion is available on this retained page. Its previous PTR summary did not preserve enough dated, per-address evidence to establish a current negative DNS answer or a complete reverse DNS check. This does not mean PTR records are absent.
The page's original snapshot date is unchanged. MX addresses receive mail and do not identify the actual sending IP. For outgoing mail, obtain that IP, query its PTR names, and resolve those names back to A/AAAA. FCrDNS and delivery were not measured here.
Where nacex.com stands
The same snapshot cut by zone, by list position and by how alive the published policies are.
- At this list position the top three mailbox providers hold 56.6% of domains (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Unknown / Other).
- Across the dataset 24.5% of DMARC records are inert — policy does nothing and no reports are collected.
- nacex.com is one of 25,946 domains with a strict
-allSPF and a DMARC record that enforces nothing — the sending side is locked down while the policy side is not.
Related domain statistics
Nearby domains in the Tranco ranking: rghost.net · fenixcommerce.com · madridhifi.com · cancioneros.com
Browse provider data · Compare historical periods · Run an inbox placement test