Kagoya (JP) mailbox provider

According to Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan (July 13, 2026), Kagoya (JP) is the mailbox provider for 587 domains — 0.09% of 658,711 domains with MX records. Detection method: primary MX record (lowest preference).

Key facts

Kagoya is a Japanese email and web hosting infrastructure provider operating primarily from Japan. It serves smaller to mid-market websites, many of which use it both for receiving email and as the source of outbound mail.

As a primary MX record for the long tail of smaller websites, Kagoya is relevant for senders engaging with Asian markets or smaller business domains. Its global spread across diverse top-level domains—particularly .com—combined with regional strength in Japan, makes it a practical testing consideration for anyone whose mail targets these segments.

Where Kagoya (JP) sits in the Tranco ranking

Tranco rank bandDomainsShare of its base
Top 1,00000.0%
Top 10,00010.2%
Top 100,000335.6%
Top 1,000,00048983.3%
Unranked6410.9%

Top-level domain split

TLDDomainsShare
.com20034.1%
.jp18231.0%
.co.jp10217.4%
.net427.2%
.or.jp183.1%
.info91.5%
.ne.jp81.4%
.biz40.7%
.tv30.5%
.club30.5%

What Kagoya (JP) users also use

Cross-tabulated from the same daily snapshot — the other email services seen on the same 587 domains.

TypeServiceDomainsShare of Kagoya (JP) users
ESPKagoya (JP, sender)50986.7%
ESPBizMatrix396.6%
ESPAmazon SES315.3%
ESPFSI Email Security142.4%
ESPSendGrid (Twilio)132.2%
ESPRepica WebCAS122.0%
ESPZendesk101.7%
ESPQ-Send61.0%
ESPHubSpot40.7%
ESPBrevo (ex-Sendinblue)40.7%

Testing strategy for smaller regional providers

Smaller providers like Kagoya often operate with less centralised reputation infrastructure than the handful of mega-providers dominating inbox placement. This means reputation signals—sender authentication, subscriber engagement, complaint handling—may not propagate or persist identically. For senders, this creates a testing blind spot: ignoring regional or smaller-scale MX providers can mask deliverability issues that surface only once mail reaches these platforms. Testing against a representative sample including providers like Kagoya is particularly important if your audience skews toward Asia-Pacific regions or smaller business domains rather than enterprise.

See the full Kagoya (JP) data page (KPI cards, trend, sample domains) →

Are your emails landing in spam?
Run a free inbox-placement test across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and more — see exactly where your mail lands and why.
Test inbox placement →

Frequently asked questions

Should I test my emails against Kagoya?

If your recipient base includes sites on Japanese hosting or smaller regional providers, or if you send significantly to Asia-Pacific markets, testing against Kagoya is worthwhile. For mail destined primarily to large enterprise domains, it is a lower priority.

How many domains use Kagoya (JP)?

587 domains in the Tranco top-1M use Kagoya (JP) as their mailbox provider as of July 13, 2026 (0.09% of domains with MX records), according to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan.

Is Kagoya (JP) common enough to affect email deliverability testing?

Kagoya (JP) accounts for 0.09% of domains with MX records in the top 1M. Whether you should seed a test mailbox there depends on how much of your audience it represents — the co-usage table above shows the services it appears alongside most.

Which countries or TLDs use Kagoya (JP) most?

Kagoya (JP)'s largest TLD is .com (34.1% of its domains); it appears across 25 TLDs in total.

Other mailbox providers

Self-Hosted (22.44%)Google Workspace (21.79%)Microsoft 365 (16.74%)Unknown / Other (7.54%)Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) (2.57%)Proofpoint (1.90%)Generic / unmatched (mail.*) (1.75%)Yandex 360 (1.64%)Cloudflare Email Routing (1.60%)Mimecast (1.52%)