← Look up another domain · Domain statistics hub

Email infrastructure of archivists.org

According to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan (July 25, 2026), archivists.org (Tranco rank #101,600) receives mail via Barracuda and sends through Barracuda Essentials. Its observed DMARC policy is p=none (monitoring). Policy alone does not establish inbox or spam placement.

Last updated: .

Mailbox provider (MX)Barracuda
ESPs in SPFBarracuda Essentials
SaaS senders in SPFnone detected
DMARC policyp=none
DMARC recordv=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:rua+archivists.org@dmarc.barracudanetworks.com; ruf=mailto:ruf+archivists.org@dmarc.barracudanetworks.com
Tranco rank#101,600
Snapshot2026-07-25 (updated daily)

How to interpret these observations

MX identifies the observed inbound mailbox or gateway. SPF includes identify services authorised to send for the domain. DMARC shows the published authentication policy. The dataset currently contains 3 populated signal groups for this page.

Observed deliverability context: based on the available observations, this page describes DNS configuration only. It does not represent a complete audit of archivists.org and does not prove that a particular message reaches the inbox or spam folder.

Frequently asked questions

What email provider does archivists.org use?

archivists.org uses Barracuda for inbound mail (detected from its primary MX record) as of July 25, 2026, per Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan.

What ESP does archivists.org use?

archivists.org authorises Barracuda Essentials in its SPF record as of July 25, 2026.

Does archivists.org enforce DMARC?

No — archivists.org publishes p=none, which only monitors and does not block spoofing (as of July 25, 2026).

How archivists.org compares

Same daily dataset, three views: how its mailbox provider is trending, how strict DMARC is at its position in the list, and where its own policy sits among all DMARC publishers in the dataset.

Market share of Barracuda

DMARC enforced by list position

Policy maturity of all DMARC publishers

SPF diagnostics

The two ways an SPF record silently stops working. Counted from the published record; include chains are resolved one level deep, so the lookup count is a lower bound.

2DNS lookups — 8 left before the limit of 10
-allhard fail — anything not listed is rejected
102 Brecord length · mixed mechanisms

Modern mail security across the dataset

Adoption of the records that go beyond SPF and DMARC. Shown for the whole snapshot — per-domain detail lives on the security posture report.

0.00%publish MTA-STS
0.00%publish TLS-RPT
0.00%publish BIMI

Reverse DNS of the mail host

The MX hostname resolved to its addresses, and those addresses resolved back. Missing or mismatched reverse DNS is one of the few DNS-visible causes of outright rejection.

Where archivists.org stands

The same snapshot cut by zone, by list position and by how alive the published policies are.

Related domain statistics

Nearby domains in the Tranco ranking: msgs.jp · liveboxserver.uk · imaginationlibrary.com · mealty.ru

Browse provider data · Compare historical periods · Run an inbox placement test

Your message may perform differently. Run a controlled inbox placement test to evaluate your own message, sender and creative.
Test My Email