Email infrastructure of exghost.com

According to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan (September 7, 2026), exghost.com (Tranco rank #73,014) points its inbound MX to Unknown / Other. The dataset currently contains no DMARC record for this snapshot. That is an authentication observation, not an inbox-placement result.

Last updated: .

Mailbox provider (MX)Unknown / Other
ESPs in SPFnone detected
SaaS senders in SPFStatuspage (Atlassian)
DMARC policyno record
Tranco rank#73,014
Snapshot2026-09-07 (updated daily)

Keep an eye on exghost.com

Get a first health report, then meaningful changes to SPF, DMARC, MX, sampled MX PTR and blocklists. See your domain history and run a real inbox placement test from your private watchlist.

Manage existing subscriptions →
Monitoring starts only after you explicitly confirm by email. English reports. Stop any time.

How exghost.com compares

Same daily dataset, three views: how its mailbox provider is trending, how strict DMARC is at its position in the list, and where its own policy sits among all DMARC publishers in the dataset.

Market share of Unknown / Other

DMARC enforced by list position

Policy maturity of all DMARC publishers

From observation to a useful check

What was observed
The DNS records and classifications in this snapshot.
What it means
MX describes inbound mail; SPF authorizes senders.
What is unknown
The actual sending IP, nested SPF dependencies, inbox placement and commercial relationships. MTA-STS, TLS-RPT and BIMI adoption are not measured.
Next check
Verify current DNS and test a real message: run an inbox placement test.

DNS records

Source: OpenINTEL / Tranco. Capture: 2026-09-07. These are answers from the measurement vantage point, not a live DNS check. TTL is the observed cache lifetime in seconds.

exghost.com · A — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

IPv4 addresses for this name. They do not identify the mail server or prove a hosting migration.

exghost.com · AAAA — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

IPv6 addresses for this name. An address record does not test service availability.

exghost.com · NS — Answer records observed

Name servers listed for the DNS zone.

Query observed at: 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z.

Response code: 0.

  • exghost.com · NS · TTL 21600 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    mdns1.appriver.com.
  • exghost.com · NS · TTL 21600 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    mdns2.appriver.com.
exghost.com · MX — Answer records observed

Servers named to receive mail. Lower preference numbers are tried first.

Query observed at: 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z.

Response code: 0.

  • exghost.com · MX · TTL 21600 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    10 server56.appriver.com.
  • exghost.com · MX · TTL 21600 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    20 server57.appriver.com.
exghost.com · SOA — Answer records observed

Zone administration data. The serial is a version number, not a creation date or clock.

Query observed at: 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z.

Response code: 0.

  • exghost.com · SOA · TTL 86400 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    expire=1209600; minimum=21600; mname=mdns1.appriver.com.; refresh=3600; retry=3600; rname=domreg.appriver.com.; serial=2026031102
exghost.com · CAA — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

Rules for certificate issuance. These do not show whether an existing certificate is valid.

exghost.com · TXT — Answer records observed

Text records can publish mail policies, domain-control challenges or other data.

Query observed at: 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z.

Response code: 0.

  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT · TTL 300 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    "6c87f69b112b4af5970cdb3f79281d77"
  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT · TTL 300 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    "m79bx1qqnskymkswzdjzp0bc9ccp3d4q"
  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT · TTL 300 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    "pr6ds1sp8781dxqpq3m6vqshtvhbv6xq"
  • SPF: authorized mail senders; not proof that mail was sent.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT · TTL 300 s · 2026-09-07T00:07:39Z · AD=0
    "v=spf1 ip4:204.232.236.0/23 ip4:204.232.250.0/24 ip4:207.97.230.0/24 ip4:5.152.185.0/24 ip4:50.56.144.0/24 ip4:72.32.253.64/26 ip4:8.19.118.0/24 ip4:8.31.233.0/24 ip4:92.52.89.64/26 ip4:72.3.212.195 ip4:198.37.147.129 include:stspg-customer.com ~all"
exghost.com · DNSKEY — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

DNSSEC key, signature or denial-of-existence data observed in this response.

exghost.com · DS — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

DNSSEC key, signature or denial-of-existence data observed in this response.

exghost.com · CDS — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

DNSSEC key, signature or denial-of-existence data observed in this response.

exghost.com · CDNSKEY — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

DNSSEC key, signature or denial-of-existence data observed in this response.

www.exghost.com · A — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

IPv4 addresses for this name. They do not identify the mail server or prove a hosting migration.

www.exghost.com · AAAA — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

IPv6 addresses for this name. An address record does not test service availability.

_dmarc.exghost.com · TXT — Unknown: no conclusive answer in this capture

Text records can publish mail policies, domain-control challenges or other data.

DNSSEC records are shown only when returned. An unset AD flag is not proof that a zone is unsigned. MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI and arbitrary DKIM selectors are not measured here; their absence cannot be inferred.

Recorded DNS history

Registry presence: first seen 2026-04-28; last seen 2026-09-07. These are appearances in our domain registry, not domain registration dates or earlier DNS values.

This history starts with saved RR captures. Provider market-share charts are aggregate context, not this domain’s DNS history. Dates identify observations; no continuous validity between them is implied. Equivalent RR states are combined, ignoring response TTL and capture-time changes. Up to 30 distinct RR states and 60 dated captures are retained within a per-domain byte limit.

No earlier different RR snapshot is available for comparison.

Available saved snapshots
2026-09-07 (equivalent state also recorded on 2026-09-05)

Each query below keeps its own observation date; unknown checks may retain older values.

exghost.com · MX

2026-09-07 — Answer records observed

  • exghost.com · MX
    10 server56.appriver.com
  • exghost.com · MX
    20 server57.appriver.com

exghost.com · NS

2026-09-07 — Answer records observed

  • exghost.com · NS
    mdns1.appriver.com
  • exghost.com · NS
    mdns2.appriver.com

exghost.com · SOA

2026-09-07 — Answer records observed

  • exghost.com · SOA
    expire=1209600; minimum=21600; mname=mdns1.appriver.com; refresh=3600; retry=3600; rname=domreg.appriver.com; serial=2026031102

exghost.com · TXT

2026-09-07 — Answer records observed

  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT
    "6c87f69b112b4af5970cdb3f79281d77"
  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT
    "m79bx1qqnskymkswzdjzp0bc9ccp3d4q"
  • Other TXT data; its purpose is not established by this measurement.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT
    "pr6ds1sp8781dxqpq3m6vqshtvhbv6xq"
  • SPF: authorized mail senders; not proof that mail was sent.

    Raw TXT valueexghost.com · TXT
    "v=spf1 ip4:204.232.236.0/23 ip4:204.232.250.0/24 ip4:207.97.230.0/24 ip4:5.152.185.0/24 ip4:50.56.144.0/24 ip4:72.32.253.64/26 ip4:8.19.118.0/24 ip4:8.31.233.0/24 ip4:92.52.89.64/26 ip4:72.3.212.195 ip4:198.37.147.129 include:stspg-customer.com ~all"

Changes to exghost.com

No entry for this domain appears in the current public change feed. The feed is a selected sample, so this does not establish that its DNS stayed unchanged.

Start monitoring to build a history from your first check, or explore observed changes across the dataset.

SPF diagnostics

Static observations from the published SPF record. No nested include or redirect dependencies were evaluated. The actual sending IP and evaluation path are needed to assess the RFC 7208 limit of 10 DNS-dependent terms.

1DNS-dependent terms — nested dependencies are not checked; headroom is not confirmed
~allsoft fail — the common conservative default
249 Brecord length · mixed mechanisms

Modern mail security across the dataset

The required DNS labels are not queried. Adoption is unknown for this domain and for the population. Apex TXT anomalies are listed separately in the security posture report.

MTA-STSNot measured in this dataset
TLS-RPTNot measured in this dataset
BIMINot measured in this dataset

Reverse DNS of inbound MX hosts

These are separately dated observations of inbound MX addresses. They do not identify the actual sending IP. To assess outbound mail, check current forward and reverse DNS of the actual sending IP; FCrDNS and delivery were not measured here.

server56.appriver.com

Definite negative PTR answers were observed for all addresses of this MX.

DNS attempt: 2026-09-07 07:08:16 UTC. 1 of 1 addresses queried; 1 definite address results in the saved observation.

Observed IPObserved PTR namesDNS observation
8.19.118.102—Negative PTR answer

Name relationships are not a forward-confirmed reverse DNS test.

server57.appriver.com

Definite negative PTR answers were observed for all addresses of this MX.

DNS attempt: 2026-09-07 07:08:16 UTC. 1 of 1 addresses queried; 1 definite address results in the saved observation.

Observed IPObserved PTR namesDNS observation
8.19.118.103—Negative PTR answer

Name relationships are not a forward-confirmed reverse DNS test.

Where exghost.com stands

The same snapshot cut by zone, by list position and by how alive the published policies are.

How to interpret these observations

MX identifies the observed inbound mailbox or gateway. SPF includes identify services authorised to send for the domain. DMARC shows the published authentication policy. The dataset currently contains 2 populated signal groups for this page.

Observed deliverability context: based on the available observations, this page describes DNS configuration only. It does not represent a complete audit of exghost.com and does not prove that a particular message reaches the inbox or spam folder.

Frequently asked questions

What email provider does exghost.com use?

exghost.com uses Unknown / Other for inbound mail (detected from its primary MX record) as of September 7, 2026, per Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan.

Does exghost.com enforce DMARC?

No — exghost.com publishes no DMARC record at all (as of September 7, 2026).

Related domain statistics

Nearby domains in the Tranco ranking: klopotenko.com · fortion.eu · mercuryinsurance.com · newgrodno.by

Browse provider data · Compare historical periods · Run an inbox placement test

Your message may perform differently. Run a controlled inbox placement test to evaluate your own message, sender and creative.
Test My Email

Data: Email infrastructure of the Tranco top-1M, daily snapshot 2026-09-07, derived from OpenINTEL forward-DNS measurements. Cite with the date — records change daily.