← Look up another domain · Domain statistics hub
Email infrastructure of techandtrends.com
According to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan (August 21, 2026), techandtrends.com (Tranco rank #70,851) receives mail via Hostinger. Its observed DMARC policy is p=none (monitoring). Policy alone does not establish inbox or spam placement.
Last updated: .
| Mailbox provider (MX) | Hostinger |
|---|---|
| ESPs in SPF | none detected |
| SaaS senders in SPF | none detected |
| DMARC policy | p=none |
| DMARC record | v=DMARC1; p=none |
| Tranco rank | #70,851 |
| Snapshot | 2026-08-21 (updated daily) |
How to interpret these observations
MX identifies the observed inbound mailbox or gateway. SPF includes identify services authorised to send for the domain. DMARC shows the published authentication policy. The dataset currently contains 2 populated signal groups for this page.
Observed deliverability context: based on the available observations, this page describes DNS configuration only. It does not represent a complete audit of techandtrends.com and does not prove that a particular message reaches the inbox or spam folder.
Frequently asked questions
What email provider does techandtrends.com use?
techandtrends.com uses Hostinger for inbound mail (detected from its primary MX record) as of August 21, 2026, per Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan.
Does techandtrends.com enforce DMARC?
No — techandtrends.com publishes p=none, which only monitors and does not block spoofing (as of August 21, 2026).
How techandtrends.com compares
Same daily dataset, three views: how its mailbox provider is trending, how strict DMARC is at its position in the list, and where its own policy sits among all DMARC publishers in the dataset.
Market share of Hostinger
DMARC enforced by list position
Policy maturity of all DMARC publishers
SPF diagnostics
The two ways an SPF record silently stops working. Counted from the published record; include chains are resolved one level deep, so the lookup count is a lower bound.
Modern mail security across the dataset
Adoption of the records that go beyond SPF and DMARC. Shown for the whole snapshot — per-domain detail lives on the security posture report.
Reverse DNS of the mail host
The MX hostname resolved to its addresses, and those addresses resolved back. Missing or mismatched reverse DNS is one of the few DNS-visible causes of outright rejection.
mx1.hostinger.comhas no PTR record — large providers commonly reject or throttle mail from addresses without one.- Resolves to 172.65.182.103, 2606:4700:90:0:c1f8:f874:2386:b61f.
- Its address
172.65.182.103also hosts 70 other mail hosts — a shared server, so reputation is shared too.
Where techandtrends.com stands
The same snapshot cut by zone, by list position and by how alive the published policies are.
- At this list position the top three mailbox providers hold 60.7% of domains (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Unknown / Other).
- Across the dataset 25.0% of DMARC records are inert — policy does nothing and no reports are collected.
Related domain statistics
Nearby domains in the Tranco ranking: petaexpress.com · uscirf.gov · vreme.com · fresho.com
Browse provider data · Compare historical periods · Run an inbox placement test