Webropol SaaS sender

According to Live Direct Marketing's daily Tranco top-1M scan (September 14, 2026), Webropol is the SaaS sender for 139 domains — 0.02% of 637,677 SPF-publishing domains. Detection method: include: mechanisms in the SPF record.

Key facts

Why Webropol appears in this category

Webropol — Finnish survey & analytics platform.

We classify it as a SaaS sender from include: mechanisms in the SPF record matching a maintained provider rule. This is infrastructure attribution from public DNS, not evidence of a direct contract or exclusive use.

Webropol is a Finnish SaaS platform that sends email on behalf of client domains, handling campaigns, surveys, and transactional messages. The platform operates from Finland and serves as a delegated email-delivery provider for its customer base.

Because Webropol's footprint sits predominantly among smaller and regional sites—particularly within the .fi domain space—rather than global enterprise brands, anyone reviewing email infrastructure in the Nordic or mid-market segments will encounter it routinely. Its frequent co-occurrence with Microsoft 365 suggests that organisations running both corporate email and Webropol-hosted campaigns are a typical user profile, making SPF and DMARC alignment a common configuration challenge.

Where Webropol sits in the Tranco ranking

Tranco rank bandDomainsShare of its base
Top 1,00000.0%
Top 10,00010.7%
Top 100,0001611.5%
Top 1,000,00012287.8%
Unranked00.0%

Top-level domain split

TLDDomainsShare
.fi10374.1%
.se2215.8%
.com107.2%
.be21.4%
.no10.7%
.sport10.7%

What Webropol users also use

Cross-tabulated from the same daily snapshot — the other email services seen on the same 139 domains.

TypeServiceDomainsShare of Webropol users
MailboxMicrosoft 3659971.2%
MailboxGeneric / unmatched (mail.*)117.9%
MailboxSelf-Hosted117.9%
MailboxUnknown / Other117.9%
MailboxGoogle Workspace32.2%
MailboxMailAnyone / VIPRE Email Security21.4%

SPF chain depth when combining Webropol with Microsoft 365

Domains that deploy both Microsoft 365 and Webropol incur include mechanisms for both providers in their SPF record. This is structurally correct but increases DNS lookup overhead; the SPF specification permits only ten authoritative DNS lookups per query, and a chain that includes corporate email infrastructure plus campaign delivery can approach or exceed that limit. Senders should audit their SPF lookup depth and consider DKIM as a primary authentication signal if SPF scope becomes constrained by competing integrations.

See the full Webropol data page (KPI cards, trend, sample domains) →

Are your emails landing in spam?
Run a free inbox-placement test across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and more — see exactly where your mail lands and why.
Test inbox placement →

Frequently asked questions

Should I test my email deliverability against Webropol?

If your primary audience comprises small-to-medium businesses or organisations in the Nordic region, testing against Webropol-using recipients or inbox placements at such firms is practical. For campaigns targeting global enterprise brands, Webropol is less relevant to your baseline testing coverage.

How many domains use Webropol?

139 domains in the Tranco top-1M use Webropol as their SaaS sender as of September 14, 2026 (0.02% of SPF-publishing domains), according to Live Direct Marketing's daily DNS scan.

Is Webropol common enough to affect email deliverability testing?

Webropol accounts for 0.02% of SPF-publishing domains in the top 1M. Whether you should seed a test mailbox there depends on how much of your audience it represents — the co-usage table above shows the services it appears alongside most.

Which countries or TLDs use Webropol most?

Webropol's largest TLD is .fi (74.1% of its domains); it appears across 6 TLDs in total.

Other SaaS senders

Shopify (0.86%)Pardot (Salesforce) (0.74%)CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 (0.70%)KnowBe4 (0.53%)Statuspage (Atlassian) (0.32%)Trustpilot (0.29%)Firebase (Google) (0.29%)BigCommerce (0.28%)Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) (0.28%)Lark / Feishu (0.20%)