Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2024-09-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 182 001 | 27.55% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 138 056 | 20.9% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 100 406 | 15.2% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 94 508 | 14.3% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 57 666 | 8.73% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 219 | 2.0% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 276 | 1.71% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 508 | 1.29% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 070 | 0.92% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 777 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 514 | 0.68% |
| 12 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 403 | 0.67% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 3 970 | 0.6% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 279 | 0.5% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 2 915 | 0.44% |
| 16 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 631 | 0.4% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 370 | 0.36% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 357 | 0.36% |
| 19 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 631 | 0.25% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 551 | 0.23% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 532 | 0.23% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 442 | 0.22% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 337 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 267 | 0.19% |
| 25 | ProtonMail | 1 136 | 0.17% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 059 | 0.16% |
| 27 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 043 | 0.16% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 781 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 669 | 0.1% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 647 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 32 407 | 5.36% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 28 077 | 4.65% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 25 449 | 4.21% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 24 234 | 4.01% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 23 597 | 3.9% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 22 944 | 3.8% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 14 908 | 2.47% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 11 466 | 1.9% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 630 | 1.26% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 128 | 0.68% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 918 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 331 | 0.55% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 796 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 602 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Constant Contact | 2 197 | 0.36% |
| 16 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 196 | 0.36% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 606 | 0.27% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 254 | 0.21% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 188 | 0.2% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 711 | 0.12% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 682 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 564 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 323 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 246 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 23 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 15 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 8 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 224 | 1.03% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 041 | 0.67% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 028 | 0.5% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 099 | 0.35% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 800 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 397 | 0.23% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 140 | 0.19% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 039 | 0.17% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 1 013 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 926 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | ConnectWise | 796 | 0.13% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 759 | 0.13% |
| 13 | ClickDimensions | 750 | 0.12% |
| 14 | Lark / Feishu | 742 | 0.12% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 715 | 0.12% |
| 16 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 712 | 0.12% |
| 17 | Sage Intacct | 702 | 0.12% |
| 18 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 684 | 0.11% |
| 19 | PayPal Braintree | 669 | 0.11% |
| 20 | Greenhouse | 634 | 0.1% |
| 21 | Zendesk | 504 | 0.08% |
| 22 | HappyFox | 475 | 0.08% |
| 23 | UKG / UltiPro | 464 | 0.08% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 402 | 0.07% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 301 | 0.05% |
| 26 | Shoptet | 291 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 240 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Odoo | 225 | 0.04% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 186 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 143 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 34 695 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 30 112 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 514 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 477 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 475 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 3 150 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 115 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 888 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 856 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 164 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 955 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 874 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 843 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 629 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 623 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 441 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 440 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 435 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 423 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 363 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 313 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 303 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 064 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 035 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 994 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 826 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 724 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 692 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 650 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 614 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 578 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 575 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 574 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 459 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 441 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 425 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 415 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 403 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 395 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 393 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 377 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 365 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 347 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 334 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 331 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 321 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 315 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 304 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 302 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 299 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1 | 298 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 294 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 287 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 283 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 279 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 271 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 270 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 267 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 243 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 227 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@dbs.com | 226 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 225 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 216 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 215 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 210 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 204 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 202 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 200 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 199 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 195 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 190 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 189 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 189 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 187 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 177 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 173 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 169 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 162 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 160 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 159 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 159 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 158 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 154 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 154 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 152 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 151 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 149 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 146 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 145 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 143 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 142 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 142 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 132 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 126 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 125 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 124 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 123 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 123 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 122 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none; | 121 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 10 219 |
| 2 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 10 216 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 10 215 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 10 203 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 10 190 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 692 |
| 7 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 692 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 690 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 494 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 482 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 3 521 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 3 490 |
| 13 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 420 |
| 14 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 391 |
| 15 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 945 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 943 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 933 |
| 18 | park-mx.above.com | 1 827 |
| 19 | nan | 1 743 |
| 20 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 596 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 578 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 290 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 290 |
| 24 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 290 |
| 25 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 125 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 115 |
| 27 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 109 |
| 28 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 022 |
| 29 | localhost | 1 012 |
| 30 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 004 |
| 31 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 992 |
| 32 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 989 |
| 33 | mail.eye-mail.net | 982 |
| 34 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 963 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 962 |
| 36 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 962 |
| 37 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 944 |
| 38 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 941 |
| 39 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 875 |
| 40 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 871 |
| 41 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 870 |
| 42 | mx1.csof.net | 793 |
| 43 | mx2.csof.net | 793 |
| 44 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 769 |
| 45 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 768 |
| 46 | mx.spamexperts.com | 755 |
| 47 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 751 |
| 48 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 746 |
| 49 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 708 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 706 |
| 51 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 693 |
| 52 | mx.stackmail.com | 648 |
| 53 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 645 |
| 54 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 644 |
| 55 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 641 |
| 56 | mx.securemx.jp | 624 |
| 57 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 599 |
| 58 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 598 |
| 59 | dmail.kagoya.net | 592 |
| 60 | smtpin.rzone.de | 572 |
| 61 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 529 |
| 62 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 527 |
| 63 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 519 |
| 64 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 512 |
| 65 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 511 |
| 66 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 503 |
| 67 | mail.h-email.net | 500 |
| 68 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 497 |
| 69 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 491 |
| 70 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 480 |
| 71 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 466 |
| 72 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 465 |
| 73 | mail.register.it | 454 |
| 74 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 430 |
| 75 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 392 |
| 76 | mx1.feishu.cn | 391 |
| 77 | mx2.feishu.cn | 391 |
| 78 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 390 |
| 79 | mx3.feishu.cn | 389 |
| 80 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 363 |
| 81 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 349 |
| 82 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 340 |
| 83 | mailgw.nic.in | 340 |
| 84 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 339 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 338 |
| 86 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 337 |
| 87 | mc.planbnow.co | 328 |
| 88 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 315 |
| 89 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 298 |
| 90 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 295 |
| 91 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 292 |
| 92 | mx01.cloud.vadesecure.com | 289 |
| 93 | mx02.cloud.vadesecure.com | 285 |
| 94 | mx03.cloud.vadesecure.com | 283 |
| 95 | mx04.cloud.vadesecure.com | 283 |
| 96 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 280 |
| 97 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 276 |
| 98 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 274 |
| 99 | vlmx21.secure.ne.jp | 272 |
| 100 | vlmx22.secure.ne.jp | 272 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 359 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 027 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 6 977 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 193 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 5 863 |
| 6 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 5 211 |
| 7 | _spf.mlsend.com | 4 570 |
| 8 | websitewelcome.com | 4 281 |
| 9 | mx.ovh.com | 4 202 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 129 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 610 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 124 |
| 13 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 821 |
| 14 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 702 |
| 15 | beget.com | 2 556 |
| 16 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 507 |
| 17 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 489 |
| 18 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 406 |
| 19 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 305 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 280 |
| 21 | zcsend.net | 2 117 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 112 |
| 23 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 041 |
| 24 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 948 |
| 25 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 890 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 792 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 759 |
| 28 | transmail.net | 1 676 |
| 29 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 510 |
| 30 | musvc.com | 1 460 |
| 31 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 450 |
| 32 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 442 |
| 33 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 411 |
| 34 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 394 |
| 35 | spf.titan.email | 1 393 |
| 36 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 362 |
| 37 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 356 |
| 38 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 339 |
| 39 | spf.crsend.com | 1 330 |
| 40 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 311 |
| 41 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 272 |
| 42 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 208 |
| 43 | spf.163.com | 1 187 |
| 44 | spf.dynect.net | 1 129 |
| 45 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 121 |
| 46 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 116 |
| 47 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 040 |
| 48 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 013 |
| 49 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 010 |
| 50 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 996 |
| 51 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 990 |
| 52 | authsmtp.com | 968 |
| 53 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 965 |
| 54 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 956 |
| 55 | spf2.esputnik.com | 947 |
| 56 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 936 |
| 57 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 927 |
| 58 | _spf.perfora.net | 924 |
| 59 | _spf.aruba.it | 912 |
| 60 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 873 |
| 61 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 858 |
| 62 | one.zoho.com | 833 |
| 63 | ispgateway.de | 817 |
| 64 | spf.brevo.com | 805 |
| 65 | spfa.mailendo.com | 791 |
| 66 | cmail1.com | 769 |
| 67 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 765 |
| 68 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 760 |
| 69 | kagoya.net | 757 |
| 70 | spf.improvmx.com | 742 |
| 71 | _spf.kmitd.com | 737 |
| 72 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 718 |
| 73 | turbo-smtp.com | 716 |
| 74 | mailcontrol.com | 711 |
| 75 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 694 |
| 76 | zoho.in | 686 |
| 77 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 657 |
| 78 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 656 |
| 79 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 640 |
| 80 | agenturserver.de | 637 |
| 81 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 628 |
| 82 | spf.afas.online | 627 |
| 83 | spf.securemx.jp | 627 |
| 84 | bluehost.com | 614 |
| 85 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 612 |
| 86 | spf.mindbox.ru | 610 |
| 87 | e2ma.net | 602 |
| 88 | spf.stackmail.com | 602 |
| 89 | spf.mailanyone.net | 587 |
| 90 | spf.bmv.jp | 585 |
| 91 | infusionmail.com | 581 |
| 92 | spf.nl2go.com | 579 |
| 93 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 578 |
| 94 | spf.us.exclaimer.net | 574 |
| 95 | spf.webapps.net | 571 |
| 96 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 571 |
| 97 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 562 |
| 98 | spf.hostmar.com | 560 |
| 99 | spf.retailcrm.pro | 557 |
| 100 | _spf.embluemail.com | 556 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.