Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2024-06-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 169 652 | 27.59% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 127 039 | 20.66% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 90 504 | 14.72% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 88 358 | 14.37% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 55 799 | 9.07% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 283 | 2.16% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 443 | 1.7% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 902 | 1.28% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 5 563 | 0.9% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 500 | 0.73% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 351 | 0.71% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 250 | 0.69% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 3 858 | 0.63% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 172 | 0.52% |
| 15 | Beget (RU) | 2 645 | 0.43% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 642 | 0.43% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 365 | 0.38% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 083 | 0.34% |
| 19 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 499 | 0.24% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 475 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 462 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 279 | 0.21% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 235 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 098 | 0.18% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 079 | 0.18% |
| 26 | ProtonMail | 1 001 | 0.16% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 941 | 0.15% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 708 | 0.12% |
| 29 | CSC (corporate) | 687 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 637 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 30 297 | 5.39% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 26 112 | 4.64% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 23 990 | 4.27% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 23 155 | 4.12% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 545 | 4.01% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 20 971 | 3.73% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 13 763 | 2.45% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 521 | 1.87% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 165 | 1.27% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 837 | 0.68% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 735 | 0.66% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 272 | 0.58% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 601 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 468 | 0.44% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 109 | 0.38% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 949 | 0.35% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 600 | 0.28% |
| 18 | MailerSend | 1 095 | 0.19% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 067 | 0.19% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 675 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 675 | 0.12% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 566 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 309 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 239 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 18 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 12 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 8 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 972 | 1.06% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 852 | 0.68% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 656 | 0.47% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 979 | 0.35% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 742 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 255 | 0.22% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 081 | 0.19% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 976 | 0.17% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 963 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 866 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | ConnectWise | 728 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ClickDimensions | 724 | 0.13% |
| 13 | Oracle Cloud Email | 693 | 0.12% |
| 14 | Oracle Cloud | 665 | 0.12% |
| 15 | PayPal Braintree | 632 | 0.11% |
| 16 | Lark / Feishu | 630 | 0.11% |
| 17 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 624 | 0.11% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 614 | 0.11% |
| 19 | Sage Intacct | 595 | 0.11% |
| 20 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 581 | 0.1% |
| 21 | Zendesk | 487 | 0.09% |
| 22 | HappyFox | 435 | 0.08% |
| 23 | UKG / UltiPro | 408 | 0.07% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 334 | 0.06% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 278 | 0.05% |
| 26 | Shoptet | 264 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 227 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Odoo | 176 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 176 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 127 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 28 600 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 26 985 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 217 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 063 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 031 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 2 963 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 776 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 482 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 2 206 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 882 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 840 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 1 707 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 623 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 478 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 416 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 388 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 349 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 332 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 314 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 225 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 043 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 001 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 981 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 935 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 912 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 760 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 605 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 595 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 580 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 565 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 540 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 535 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 526 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 484 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 447 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 399 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 380 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 365 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 356 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 354 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 343 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 317 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 313 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 309 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 297 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 292 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 290 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 288 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1 | 277 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 277 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 274 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 273 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 273 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 263 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 261 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 260 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 259 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 254 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 246 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 245 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 224 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 223 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 207 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 204 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 198 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 193 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 193 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 189 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 185 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@dbs.com | 180 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 175 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 174 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 174 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 173 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 171 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 167 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 165 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 165 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 165 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 165 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 158 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 157 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 151 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 150 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 150 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 150 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 148 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 145 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 144 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;fo=1;ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com;rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com | 142 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 141 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 139 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 131 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 130 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 124 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 123 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 120 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 118 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 116 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 114 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 207 |
| 2 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 205 |
| 3 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 197 |
| 4 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 197 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 178 |
| 6 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 035 |
| 7 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 034 |
| 8 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 033 |
| 9 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 001 |
| 10 | smtp.secureserver.net | 4 986 |
| 11 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 4 522 |
| 12 | park-mx.above.com | 3 501 |
| 13 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 672 |
| 14 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 645 |
| 15 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 094 |
| 16 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 071 |
| 17 | mail.eye-mail.net | 1 792 |
| 18 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 757 |
| 19 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 748 |
| 20 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 747 |
| 21 | nan | 1 474 |
| 22 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 432 |
| 23 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 418 |
| 24 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 038 |
| 25 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 038 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 037 |
| 27 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 011 |
| 28 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 005 |
| 29 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 000 |
| 30 | localhost | 981 |
| 31 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 936 |
| 32 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 935 |
| 33 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 935 |
| 34 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 890 |
| 35 | mx1.hostinger.in | 823 |
| 36 | mx2.hostinger.in | 804 |
| 37 | dmail.kagoya.net | 735 |
| 38 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 731 |
| 39 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 731 |
| 40 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 730 |
| 41 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 729 |
| 42 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 727 |
| 43 | mx1.csof.net | 699 |
| 44 | mx2.csof.net | 699 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 676 |
| 46 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 666 |
| 47 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 655 |
| 48 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 654 |
| 49 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 642 |
| 50 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 636 |
| 51 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 630 |
| 52 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 627 |
| 53 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 622 |
| 54 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 619 |
| 55 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 596 |
| 56 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 595 |
| 57 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 591 |
| 58 | mx.securemx.jp | 568 |
| 59 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 527 |
| 60 | smtpin.rzone.de | 521 |
| 61 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 518 |
| 62 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 511 |
| 63 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 484 |
| 64 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 481 |
| 65 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 479 |
| 66 | mx.stackmail.com | 450 |
| 67 | mail.h-email.net | 450 |
| 68 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 438 |
| 69 | mail.register.it | 437 |
| 70 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 426 |
| 71 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 421 |
| 72 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 389 |
| 73 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 389 |
| 74 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 378 |
| 75 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 329 |
| 76 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 327 |
| 77 | mx1.feishu.cn | 325 |
| 78 | mx2.feishu.cn | 324 |
| 79 | mx3.feishu.cn | 323 |
| 80 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 319 |
| 81 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 309 |
| 82 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 309 |
| 83 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 308 |
| 84 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 306 |
| 85 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 301 |
| 86 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 297 |
| 87 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 289 |
| 88 | mailgw.nic.in | 275 |
| 89 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 271 |
| 90 | mx01.cloud.vadesecure.com | 258 |
| 91 | mx02.cloud.vadesecure.com | 257 |
| 92 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 257 |
| 93 | mx03.cloud.vadesecure.com | 256 |
| 94 | mx04.cloud.vadesecure.com | 255 |
| 95 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 252 |
| 96 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 245 |
| 97 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 243 |
| 98 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 242 |
| 99 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 240 |
| 100 | vlmx21.secure.ne.jp | 239 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 307 |
| 2 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 288 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 5 931 |
| 4 | zoho.com | 5 601 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 5 072 |
| 6 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 4 014 |
| 7 | mx.ovh.com | 3 996 |
| 8 | _spf.mlsend.com | 3 917 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 789 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 3 633 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 441 |
| 12 | beget.com | 2 851 |
| 13 | emailsrvr.com | 2 822 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 714 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 514 |
| 16 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 264 |
| 17 | stspg-customer.com | 2 212 |
| 18 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 201 |
| 19 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 126 |
| 20 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 104 |
| 21 | zcsend.net | 1 927 |
| 22 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 916 |
| 23 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 909 |
| 24 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 724 |
| 25 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 1 686 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 637 |
| 27 | transmail.net | 1 561 |
| 28 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 545 |
| 29 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 384 |
| 30 | musvc.com | 1 370 |
| 31 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 347 |
| 32 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 340 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 294 |
| 34 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 270 |
| 35 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 260 |
| 36 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 241 |
| 37 | spf.titan.email | 1 219 |
| 38 | spf.crsend.com | 1 210 |
| 39 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 190 |
| 40 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 177 |
| 41 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 156 |
| 42 | spf.dynect.net | 1 071 |
| 43 | spf.163.com | 1 071 |
| 44 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 061 |
| 45 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 028 |
| 46 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 999 |
| 47 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 966 |
| 48 | spf2.esputnik.com | 939 |
| 49 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 927 |
| 50 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 924 |
| 51 | authsmtp.com | 917 |
| 52 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 894 |
| 53 | kagoya.net | 890 |
| 54 | _spf.perfora.net | 884 |
| 55 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 869 |
| 56 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 854 |
| 57 | _spf.aruba.it | 844 |
| 58 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 834 |
| 59 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 825 |
| 60 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 806 |
| 61 | relay.mailbaby.net | 802 |
| 62 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 781 |
| 63 | ispgateway.de | 742 |
| 64 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 735 |
| 65 | cmail1.com | 731 |
| 66 | spfa.mailendo.com | 721 |
| 67 | one.zoho.com | 720 |
| 68 | _spf.kmitd.com | 678 |
| 69 | mailcontrol.com | 670 |
| 70 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 665 |
| 71 | spf.improvmx.com | 655 |
| 72 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 651 |
| 73 | turbo-smtp.com | 640 |
| 74 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 630 |
| 75 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 619 |
| 76 | spf.brevo.com | 610 |
| 77 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 603 |
| 78 | spf.mindbox.ru | 600 |
| 79 | zoho.in | 596 |
| 80 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 588 |
| 81 | spf.securemx.jp | 581 |
| 82 | spf.afas.online | 555 |
| 83 | e2ma.net | 552 |
| 84 | bluehost.com | 552 |
| 85 | spf.nl2go.com | 544 |
| 86 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 535 |
| 87 | spf.mailanyone.net | 532 |
| 88 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 532 |
| 89 | agenturserver.de | 532 |
| 90 | spf.webapps.net | 528 |
| 91 | infusionmail.com | 524 |
| 92 | spf.bmv.jp | 516 |
| 93 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 514 |
| 94 | _netblocks.google.com | 510 |
| 95 | _spf.embluemail.com | 508 |
| 96 | spf.flowmailer.net | 507 |
| 97 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 505 |
| 98 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 504 |
| 99 | spf.autopilothq.com | 503 |
| 100 | spf.haihaimail.jp | 500 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.