Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2024-02-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 184 625 | 28.25% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 132 764 | 20.32% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 95 161 | 14.56% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 91 651 | 14.02% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 60 658 | 9.28% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 692 | 2.1% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 664 | 1.63% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 705 | 1.33% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 022 | 0.92% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 580 | 0.7% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 528 | 0.69% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 4 359 | 0.67% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 320 | 0.66% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 213 | 0.49% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 2 996 | 0.46% |
| 16 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 920 | 0.45% |
| 17 | Beget (RU) | 2 528 | 0.39% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 082 | 0.32% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 746 | 0.27% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 646 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 594 | 0.24% |
| 22 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 381 | 0.21% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 339 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 275 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 171 | 0.18% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 014 | 0.16% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 964 | 0.15% |
| 28 | CSC (corporate) | 935 | 0.14% |
| 29 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 793 | 0.12% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 670 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 29 681 | 5.04% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 25 259 | 4.29% |
| 3 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 25 161 | 4.28% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 24 530 | 4.17% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 722 | 3.86% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 20 506 | 3.49% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 13 230 | 2.25% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 386 | 1.77% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 735 | 1.31% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 960 | 0.67% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 896 | 0.66% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 127 | 0.53% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 731 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 522 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 130 | 0.36% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 039 | 0.35% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 720 | 0.29% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 1 137 | 0.19% |
| 19 | MailerSend | 964 | 0.16% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 689 | 0.12% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 635 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 599 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 321 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 237 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 17 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 12 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 7 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 275 | 1.07% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 199 | 0.71% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 517 | 0.43% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 968 | 0.33% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 803 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 261 | 0.21% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 093 | 0.19% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 065 | 0.18% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 991 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Docebo (LMS) | 799 | 0.14% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | ClickDimensions | 769 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 766 | 0.13% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 656 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Oracle Cloud Email | 618 | 0.11% |
| 15 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 609 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Oracle Cloud | 566 | 0.1% |
| 17 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 565 | 0.1% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 539 | 0.09% |
| 19 | Sage Intacct | 536 | 0.09% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 532 | 0.09% |
| 21 | Zendesk | 516 | 0.09% |
| 22 | HappyFox | 408 | 0.07% |
| 23 | UKG / UltiPro | 343 | 0.06% |
| 24 | Shoptet | 322 | 0.05% |
| 25 | FormAssembly | 296 | 0.05% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 254 | 0.04% |
| 27 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 243 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Gorgias | 189 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Odoo | 180 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 138 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 24 398 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 18 052 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 573 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 043 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 850 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 525 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 474 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 170 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 841 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 808 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 606 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 1 526 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 423 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 374 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 374 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 299 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 210 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 181 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 140 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 132 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 983 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 967 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 948 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 941 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 746 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 680 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 664 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 595 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 559 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 502 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 477 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 445 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 394 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 393 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 391 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 368 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 339 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 326 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 324 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 303 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 295 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 282 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 279 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 263 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 261 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 260 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 259 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 256 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 251 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 251 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 247 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 246 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1 | 240 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 238 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 237 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 230 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 227 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 220 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 211 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 204 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 196 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 193 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 189 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 188 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 187 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 185 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 181 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 180 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 177 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 176 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 172 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 172 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 168 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 155 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 154 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 151 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 149 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 146 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 146 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 140 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 140 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 136 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 133 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 132 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 132 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 127 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 126 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 123 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 119 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 119 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 119 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 116 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=s; adkim=r | 112 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 111 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 111 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 109 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 109 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 107 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 106 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 106 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 750 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 744 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 743 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 733 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 712 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 644 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 620 |
| 8 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 871 |
| 9 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 869 |
| 10 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 867 |
| 11 | park-mx.above.com | 4 376 |
| 12 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 918 |
| 13 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 883 |
| 14 | mail.eye-mail.net | 2 496 |
| 15 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 157 |
| 16 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 143 |
| 17 | mx1.csof.net | 2 045 |
| 18 | mx2.csof.net | 2 045 |
| 19 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 918 |
| 20 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 915 |
| 21 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 915 |
| 22 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 621 |
| 23 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 529 |
| 24 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 514 |
| 25 | nan | 1 420 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 206 |
| 27 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 206 |
| 28 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 205 |
| 29 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 187 |
| 30 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 159 |
| 31 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 123 |
| 32 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 117 |
| 33 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 113 |
| 34 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 003 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 002 |
| 36 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 002 |
| 37 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 973 |
| 38 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 919 |
| 39 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 915 |
| 40 | localhost | 907 |
| 41 | dmail.kagoya.net | 861 |
| 42 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 832 |
| 43 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 831 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 828 |
| 45 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 764 |
| 46 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 762 |
| 47 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 757 |
| 48 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 756 |
| 49 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 752 |
| 50 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 748 |
| 51 | mx.spamexperts.com | 721 |
| 52 | mx.aams4.jp | 682 |
| 53 | mx-0.aams4.jp | 678 |
| 54 | mx-1.aams4.jp | 678 |
| 55 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 671 |
| 56 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 658 |
| 57 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 636 |
| 58 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 635 |
| 59 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 623 |
| 60 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 617 |
| 61 | mx.securemx.jp | 604 |
| 62 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 597 |
| 63 | sagw.fsi.ne.jp | 594 |
| 64 | mx.stackmail.com | 562 |
| 65 | smtpin.rzone.de | 555 |
| 66 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 544 |
| 67 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 543 |
| 68 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 530 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 523 |
| 70 | mail.h-email.net | 519 |
| 71 | mail.register.it | 482 |
| 72 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 480 |
| 73 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 480 |
| 74 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 431 |
| 75 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 425 |
| 76 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 423 |
| 77 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 418 |
| 78 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 403 |
| 79 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 371 |
| 80 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 371 |
| 81 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 336 |
| 82 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 335 |
| 83 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 323 |
| 84 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 323 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 320 |
| 86 | mailgw.nic.in | 308 |
| 87 | mail4.makeshop.jp | 304 |
| 88 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 295 |
| 89 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 290 |
| 90 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 289 |
| 91 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 282 |
| 92 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 282 |
| 93 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 279 |
| 94 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 275 |
| 95 | mx02.cloud.vadesecure.com | 270 |
| 96 | vlmx21.secure.ne.jp | 269 |
| 97 | vlmx22.secure.ne.jp | 269 |
| 98 | mx01.cloud.vadesecure.com | 269 |
| 99 | kr1-aspmx2.worksmobile.com | 267 |
| 100 | vlmx20.secure.ne.jp | 267 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 791 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 6 551 |
| 3 | zoho.com | 6 155 |
| 4 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 6 142 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 5 907 |
| 6 | websitewelcome.com | 4 806 |
| 7 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 4 503 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 399 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 976 |
| 10 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 3 717 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 599 |
| 12 | _spf.mlsend.com | 3 388 |
| 13 | emailsrvr.com | 3 159 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 883 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 729 |
| 16 | beget.com | 2 675 |
| 17 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 485 |
| 18 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 434 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 247 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 190 |
| 21 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 171 |
| 22 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 080 |
| 23 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 059 |
| 24 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 918 |
| 25 | zcsend.net | 1 861 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 681 |
| 27 | spf.titan.email | 1 561 |
| 28 | transmail.net | 1 548 |
| 29 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 487 |
| 30 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 471 |
| 31 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 471 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 385 |
| 33 | musvc.com | 1 359 |
| 34 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 344 |
| 35 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 323 |
| 36 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 300 |
| 37 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 293 |
| 38 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 269 |
| 39 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 242 |
| 40 | spf.dynect.net | 1 180 |
| 41 | spf.crsend.com | 1 158 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 144 |
| 43 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 142 |
| 44 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 1 108 |
| 45 | spf.makeshop.jp | 1 105 |
| 46 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 075 |
| 47 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 071 |
| 48 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 1 071 |
| 49 | kagoya.net | 1 052 |
| 50 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 049 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 047 |
| 52 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 995 |
| 53 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 980 |
| 54 | spf2.esputnik.com | 979 |
| 55 | _spf.perfora.net | 958 |
| 56 | authsmtp.com | 953 |
| 57 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 939 |
| 58 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 934 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 928 |
| 60 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 870 |
| 61 | relay.mailbaby.net | 816 |
| 62 | cmail1.com | 797 |
| 63 | ispgateway.de | 774 |
| 64 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 771 |
| 65 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 765 |
| 66 | spfa.mailendo.com | 756 |
| 67 | _spf.kmitd.com | 733 |
| 68 | spf.improvmx.com | 728 |
| 69 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 717 |
| 70 | spf.aams4.jp | 711 |
| 71 | mailcontrol.com | 699 |
| 72 | spf.shopserve.jp | 696 |
| 73 | bluehost.com | 678 |
| 74 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 667 |
| 75 | zoho.in | 655 |
| 76 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 649 |
| 77 | one.zoho.com | 642 |
| 78 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 634 |
| 79 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 633 |
| 80 | e2ma.net | 623 |
| 81 | _spf.aruba.it | 614 |
| 82 | spf.securemx.jp | 610 |
| 83 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 602 |
| 84 | turbo-smtp.com | 597 |
| 85 | spf001.shop-pro.jp | 590 |
| 86 | spf.webapps.net | 589 |
| 87 | spf.mindbox.ru | 588 |
| 88 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 588 |
| 89 | infusionmail.com | 585 |
| 90 | spf.afas.online | 556 |
| 91 | spf.nl2go.com | 555 |
| 92 | spf.bmv.jp | 554 |
| 93 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 553 |
| 94 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 553 |
| 95 | agenturserver.de | 538 |
| 96 | spf.q-send.jp | 538 |
| 97 | spf.hostmar.com | 537 |
| 98 | _spf.embluemail.com | 527 |
| 99 | spf.autopilothq.com | 525 |
| 100 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 524 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.