Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2024-01-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 187 572 | 28.53% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 133 308 | 20.28% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 96 163 | 14.63% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 91 939 | 13.99% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 60 149 | 9.15% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 123 | 2.15% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 702 | 1.63% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 652 | 1.32% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 005 | 0.91% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 735 | 0.72% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 469 | 0.68% |
| 12 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 425 | 0.67% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 304 | 0.65% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 220 | 0.49% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 3 042 | 0.46% |
| 16 | Beget (RU) | 2 543 | 0.39% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 423 | 0.37% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 066 | 0.31% |
| 19 | Gandi Mail | 1 703 | 0.26% |
| 20 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 671 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 596 | 0.24% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 381 | 0.21% |
| 23 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 329 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 251 | 0.19% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 178 | 0.18% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 029 | 0.16% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 977 | 0.15% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 799 | 0.12% |
| 29 | Reg.ru | 672 | 0.1% |
| 30 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 590 | 0.09% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 29 524 | 5.03% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 25 676 | 4.38% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 25 013 | 4.26% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 24 309 | 4.14% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 744 | 3.88% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 20 017 | 3.41% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 13 032 | 2.22% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 373 | 1.77% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 866 | 1.34% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 041 | 0.69% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 868 | 0.66% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 264 | 0.56% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 732 | 0.47% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 508 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 143 | 0.37% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 970 | 0.34% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 773 | 0.3% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 1 123 | 0.19% |
| 19 | MailerSend | 925 | 0.16% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 713 | 0.12% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 649 | 0.11% |
| 22 | Customer.io | 603 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 333 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 233 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 15 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 8 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Klaviyo | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 451 | 1.1% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 093 | 0.7% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 472 | 0.42% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 002 | 0.34% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 821 | 0.31% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 259 | 0.21% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 1 071 | 0.18% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 1 023 | 0.17% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 977 | 0.17% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 803 | 0.14% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 788 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 755 | 0.13% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 671 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 631 | 0.11% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud Email | 604 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Oracle Cloud | 556 | 0.09% |
| 17 | Greenhouse | 556 | 0.09% |
| 18 | Zendesk | 537 | 0.09% |
| 19 | Sage Intacct | 525 | 0.09% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 494 | 0.08% |
| 21 | HappyFox | 342 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 323 | 0.06% |
| 23 | Shoptet | 291 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Chargebee | 253 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 246 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Gorgias | 204 | 0.03% |
| 27 | FormAssembly | 200 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 185 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Squarespace | 137 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Recurly | 124 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 20 732 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 7 977 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 771 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 237 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 690 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 455 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 193 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 131 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 761 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 664 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 430 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 416 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 347 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 338 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 181 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 176 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 095 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 949 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 873 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 850 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 846 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 844 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 798 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 693 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 673 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 619 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 577 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 480 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 475 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 422 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 398 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 373 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 306 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 305 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 296 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 291 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 290 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.reporting@deutschebahn.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc.reporting@deutschebahn.com; fo=1 | 279 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 273 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 263 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 259 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 250 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 249 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 249 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 248 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 244 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 241 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 239 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1 | 229 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 228 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 227 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 226 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 224 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 220 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 201 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 196 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 192 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 187 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 184 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 181 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 179 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 174 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 172 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 172 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 170 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 158 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 157 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 157 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 156 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 155 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 139 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 138 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 129 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 128 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 128 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 124 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 124 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 120 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 118 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 117 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 116 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 116 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 115 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 115 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 114 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 113 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 112 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 111 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 111 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 106 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; | 104 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@mailkit.com; | 104 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 103 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 103 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 103 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 103 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 103 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 102 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 100 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 100 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 653 |
| 2 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 643 |
| 3 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 642 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 634 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 608 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 559 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 539 |
| 8 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 562 |
| 9 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 561 |
| 10 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 560 |
| 11 | park-mx.above.com | 4 544 |
| 12 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 471 |
| 13 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 436 |
| 14 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 107 |
| 15 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 088 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 867 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 863 |
| 18 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 860 |
| 19 | mx1.csof.net | 1 603 |
| 20 | mx2.csof.net | 1 603 |
| 21 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 482 |
| 22 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 472 |
| 23 | nan | 1 443 |
| 24 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 300 |
| 25 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 179 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 178 |
| 27 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 177 |
| 28 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 150 |
| 29 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 144 |
| 30 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 137 |
| 31 | mail.eye-mail.net | 1 058 |
| 32 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 998 |
| 33 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 997 |
| 34 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 996 |
| 35 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 996 |
| 36 | mx1.hostinger.in | 979 |
| 37 | mx2.hostinger.in | 952 |
| 38 | localhost | 925 |
| 39 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 914 |
| 40 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 908 |
| 41 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 820 |
| 42 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 818 |
| 43 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 818 |
| 44 | dmail.kagoya.net | 798 |
| 45 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 792 |
| 46 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 789 |
| 47 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 784 |
| 48 | mx.spamexperts.com | 751 |
| 49 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 735 |
| 50 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 731 |
| 51 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 729 |
| 52 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 701 |
| 53 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 691 |
| 54 | mx.aams4.jp | 679 |
| 55 | mx-0.aams4.jp | 675 |
| 56 | mx-1.aams4.jp | 675 |
| 57 | mx.stackmail.com | 637 |
| 58 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 627 |
| 59 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 625 |
| 60 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 619 |
| 61 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 613 |
| 62 | mx.securemx.jp | 603 |
| 63 | smtpin.rzone.de | 597 |
| 64 | sagw.fsi.ne.jp | 577 |
| 65 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 568 |
| 66 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 568 |
| 67 | mail.h-email.net | 564 |
| 68 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 555 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 548 |
| 70 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 511 |
| 71 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 510 |
| 72 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 508 |
| 73 | mail.register.it | 473 |
| 74 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 449 |
| 75 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 421 |
| 76 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 413 |
| 77 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 408 |
| 78 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 407 |
| 79 | mx00.1and1.com | 398 |
| 80 | mx01.1and1.com | 397 |
| 81 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 382 |
| 82 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 382 |
| 83 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 339 |
| 84 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 338 |
| 85 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 325 |
| 86 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 324 |
| 87 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 322 |
| 88 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 316 |
| 89 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 315 |
| 90 | mail4.makeshop.jp | 311 |
| 91 | vlmx21.secure.ne.jp | 307 |
| 92 | vlmx22.secure.ne.jp | 307 |
| 93 | vlmx20.secure.ne.jp | 306 |
| 94 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 303 |
| 95 | mailgw.nic.in | 297 |
| 96 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 281 |
| 97 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 279 |
| 98 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 275 |
| 99 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 274 |
| 100 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 274 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 669 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 6 212 |
| 3 | zoho.com | 6 157 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 5 999 |
| 5 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 811 |
| 6 | websitewelcome.com | 5 166 |
| 7 | mx.ovh.com | 4 325 |
| 8 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 956 |
| 9 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 3 830 |
| 10 | emsd1.com | 3 510 |
| 11 | emailsrvr.com | 3 200 |
| 12 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 990 |
| 13 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 2 973 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 920 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 784 |
| 16 | beget.com | 2 671 |
| 17 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 377 |
| 18 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 352 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 242 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 186 |
| 21 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 184 |
| 22 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 103 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 972 |
| 24 | zcsend.net | 1 892 |
| 25 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 839 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 762 |
| 27 | transmail.net | 1 585 |
| 28 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 554 |
| 29 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 496 |
| 30 | spf.titan.email | 1 487 |
| 31 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 398 |
| 32 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 357 |
| 33 | musvc.com | 1 355 |
| 34 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 333 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 331 |
| 36 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 323 |
| 37 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 313 |
| 38 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 256 |
| 39 | spf.dynect.net | 1 234 |
| 40 | spf.crsend.com | 1 172 |
| 41 | spf.163.com | 1 168 |
| 42 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 163 |
| 43 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 127 |
| 44 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 1 106 |
| 45 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 102 |
| 46 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 101 |
| 47 | spf.makeshop.jp | 1 096 |
| 48 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 071 |
| 49 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 062 |
| 50 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 040 |
| 51 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 997 |
| 52 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 976 |
| 53 | authsmtp.com | 976 |
| 54 | kagoya.net | 971 |
| 55 | spf2.esputnik.com | 971 |
| 56 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 940 |
| 57 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 929 |
| 58 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 924 |
| 59 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 876 |
| 60 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 867 |
| 61 | relay.mailbaby.net | 862 |
| 62 | cmail1.com | 830 |
| 63 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 777 |
| 64 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 753 |
| 65 | ispgateway.de | 753 |
| 66 | _spf.kmitd.com | 751 |
| 67 | spfa.mailendo.com | 743 |
| 68 | spf.improvmx.com | 729 |
| 69 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 718 |
| 70 | mailcontrol.com | 711 |
| 71 | bluehost.com | 707 |
| 72 | spf.aams4.jp | 704 |
| 73 | spf.shopserve.jp | 687 |
| 74 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 665 |
| 75 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 628 |
| 76 | one.zoho.com | 627 |
| 77 | e2ma.net | 624 |
| 78 | spf.securemx.jp | 613 |
| 79 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 611 |
| 80 | zoho.in | 611 |
| 81 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 606 |
| 82 | _spf.aruba.it | 606 |
| 83 | infusionmail.com | 605 |
| 84 | turbo-smtp.com | 594 |
| 85 | spf.mindbox.ru | 593 |
| 86 | spf001.shop-pro.jp | 584 |
| 87 | spf.webapps.net | 578 |
| 88 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 577 |
| 89 | spf.nl2go.com | 570 |
| 90 | spf.hostmar.com | 568 |
| 91 | spf.afas.online | 556 |
| 92 | spf.autopilothq.com | 551 |
| 93 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 547 |
| 94 | spf.stackmail.com | 544 |
| 95 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 544 |
| 96 | spf.mailanyone.net | 533 |
| 97 | agenturserver.de | 518 |
| 98 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 517 |
| 99 | email-od.com | 512 |
| 100 | spf.q-send.jp | 511 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.