Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-12-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 188 473 | 28.54% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 133 844 | 20.27% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 96 553 | 14.62% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 92 099 | 13.94% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 60 200 | 9.11% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 270 | 2.16% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 805 | 1.64% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 8 813 | 1.33% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 004 | 0.91% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 847 | 0.73% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 529 | 0.69% |
| 12 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 391 | 0.66% |
| 13 | OVH Mail | 4 316 | 0.65% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 308 | 0.5% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 3 134 | 0.47% |
| 16 | Beget (RU) | 2 555 | 0.39% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 138 | 0.32% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 115 | 0.32% |
| 19 | Gandi Mail | 1 720 | 0.26% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 617 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 508 | 0.23% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 398 | 0.21% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 309 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 303 | 0.2% |
| 25 | CSC (corporate) | 1 128 | 0.17% |
| 26 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 118 | 0.17% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 014 | 0.15% |
| 28 | ProtonMail | 988 | 0.15% |
| 29 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 835 | 0.13% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 619 | 0.09% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 29 571 | 5.03% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 25 992 | 4.42% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 25 237 | 4.29% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 24 276 | 4.13% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 476 | 3.82% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 19 737 | 3.35% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 921 | 2.2% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 378 | 1.76% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 879 | 1.34% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 093 | 0.7% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 840 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 227 | 0.55% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 720 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 567 | 0.44% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 182 | 0.37% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 993 | 0.34% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 788 | 0.3% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 1 123 | 0.19% |
| 19 | MailerSend | 872 | 0.15% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 714 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Customer.io | 626 | 0.11% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 620 | 0.11% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 348 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 232 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 16 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 9 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Klaviyo | 4 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 496 | 1.1% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 813 | 0.65% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 485 | 0.42% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 051 | 0.35% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 777 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 261 | 0.21% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 024 | 0.17% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 981 | 0.17% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 974 | 0.17% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 815 | 0.14% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 789 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 753 | 0.13% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 671 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 632 | 0.11% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud Email | 596 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 554 | 0.09% |
| 17 | Oracle Cloud | 544 | 0.09% |
| 18 | Zendesk | 530 | 0.09% |
| 19 | Sage Intacct | 518 | 0.09% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 459 | 0.08% |
| 21 | HappyFox | 341 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 314 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 256 | 0.04% |
| 24 | Chargebee | 245 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 237 | 0.04% |
| 26 | FormAssembly | 207 | 0.04% |
| 27 | Gorgias | 192 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 182 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Squarespace | 148 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Recurly | 125 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 20 189 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 7 284 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 798 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 544 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 635 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 451 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 177 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 083 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 746 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 626 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 476 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 423 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 347 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 317 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 057 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 007 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; fo=1; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 987 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 952 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 938 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 932 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 848 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 821 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 786 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 777 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 675 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 664 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 626 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 558 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; sp=reject; fo=1; aspf=s; adkim=s; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 540 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 470 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 457 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 419 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 400 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 399 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 367 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:santander@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:santander@ruf.agari.com | 333 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 294 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 292 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 292 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 291 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 278 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 277 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 269 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 255 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 248 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 248 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 244 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 243 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 235 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 231 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 230 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 229 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 228 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1 | 223 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 222 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 206 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 195 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 193 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 183 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 179 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 178 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 174 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:xlcat@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:xlcat@ruf.agari.com | 173 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 171 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 169 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 161 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 160 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 159 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 158 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 157 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 149 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 140 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 140 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 135 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 132 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 127 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 127 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 122 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 121 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 121 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 117 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 117 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 115 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 115 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 112 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 112 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 111 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 109 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 109 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 108 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 108 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; | 105 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 104 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 104 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 104 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=25; fo=1; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 103 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 103 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 100 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 99 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 10 082 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 10 074 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 10 070 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 10 067 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 10 035 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 717 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 691 |
| 8 | park-mx.above.com | 5 025 |
| 9 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 487 |
| 10 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 485 |
| 11 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 485 |
| 12 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 490 |
| 13 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 451 |
| 14 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 053 |
| 15 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 035 |
| 16 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 900 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 896 |
| 18 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 890 |
| 19 | mx1.csof.net | 1 661 |
| 20 | mx2.csof.net | 1 661 |
| 21 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 502 |
| 22 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 491 |
| 23 | nan | 1 355 |
| 24 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 215 |
| 25 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 214 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 213 |
| 27 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 169 |
| 28 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 163 |
| 29 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 158 |
| 30 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 154 |
| 31 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 131 |
| 32 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 077 |
| 33 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 030 |
| 34 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 029 |
| 35 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 029 |
| 36 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 1 005 |
| 37 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 949 |
| 38 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 947 |
| 39 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 850 |
| 40 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 849 |
| 41 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 841 |
| 42 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 816 |
| 43 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 814 |
| 44 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 814 |
| 45 | mail.eye-mail.net | 806 |
| 46 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 760 |
| 47 | mx.spamexperts.com | 756 |
| 48 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 711 |
| 49 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 708 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 706 |
| 51 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 696 |
| 52 | mail.h-email.net | 682 |
| 53 | localhost | 662 |
| 54 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 621 |
| 55 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 620 |
| 56 | smtpin.rzone.de | 619 |
| 57 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 612 |
| 58 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 606 |
| 59 | mx.stackmail.com | 592 |
| 60 | dmail.kagoya.net | 571 |
| 61 | mx.securemx.jp | 554 |
| 62 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 552 |
| 63 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 540 |
| 64 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 534 |
| 65 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 532 |
| 66 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 531 |
| 67 | mx00.1and1.com | 514 |
| 68 | mx01.1and1.com | 514 |
| 69 | mail.register.it | 478 |
| 70 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 470 |
| 71 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 463 |
| 72 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 458 |
| 73 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 425 |
| 74 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 417 |
| 75 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 410 |
| 76 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 398 |
| 77 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 394 |
| 78 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 394 |
| 79 | relay2.netnames.net | 393 |
| 80 | relay1.netnames.net | 390 |
| 81 | sagw.fsi.ne.jp | 381 |
| 82 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 362 |
| 83 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 353 |
| 84 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 352 |
| 85 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 338 |
| 86 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 336 |
| 87 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 332 |
| 88 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 332 |
| 89 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 332 |
| 90 | mx01.udag.de | 318 |
| 91 | mx00.udag.de | 317 |
| 92 | mailgw.nic.in | 305 |
| 93 | mx.aams4.jp | 302 |
| 94 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 299 |
| 95 | mx-0.aams4.jp | 298 |
| 96 | mx-1.aams4.jp | 298 |
| 97 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 297 |
| 98 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 295 |
| 99 | mx01.1and1.es | 294 |
| 100 | mx00.1and1.es | 293 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 109 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 6 174 |
| 3 | zoho.com | 6 147 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 125 |
| 5 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 759 |
| 6 | websitewelcome.com | 5 357 |
| 7 | mx.ovh.com | 4 253 |
| 8 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 3 994 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 975 |
| 10 | emsd1.com | 3 495 |
| 11 | emailsrvr.com | 3 245 |
| 12 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 3 071 |
| 13 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 949 |
| 14 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 934 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 813 |
| 16 | beget.com | 2 695 |
| 17 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 478 |
| 18 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 277 |
| 19 | stspg-customer.com | 2 226 |
| 20 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 144 |
| 21 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 132 |
| 22 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 127 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 047 |
| 24 | zcsend.net | 1 870 |
| 25 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 822 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 692 |
| 27 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 1 622 |
| 28 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 593 |
| 29 | transmail.net | 1 565 |
| 30 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 523 |
| 31 | spf.titan.email | 1 492 |
| 32 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 416 |
| 33 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 364 |
| 34 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 357 |
| 35 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 345 |
| 36 | musvc.com | 1 344 |
| 37 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 342 |
| 38 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 334 |
| 39 | spf.dynect.net | 1 251 |
| 40 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 237 |
| 41 | spf.crsend.com | 1 190 |
| 42 | spf.163.com | 1 162 |
| 43 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 152 |
| 44 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 137 |
| 45 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 131 |
| 46 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 119 |
| 47 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 099 |
| 48 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 094 |
| 49 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 062 |
| 50 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 008 |
| 51 | authsmtp.com | 983 |
| 52 | spf2.esputnik.com | 948 |
| 53 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 931 |
| 54 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 928 |
| 55 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 863 |
| 56 | cmail1.com | 849 |
| 57 | relay.mailbaby.net | 839 |
| 58 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 834 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 830 |
| 60 | ispgateway.de | 780 |
| 61 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 763 |
| 62 | _spf.kmitd.com | 748 |
| 63 | spf.improvmx.com | 744 |
| 64 | bluehost.com | 744 |
| 65 | spfa.mailendo.com | 732 |
| 66 | mailcontrol.com | 728 |
| 67 | kagoya.net | 718 |
| 68 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 709 |
| 69 | spfgw.fsi.ne.jp | 669 |
| 70 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 669 |
| 71 | e2ma.net | 641 |
| 72 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 633 |
| 73 | zoho.in | 629 |
| 74 | _spf.aruba.it | 624 |
| 75 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 623 |
| 76 | one.zoho.com | 621 |
| 77 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 615 |
| 78 | infusionmail.com | 609 |
| 79 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 594 |
| 80 | spf.webapps.net | 590 |
| 81 | turbo-smtp.com | 589 |
| 82 | spf.makeshop.jp | 589 |
| 83 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 585 |
| 84 | spf.mindbox.ru | 585 |
| 85 | spf.nl2go.com | 574 |
| 86 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 574 |
| 87 | spf.securemx.jp | 571 |
| 88 | spf.afas.online | 564 |
| 89 | spf.autopilothq.com | 561 |
| 90 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 547 |
| 91 | spf.hostmar.com | 541 |
| 92 | spf.mailanyone.net | 540 |
| 93 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 538 |
| 94 | _spf.act-on.net | 533 |
| 95 | outlook.com | 529 |
| 96 | spf.stackmail.com | 521 |
| 97 | agenturserver.de | 517 |
| 98 | msgfocus.com | 509 |
| 99 | email-od.com | 509 |
| 100 | _spf.embluemail.com | 502 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.