Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-11-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 191 559 | 28.72% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 134 394 | 20.15% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 98 754 | 14.81% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 91 198 | 13.67% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 61 480 | 9.22% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 14 130 | 2.12% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 763 | 1.61% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 9 068 | 1.36% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 107 | 0.92% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 5 056 | 0.76% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 661 | 0.7% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 4 592 | 0.69% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 167 | 0.62% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 322 | 0.5% |
| 15 | Rackspace Email | 3 180 | 0.48% |
| 16 | Beget (RU) | 2 436 | 0.37% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 219 | 0.33% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 123 | 0.32% |
| 19 | Gandi Mail | 1 807 | 0.27% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 638 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 512 | 0.23% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 381 | 0.21% |
| 23 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 338 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 335 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 052 | 0.16% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 038 | 0.16% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 970 | 0.15% |
| 28 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 823 | 0.12% |
| 29 | CSC (corporate) | 739 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 650 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 29 285 | 4.95% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 25 926 | 4.38% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 25 287 | 4.27% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 24 094 | 4.07% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 311 | 3.77% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 19 594 | 3.31% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 707 | 2.15% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 286 | 1.74% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 983 | 1.35% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 124 | 0.7% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 865 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 052 | 0.52% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 757 | 0.47% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 547 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 284 | 0.39% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 967 | 0.33% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 778 | 0.3% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 1 141 | 0.19% |
| 19 | MailerSend | 836 | 0.14% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 721 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Customer.io | 630 | 0.11% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 598 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 346 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 236 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 14 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 8 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Klaviyo | 3 | 0.0% |
| 29 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 574 | 1.11% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 713 | 0.63% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 452 | 0.41% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 998 | 0.34% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 755 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 275 | 0.22% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 006 | 0.17% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 975 | 0.16% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 932 | 0.16% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 812 | 0.14% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 767 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 747 | 0.13% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 670 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 602 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud Email | 572 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 564 | 0.1% |
| 17 | Zendesk | 532 | 0.09% |
| 18 | Oracle Cloud | 516 | 0.09% |
| 19 | Sage Intacct | 500 | 0.08% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 429 | 0.07% |
| 21 | HappyFox | 334 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 311 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 256 | 0.04% |
| 24 | Shoptet | 253 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 239 | 0.04% |
| 26 | FormAssembly | 205 | 0.03% |
| 27 | Gorgias | 191 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 172 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Squarespace | 146 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Recurly | 126 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 20 200 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 7 252 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 884 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 132 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 572 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 385 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 203 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 097 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 769 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 725 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 591 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 430 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 342 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 281 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 035 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 982 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 943 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 898 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 879 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 865 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 831 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 792 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 764 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 679 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 654 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 647 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 561 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 477 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 450 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 437 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 417 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 365 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 360 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 306 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 300 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 296 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 283 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 273 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 263 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 255 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 249 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 248 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 246 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 243 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1 | 241 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 240 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 239 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 233 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 230 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 229 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 228 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 225 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 224 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 212 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 211 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 198 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 190 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 185 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 185 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 176 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 174 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 168 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 165 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 163 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 155 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 155 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 147 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 147 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 143 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 141 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 139 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 139 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 126 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 125 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 124 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 124 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 122 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 121 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 118 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 116 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 115 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 115 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 114 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 112 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 110 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 108 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 105 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 105 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 103 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 103 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 103 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:bcc@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:bcc@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 102 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 102 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 102 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 100 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 99 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 99 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 99 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; | 97 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 97 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 10 289 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 10 285 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 10 282 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 10 274 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 10 253 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 947 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 924 |
| 8 | park-mx.above.com | 5 135 |
| 9 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 414 |
| 10 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 412 |
| 11 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 412 |
| 12 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 758 |
| 13 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 710 |
| 14 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 307 |
| 15 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 304 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 296 |
| 17 | mail.h-email.net | 2 237 |
| 18 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 1 961 |
| 19 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 1 942 |
| 20 | mx1.csof.net | 1 909 |
| 21 | mx2.csof.net | 1 909 |
| 22 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 532 |
| 23 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 520 |
| 24 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 444 |
| 25 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 407 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | nan | 1 307 |
| 27 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 286 |
| 28 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 285 |
| 29 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 284 |
| 30 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 204 |
| 31 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 194 |
| 32 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 189 |
| 33 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 058 |
| 34 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 1 035 |
| 35 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 033 |
| 36 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 032 |
| 37 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 031 |
| 38 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 970 |
| 39 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 966 |
| 40 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 909 |
| 41 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 907 |
| 42 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 901 |
| 43 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 854 |
| 44 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 852 |
| 45 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 851 |
| 46 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 786 |
| 47 | mx.spamexperts.com | 770 |
| 48 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 739 |
| 49 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 736 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 723 |
| 51 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 714 |
| 52 | localhost | 711 |
| 53 | mx.stackmail.com | 630 |
| 54 | smtpin.rzone.de | 611 |
| 55 | mx-vip-01.uni5.net | 597 |
| 56 | mx-vip-02.uni5.net | 595 |
| 57 | dmail.kagoya.net | 588 |
| 58 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 588 |
| 59 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 587 |
| 60 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 579 |
| 61 | mx.securemx.jp | 577 |
| 62 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 573 |
| 63 | mail.eye-mail.net | 566 |
| 64 | mx00.1and1.com | 540 |
| 65 | mx01.1and1.com | 540 |
| 66 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 526 |
| 67 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 524 |
| 68 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 519 |
| 69 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 506 |
| 70 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 503 |
| 71 | mail.register.it | 497 |
| 72 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 486 |
| 73 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 467 |
| 74 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 460 |
| 75 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 447 |
| 76 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 434 |
| 77 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 426 |
| 78 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 419 |
| 79 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 414 |
| 80 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 404 |
| 81 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 404 |
| 82 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 365 |
| 83 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 354 |
| 84 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 354 |
| 85 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 330 |
| 86 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 325 |
| 87 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 322 |
| 88 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 319 |
| 89 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 319 |
| 90 | mx01.1and1.es | 316 |
| 91 | mx00.1and1.es | 315 |
| 92 | mailgw.nic.in | 314 |
| 93 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 309 |
| 94 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 305 |
| 95 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 283 |
| 96 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 281 |
| 97 | mx01.1and1.fr | 280 |
| 98 | mx00.1and1.fr | 277 |
| 99 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 275 |
| 100 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 275 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 355 |
| 2 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 408 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 6 309 |
| 4 | zoho.com | 6 205 |
| 5 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 679 |
| 6 | websitewelcome.com | 5 659 |
| 7 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 4 504 |
| 8 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 990 |
| 9 | mx.ovh.com | 3 875 |
| 10 | emsd1.com | 3 460 |
| 11 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 3 434 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 280 |
| 13 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 927 |
| 14 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 920 |
| 15 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 908 |
| 16 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 900 |
| 17 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 2 756 |
| 18 | beget.com | 2 542 |
| 19 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 496 |
| 20 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 296 |
| 21 | stspg-customer.com | 2 209 |
| 22 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 147 |
| 23 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 045 |
| 24 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 968 |
| 25 | zcsend.net | 1 837 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 815 |
| 27 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 741 |
| 28 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 593 |
| 29 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 556 |
| 30 | spf.titan.email | 1 554 |
| 31 | transmail.net | 1 552 |
| 32 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 505 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 439 |
| 34 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 397 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 380 |
| 36 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 348 |
| 37 | musvc.com | 1 332 |
| 38 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 320 |
| 39 | spf.dynect.net | 1 277 |
| 40 | spf.163.com | 1 244 |
| 41 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 199 |
| 42 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 179 |
| 43 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 172 |
| 44 | spf.crsend.com | 1 145 |
| 45 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 118 |
| 46 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 115 |
| 47 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 104 |
| 48 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 083 |
| 49 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 015 |
| 50 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 1 003 |
| 51 | authsmtp.com | 975 |
| 52 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 971 |
| 53 | spf2.esputnik.com | 948 |
| 54 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 935 |
| 55 | relay.mailbaby.net | 904 |
| 56 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 871 |
| 57 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 864 |
| 58 | cmail1.com | 862 |
| 59 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 834 |
| 60 | ispgateway.de | 773 |
| 61 | _spf.uni5.net | 771 |
| 62 | bluehost.com | 769 |
| 63 | _spf.kmitd.com | 767 |
| 64 | kagoya.net | 751 |
| 65 | spfa.mailendo.com | 742 |
| 66 | spf.improvmx.com | 738 |
| 67 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 727 |
| 68 | mailcontrol.com | 721 |
| 69 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 702 |
| 70 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 679 |
| 71 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 677 |
| 72 | zoho.in | 674 |
| 73 | _spf.aruba.it | 666 |
| 74 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 652 |
| 75 | e2ma.net | 637 |
| 76 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 629 |
| 77 | spf.webapps.net | 624 |
| 78 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 616 |
| 79 | infusionmail.com | 607 |
| 80 | turbo-smtp.com | 600 |
| 81 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 591 |
| 82 | one.zoho.com | 591 |
| 83 | spf.securemx.jp | 582 |
| 84 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 570 |
| 85 | spf.nl2go.com | 569 |
| 86 | spf.mindbox.ru | 564 |
| 87 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 559 |
| 88 | spf.autopilothq.com | 557 |
| 89 | spf.afas.online | 554 |
| 90 | spf.hostmar.com | 552 |
| 91 | spf.stackmail.com | 550 |
| 92 | spf.mailanyone.net | 536 |
| 93 | _spf.act-on.net | 531 |
| 94 | agenturserver.de | 520 |
| 95 | msgfocus.com | 517 |
| 96 | email-od.com | 514 |
| 97 | _spf.embluemail.com | 511 |
| 98 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 509 |
| 99 | outlook.com | 504 |
| 100 | spf.a2hosting.com | 499 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.