Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-09-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 199 400 | 28.69% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 139 738 | 20.11% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 103 905 | 14.95% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 93 893 | 13.51% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 63 942 | 9.2% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 15 134 | 2.18% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 330 | 1.63% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 9 641 | 1.39% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 429 | 0.93% |
| 10 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 5 381 | 0.77% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | OVH Mail | 4 991 | 0.72% |
| 12 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 549 | 0.65% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 208 | 0.61% |
| 14 | Rackspace Email | 3 470 | 0.5% |
| 15 | Cisco IronPort | 3 413 | 0.49% |
| 16 | Beget (RU) | 2 544 | 0.37% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 264 | 0.33% |
| 18 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 203 | 0.32% |
| 19 | Gandi Mail | 1 942 | 0.28% |
| 20 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 717 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 600 | 0.23% |
| 22 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 429 | 0.21% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 408 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 312 | 0.19% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 077 | 0.15% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 047 | 0.15% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 1 011 | 0.15% |
| 28 | CSC (corporate) | 949 | 0.14% |
| 29 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 856 | 0.12% |
| 30 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 680 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 29 285 | 4.78% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 27 240 | 4.45% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 26 168 | 4.27% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 24 567 | 4.01% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 22 670 | 3.7% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 20 188 | 3.3% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 548 | 2.05% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 573 | 1.73% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 8 429 | 1.38% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 211 | 0.69% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 994 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 103 | 0.51% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 908 | 0.47% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 580 | 0.42% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 207 | 0.36% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 2 061 | 0.34% |
| 17 | Freshdesk | 1 848 | 0.3% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 1 203 | 0.2% |
| 19 | MailerSend | 790 | 0.13% |
| 20 | Sailthru | 737 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Customer.io | 654 | 0.11% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 596 | 0.1% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 358 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 245 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 14 | 0.0% |
| 26 | Dotdigital | 6 | 0.0% |
| 27 | HubSpot | 6 | 0.0% |
| 28 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 831 | 1.12% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 025 | 0.66% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 449 | 0.4% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 077 | 0.34% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 868 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 274 | 0.21% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 999 | 0.16% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 990 | 0.16% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 982 | 0.16% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 845 | 0.14% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 794 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 769 | 0.13% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 687 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 627 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Greenhouse | 573 | 0.09% |
| 16 | Zendesk | 555 | 0.09% |
| 17 | Oracle Cloud Email | 544 | 0.09% |
| 18 | Sage Intacct | 492 | 0.08% |
| 19 | Oracle Cloud | 462 | 0.08% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 388 | 0.06% |
| 21 | HappyFox | 339 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 312 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 278 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Shoptet | 252 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 233 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Gorgias | 222 | 0.04% |
| 27 | FormAssembly | 194 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 170 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Squarespace | 153 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Recurly | 128 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 21 402 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 7 370 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 4 132 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 012 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 563 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 379 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 256 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 084 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 790 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 731 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 644 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 393 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 392 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 273 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 059 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 046 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 014 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 904 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 867 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 829 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 828 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 790 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 773 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 711 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 673 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 657 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 563 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 462 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 455 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 445 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 366 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 360 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 295 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 290 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 283 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 279 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 277 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 276 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 267 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 266 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1 | 262 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 257 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 256 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 254 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 241 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 238 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 234 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 234 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 230 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 226 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 223 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 221 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 221 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 216 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 205 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 198 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 193 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 193 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 191 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 190 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 186 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 181 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 177 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 174 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 157 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 155 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 152 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 149 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 144 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 132 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 130 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 126 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 124 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 123 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 118 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 118 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 117 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 116 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 116 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 114 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 108 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 105 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 103 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:bcc@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:bcc@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 103 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 103 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 102 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 101 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; | 101 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 100 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 99 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 98 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 98 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 98 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:f1rg2pej@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:f1rg2pej@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 96 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 95 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 95 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 94 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com;ruf=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com | 93 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 10 605 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 10 598 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 10 596 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 10 586 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 10 561 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 6 419 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 6 389 |
| 8 | park-mx.above.com | 5 472 |
| 9 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 237 |
| 10 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 236 |
| 11 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 235 |
| 12 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 710 |
| 13 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 655 |
| 14 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 425 |
| 15 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 419 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 415 |
| 17 | mail.h-email.net | 2 265 |
| 18 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 086 |
| 19 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 062 |
| 20 | mx1.csof.net | 1 810 |
| 21 | mx2.csof.net | 1 810 |
| 22 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 642 |
| 23 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 642 |
| 24 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 631 |
| 25 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 599 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | nan | 1 475 |
| 27 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 352 |
| 28 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 352 |
| 29 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 352 |
| 30 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 1 286 |
| 31 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 1 272 |
| 32 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 1 272 |
| 33 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 1 146 |
| 34 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 1 143 |
| 35 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 1 139 |
| 36 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 129 |
| 37 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 1 096 |
| 38 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 069 |
| 39 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 068 |
| 40 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 068 |
| 41 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 041 |
| 42 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 038 |
| 43 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 918 |
| 44 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 917 |
| 45 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 917 |
| 46 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 872 |
| 47 | mx.spamexperts.com | 821 |
| 48 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 801 |
| 49 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 799 |
| 50 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 769 |
| 51 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 761 |
| 52 | mx.stackmail.com | 735 |
| 53 | localhost | 702 |
| 54 | smtpin.rzone.de | 690 |
| 55 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 605 |
| 56 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 604 |
| 57 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 596 |
| 58 | dmail.kagoya.net | 594 |
| 59 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 591 |
| 60 | mx.securemx.jp | 588 |
| 61 | mx00.1and1.com | 575 |
| 62 | mx01.1and1.com | 575 |
| 63 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 543 |
| 64 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 539 |
| 65 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 534 |
| 66 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 534 |
| 67 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 527 |
| 68 | mail.register.it | 526 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 526 |
| 70 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 462 |
| 71 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 450 |
| 72 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 449 |
| 73 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 445 |
| 74 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 430 |
| 75 | mx1.hostinger.com.br | 428 |
| 76 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 426 |
| 77 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 425 |
| 78 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 421 |
| 79 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 415 |
| 80 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 405 |
| 81 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 403 |
| 82 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 403 |
| 83 | mx2.hostinger.com.br | 377 |
| 84 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 348 |
| 85 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 345 |
| 86 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 345 |
| 87 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 344 |
| 88 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 343 |
| 89 | mailgw.nic.in | 329 |
| 90 | mx01.1and1.fr | 307 |
| 91 | mx01.1and1.es | 306 |
| 92 | mx00.1and1.fr | 304 |
| 93 | mx00.1and1.es | 304 |
| 94 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 291 |
| 95 | mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 285 |
| 96 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 285 |
| 97 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 283 |
| 98 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 279 |
| 99 | vlmx21.secure.ne.jp | 278 |
| 100 | vlmx22.secure.ne.jp | 278 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 10 624 |
| 2 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 803 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 6 761 |
| 4 | zoho.com | 6 507 |
| 5 | websitewelcome.com | 6 369 |
| 6 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 5 528 |
| 7 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 4 630 |
| 8 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 216 |
| 9 | mx.ovh.com | 4 150 |
| 10 | emsd1.com | 3 539 |
| 11 | emailsrvr.com | 3 529 |
| 12 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 3 180 |
| 13 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 094 |
| 14 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 3 034 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 978 |
| 16 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 953 |
| 17 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 941 |
| 18 | beget.com | 2 639 |
| 19 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 486 |
| 20 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 473 |
| 21 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 367 |
| 22 | stspg-customer.com | 2 219 |
| 23 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 083 |
| 24 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 030 |
| 25 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 949 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | zcsend.net | 1 908 |
| 27 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 1 709 |
| 28 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 706 |
| 29 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 624 |
| 30 | transmail.net | 1 616 |
| 31 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 591 |
| 32 | spf.titan.email | 1 546 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 519 |
| 34 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 500 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 474 |
| 36 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 406 |
| 37 | spf.dynect.net | 1 360 |
| 38 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 358 |
| 39 | musvc.com | 1 344 |
| 40 | spf.163.com | 1 274 |
| 41 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 270 |
| 42 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 251 |
| 43 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 231 |
| 44 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 195 |
| 45 | spf.crsend.com | 1 193 |
| 46 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 153 |
| 47 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 141 |
| 48 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 127 |
| 49 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 035 |
| 50 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 1 032 |
| 51 | authsmtp.com | 1 006 |
| 52 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 959 |
| 53 | spf2.esputnik.com | 957 |
| 54 | cmail1.com | 909 |
| 55 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 899 |
| 56 | bluehost.com | 894 |
| 57 | relay.mailbaby.net | 872 |
| 58 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 864 |
| 59 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 822 |
| 60 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 821 |
| 61 | ispgateway.de | 818 |
| 62 | _spf.kmitd.com | 788 |
| 63 | spf.improvmx.com | 770 |
| 64 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 760 |
| 65 | mailcontrol.com | 749 |
| 66 | kagoya.net | 747 |
| 67 | spfa.mailendo.com | 743 |
| 68 | _spf.aruba.it | 719 |
| 69 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 718 |
| 70 | zoho.in | 702 |
| 71 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 700 |
| 72 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 698 |
| 73 | e2ma.net | 690 |
| 74 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 658 |
| 75 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 647 |
| 76 | spf.webapps.net | 641 |
| 77 | infusionmail.com | 640 |
| 78 | spf.stackmail.com | 635 |
| 79 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 624 |
| 80 | spf.hostmar.com | 618 |
| 81 | spf.nl2go.com | 617 |
| 82 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 604 |
| 83 | spf.autopilothq.com | 600 |
| 84 | spf.securemx.jp | 591 |
| 85 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 576 |
| 86 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 575 |
| 87 | turbo-smtp.com | 570 |
| 88 | spf.mindbox.ru | 558 |
| 89 | spf.afas.online | 556 |
| 90 | agenturserver.de | 554 |
| 91 | _spf.arandomserver.com | 550 |
| 92 | spf.mailanyone.net | 547 |
| 93 | _spf.act-on.net | 542 |
| 94 | _spf.embluemail.com | 538 |
| 95 | spf.a2hosting.com | 536 |
| 96 | outlook.com | 533 |
| 97 | msgfocus.com | 531 |
| 98 | email-od.com | 527 |
| 99 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 514 |
| 100 | outboundmail.convio.net | 509 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.