Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-08-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 205 878 | 28.72% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 140 750 | 19.64% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 109 950 | 15.34% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 94 765 | 13.22% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 65 053 | 9.08% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 17 027 | 2.38% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 12 133 | 1.69% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 9 781 | 1.36% |
| 9 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 6 603 | 0.92% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 6 342 | 0.88% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 890 | 0.68% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 4 227 | 0.59% |
| 13 | Beget (RU) | 4 097 | 0.57% |
| 14 | Rackspace Email | 3 783 | 0.53% |
| 15 | Amazon WorkMail | 3 709 | 0.52% |
| 16 | Cisco IronPort | 3 303 | 0.46% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 897 | 0.4% |
| 18 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 2 129 | 0.3% |
| 19 | Mailgun (inbound) | 1 919 | 0.27% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 792 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 609 | 0.22% |
| 22 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 601 | 0.22% |
| 23 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 532 | 0.21% |
| 24 | FastMail | 1 465 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 373 | 0.19% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 218 | 0.17% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 977 | 0.14% |
| 28 | Reg.ru | 893 | 0.12% |
| 29 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 772 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 728 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 27 511 | 4.42% |
| 2 | Amazon SES | 25 762 | 4.14% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 24 805 | 3.98% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 23 347 | 3.75% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 20 350 | 3.27% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 18 901 | 3.04% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 505 | 2.01% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 9 202 | 1.48% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 575 | 1.22% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 239 | 0.68% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 710 | 0.6% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 417 | 0.55% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 596 | 0.42% |
| 14 | SparkPost | 2 385 | 0.38% |
| 15 | Constant Contact | 2 365 | 0.38% |
| 16 | Freshdesk | 1 710 | 0.27% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 577 | 0.25% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 982 | 0.16% |
| 19 | Sailthru | 722 | 0.12% |
| 20 | MailerSend | 657 | 0.11% |
| 21 | Customer.io | 608 | 0.1% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 582 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 358 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 220 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 14 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 7 | 0.0% |
| 27 | Dotdigital | 3 | 0.0% |
| 28 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 7 123 | 1.14% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 872 | 0.62% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 602 | 0.42% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 988 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 452 | 0.23% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 237 | 0.2% |
| 7 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 047 | 0.17% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 009 | 0.16% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 978 | 0.16% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 936 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 818 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 716 | 0.12% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 695 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Greenhouse | 617 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 533 | 0.09% |
| 16 | Zendesk | 523 | 0.08% |
| 17 | Sage Intacct | 508 | 0.08% |
| 18 | Oracle Cloud Email | 454 | 0.07% |
| 19 | Oracle Cloud | 437 | 0.07% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 351 | 0.06% |
| 21 | HappyFox | 346 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 328 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Squarespace | 295 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 263 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 239 | 0.04% |
| 26 | FormAssembly | 224 | 0.04% |
| 27 | Gorgias | 196 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 162 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Recurly | 135 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Shoptet | 117 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 21 568 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 6 994 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 674 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 925 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 451 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 336 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 994 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 766 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 1 682 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 665 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 659 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 266 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 264 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 089 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 035 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 019 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 958 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 890 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 886 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 837 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 790 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 771 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 731 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 721 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 708 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 627 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 555 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 420 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 420 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 416 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 410 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 345 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 305 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 284 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 283 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 264 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 264 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1 | 253 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 251 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 241 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 233 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 231 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 228 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 227 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 226 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 213 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 211 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 211 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 203 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 201 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 201 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 192 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 191 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 190 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 183 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 181 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 176 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 153 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 152 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 149 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 144 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 142 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 139 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 133 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 127 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 126 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.em.secureserver.net | 124 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 122 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 119 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 118 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 118 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=quarantine;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 113 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=90; sp=none | 113 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 112 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 111 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 110 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 106 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 105 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 102 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 100 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 99 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 99 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 99 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 98 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 97 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 97 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 96 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 94 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 93 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 90 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 89 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com;ruf=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com | 88 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 88 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:tcod1eh2@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 86 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 84 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 84 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 82 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 81 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 81 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 8 421 |
| 2 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 8 421 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 8 415 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 8 410 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 8 404 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 6 783 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 6 759 |
| 8 | park-mx.above.com | 5 798 |
| 9 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 565 |
| 10 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 564 |
| 11 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 564 |
| 12 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 982 |
| 13 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 975 |
| 14 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 964 |
| 15 | nan | 2 932 |
| 16 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 532 |
| 17 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 500 |
| 18 | mail.h-email.net | 2 460 |
| 19 | mx1.hostinger.com | 2 212 |
| 20 | mx2.hostinger.com | 2 150 |
| 21 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 947 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 946 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 946 |
| 24 | mx1.csof.net | 1 781 |
| 25 | mx2.csof.net | 1 781 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 579 |
| 27 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 569 |
| 28 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 1 532 |
| 29 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 1 531 |
| 30 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 1 523 |
| 31 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 486 |
| 32 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 443 |
| 33 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 339 |
| 34 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 337 |
| 35 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 296 |
| 36 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 195 |
| 37 | smtpin.rzone.de | 1 095 |
| 38 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 1 035 |
| 39 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 963 |
| 40 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 963 |
| 41 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 963 |
| 42 | localhost | 881 |
| 43 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 859 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 853 |
| 45 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 850 |
| 46 | mx.spamexperts.com | 849 |
| 47 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 781 |
| 48 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 776 |
| 49 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 773 |
| 50 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 771 |
| 51 | mx00.1and1.com | 769 |
| 52 | mx01.1and1.com | 764 |
| 53 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 751 |
| 54 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 750 |
| 55 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 740 |
| 56 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 740 |
| 57 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 680 |
| 58 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 637 |
| 59 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 632 |
| 60 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 628 |
| 61 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 564 |
| 62 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 562 |
| 63 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 556 |
| 64 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 552 |
| 65 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 543 |
| 66 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 539 |
| 67 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 530 |
| 68 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 521 |
| 69 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 517 |
| 70 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 514 |
| 71 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 512 |
| 72 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 500 |
| 73 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 499 |
| 74 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 498 |
| 75 | mx.securemx.jp | 485 |
| 76 | mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 485 |
| 77 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 483 |
| 78 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 467 |
| 79 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 461 |
| 80 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 459 |
| 81 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 458 |
| 82 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 453 |
| 83 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 410 |
| 84 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 409 |
| 85 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 386 |
| 86 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 386 |
| 87 | mail.register.it | 373 |
| 88 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 325 |
| 89 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 324 |
| 90 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 323 |
| 91 | dmail.kagoya.net | 315 |
| 92 | mail.eye-mail.net | 314 |
| 93 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 308 |
| 94 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 305 |
| 95 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 303 |
| 96 | mx01.1and1.fr | 300 |
| 97 | mx00.1and1.fr | 298 |
| 98 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 296 |
| 99 | mx00.1and1.es | 296 |
| 100 | mx01.1and1.es | 295 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | websitewelcome.com | 9 571 |
| 2 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 8 455 |
| 3 | relay.mailchannels.net | 7 974 |
| 4 | secureserver.net | 7 689 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 6 368 |
| 6 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 689 |
| 7 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 4 676 |
| 8 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 4 366 |
| 9 | beget.com | 4 282 |
| 10 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 3 932 |
| 11 | emailsrvr.com | 3 832 |
| 12 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 787 |
| 13 | mx.ovh.com | 3 433 |
| 14 | emsd1.com | 3 399 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 3 373 |
| 16 | _spf.mlsend.com | 3 057 |
| 17 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 2 981 |
| 18 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 917 |
| 19 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 878 |
| 20 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 844 |
| 21 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 654 |
| 22 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 373 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 118 |
| 24 | stspg-customer.com | 2 112 |
| 25 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 026 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | zcsend.net | 2 003 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 979 |
| 28 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 899 |
| 29 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 751 |
| 30 | spf.titan.email | 1 738 |
| 31 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 732 |
| 32 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 707 |
| 33 | transmail.net | 1 686 |
| 34 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 605 |
| 35 | spf.163.com | 1 514 |
| 36 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 512 |
| 37 | bluehost.com | 1 457 |
| 38 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 437 |
| 39 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 412 |
| 40 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 382 |
| 41 | spf.dynect.net | 1 351 |
| 42 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 303 |
| 43 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 222 |
| 44 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 220 |
| 45 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 189 |
| 46 | spf.crsend.com | 1 187 |
| 47 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 158 |
| 48 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 151 |
| 49 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 1 134 |
| 50 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 083 |
| 51 | authsmtp.com | 1 067 |
| 52 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 1 043 |
| 53 | spf.stackmail.com | 1 011 |
| 54 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 984 |
| 55 | cmail1.com | 965 |
| 56 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 953 |
| 57 | musvc.com | 949 |
| 58 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 869 |
| 59 | ispgateway.de | 822 |
| 60 | e2ma.net | 772 |
| 61 | spf.cloudus.oxcs.net | 771 |
| 62 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 746 |
| 63 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 737 |
| 64 | infusionmail.com | 728 |
| 65 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 727 |
| 66 | zoho.in | 719 |
| 67 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 709 |
| 68 | spf.a2hosting.com | 707 |
| 69 | agenturserver.de | 703 |
| 70 | webhostbox.net | 700 |
| 71 | mailcontrol.com | 698 |
| 72 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 697 |
| 73 | spf.improvmx.com | 689 |
| 74 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 687 |
| 75 | nicmail.ru | 678 |
| 76 | spf2.esputnik.com | 664 |
| 77 | _spf.aruba.it | 648 |
| 78 | spf.autopilothq.com | 641 |
| 79 | spfa.mailendo.com | 627 |
| 80 | spf.registeredsite.com | 618 |
| 81 | outlook.com | 588 |
| 82 | spf.nl2go.com | 587 |
| 83 | spf.mailanyone.net | 581 |
| 84 | _spf.act-on.net | 577 |
| 85 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 575 |
| 86 | spf.afas.online | 573 |
| 87 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 566 |
| 88 | msgfocus.com | 565 |
| 89 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 557 |
| 90 | outboundmail.convio.net | 556 |
| 91 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 547 |
| 92 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 533 |
| 93 | spf.mindbox.ru | 524 |
| 94 | email-od.com | 518 |
| 95 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 515 |
| 96 | send.aweber.com | 514 |
| 97 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 501 |
| 98 | _spfprod.ngpvan.com | 496 |
| 99 | icpbounce.com | 492 |
| 100 | spf.securemx.jp | 491 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.