Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-07-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 184 200 | 28.19% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 129 955 | 19.89% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 99 136 | 15.17% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 87 063 | 13.33% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 59 246 | 9.07% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 15 571 | 2.38% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 11 674 | 1.79% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 9 239 | 1.41% |
| 9 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 6 139 | 0.94% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 5 810 | 0.89% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 378 | 0.67% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 3 867 | 0.59% |
| 13 | Beget (RU) | 3 621 | 0.55% |
| 14 | Rackspace Email | 3 588 | 0.55% |
| 15 | Amazon WorkMail | 3 513 | 0.54% |
| 16 | Cisco IronPort | 3 090 | 0.47% |
| 17 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 677 | 0.41% |
| 18 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 2 037 | 0.31% |
| 19 | Mailgun (inbound) | 1 813 | 0.28% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 672 | 0.26% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 489 | 0.23% |
| 22 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 473 | 0.23% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 327 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 322 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 264 | 0.19% |
| 26 | NetEase Mail | 1 105 | 0.17% |
| 27 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 1 072 | 0.16% |
| 28 | ProtonMail | 868 | 0.13% |
| 29 | Reg.ru | 824 | 0.13% |
| 30 | CSC (corporate) | 773 | 0.12% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 25 479 | 4.51% |
| 2 | Amazon SES | 23 783 | 4.21% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 22 825 | 4.04% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 21 622 | 3.82% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 18 753 | 3.32% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 17 509 | 3.1% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 11 516 | 2.04% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 8 397 | 1.49% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 045 | 1.25% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 974 | 0.7% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 363 | 0.59% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 087 | 0.55% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 412 | 0.43% |
| 14 | Constant Contact | 2 228 | 0.39% |
| 15 | SparkPost | 2 159 | 0.38% |
| 16 | Freshdesk | 1 580 | 0.28% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 461 | 0.26% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 958 | 0.17% |
| 19 | Sailthru | 685 | 0.12% |
| 20 | Customer.io | 558 | 0.1% |
| 21 | MailerSend | 551 | 0.1% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 523 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 346 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 212 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 13 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 9 | 0.0% |
| 27 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Klaviyo | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 650 | 1.18% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 577 | 0.63% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 432 | 0.43% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 833 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 353 | 0.24% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 138 | 0.2% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 995 | 0.18% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 978 | 0.17% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 896 | 0.16% |
| 10 | ClickDimensions | 874 | 0.15% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 740 | 0.13% |
| 12 | PayPal Braintree | 650 | 0.11% |
| 13 | ConnectWise | 627 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Greenhouse | 580 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Zendesk | 483 | 0.09% |
| 16 | Sage Intacct | 469 | 0.08% |
| 17 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 427 | 0.08% |
| 18 | Oracle Cloud Email | 401 | 0.07% |
| 19 | Oracle Cloud | 400 | 0.07% |
| 20 | HappyFox | 339 | 0.06% |
| 21 | Lark / Feishu | 329 | 0.06% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 312 | 0.06% |
| 23 | Squarespace | 268 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 252 | 0.04% |
| 25 | FormAssembly | 207 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 204 | 0.04% |
| 27 | Gorgias | 180 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Odoo | 145 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Recurly | 121 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Shoptet | 103 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 19 449 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 6 233 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 420 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 735 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 205 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 106 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 860 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 575 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 514 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 1 491 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 220 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 1 171 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 110 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 032 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 946 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 868 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 849 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 808 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 775 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 736 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 733 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 726 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 648 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 639 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 590 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 510 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 496 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 392 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 386 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 385 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 372 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 290 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 277 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 267 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 245 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 243 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 234 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 231 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 226 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 223 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 216 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1 | 215 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 214 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 214 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 203 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 200 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 197 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 192 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 189 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 185 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 183 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 181 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 171 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 167 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 155 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 153 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 152 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 142 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 141 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:abbvie@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:abbvie@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 139 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 136 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 136 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 135 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; adkim=s; aspf=s; p=quarantine | 132 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 132 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 129 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 120 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=90; sp=none | 114 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 114 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.em.secureserver.net | 114 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 112 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 111 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 110 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 109 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 102 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 101 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 97 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 96 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 94 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=quarantine;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 93 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 93 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 88 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 87 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 86 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 86 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 86 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 85 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 83 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 83 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@ruf.agari.com | 82 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 79 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:tcod1eh2@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 79 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; | 78 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com;ruf=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com | 78 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 78 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 75 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;""p=quarantine;""pct=100;""rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com;""ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 74 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 7 974 |
| 2 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 7 971 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 7 965 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 7 963 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 7 953 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 6 499 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 6 479 |
| 8 | park-mx.above.com | 3 018 |
| 9 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 841 |
| 10 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 832 |
| 11 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 820 |
| 12 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 816 |
| 13 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 816 |
| 14 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 815 |
| 15 | nan | 2 512 |
| 16 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 375 |
| 17 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 351 |
| 18 | mail.h-email.net | 2 271 |
| 19 | mx1.hostinger.com | 1 932 |
| 20 | mx2.hostinger.com | 1 877 |
| 21 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 774 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 773 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 773 |
| 24 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 497 |
| 25 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 1 495 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 1 490 |
| 27 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 489 |
| 28 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 1 485 |
| 29 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 407 |
| 30 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 363 |
| 31 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 238 |
| 32 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 235 |
| 33 | mx1.csof.net | 1 188 |
| 34 | mx2.csof.net | 1 188 |
| 35 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 1 107 |
| 36 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 061 |
| 37 | smtpin.rzone.de | 1 040 |
| 38 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 962 |
| 39 | localhost | 892 |
| 40 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 889 |
| 41 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 889 |
| 42 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 888 |
| 43 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 785 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 777 |
| 45 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 776 |
| 46 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 771 |
| 47 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 771 |
| 48 | mx.spamexperts.com | 759 |
| 49 | mx00.1and1.com | 739 |
| 50 | mx01.1and1.com | 734 |
| 51 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 699 |
| 52 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 696 |
| 53 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 689 |
| 54 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 686 |
| 55 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 684 |
| 56 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 681 |
| 57 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 633 |
| 58 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 598 |
| 59 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 594 |
| 60 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 590 |
| 61 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 531 |
| 62 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 525 |
| 63 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 515 |
| 64 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 513 |
| 65 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 505 |
| 66 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 501 |
| 67 | mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 497 |
| 68 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 497 |
| 69 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 496 |
| 70 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 489 |
| 71 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 482 |
| 72 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 471 |
| 73 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 469 |
| 74 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 466 |
| 75 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 454 |
| 76 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 453 |
| 77 | mx.securemx.jp | 434 |
| 78 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 429 |
| 79 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 425 |
| 80 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 416 |
| 81 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 411 |
| 82 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 409 |
| 83 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 402 |
| 84 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 402 |
| 85 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 365 |
| 86 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 364 |
| 87 | mail.register.it | 342 |
| 88 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 283 |
| 89 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 283 |
| 90 | dmail.kagoya.net | 281 |
| 91 | mx01.1and1.fr | 281 |
| 92 | mx00.1and1.fr | 279 |
| 93 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 278 |
| 94 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 278 |
| 95 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 277 |
| 96 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 274 |
| 97 | mx00.1and1.es | 272 |
| 98 | mx-02-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 271 |
| 99 | mx01.1and1.es | 271 |
| 100 | alt1.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 271 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | websitewelcome.com | 8 498 |
| 2 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 7 942 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 6 987 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 938 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 5 810 |
| 6 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 4 563 |
| 7 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 4 079 |
| 8 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 837 |
| 9 | beget.com | 3 762 |
| 10 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 612 |
| 11 | emailsrvr.com | 3 596 |
| 12 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 3 543 |
| 13 | mx.ovh.com | 3 105 |
| 14 | emsd1.com | 3 103 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 3 083 |
| 16 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 788 |
| 17 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 763 |
| 18 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 667 |
| 19 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 623 |
| 20 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 600 |
| 21 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 165 |
| 22 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 2 132 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 941 |
| 24 | stspg-customer.com | 1 941 |
| 25 | zcsend.net | 1 858 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 849 |
| 27 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 1 849 |
| 28 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 827 |
| 29 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 644 |
| 30 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 584 |
| 31 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 563 |
| 32 | transmail.net | 1 522 |
| 33 | spf.titan.email | 1 511 |
| 34 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 494 |
| 35 | bluehost.com | 1 373 |
| 36 | spf.163.com | 1 373 |
| 37 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 336 |
| 38 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 330 |
| 39 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 287 |
| 40 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 275 |
| 41 | spf.dynect.net | 1 240 |
| 42 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 226 |
| 43 | _spf.perfora.net | 1 147 |
| 44 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 105 |
| 45 | spf.crsend.com | 1 083 |
| 46 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 077 |
| 47 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 056 |
| 48 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 024 |
| 49 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 1 021 |
| 50 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 017 |
| 51 | spf.improvmx.com | 1 010 |
| 52 | authsmtp.com | 998 |
| 53 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 966 |
| 54 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 915 |
| 55 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 901 |
| 56 | spf.stackmail.com | 899 |
| 57 | cmail1.com | 881 |
| 58 | musvc.com | 844 |
| 59 | spf.cloudus.oxcs.net | 796 |
| 60 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 788 |
| 61 | ispgateway.de | 744 |
| 62 | e2ma.net | 733 |
| 63 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 687 |
| 64 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 685 |
| 65 | infusionmail.com | 678 |
| 66 | spf.registeredsite.com | 659 |
| 67 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 656 |
| 68 | mailcontrol.com | 655 |
| 69 | zoho.in | 654 |
| 70 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 644 |
| 71 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 642 |
| 72 | spf.a2hosting.com | 635 |
| 73 | agenturserver.de | 619 |
| 74 | nicmail.ru | 617 |
| 75 | webhostbox.net | 615 |
| 76 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 612 |
| 77 | spfa.mailendo.com | 590 |
| 78 | spf2.esputnik.com | 590 |
| 79 | spf.autopilothq.com | 588 |
| 80 | aruba.it | 559 |
| 81 | _spf.act-on.net | 550 |
| 82 | spf.mailanyone.net | 548 |
| 83 | spf.nl2go.com | 546 |
| 84 | outlook.com | 540 |
| 85 | msgfocus.com | 518 |
| 86 | outboundmail.convio.net | 516 |
| 87 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 516 |
| 88 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 507 |
| 89 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 505 |
| 90 | spf.afas.online | 501 |
| 91 | email-od.com | 492 |
| 92 | send.aweber.com | 485 |
| 93 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 478 |
| 94 | spf.mindbox.ru | 475 |
| 95 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 457 |
| 96 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 456 |
| 97 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 456 |
| 98 | icpbounce.com | 450 |
| 99 | _spfprod.ngpvan.com | 444 |
| 100 | _spf.lolipop.jp | 438 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.