Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-02-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 202 336 | 28.3% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 140 430 | 19.64% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 111 147 | 15.54% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 92 555 | 12.94% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 63 881 | 8.93% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 20 388 | 2.85% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 13 320 | 1.86% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 10 720 | 1.5% |
| 9 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 8 058 | 1.13% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 5 881 | 0.82% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Rackspace Email | 4 332 | 0.61% |
| 12 | Amazon WorkMail | 3 875 | 0.54% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 781 | 0.53% |
| 14 | Beget (RU) | 3 724 | 0.52% |
| 15 | Cisco IronPort | 3 573 | 0.5% |
| 16 | OVH Mail | 3 536 | 0.49% |
| 17 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 2 437 | 0.34% |
| 18 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 352 | 0.33% |
| 19 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 040 | 0.29% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 683 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 516 | 0.21% |
| 22 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 496 | 0.21% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 464 | 0.2% |
| 24 | NetEase Mail | 1 272 | 0.18% |
| 25 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 219 | 0.17% |
| 26 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 1 199 | 0.17% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 970 | 0.14% |
| 28 | Titan (Hostinger) | 912 | 0.13% |
| 29 | NetEase 163 | 821 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 810 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 29 250 | 4.85% |
| 2 | Amazon SES | 25 492 | 4.23% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 25 368 | 4.21% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 23 860 | 3.96% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 20 641 | 3.43% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 18 853 | 3.13% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 255 | 2.03% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 8 880 | 1.47% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 7 232 | 1.2% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 610 | 0.77% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 440 | 0.57% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 306 | 0.55% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 700 | 0.45% |
| 14 | Constant Contact | 2 455 | 0.41% |
| 15 | SparkPost | 2 429 | 0.4% |
| 16 | Freshdesk | 1 848 | 0.31% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 653 | 0.27% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 877 | 0.15% |
| 19 | Sailthru | 751 | 0.12% |
| 20 | Customer.io | 679 | 0.11% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 488 | 0.08% |
| 22 | MailerSend | 464 | 0.08% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 385 | 0.06% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 237 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 18 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 9 | 0.0% |
| 27 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 7 757 | 1.29% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 874 | 0.64% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 520 | 0.42% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 164 | 0.36% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 516 | 0.25% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 169 | 0.19% |
| 7 | BigCommerce | 1 141 | 0.19% |
| 8 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 095 | 0.18% |
| 9 | ClickDimensions | 1 045 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 999 | 0.17% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 795 | 0.13% |
| 12 | PayPal Braintree | 720 | 0.12% |
| 13 | ConnectWise | 711 | 0.12% |
| 14 | Zendesk | 601 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Greenhouse | 574 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 509 | 0.08% |
| 17 | Sage Intacct | 470 | 0.08% |
| 18 | Oracle Cloud | 358 | 0.06% |
| 19 | HappyFox | 353 | 0.06% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 310 | 0.05% |
| 21 | Oracle Cloud Email | 307 | 0.05% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 300 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 291 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Squarespace | 246 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Chargebee | 207 | 0.03% |
| 26 | Gorgias | 204 | 0.03% |
| 27 | FormAssembly | 186 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Recurly | 139 | 0.02% |
| 29 | Odoo | 124 | 0.02% |
| 30 | SurveyMonkey | 59 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 22 065 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 5 945 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 789 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 741 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 293 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 137 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 2 012 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 895 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 1 584 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 529 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 348 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 101 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 088 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 006 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 981 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 966 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 825 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 814 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 814 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 790 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 724 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 679 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 643 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 581 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 566 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 562 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 451 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 429 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 388 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 387 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 332 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 300 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 288 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 267 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1 | 257 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 250 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 247 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 244 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 242 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 242 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 236 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 229 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 225 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 210 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 208 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 206 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 198 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 187 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 181 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 178 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 176 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 175 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 175 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 173 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 165 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 157 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 157 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 149 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 144 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 134 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.em.secureserver.net | 132 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 130 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 129 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 127 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 127 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 124 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 123 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 121 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 120 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 120 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 119 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 116 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 111 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 103 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 102 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 101 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 97 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=90; sp=none | 97 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 96 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 95 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 95 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 94 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@ruf.agari.com | 93 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 89 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com;ruf=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com | 88 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 87 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; fo=1; | 85 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 84 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=quarantine;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 82 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 82 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 82 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 81 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; sp=reject; rua=mailto:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com; ruf=mailto:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com; adkim=r; aspf=r; fo=1; rf=afrf; ri=3600 | 81 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:tcod1eh2@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 79 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; pct=100; p=none | 79 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 78 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 77 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 77 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 77 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 76 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 506 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 505 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 496 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 493 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 482 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 7 510 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 7 474 |
| 8 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 3 180 |
| 9 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 3 179 |
| 10 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 3 171 |
| 11 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 748 |
| 12 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 748 |
| 13 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 745 |
| 14 | park-mx.above.com | 2 744 |
| 15 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 641 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 631 |
| 17 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 629 |
| 18 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 599 |
| 19 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 564 |
| 20 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 644 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 634 |
| 22 | mx1.hostinger.com | 1 428 |
| 23 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 387 |
| 24 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 385 |
| 25 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 380 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx2.hostinger.com | 1 353 |
| 27 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 322 |
| 28 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 1 177 |
| 29 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 1 175 |
| 30 | localhost | 1 138 |
| 31 | mail.h-email.net | 1 127 |
| 32 | mx.stackmail.com | 1 078 |
| 33 | nan | 1 027 |
| 34 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 022 |
| 35 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 021 |
| 36 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 020 |
| 37 | mx1.csof.net | 998 |
| 38 | mx2.csof.net | 998 |
| 39 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 977 |
| 40 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 970 |
| 41 | smtpin.rzone.de | 941 |
| 42 | mx.spamexperts.com | 857 |
| 43 | mx00.1and1.com | 848 |
| 44 | mx01.1and1.com | 844 |
| 45 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 800 |
| 46 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 798 |
| 47 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 795 |
| 48 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 791 |
| 49 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 788 |
| 50 | mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 771 |
| 51 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 771 |
| 52 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 768 |
| 53 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 754 |
| 54 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 751 |
| 55 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 742 |
| 56 | mail.eye-mail.net | 697 |
| 57 | mx.securemx.jp | 581 |
| 58 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 555 |
| 59 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 553 |
| 60 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 544 |
| 61 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 543 |
| 62 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 542 |
| 63 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 540 |
| 64 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 539 |
| 65 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 539 |
| 66 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 524 |
| 67 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 505 |
| 68 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 500 |
| 69 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 499 |
| 70 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 498 |
| 71 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 498 |
| 72 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 498 |
| 73 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 497 |
| 74 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 488 |
| 75 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 483 |
| 76 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 431 |
| 77 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 409 |
| 78 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 407 |
| 79 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 407 |
| 80 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 406 |
| 81 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 393 |
| 82 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 390 |
| 83 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 383 |
| 84 | mail.register.it | 336 |
| 85 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 324 |
| 86 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 322 |
| 87 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 322 |
| 88 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 322 |
| 89 | primary.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 316 |
| 90 | alt1.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 316 |
| 91 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 315 |
| 92 | alt2.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 313 |
| 93 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 313 |
| 94 | alt3.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 311 |
| 95 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 311 |
| 96 | mx-01-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 297 |
| 97 | mx1.mtaroutes.com | 293 |
| 98 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 288 |
| 99 | mx2.mtaroutes.com | 285 |
| 100 | mx-02-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 284 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 433 |
| 2 | websitewelcome.com | 7 724 |
| 3 | relay.mailchannels.net | 7 160 |
| 4 | secureserver.net | 7 010 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 5 938 |
| 6 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 5 251 |
| 7 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 4 351 |
| 8 | emailsrvr.com | 3 941 |
| 9 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 834 |
| 10 | beget.com | 3 834 |
| 11 | spf.mail.qq.com | 3 785 |
| 12 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 521 |
| 13 | emsd1.com | 3 276 |
| 14 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 197 |
| 15 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 3 135 |
| 16 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 3 020 |
| 17 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 947 |
| 18 | mx.ovh.com | 2 842 |
| 19 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 702 |
| 20 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 2 228 |
| 21 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 179 |
| 22 | spf.mxhichina.com | 2 168 |
| 23 | stspg-customer.com | 2 162 |
| 24 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 130 |
| 25 | spf.messagelabs.com | 2 006 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | zcsend.net | 1 893 |
| 27 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 890 |
| 28 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 860 |
| 29 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 773 |
| 30 | bluehost.com | 1 704 |
| 31 | transmail.net | 1 647 |
| 32 | spf.163.com | 1 559 |
| 33 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 553 |
| 34 | spf.dynect.net | 1 510 |
| 35 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 1 444 |
| 36 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 429 |
| 37 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 384 |
| 38 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 274 |
| 39 | spf.crsend.com | 1 244 |
| 40 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 212 |
| 41 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 209 |
| 42 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 201 |
| 43 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 164 |
| 44 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 108 |
| 45 | spf.improvmx.com | 1 099 |
| 46 | authsmtp.com | 1 082 |
| 47 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 079 |
| 48 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 075 |
| 49 | spf.titan.email | 1 073 |
| 50 | cmail1.com | 1 063 |
| 51 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 1 056 |
| 52 | spf.registeredsite.com | 1 046 |
| 53 | _spf.perfora.net | 999 |
| 54 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 961 |
| 55 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 894 |
| 56 | spf.stackmail.com | 889 |
| 57 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 879 |
| 58 | spf.cloudus.oxcs.net | 858 |
| 59 | musvc.com | 853 |
| 60 | e2ma.net | 824 |
| 61 | infusionmail.com | 796 |
| 62 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 775 |
| 63 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 774 |
| 64 | mailcontrol.com | 762 |
| 65 | ispgateway.de | 712 |
| 66 | spf.autopilothq.com | 691 |
| 67 | nicmail.ru | 671 |
| 68 | outlook.com | 665 |
| 69 | spf2.esputnik.com | 663 |
| 70 | spf.a2hosting.com | 661 |
| 71 | aruba.it | 658 |
| 72 | spf.nl2go.com | 625 |
| 73 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 623 |
| 74 | outboundmail.convio.net | 619 |
| 75 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 617 |
| 76 | msgfocus.com | 594 |
| 77 | _spf.act-on.net | 589 |
| 78 | zoho.in | 578 |
| 79 | spf.securemx.jp | 572 |
| 80 | send.aweber.com | 571 |
| 81 | spf.mailanyone.net | 570 |
| 82 | spf.afas.online | 567 |
| 83 | spfa.mailendo.com | 566 |
| 84 | agenturserver.de | 566 |
| 85 | icpbounce.com | 557 |
| 86 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 551 |
| 87 | email-od.com | 548 |
| 88 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 532 |
| 89 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 522 |
| 90 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 521 |
| 91 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 518 |
| 92 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 517 |
| 93 | spf.mindbox.ru | 510 |
| 94 | _spf.arandomserver.com | 491 |
| 95 | _netblocks.google.com | 485 |
| 96 | spf.topdesk.net | 481 |
| 97 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 478 |
| 98 | webhostbox.net | 466 |
| 99 | spf.intermedia.net | 463 |
| 100 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 459 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.