Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2023-01-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 200 776 | 28.17% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 140 053 | 19.65% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 112 557 | 15.79% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 92 582 | 12.99% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 62 538 | 8.77% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 19 641 | 2.76% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 13 034 | 1.83% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 11 005 | 1.54% |
| 9 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 8 446 | 1.18% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 5 765 | 0.81% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Rackspace Email | 4 453 | 0.62% |
| 12 | Beget (RU) | 4 384 | 0.62% |
| 13 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 198 | 0.59% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 3 609 | 0.51% |
| 15 | OVH Mail | 3 476 | 0.49% |
| 16 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 450 | 0.48% |
| 17 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 2 493 | 0.35% |
| 18 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 372 | 0.33% |
| 19 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 031 | 0.28% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 1 706 | 0.24% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 464 | 0.21% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 451 | 0.2% |
| 23 | NetEase Mail | 1 311 | 0.18% |
| 24 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 229 | 0.17% |
| 25 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 1 165 | 0.16% |
| 26 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 164 | 0.16% |
| 27 | NetEase 163 | 904 | 0.13% |
| 28 | ProtonMail | 894 | 0.13% |
| 29 | Titan (Hostinger) | 786 | 0.11% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 718 | 0.1% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 29 567 | 4.93% |
| 2 | Amazon SES | 25 752 | 4.29% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 25 449 | 4.24% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 23 920 | 3.99% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 20 637 | 3.44% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 18 722 | 3.12% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 12 159 | 2.03% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 8 804 | 1.47% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 6 972 | 1.16% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 625 | 0.77% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 3 383 | 0.56% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 3 121 | 0.52% |
| 13 | Postmark | 2 712 | 0.45% |
| 14 | SparkPost | 2 431 | 0.41% |
| 15 | Constant Contact | 2 428 | 0.4% |
| 16 | Freshdesk | 1 858 | 0.31% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 734 | 0.29% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 847 | 0.14% |
| 19 | Sailthru | 744 | 0.12% |
| 20 | Customer.io | 682 | 0.11% |
| 21 | SMTP.BZ | 422 | 0.07% |
| 22 | MailerSend | 411 | 0.07% |
| 23 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 395 | 0.07% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 237 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Intercom | 17 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 8 | 0.0% |
| 27 | AWeber | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Help Scout | 1 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 7 819 | 1.3% |
| 2 | Shopify | 3 894 | 0.65% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 2 474 | 0.41% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 2 150 | 0.36% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 513 | 0.25% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 173 | 0.2% |
| 7 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 100 | 0.18% |
| 8 | ClickDimensions | 1 056 | 0.18% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 1 033 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 994 | 0.17% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 774 | 0.13% |
| 12 | PayPal Braintree | 720 | 0.12% |
| 13 | ConnectWise | 666 | 0.11% |
| 14 | Zendesk | 623 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Greenhouse | 578 | 0.1% |
| 16 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 515 | 0.09% |
| 17 | Sage Intacct | 453 | 0.08% |
| 18 | Oracle Cloud | 344 | 0.06% |
| 19 | HappyFox | 342 | 0.06% |
| 20 | Lark / Feishu | 321 | 0.05% |
| 21 | Oracle Cloud Email | 312 | 0.05% |
| 22 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 300 | 0.05% |
| 23 | UKG / UltiPro | 297 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Squarespace | 248 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Gorgias | 209 | 0.03% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 206 | 0.03% |
| 27 | FormAssembly | 175 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Recurly | 140 | 0.02% |
| 29 | Odoo | 124 | 0.02% |
| 30 | SurveyMonkey | 61 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 22 082 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 5 756 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 783 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 682 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 257 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 2 130 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 1 938 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 563 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 1 486 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 480 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 252 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 177 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 105 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 992 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 944 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 904 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 854 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 836 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 819 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 776 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 690 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 630 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 619 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 572 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 559 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 530 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 461 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 430 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 378 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 371 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 324 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 306 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 279 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 268 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1 | 261 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 258 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 256 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 250 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 247 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 244 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 236 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 231 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 231 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 220 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 207 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 204 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 201 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 193 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 189 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 179 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 174 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 172 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;fo=1;ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com;rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com | 170 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 168 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 165 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 161 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.250ok.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.250ok.net; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 159 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 143 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2fmk5p39@ag.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:2fmk5p39@fr.dmarcian.com; pct=100 | 140 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-yahoo-rua@yahoo-inc.com; | 137 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 137 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 137 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 135 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 134 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 133 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.em.secureserver.net | 133 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 128 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 128 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; ri=86400 | 127 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 122 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 121 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 119 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:adobe@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:adobe@ruf.agari.com; fo=1 | 119 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 115 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 111 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@auth.returnpath.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc_afrf@auth.returnpath.net | 109 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 102 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 99 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 99 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 99 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 98 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc-groups@hubspot.com | 98 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 94 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=90; sp=none | 92 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com;ruf=mailto:youremailaddress@yourdomain.com | 90 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 87 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 86 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:unitedhealthgroup@ruf.agari.com | 85 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s | 84 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 84 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; sp=reject; rua=mailto:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com; ruf=mailto:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com; adkim=r; aspf=r; fo=1; rf=afrf; ri=3600 | 82 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:1e9b317813bb873@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com; ruf=mailto:1e9b317813bb873@for.dmarcanalyzer.com; fo=1; | 82 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com; | 79 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:abbvie@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:abbvie@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 79 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; ruf=mailto:dmarc@inbound.flowmailer.net; fo=1 | 78 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 78 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:tcod1eh2@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 77 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:a@dmarcreports.facebook.com; | 77 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 76 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 76 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 9 301 |
| 2 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 9 296 |
| 3 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 9 295 |
| 4 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 9 294 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 9 278 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 7 723 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 7 686 |
| 8 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 3 407 |
| 9 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 3 406 |
| 10 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 3 403 |
| 11 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 589 |
| 12 | park-mx.above.com | 2 567 |
| 13 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 558 |
| 14 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 530 |
| 15 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 516 |
| 16 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 513 |
| 17 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 034 |
| 18 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 034 |
| 19 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 2 032 |
| 20 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 546 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 537 |
| 22 | mx1.hostinger.in | 1 363 |
| 23 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 1 361 |
| 24 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 1 357 |
| 25 | mx2.hostinger.in | 1 303 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | localhost | 1 287 |
| 27 | mx1.hostinger.com | 1 280 |
| 28 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 1 204 |
| 29 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 1 204 |
| 30 | mx2.hostinger.com | 1 201 |
| 31 | mail.h-email.net | 1 184 |
| 32 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 995 |
| 33 | nan | 990 |
| 34 | mx.stackmail.com | 978 |
| 35 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 952 |
| 36 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 951 |
| 37 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 949 |
| 38 | mx1.csof.net | 918 |
| 39 | mx2.csof.net | 918 |
| 40 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 872 |
| 41 | mx00.1and1.com | 860 |
| 42 | mx.spamexperts.com | 856 |
| 43 | mx01.1and1.com | 856 |
| 44 | mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 801 |
| 45 | mx004.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 801 |
| 46 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 787 |
| 47 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 784 |
| 48 | smtpin.rzone.de | 775 |
| 49 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 765 |
| 50 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 764 |
| 51 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 760 |
| 52 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 686 |
| 53 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 669 |
| 54 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 668 |
| 55 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 605 |
| 56 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 558 |
| 57 | mx.securemx.jp | 554 |
| 58 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 549 |
| 59 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 548 |
| 60 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 548 |
| 61 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 548 |
| 62 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 545 |
| 63 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 542 |
| 64 | offline.iserv.eu | 532 |
| 65 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 513 |
| 66 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 512 |
| 67 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 511 |
| 68 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 506 |
| 69 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 491 |
| 70 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 481 |
| 71 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 481 |
| 72 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 477 |
| 73 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 474 |
| 74 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 472 |
| 75 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 463 |
| 76 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 459 |
| 77 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 424 |
| 78 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 424 |
| 79 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 415 |
| 80 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 414 |
| 81 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 390 |
| 82 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 389 |
| 83 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 376 |
| 84 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 320 |
| 85 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 317 |
| 86 | alt1.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 314 |
| 87 | alt2.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 314 |
| 88 | primary.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 313 |
| 89 | alt3.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 310 |
| 90 | mail.register.it | 305 |
| 91 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 305 |
| 92 | mx-01-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 304 |
| 93 | mx-vip-01.uni5.net | 303 |
| 94 | mx-vip-02.uni5.net | 302 |
| 95 | mx1.mtaroutes.com | 297 |
| 96 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 290 |
| 97 | mx-02-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 290 |
| 98 | mx2.mtaroutes.com | 288 |
| 99 | mx3.mtaroutes.com | 285 |
| 100 | mx-01-us-west-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 283 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 9 296 |
| 2 | websitewelcome.com | 8 313 |
| 3 | secureserver.net | 7 182 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 819 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 5 797 |
| 6 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 5 187 |
| 7 | beget.com | 4 560 |
| 8 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 4 201 |
| 9 | emailsrvr.com | 3 956 |
| 10 | spf.mail.qq.com | 3 938 |
| 11 | spf.web-hosting.com | 3 472 |
| 12 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 232 |
| 13 | emsd1.com | 3 164 |
| 14 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 3 126 |
| 15 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 3 063 |
| 16 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 908 |
| 17 | mx.ovh.com | 2 804 |
| 18 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 2 755 |
| 19 | _spf.mlsend.com | 2 589 |
| 20 | spf.mxhichina.com | 2 211 |
| 21 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 2 204 |
| 22 | stspg-customer.com | 2 173 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 134 |
| 24 | spf.messagelabs.com | 2 081 |
| 25 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 068 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 880 |
| 27 | zcsend.net | 1 873 |
| 28 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 732 |
| 29 | bluehost.com | 1 639 |
| 30 | spf.163.com | 1 627 |
| 31 | transmail.net | 1 619 |
| 32 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 588 |
| 33 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 566 |
| 34 | spf.dynect.net | 1 521 |
| 35 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 366 |
| 36 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 1 278 |
| 37 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 1 248 |
| 38 | spf.crsend.com | 1 227 |
| 39 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 204 |
| 40 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 198 |
| 41 | _spf.createsend.com | 1 190 |
| 42 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 142 |
| 43 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 130 |
| 44 | cmail1.com | 1 091 |
| 45 | authsmtp.com | 1 089 |
| 46 | spf.registeredsite.com | 1 086 |
| 47 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 072 |
| 48 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 066 |
| 49 | spf.improvmx.com | 1 065 |
| 50 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 060 |
| 51 | _spf.perfora.net | 991 |
| 52 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 979 |
| 53 | spf.titan.email | 954 |
| 54 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 889 |
| 55 | spf.cloudus.oxcs.net | 889 |
| 56 | musvc.com | 842 |
| 57 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 834 |
| 58 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 828 |
| 59 | e2ma.net | 827 |
| 60 | infusionmail.com | 800 |
| 61 | spf.stackmail.com | 798 |
| 62 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 791 |
| 63 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 766 |
| 64 | mailcontrol.com | 756 |
| 65 | spf.autopilothq.com | 709 |
| 66 | spf2.esputnik.com | 708 |
| 67 | ispgateway.de | 706 |
| 68 | outlook.com | 686 |
| 69 | aruba.it | 670 |
| 70 | outboundmail.convio.net | 629 |
| 71 | spf.nl2go.com | 621 |
| 72 | spf.a2hosting.com | 607 |
| 73 | spf.mailanyone.net | 600 |
| 74 | msgfocus.com | 599 |
| 75 | _spf.act-on.net | 597 |
| 76 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 597 |
| 77 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 591 |
| 78 | nicmail.ru | 585 |
| 79 | send.aweber.com | 574 |
| 80 | spf.afas.online | 570 |
| 81 | spfa.mailendo.com | 568 |
| 82 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 559 |
| 83 | icpbounce.com | 551 |
| 84 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 546 |
| 85 | agenturserver.de | 545 |
| 86 | zoho.in | 542 |
| 87 | spf.securemx.jp | 541 |
| 88 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 536 |
| 89 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 530 |
| 90 | webhostbox.net | 529 |
| 91 | email-od.com | 527 |
| 92 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 482 |
| 93 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 482 |
| 94 | spf.topdesk.net | 479 |
| 95 | _netblocks.google.com | 477 |
| 96 | spf.mindbox.ru | 472 |
| 97 | spf.intermedia.net | 455 |
| 98 | _spfprod.ngpvan.com | 444 |
| 99 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 443 |
| 100 | spf.icoremail.net | 440 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.