Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-01-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 171 044 | 25.91% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 143 171 | 21.69% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 107 277 | 16.25% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 91 739 | 13.9% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 59 783 | 9.06% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 12 587 | 1.91% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 9 850 | 1.49% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 649 | 1.16% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 800 | 1.03% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 707 | 0.71% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | OVH Mail | 4 503 | 0.68% |
| 12 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 445 | 0.67% |
| 13 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 259 | 0.65% |
| 14 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 979 | 0.45% |
| 15 | Cisco IronPort | 2 935 | 0.44% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 658 | 0.4% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 222 | 0.34% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 049 | 0.31% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 1 886 | 0.29% |
| 20 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 690 | 0.26% |
| 21 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 639 | 0.25% |
| 22 | FastMail | 1 495 | 0.23% |
| 23 | ProtonMail | 1 438 | 0.22% |
| 24 | Gandi Mail | 1 437 | 0.22% |
| 25 | NetEase Mail | 1 262 | 0.19% |
| 26 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 244 | 0.19% |
| 27 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 126 | 0.17% |
| 28 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 909 | 0.14% |
| 29 | CSC (corporate) | 867 | 0.13% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 779 | 0.12% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 36 148 | 5.86% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 28 695 | 4.66% |
| 3 | Mailgun | 25 066 | 4.07% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 053 | 3.9% |
| 5 | Mailchimp | 23 606 | 3.83% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 22 008 | 3.57% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 15 426 | 2.5% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 12 720 | 2.06% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 6 892 | 1.12% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 399 | 0.71% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 3 978 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 405 | 0.55% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 665 | 0.43% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 650 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Constant Contact | 1 817 | 0.29% |
| 16 | MailerSend | 1 739 | 0.28% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 1 718 | 0.28% |
| 18 | Freshdesk | 1 493 | 0.24% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 188 | 0.19% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 724 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 638 | 0.1% |
| 22 | GetResponse | 575 | 0.09% |
| 23 | Customer.io | 470 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 273 | 0.04% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 49 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Intercom | 33 | 0.01% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 17 | 0.0% |
| 28 | MailPoet | 6 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Benchmark Email | 4 | 0.0% |
| 30 | Dotdigital | 4 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shopify | 5 446 | 0.88% |
| 2 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 191 | 0.84% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 309 | 0.54% |
| 4 | Trustpilot | 1 966 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 864 | 0.3% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 614 | 0.26% |
| 7 | Lark / Feishu | 1 181 | 0.19% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 157 | 0.19% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 139 | 0.18% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 1 104 | 0.18% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Sage Intacct | 1 029 | 0.17% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 981 | 0.16% |
| 13 | Docebo (LMS) | 910 | 0.15% |
| 14 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 839 | 0.14% |
| 15 | Oracle Cloud | 788 | 0.13% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 637 | 0.1% |
| 17 | PayPal Braintree | 633 | 0.1% |
| 18 | ClickDimensions | 600 | 0.1% |
| 19 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 569 | 0.09% |
| 20 | ConnectWise | 566 | 0.09% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 517 | 0.08% |
| 22 | Shoptet | 478 | 0.08% |
| 23 | Zendesk | 440 | 0.07% |
| 24 | HappyFox | 425 | 0.07% |
| 25 | FormAssembly | 386 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Odoo | 348 | 0.06% |
| 27 | Chargebee | 323 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 201 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 171 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 121 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 50 658 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 32 837 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 7 172 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 365 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 974 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 636 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 333 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 319 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 978 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 753 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 353 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 300 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 236 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 800 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 793 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 770 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 652 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 382 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 381 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 372 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 323 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 245 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 188 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 134 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 107 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 103 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 093 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 027 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 806 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 730 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 723 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 719 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 699 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 655 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 620 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 596 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 560 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 556 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 525 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 491 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 489 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 471 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:xlcat@rua.agari.com,mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:xlcat@ruf.agari.com | 463 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 457 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 443 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 420 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 418 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 377 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 368 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 364 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 351 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 350 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 346 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 344 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 344 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 343 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 327 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1 | 315 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 305 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 299 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 295 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 283 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 269 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 267 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 260 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 259 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 234 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 231 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 230 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 230 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 221 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 218 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 213 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 211 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 210 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 207 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 200 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 199 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 195 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 193 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 191 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 183 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 179 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 173 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 173 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 171 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 167 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 162 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:2ynhg3yt@ag.dmarcian.com | 161 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=0;rua=mailto:dmarc@vercom.pl | 160 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 160 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 156 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none; | 155 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 150 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 149 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 149 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 149 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 147 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; ruf=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; | 147 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 728 |
| 2 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 727 |
| 3 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 726 |
| 4 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 6 930 |
| 5 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 6 928 |
| 6 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 6 923 |
| 7 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 6 920 |
| 8 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 6 912 |
| 9 | mx1.hostinger.com | 5 110 |
| 10 | mx2.hostinger.com | 5 084 |
| 11 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 078 |
| 12 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 076 |
| 13 | nan | 2 664 |
| 14 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 212 |
| 15 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 183 |
| 16 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 2 163 |
| 17 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 161 |
| 18 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 148 |
| 19 | mx.plingest.com | 2 011 |
| 20 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 658 |
| 21 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 642 |
| 22 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 530 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 526 |
| 24 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 524 |
| 25 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 961 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 958 |
| 27 | mx.stackmail.com | 955 |
| 28 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 950 |
| 29 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 948 |
| 30 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 946 |
| 31 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 935 |
| 32 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 935 |
| 33 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 928 |
| 34 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 923 |
| 35 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 886 |
| 36 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 884 |
| 37 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 884 |
| 38 | park-mx.above.com | 883 |
| 39 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 833 |
| 40 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 784 |
| 41 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 770 |
| 42 | mx1.hostinger.in | 758 |
| 43 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 756 |
| 44 | mx2.hostinger.in | 751 |
| 45 | mx.spamexperts.com | 714 |
| 46 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 703 |
| 47 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 703 |
| 48 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 703 |
| 49 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 702 |
| 50 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 690 |
| 51 | mx1.feishu.cn | 686 |
| 52 | mx2.feishu.cn | 685 |
| 53 | mx3.feishu.cn | 683 |
| 54 | mx1.csof.net | 611 |
| 55 | mx2.csof.net | 611 |
| 56 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 591 |
| 57 | smtpin.rzone.de | 587 |
| 58 | dmail.kagoya.net | 573 |
| 59 | mx.securemx.jp | 572 |
| 60 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 566 |
| 61 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 565 |
| 62 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 551 |
| 63 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 549 |
| 64 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 541 |
| 65 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 524 |
| 66 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 520 |
| 67 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 512 |
| 68 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 504 |
| 69 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 500 |
| 70 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 499 |
| 71 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 488 |
| 72 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 488 |
| 73 | mail.register.it | 478 |
| 74 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 438 |
| 75 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 425 |
| 76 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 424 |
| 77 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 409 |
| 78 | localhost | 404 |
| 79 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 380 |
| 80 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 379 |
| 81 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 379 |
| 82 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 368 |
| 83 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 368 |
| 84 | mx2.larksuite.com | 362 |
| 85 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 361 |
| 86 | mx1.larksuite.com | 361 |
| 87 | mx3.larksuite.com | 360 |
| 88 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 311 |
| 89 | mxext1.mailbox.org | 302 |
| 90 | mxext2.mailbox.org | 301 |
| 91 | in.arubabusiness.it | 300 |
| 92 | mxext3.mailbox.org | 294 |
| 93 | kr1-aspmx1.worksmobile.com | 292 |
| 94 | 285 | |
| 95 | mx.mgovcloud.in | 283 |
| 96 | mx2.mgovcloud.in | 282 |
| 97 | mx3.mgovcloud.in | 281 |
| 98 | mailstream-eu1.mxrecord.io | 277 |
| 99 | kr1-aspmx2.worksmobile.com | 274 |
| 100 | mx01.udag.de | 273 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 966 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 8 576 |
| 3 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 7 081 |
| 4 | relay.mailchannels.net | 6 631 |
| 5 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 598 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 6 100 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 395 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 975 |
| 9 | websitewelcome.com | 4 242 |
| 10 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 610 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 178 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 053 |
| 13 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 853 |
| 14 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 703 |
| 15 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 663 |
| 16 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 466 |
| 17 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 426 |
| 18 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 349 |
| 19 | zcsend.net | 2 348 |
| 20 | beget.com | 2 266 |
| 21 | stspg-customer.com | 2 179 |
| 22 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 089 |
| 23 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 086 |
| 24 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 005 |
| 25 | zohomail.com | 1 818 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 783 |
| 27 | transmail.net | 1 768 |
| 28 | spf.brevo.com | 1 651 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 552 |
| 30 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 523 |
| 31 | musvc.com | 1 485 |
| 32 | spf.163.com | 1 402 |
| 33 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 401 |
| 34 | spf.crsend.com | 1 373 |
| 35 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 320 |
| 36 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 318 |
| 37 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 309 |
| 38 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 305 |
| 39 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 1 292 |
| 40 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 288 |
| 41 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 282 |
| 42 | spf.titan.email | 1 241 |
| 43 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 238 |
| 44 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 198 |
| 45 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 176 |
| 46 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 175 |
| 47 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 1 143 |
| 48 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 120 |
| 49 | one.zoho.com | 1 112 |
| 50 | spfa.cpmails.com | 1 110 |
| 51 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 104 |
| 52 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 076 |
| 53 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 060 |
| 54 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 060 |
| 55 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 045 |
| 56 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 1 045 |
| 57 | _spf.aruba.it | 1 007 |
| 58 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 991 |
| 59 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 990 |
| 60 | _spf.perfora.net | 984 |
| 61 | spf.stackmail.com | 981 |
| 62 | authsmtp.com | 978 |
| 63 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 952 |
| 64 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 951 |
| 65 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 927 |
| 66 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 922 |
| 67 | spf.dynect.net | 884 |
| 68 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 877 |
| 69 | spfa.mailendo.com | 852 |
| 70 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 850 |
| 71 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 820 |
| 72 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 817 |
| 73 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 795 |
| 74 | zoho.in | 794 |
| 75 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 785 |
| 76 | ispgateway.de | 766 |
| 77 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 741 |
| 78 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 723 |
| 79 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 717 |
| 80 | kagoya.net | 713 |
| 81 | _spf.kmitd.com | 709 |
| 82 | spf.improvmx.com | 703 |
| 83 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 702 |
| 84 | cmail1.com | 687 |
| 85 | eu.zcsend.net | 683 |
| 86 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 680 |
| 87 | spf.unisender.ru | 673 |
| 88 | spf.webapps.net | 657 |
| 89 | spf.mindbox.ru | 646 |
| 90 | sendersrv.com | 644 |
| 91 | spf.sendsay.ru | 643 |
| 92 | _auxspf.axspace.com | 642 |
| 93 | turbo-smtp.com | 636 |
| 94 | spf.afas.online | 630 |
| 95 | agenturserver.de | 625 |
| 96 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 619 |
| 97 | spf.flowmailer.net | 619 |
| 98 | eu.transmail.net | 614 |
| 99 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 607 |
| 100 | spf.bmv.jp | 604 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.