Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2025-10-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 165 744 | 25.72% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 141 135 | 21.9% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 106 090 | 16.46% |
| 4 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 87 837 | 13.63% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 57 195 | 8.88% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 13 148 | 2.04% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 10 006 | 1.55% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 878 | 1.22% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 6 812 | 1.06% |
| 10 | Amazon WorkMail | 4 792 | 0.74% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 4 500 | 0.7% |
| 12 | OVH Mail | 4 343 | 0.67% |
| 13 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 3 779 | 0.59% |
| 14 | Cisco IronPort | 2 954 | 0.46% |
| 15 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 918 | 0.45% |
| 16 | Rackspace Email | 2 638 | 0.41% |
| 17 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 270 | 0.35% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 2 172 | 0.34% |
| 19 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 2 140 | 0.33% |
| 20 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 1 632 | 0.25% |
| 21 | Gandi Mail | 1 452 | 0.23% |
| 22 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 442 | 0.22% |
| 23 | FastMail | 1 394 | 0.22% |
| 24 | ProtonMail | 1 294 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Timeweb (RU) | 1 166 | 0.18% |
| 26 | Titan (Hostinger) | 1 123 | 0.17% |
| 27 | NetEase Mail | 1 020 | 0.16% |
| 28 | Zoho Mail (IN) | 873 | 0.14% |
| 29 | Reg.ru | 736 | 0.11% |
| 30 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 677 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon SES | 35 219 | 5.88% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 28 514 | 4.76% |
| 3 | Mailgun | 24 661 | 4.12% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 146 | 4.03% |
| 5 | Mailchimp | 23 605 | 3.94% |
| 6 | Mandrill | 22 280 | 3.72% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 15 445 | 2.58% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 12 350 | 2.06% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 6 910 | 1.15% |
| 10 | Elastic Email | 4 372 | 0.73% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Unisender (RU) | 4 043 | 0.67% |
| 12 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 490 | 0.58% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 2 679 | 0.45% |
| 14 | Postmark | 2 597 | 0.43% |
| 15 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 2 037 | 0.34% |
| 16 | Constant Contact | 1 874 | 0.31% |
| 17 | MailerSend | 1 655 | 0.28% |
| 18 | Freshdesk | 1 510 | 0.25% |
| 19 | SMTP.com | 1 268 | 0.21% |
| 20 | SMTP.BZ | 760 | 0.13% |
| 21 | Sailthru | 643 | 0.11% |
| 22 | GetResponse | 505 | 0.08% |
| 23 | Customer.io | 499 | 0.08% |
| 24 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 290 | 0.05% |
| 25 | HubSpot | 38 | 0.01% |
| 26 | Intercom | 31 | 0.01% |
| 27 | Klaviyo | 11 | 0.0% |
| 28 | Dotdigital | 5 | 0.0% |
| 29 | Omnisend | 5 | 0.0% |
| 30 | ConvertKit | 4 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shopify | 5 552 | 0.93% |
| 2 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 346 | 0.89% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 3 329 | 0.56% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 938 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 902 | 0.32% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 594 | 0.27% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 1 118 | 0.19% |
| 8 | BigCommerce | 1 116 | 0.19% |
| 9 | Lark / Feishu | 1 114 | 0.19% |
| 10 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 109 | 0.19% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Sage Intacct | 987 | 0.16% |
| 12 | Oracle Cloud Email | 945 | 0.16% |
| 13 | Docebo (LMS) | 916 | 0.15% |
| 14 | Oracle Cloud | 806 | 0.13% |
| 15 | WordPress.com / WP Cloud | 799 | 0.13% |
| 16 | PayPal Braintree | 638 | 0.11% |
| 17 | Greenhouse | 632 | 0.11% |
| 18 | ClickDimensions | 616 | 0.1% |
| 19 | ConnectWise | 594 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 557 | 0.09% |
| 21 | UKG / UltiPro | 521 | 0.09% |
| 22 | Zendesk | 446 | 0.07% |
| 23 | HappyFox | 436 | 0.07% |
| 24 | FormAssembly | 379 | 0.06% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 356 | 0.06% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 331 | 0.06% |
| 27 | Odoo | 321 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 207 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Gorgias | 174 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 114 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 46 713 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 32 341 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 6 333 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 140 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 965 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 435 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 377 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 232 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 535 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 2 534 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 447 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 253 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 219 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 912 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 708 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 697 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 409 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 333 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 266 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 237 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 228 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 201 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 179 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 174 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 068 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 935 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 776 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 722 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 698 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 689 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 686 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 683 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 590 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 565 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 542 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 532 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 479 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 470 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 468 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 456 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 442 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 433 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 432 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 392 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 375 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 364 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 356 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 348 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 346 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 344 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 334 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 301 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1 | 299 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 295 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 294 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 270 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 268 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 257 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 254 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 251 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 236 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 233 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 231 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 229 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 223 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 213 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 212 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 212 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 210 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 208 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 207 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 205 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 203 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 197 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 195 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 192 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 192 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 177 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 173 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com,mailto:dmarc@dyn.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com,mailto:dmarc@dyn.com; fo=1 | 170 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 168 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@newsletters.visualsoft.co.uk; aspf=r; adkim=r; ri=86400; fo=1 | 165 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=0;rua=mailto:dmarc@vercom.pl | 162 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 162 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 160 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 159 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 157 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarcreport@matrimony.com;ruf=mailto:dmarcreports@matrimony.com | 155 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 152 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 150 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=none; | 149 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 147 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; ruf=mailto:1dd3f5c7@inbox.ondmarc.com; | 146 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 145 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; aspf=s | 145 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 144 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dbotxvip@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; ruf=mailto:dbotxvip@fr.eu.dmarcadvisor.com | 142 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 346 |
| 2 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 341 |
| 3 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 7 341 |
| 4 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 7 102 |
| 5 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 7 098 |
| 6 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 7 095 |
| 7 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 7 089 |
| 8 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 7 078 |
| 9 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 362 |
| 10 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 356 |
| 11 | mx1.hostinger.com | 4 698 |
| 12 | mx2.hostinger.com | 4 670 |
| 13 | nan | 3 174 |
| 14 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 270 |
| 15 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 2 249 |
| 16 | mx1.privateemail.com | 1 709 |
| 17 | mx2.privateemail.com | 1 697 |
| 18 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 681 |
| 19 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 679 |
| 20 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 677 |
| 21 | mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 466 |
| 22 | mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 465 |
| 23 | mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com | 1 464 |
| 24 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 960 |
| 25 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 950 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 947 |
| 27 | mx1.hostinger.in | 931 |
| 28 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 930 |
| 29 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 926 |
| 30 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 923 |
| 31 | mx2.hostinger.in | 922 |
| 32 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 921 |
| 33 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 905 |
| 34 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 903 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 903 |
| 36 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 899 |
| 37 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 896 |
| 38 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 857 |
| 39 | mx.stackmail.com | 755 |
| 40 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 739 |
| 41 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 738 |
| 42 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 736 |
| 43 | park-mx.above.com | 705 |
| 44 | mx.spamexperts.com | 678 |
| 45 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 673 |
| 46 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 665 |
| 47 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 657 |
| 48 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 651 |
| 49 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 648 |
| 50 | mx.plingest.com | 622 |
| 51 | mx1.feishu.cn | 616 |
| 52 | mx2.feishu.cn | 616 |
| 53 | mx3.feishu.cn | 613 |
| 54 | dmail.kagoya.net | 587 |
| 55 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 566 |
| 56 | mx.securemx.jp | 566 |
| 57 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 563 |
| 58 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 557 |
| 59 | mx1.csof.net | 556 |
| 60 | mx2.csof.net | 556 |
| 61 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 556 |
| 62 | localhost | 554 |
| 63 | smtpin.rzone.de | 549 |
| 64 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 539 |
| 65 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 534 |
| 66 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 533 |
| 67 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 532 |
| 68 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 527 |
| 69 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 513 |
| 70 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 512 |
| 71 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 509 |
| 72 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 481 |
| 73 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 479 |
| 74 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 449 |
| 75 | mail.register.it | 438 |
| 76 | mailstream-east.mxrecord.io | 427 |
| 77 | mailstream-west.mxrecord.io | 426 |
| 78 | mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx | 404 |
| 79 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 384 |
| 80 | mail.h-email.net | 379 |
| 81 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 368 |
| 82 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 367 |
| 83 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 365 |
| 84 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 365 |
| 85 | mx2.larksuite.com | 361 |
| 86 | mx1.larksuite.com | 360 |
| 87 | mx3.larksuite.com | 360 |
| 88 | 337 | |
| 89 | mx.serviciodecorreo.es | 332 |
| 90 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 322 |
| 91 | in.arubabusiness.it | 293 |
| 92 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 283 |
| 93 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 282 |
| 94 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 281 |
| 95 | mxext2.mailbox.org | 280 |
| 96 | mxext1.mailbox.org | 279 |
| 97 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 277 |
| 98 | mxext3.mailbox.org | 273 |
| 99 | mx01.udag.de | 271 |
| 100 | mx00.udag.de | 269 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 8 711 |
| 2 | secureserver.net | 8 693 |
| 3 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 7 283 |
| 4 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 6 401 |
| 5 | relay.mailchannels.net | 5 964 |
| 6 | _spf.mlsend.com | 5 671 |
| 7 | zoho.com | 5 578 |
| 8 | mx.ovh.com | 4 701 |
| 9 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 623 |
| 10 | websitewelcome.com | 3 590 |
| 11 | emsd1.com | 3 210 |
| 12 | emailsrvr.com | 3 039 |
| 13 | _spf.createsend.com | 2 641 |
| 14 | helpscoutemail.com | 2 566 |
| 15 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 524 |
| 16 | beget.com | 2 467 |
| 17 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 2 373 |
| 18 | zcsend.net | 2 336 |
| 19 | _spf-eu.ionos.com | 2 259 |
| 20 | stspg-customer.com | 2 215 |
| 21 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 167 |
| 22 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 2 142 |
| 23 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 2 133 |
| 24 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 068 |
| 25 | transmail.net | 1 780 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf.rdstation.com.br | 1 752 |
| 27 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 587 |
| 28 | zohomail.com | 1 576 |
| 29 | spf.messagingengine.com | 1 464 |
| 30 | spf.brevo.com | 1 426 |
| 31 | musvc.com | 1 418 |
| 32 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 413 |
| 33 | spf.crsend.com | 1 326 |
| 34 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 283 |
| 35 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 1 269 |
| 36 | spf.titan.email | 1 252 |
| 37 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 1 243 |
| 38 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 1 238 |
| 39 | spf.exclaimer.net | 1 236 |
| 40 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 233 |
| 41 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 1 229 |
| 42 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 226 |
| 43 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 1 212 |
| 44 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 1 169 |
| 45 | spf.163.com | 1 127 |
| 46 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 1 120 |
| 47 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 113 |
| 48 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 073 |
| 49 | spf.smtp2go.com | 1 061 |
| 50 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 060 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 1 035 |
| 52 | spf2.esputnik.com | 1 021 |
| 53 | one.zoho.com | 1 001 |
| 54 | spfa.cpmails.com | 999 |
| 55 | _spf.jupiter.salesmanago.pl | 979 |
| 56 | spf.dynect.net | 969 |
| 57 | authsmtp.com | 969 |
| 58 | _spf.perfora.net | 966 |
| 59 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 931 |
| 60 | _spf.aruba.it | 915 |
| 61 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 910 |
| 62 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 890 |
| 63 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 874 |
| 64 | spf.ipzmarketing.com | 874 |
| 65 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 862 |
| 66 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 852 |
| 67 | spf.mysecurecloudhost.com | 852 |
| 68 | spfa.mailendo.com | 835 |
| 69 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 832 |
| 70 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 796 |
| 71 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 794 |
| 72 | zoho.in | 781 |
| 73 | _spf.emaillabs.net.pl | 777 |
| 74 | spf.stackmail.com | 772 |
| 75 | spf-de.emailsignatures365.com | 759 |
| 76 | ispgateway.de | 751 |
| 77 | kagoya.net | 745 |
| 78 | _spf.dashasender.ru | 725 |
| 79 | spf.eu.exclaimer.net | 704 |
| 80 | usb._netblocks.mimecast.com | 697 |
| 81 | _spf.kmitd.com | 686 |
| 82 | spf.improvmx.com | 679 |
| 83 | cmail1.com | 670 |
| 84 | spf.infomaniak.ch | 660 |
| 85 | spf.unisender.ru | 656 |
| 86 | de._netblocks.mimecast.com | 649 |
| 87 | turbo-smtp.com | 648 |
| 88 | eu.zcsend.net | 644 |
| 89 | spf.mindbox.ru | 642 |
| 90 | _spf-us.ionos.com | 638 |
| 91 | spf.sendsay.ru | 631 |
| 92 | spf.webapps.net | 614 |
| 93 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 613 |
| 94 | agenturserver.de | 607 |
| 95 | spf.bmv.jp | 599 |
| 96 | sendersrv.com | 594 |
| 97 | eu.transmail.net | 594 |
| 98 | spf.us.exclaimer.net | 587 |
| 99 | bluehost.com | 587 |
| 100 | spf.flowmailer.net | 586 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.