Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-08-11.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown / Other | 122 100 | 28.54% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 82 149 | 19.2% |
| 3 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 69 470 | 16.24% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 52 617 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 38 178 | 8.92% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 11 931 | 2.79% |
| 7 | Mimecast | 8 282 | 1.94% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 7 257 | 1.7% |
| 9 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 5 030 | 1.18% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 3 425 | 0.8% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Rackspace Email | 2 979 | 0.7% |
| 12 | Amazon WorkMail | 2 214 | 0.52% |
| 13 | Cisco IronPort | 2 186 | 0.51% |
| 14 | Beget (RU) | 2 088 | 0.49% |
| 15 | OVH Mail | 2 061 | 0.48% |
| 16 | Mail.ru for Business | 1 959 | 0.46% |
| 17 | Alibaba Mail (China) | 1 493 | 0.35% |
| 18 | 1&1 IONOS | 1 375 | 0.32% |
| 19 | Mailgun (inbound) | 1 197 | 0.28% |
| 20 | Gandi Mail | 995 | 0.23% |
| 21 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 908 | 0.21% |
| 22 | NetEase Mail | 852 | 0.2% |
| 23 | FastMail | 831 | 0.19% |
| 24 | Timeweb (RU) | 778 | 0.18% |
| 25 | ImprovMX (forwarding) | 739 | 0.17% |
| 26 | Zoho Mail (EU) | 703 | 0.16% |
| 27 | ProtonMail | 539 | 0.13% |
| 28 | CSC (corporate) | 532 | 0.12% |
| 29 | NetEase 163 | 531 | 0.12% |
| 30 | Reg.ru | 480 | 0.11% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 17 625 | 4.97% |
| 2 | Mandrill | 14 875 | 4.19% |
| 3 | Amazon SES | 14 288 | 4.03% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 13 975 | 3.94% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 11 744 | 3.31% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 10 916 | 3.08% |
| 7 | Salesforce | 6 858 | 1.93% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 4 989 | 1.41% |
| 9 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 3 633 | 1.02% |
| 10 | Marketo (Adobe) | 2 790 | 0.79% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Elastic Email | 1 913 | 0.54% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 1 746 | 0.49% |
| 13 | Postmark | 1 628 | 0.46% |
| 14 | Constant Contact | 1 471 | 0.41% |
| 15 | SparkPost | 1 449 | 0.41% |
| 16 | Freshdesk | 1 129 | 0.32% |
| 17 | Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 987 | 0.28% |
| 18 | SMTP.com | 517 | 0.15% |
| 19 | Sailthru | 447 | 0.13% |
| 20 | Customer.io | 422 | 0.12% |
| 21 | Eloqua (Oracle) | 230 | 0.06% |
| 22 | SMTP.BZ | 206 | 0.06% |
| 23 | MailerSend | 193 | 0.05% |
| 24 | GetResponse | 120 | 0.03% |
| 25 | Intercom | 10 | 0.0% |
| 26 | HubSpot | 5 | 0.0% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 4 796 | 1.35% |
| 2 | Shopify | 2 220 | 0.63% |
| 3 | KnowBe4 | 1 428 | 0.4% |
| 4 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 131 | 0.32% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 903 | 0.25% |
| 6 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 650 | 0.18% |
| 7 | Firebase (Google) | 648 | 0.18% |
| 8 | ClickDimensions | 628 | 0.18% |
| 9 | BigCommerce | 607 | 0.17% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 597 | 0.17% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Docebo (LMS) | 460 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ConnectWise | 439 | 0.12% |
| 13 | PayPal Braintree | 432 | 0.12% |
| 14 | Zendesk | 380 | 0.11% |
| 15 | Greenhouse | 333 | 0.09% |
| 16 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 299 | 0.08% |
| 17 | Sage Intacct | 263 | 0.07% |
| 18 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 188 | 0.05% |
| 19 | Oracle Cloud | 176 | 0.05% |
| 20 | HappyFox | 175 | 0.05% |
| 21 | Oracle Cloud Email | 159 | 0.04% |
| 22 | UKG / UltiPro | 157 | 0.04% |
| 23 | Lark / Feishu | 145 | 0.04% |
| 24 | Squarespace | 143 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Gorgias | 121 | 0.03% |
| 26 | Chargebee | 99 | 0.03% |
| 27 | Recurly | 81 | 0.02% |
| 28 | FormAssembly | 75 | 0.02% |
| 29 | Odoo | 61 | 0.02% |
| 30 | SurveyMonkey | 32 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 31 036 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 28 531 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 301 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 3 214 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 179 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 3 089 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 2 668 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 2 590 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 2 534 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 1 871 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 866 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 1 814 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 1 685 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 642 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 1 562 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 408 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 397 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 349 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 326 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 304 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 124 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 066 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 003 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 977 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 952 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 785 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 629 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 607 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 601 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 561 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 547 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100 | 540 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 406 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 402 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 393 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 380 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 373 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 372 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 352 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 349 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com | 338 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 317 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 316 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 313 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 307 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 298 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 298 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 287 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 286 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 279 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 279 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1 | 278 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 276 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 271 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 265 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 260 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 244 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 242 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 231 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 223 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 205 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 204 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 195 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com | 194 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@dbs.com | 193 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 192 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 184 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com | 183 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; | 183 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 179 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 179 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 176 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 173 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp | 172 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 168 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 167 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 165 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 164 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 163 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 160 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 160 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 159 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 156 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 154 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 149 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 145 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r | 144 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; | 142 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 136 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100 | 132 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com | 131 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50; | 127 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 127 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br | 124 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf | 121 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 120 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 116 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 116 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1;""p=none; | 116 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 114 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | eforward5.registrar-servers.com | 5 324 |
| 2 | eforward2.registrar-servers.com | 5 322 |
| 3 | eforward4.registrar-servers.com | 5 320 |
| 4 | eforward1.registrar-servers.com | 5 316 |
| 5 | eforward3.registrar-servers.com | 5 311 |
| 6 | mailstore1.secureserver.net | 5 217 |
| 7 | smtp.secureserver.net | 5 195 |
| 8 | mx20.mailspamprotection.com | 2 192 |
| 9 | mx10.mailspamprotection.com | 2 191 |
| 10 | mx30.mailspamprotection.com | 2 188 |
| 11 | mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 588 |
| 12 | mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 580 |
| 13 | mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems | 1 576 |
| 14 | mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 1 563 |
| 15 | mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com | 1 540 |
| 16 | park-mx.above.com | 1 321 |
| 17 | mx1.hostinger.in | 994 |
| 18 | mx2.hostinger.in | 949 |
| 19 | mx1.privateemail.com | 871 |
| 20 | mx2.privateemail.com | 869 |
| 21 | mx1.mailchannels.net | 839 |
| 22 | mx2.mailchannels.net | 839 |
| 23 | mail.h-email.net | 762 |
| 24 | route2.mx.cloudflare.net | 724 |
| 25 | route1.mx.cloudflare.net | 724 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | route3.mx.cloudflare.net | 723 |
| 27 | mx1.hostinger.com | 723 |
| 28 | mx2.hostinger.com | 659 |
| 29 | mx1.csof.net | 640 |
| 30 | mx2.csof.net | 640 |
| 31 | mx156.hostedmxserver.com | 629 |
| 32 | localhost | 583 |
| 33 | amir.mx.cloudflare.net | 582 |
| 34 | isaac.mx.cloudflare.net | 582 |
| 35 | linda.mx.cloudflare.net | 580 |
| 36 | mx00.1and1.com | 546 |
| 37 | nan | 545 |
| 38 | mx01.1and1.com | 544 |
| 39 | mxlb.ispgateway.de | 542 |
| 40 | mx.spamexperts.com | 537 |
| 41 | us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com | 506 |
| 42 | smtpin.rzone.de | 504 |
| 43 | us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com | 501 |
| 44 | us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com | 499 |
| 45 | lastmx.spamexperts.net | 493 |
| 46 | fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu | 490 |
| 47 | mx01.nicmail.ru | 437 |
| 48 | mx02.nicmail.ru | 431 |
| 49 | mx03.nicmail.ru | 426 |
| 50 | mail.eye-mail.net | 421 |
| 51 | mx.stackmail.com | 420 |
| 52 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 400 |
| 53 | mx15.ukraine.com.ua | 351 |
| 54 | mx20.ukraine.com.ua | 347 |
| 55 | mx1.dreamhost.com | 330 |
| 56 | mx1.123-reg.co.uk | 330 |
| 57 | mx.a.locaweb.com.br | 330 |
| 58 | mx2.dreamhost.com | 328 |
| 59 | mx0.123-reg.co.uk | 326 |
| 60 | mx.b.locaweb.com.br | 321 |
| 61 | mx.jk.locaweb.com.br | 321 |
| 62 | mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 319 |
| 63 | mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net | 318 |
| 64 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 315 |
| 65 | mx1.qiye.aliyun.com | 311 |
| 66 | mx.securemx.jp | 311 |
| 67 | mx-vip-01.uni5.net | 306 |
| 68 | mx-vip-02.uni5.net | 306 |
| 69 | mx2.qiye.aliyun.com | 303 |
| 70 | mx3.qiye.aliyun.com | 293 |
| 71 | za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za | 289 |
| 72 | za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za | 289 |
| 73 | mx.core.locaweb.com.br | 275 |
| 74 | mx1.forwardemail.net | 270 |
| 75 | mx2.forwardemail.net | 269 |
| 76 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 269 |
| 77 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 267 |
| 78 | mx1.spaceweb.ru | 260 |
| 79 | mx2.spaceweb.ru | 258 |
| 80 | mx01.hornetsecurity.com | 224 |
| 81 | mx02.hornetsecurity.com | 223 |
| 82 | mta-gw.infomaniak.ch | 223 |
| 83 | mx03.hornetsecurity.com | 218 |
| 84 | mx04.hornetsecurity.com | 218 |
| 85 | mail.parktons.com | 208 |
| 86 | mx-01-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 196 |
| 87 | primary.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 194 |
| 88 | alt1.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 194 |
| 89 | mx.ukraine.com.ua | 193 |
| 90 | mx1.mtaroutes.com | 193 |
| 91 | alt2.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 193 |
| 92 | alt3.us.email.fireeyecloud.com | 191 |
| 93 | mx-02-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 188 |
| 94 | mx01.lolipop.jp | 187 |
| 95 | mx2.mtaroutes.com | 187 |
| 96 | mail.register.it | 186 |
| 97 | mx3.mtaroutes.com | 183 |
| 98 | mx4.mtaroutes.com | 182 |
| 99 | mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 182 |
| 100 | mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com | 181 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com | 5 304 |
| 2 | websitewelcome.com | 5 082 |
| 3 | relay.mailchannels.net | 4 539 |
| 4 | secureserver.net | 4 098 |
| 5 | zoho.com | 3 365 |
| 6 | us._netblocks.mimecast.com | 3 303 |
| 7 | _spf.mailspamprotection.com | 2 625 |
| 8 | emailsrvr.com | 2 580 |
| 9 | spf.web-hosting.com | 2 377 |
| 10 | spf.mail.qq.com | 2 313 |
| 11 | _netblocks.mimecast.com | 2 185 |
| 12 | beget.com | 2 098 |
| 13 | spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com | 1 871 |
| 14 | emsd1.com | 1 765 |
| 15 | helpscoutemail.com | 1 726 |
| 16 | mx.ovh.com | 1 696 |
| 17 | _spf.mail.hostinger.com | 1 684 |
| 18 | relay.mailbaby.net | 1 652 |
| 19 | spf.emailsignatures365.com | 1 443 |
| 20 | _spf.mlsend.com | 1 419 |
| 21 | spf.mxhichina.com | 1 356 |
| 22 | spf.messagelabs.com | 1 352 |
| 23 | _spf.mx.cloudflare.net | 1 335 |
| 24 | stspg-customer.com | 1 252 |
| 25 | eu._netblocks.mimecast.com | 1 222 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | aspmx.googlemail.com | 1 199 |
| 27 | mxsspf.sendpulse.com | 1 196 |
| 28 | _incspfcheck.mailspike.net | 1 160 |
| 29 | bluehost.com | 1 127 |
| 30 | zcsend.net | 1 093 |
| 31 | spf.163.com | 1 035 |
| 32 | netblocks.dreamhost.com | 1 015 |
| 33 | spf.exclaimer.net | 986 |
| 34 | transmail.net | 937 |
| 35 | spf.dynect.net | 924 |
| 36 | spf.sender.xserver.jp | 829 |
| 37 | mxsmtp.sendpulse.com | 795 |
| 38 | spf.messagingengine.com | 767 |
| 39 | spf.smtp2go.com | 735 |
| 40 | spf.antispamcloud.com | 715 |
| 41 | _spf.createsend.com | 714 |
| 42 | _spf.timeweb.ru | 714 |
| 43 | spf.improvmx.com | 674 |
| 44 | spf.crsend.com | 667 |
| 45 | cmail1.com | 657 |
| 46 | _mailcust.gandi.net | 644 |
| 47 | authsmtp.com | 632 |
| 48 | spf.mx.hostinger.com | 624 |
| 49 | spf.tmes.trendmicro.com | 581 |
| 50 | _spf.mailhostbox.com | 576 |
| 51 | _spf.kundenserver.de | 567 |
| 52 | _spf.hosting.reg.ru | 560 |
| 53 | spf.securedserverspace.com | 547 |
| 54 | _spf.perfora.net | 535 |
| 55 | infusionmail.com | 501 |
| 56 | outboundmail.blackbaud.net | 499 |
| 57 | e2ma.net | 495 |
| 58 | musvc.com | 491 |
| 59 | spf.titan.email | 482 |
| 60 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 476 |
| 61 | mailcontrol.com | 467 |
| 62 | spf.autopilothq.com | 437 |
| 63 | outlook.com | 426 |
| 64 | aruba.it | 418 |
| 65 | spf.a2hosting.com | 382 |
| 66 | ispgateway.de | 382 |
| 67 | nicmail.ru | 379 |
| 68 | msgfocus.com | 378 |
| 69 | spf2.esputnik.com | 376 |
| 70 | _spf.act-on.net | 375 |
| 71 | outboundmail.convio.net | 374 |
| 72 | _spf.uni5.net | 372 |
| 73 | send.aweber.com | 363 |
| 74 | spf-bma.mpme.jp | 357 |
| 75 | spf.flockmail.com | 347 |
| 76 | zoho.in | 334 |
| 77 | webhostbox.net | 333 |
| 78 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 330 |
| 79 | _spf.locaweb.com.br | 330 |
| 80 | email-od.com | 328 |
| 81 | spf.afas.online | 328 |
| 82 | spf.mailanyone.net | 328 |
| 83 | icpbounce.com | 327 |
| 84 | au._netblocks.mimecast.com | 326 |
| 85 | _spf.hostedemail.com | 324 |
| 86 | spfa.mailendo.com | 314 |
| 87 | _spf.arandomserver.com | 308 |
| 88 | spf.nl2go.com | 307 |
| 89 | spf.stackmail.com | 303 |
| 90 | spf.securemx.jp | 302 |
| 91 | spf.intermedia.net | 295 |
| 92 | agenturserver.de | 292 |
| 93 | spf.qiye.aliyun.com | 287 |
| 94 | spf.topdesk.net | 285 |
| 95 | _spf.ukraine.com.ua | 283 |
| 96 | spf.hornetsecurity.com | 280 |
| 97 | _netblocks.google.com | 279 |
| 98 | emailus.freshservice.com | 276 |
| 99 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 273 |
| 100 | spf.mindbox.ru | 272 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.