Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-08-11.

427 823
Domains with MX
354 634
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
427 823
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Unknown / Other122 10028.54%
2Google Workspace82 14919.2%
3Generic / unmatched (mail.*)69 47016.24%
4Microsoft 36552 61712.3%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)38 1788.92%
6Yandex 36011 9312.79%
7Mimecast8 2821.94%
8Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)7 2571.7%
9QQ Mail (Tencent)5 0301.18%
10Zoho Mail3 4250.8%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Rackspace Email2 9790.7%
12Amazon WorkMail2 2140.52%
13Cisco IronPort2 1860.51%
14Beget (RU)2 0880.49%
15OVH Mail2 0610.48%
16Mail.ru for Business1 9590.46%
17Alibaba Mail (China)1 4930.35%
181&1 IONOS1 3750.32%
19Mailgun (inbound)1 1970.28%
20Gandi Mail9950.23%
21Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)9080.21%
22NetEase Mail8520.2%
23FastMail8310.19%
24Timeweb (RU)7780.18%
25ImprovMX (forwarding)7390.17%
26Zoho Mail (EU)7030.16%
27ProtonMail5390.13%
28CSC (corporate)5320.12%
29NetEase 1635310.12%
30Reg.ru4800.11%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
55.4%
237 005 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
160 815
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
29.91%
127 973 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp17 6254.97%
2Mandrill14 8754.19%
3Amazon SES14 2884.03%
4SendGrid (Twilio)13 9753.94%
5Zendesk11 7443.31%
6Mailgun10 9163.08%
7Salesforce6 8581.93%
8Mailjet (Sinch)4 9891.41%
9Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)3 6331.02%
10Marketo (Adobe)2 7900.79%
Show rows 11 – 26
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Elastic Email1 9130.54%
12Unisender (RU)1 7460.49%
13Postmark1 6280.46%
14Constant Contact1 4710.41%
15SparkPost1 4490.41%
16Freshdesk1 1290.32%
17Salesforce Marketing Cloud9870.28%
18SMTP.com5170.15%
19Sailthru4470.13%
20Customer.io4220.12%
21Eloqua (Oracle)2300.06%
22SMTP.BZ2060.06%
23MailerSend1930.05%
24GetResponse1200.03%
25Intercom100.0%
26HubSpot50.0%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 7961.35%
2Shopify2 2200.63%
3KnowBe41 4280.4%
4Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1 1310.32%
5Trustpilot9030.25%
6NetSuite (Oracle)6500.18%
7Firebase (Google)6480.18%
8ClickDimensions6280.18%
9BigCommerce6070.17%
10Qualtrics5970.17%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Docebo (LMS)4600.13%
12ConnectWise4390.12%
13PayPal Braintree4320.12%
14Zendesk3800.11%
15Greenhouse3330.09%
16Autotask (ConnectWise)2990.08%
17Sage Intacct2630.07%
18Freshsales (Freshworks)1880.05%
19Oracle Cloud1760.05%
20HappyFox1750.05%
21Oracle Cloud Email1590.04%
22UKG / UltiPro1570.04%
23Lark / Feishu1450.04%
24Squarespace1430.04%
25Gorgias1210.03%
26Chargebee990.03%
27Recurly810.02%
28FormAssembly750.02%
29Odoo610.02%
30SurveyMonkey320.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.23%90d ago▲ +1.86%1y ago▲ +4.28%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;31 036
2v=DMARC1; p=none28 531
3v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 301
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;3 214
5v=DMARC1;p=none;3 179
6v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864003 089
7v=DMARC1; p=quarantine2 668
8v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com2 590
9v=DMARC1; p=reject;2 534
10v=DMARC1; p=reject1 871
11v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 866
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;1 814
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s1 685
14v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 642
15v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1001 562
16v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 408
17v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 397
18v=DMARC1;p=none1 349
19v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 326
20v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 304
21v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 124
22v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 066
23v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 003
24v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;977
25v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email952
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100785
27v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400629
28v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email607
29v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com601
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100561
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com547
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_report@mail.liamfactory.com; fo=1; pct=100540
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;406
34v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;402
35v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400393
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;380
37v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com373
38v=DMARC1;p=quarantine372
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;352
40v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;349
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:d@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d@ruf.agari.com338
42v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1317
43v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;316
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;313
45v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com307
46v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r298
47v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1298
48v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s287
49v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;286
50v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com279
51v=DMARC1;p=reject279
52v=DMARC1278
53v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com276
54v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r271
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;265
56v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com260
57v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400244
58v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1242
59v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp231
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;223
61v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100205
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com204
63v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com195
64v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:dmarc@smtpeter.com194
65v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@dbs.com193
66v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400192
67v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100184
68v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:procter-gamble@rua.dmp.cisco.com; ruf=mailto:procter-gamble@ruf.dmp.cisco.com183
69v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100;183
70v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400179
71v=DMARC1;p=reject;179
72v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl176
73v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1173
74v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@report.securemx.jp172
75v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com168
76v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;167
77v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;165
78v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;164
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400163
80v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1160
81v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;160
82v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf159
83v=DMARC1;""p=reject;""fo=1;""rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;""ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com156
84v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100154
85v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s149
86v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com145
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r144
88v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1;142
89v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;136
90v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100132
91v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:nexstar@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:nexstar@ruf.agari.com131
92v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=50;127
93v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r127
94v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br; ruf=mailto:abuse@mailbiz.com.br124
95v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email; ruf=mailto:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email; fo=1; pct=100; rf=afrf121
96v=DMARC1;p=none;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com120
97v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine116
98v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s116
99v=DMARC1;""p=none;116
100v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com114

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1eforward5.registrar-servers.com5 324
2eforward2.registrar-servers.com5 322
3eforward4.registrar-servers.com5 320
4eforward1.registrar-servers.com5 316
5eforward3.registrar-servers.com5 311
6mailstore1.secureserver.net5 217
7smtp.secureserver.net5 195
8mx20.mailspamprotection.com2 192
9mx10.mailspamprotection.com2 191
10mx30.mailspamprotection.com2 188
11mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems1 588
12mx1-hosting.jellyfish.systems1 580
13mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems1 576
14mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com1 563
15mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com1 540
16park-mx.above.com1 321
17mx1.hostinger.in994
18mx2.hostinger.in949
19mx1.privateemail.com871
20mx2.privateemail.com869
21mx1.mailchannels.net839
22mx2.mailchannels.net839
23mail.h-email.net762
24route2.mx.cloudflare.net724
25route1.mx.cloudflare.net724
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26route3.mx.cloudflare.net723
27mx1.hostinger.com723
28mx2.hostinger.com659
29mx1.csof.net640
30mx2.csof.net640
31mx156.hostedmxserver.com629
32localhost583
33amir.mx.cloudflare.net582
34isaac.mx.cloudflare.net582
35linda.mx.cloudflare.net580
36mx00.1and1.com546
37nan545
38mx01.1and1.com544
39mxlb.ispgateway.de542
40mx.spamexperts.com537
41us2.mx1.mailhostbox.com506
42smtpin.rzone.de504
43us2.mx3.mailhostbox.com501
44us2.mx2.mailhostbox.com499
45lastmx.spamexperts.net493
46fallbackmx.spamexperts.eu490
47mx01.nicmail.ru437
48mx02.nicmail.ru431
49mx03.nicmail.ru426
50mail.eye-mail.net421
51mx.stackmail.com420
52mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net400
53mx15.ukraine.com.ua351
54mx20.ukraine.com.ua347
55mx1.dreamhost.com330
56mx1.123-reg.co.uk330
57mx.a.locaweb.com.br330
58mx2.dreamhost.com328
59mx0.123-reg.co.uk326
60mx.b.locaweb.com.br321
61mx.jk.locaweb.com.br321
62mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net319
63mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net318
64mx1.netsolmail.net315
65mx1.qiye.aliyun.com311
66mx.securemx.jp311
67mx-vip-01.uni5.net306
68mx-vip-02.uni5.net306
69mx2.qiye.aliyun.com303
70mx3.qiye.aliyun.com293
71za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za289
72za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za289
73mx.core.locaweb.com.br275
74mx1.forwardemail.net270
75mx2.forwardemail.net269
76mx00.1and1.co.uk269
77mx01.1and1.co.uk267
78mx1.spaceweb.ru260
79mx2.spaceweb.ru258
80mx01.hornetsecurity.com224
81mx02.hornetsecurity.com223
82mta-gw.infomaniak.ch223
83mx03.hornetsecurity.com218
84mx04.hornetsecurity.com218
85mail.parktons.com208
86mx-01-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com196
87primary.us.email.fireeyecloud.com194
88alt1.us.email.fireeyecloud.com194
89mx.ukraine.com.ua193
90mx1.mtaroutes.com193
91alt2.us.email.fireeyecloud.com193
92alt3.us.email.fireeyecloud.com191
93mx-02-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com188
94mx01.lolipop.jp187
95mx2.mtaroutes.com187
96mail.register.it186
97mx3.mtaroutes.com183
98mx4.mtaroutes.com182
99mx2-eu1.ppe-hosted.com182
100mx1-eu1.ppe-hosted.com181

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com5 304
2websitewelcome.com5 082
3relay.mailchannels.net4 539
4secureserver.net4 098
5zoho.com3 365
6us._netblocks.mimecast.com3 303
7_spf.mailspamprotection.com2 625
8emailsrvr.com2 580
9spf.web-hosting.com2 377
10spf.mail.qq.com2 313
11_netblocks.mimecast.com2 185
12beget.com2 098
13spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com1 871
14emsd1.com1 765
15helpscoutemail.com1 726
16mx.ovh.com1 696
17_spf.mail.hostinger.com1 684
18relay.mailbaby.net1 652
19spf.emailsignatures365.com1 443
20_spf.mlsend.com1 419
21spf.mxhichina.com1 356
22spf.messagelabs.com1 352
23_spf.mx.cloudflare.net1 335
24stspg-customer.com1 252
25eu._netblocks.mimecast.com1 222
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26aspmx.googlemail.com1 199
27mxsspf.sendpulse.com1 196
28_incspfcheck.mailspike.net1 160
29bluehost.com1 127
30zcsend.net1 093
31spf.163.com1 035
32netblocks.dreamhost.com1 015
33spf.exclaimer.net986
34transmail.net937
35spf.dynect.net924
36spf.sender.xserver.jp829
37mxsmtp.sendpulse.com795
38spf.messagingengine.com767
39spf.smtp2go.com735
40spf.antispamcloud.com715
41_spf.createsend.com714
42_spf.timeweb.ru714
43spf.improvmx.com674
44spf.crsend.com667
45cmail1.com657
46_mailcust.gandi.net644
47authsmtp.com632
48spf.mx.hostinger.com624
49spf.tmes.trendmicro.com581
50_spf.mailhostbox.com576
51_spf.kundenserver.de567
52_spf.hosting.reg.ru560
53spf.securedserverspace.com547
54_spf.perfora.net535
55infusionmail.com501
56outboundmail.blackbaud.net499
57e2ma.net495
58musvc.com491
59spf.titan.email482
60spf.mail.intercom.io476
61mailcontrol.com467
62spf.autopilothq.com437
63outlook.com426
64aruba.it418
65spf.a2hosting.com382
66ispgateway.de382
67nicmail.ru379
68msgfocus.com378
69spf2.esputnik.com376
70_spf.act-on.net375
71outboundmail.convio.net374
72_spf.uni5.net372
73send.aweber.com363
74spf-bma.mpme.jp357
75spf.flockmail.com347
76zoho.in334
77webhostbox.net333
78_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com330
79_spf.locaweb.com.br330
80email-od.com328
81spf.afas.online328
82spf.mailanyone.net328
83icpbounce.com327
84au._netblocks.mimecast.com326
85_spf.hostedemail.com324
86spfa.mailendo.com314
87_spf.arandomserver.com308
88spf.nl2go.com307
89spf.stackmail.com303
90spf.securemx.jp302
91spf.intermedia.net295
92agenturserver.de292
93spf.qiye.aliyun.com287
94spf.topdesk.net285
95_spf.ukraine.com.ua283
96spf.hornetsecurity.com280
97_netblocks.google.com279
98emailus.freshservice.com276
99spf.zixsmbhosted.com273
100spf.mindbox.ru272

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-08-11. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-28T19:23:07Z.