Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-07-01.

968 388
Domains with MX
789 788
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
968 388
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted274 94128.39%
2Google Workspace204 16521.08%
3Microsoft 365130 00913.43%
4Unknown / Other68 8807.11%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)32 9343.4%
6Yandex 36022 5732.33%
7GoDaddy14 9101.54%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)12 9041.33%
9Zoho Mail11 4321.18%
10Mimecast11 3601.17%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Namecheap Email Forwarding10 6201.1%
12Proofpoint9 6140.99%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 3310.96%
14Hostinger9 0590.94%
15OVH Mail8 9830.93%
16QQ Mail (Tencent)6 2110.64%
17Rackspace Email6 1510.64%
18Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 1020.63%
19Barracuda5 8930.61%
20Jellyfish (Namecheap)5 5820.58%
211&1 IONOS5 3190.55%
22Proofpoint Essentials3 8330.4%
23Beget (RU)3 7830.39%
24Amazon WorkMail3 4530.36%
25One.com mailpod3 3300.34%
26Cisco IronPort2 9790.31%
27Mail.ru for Business2 9110.3%
28Namecheap PrivateEmail2 8080.29%
29Gandi Mail2 5860.27%
30Mailgun (inbound)2 4730.26%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.03%
116 483 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
44 043
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
28.41%
275 082 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp33 8544.29%
2SendGrid (Twilio)30 0903.81%
3Mandrill28 8293.65%
4Zendesk24 8283.14%
5Amazon SES24 2673.07%
6Mailgun21 7902.76%
7MailChannels14 7721.87%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)11 3731.44%
9Mailjet (Sinch)10 7881.37%
10Namecheap Forwarding10 7741.36%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast9 8801.25%
12Salesforce9 7171.23%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)9 3891.19%
14Elastic Email4 6970.59%
15Emsd1 (transactional)4 0260.51%
16MailerSend3 9700.5%
17Marketo (Adobe)3 9080.49%
18SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)3 4920.44%
19Barracuda Essentials3 2810.42%
20Constant Contact3 1480.4%
21Help Scout3 1310.4%
22Zoho Campaigns3 0570.39%
23SendPulse2 8310.36%
24Zoho ZeptoMail2 8090.36%
25Postmark2 7400.35%
26SparkPost2 6620.34%
27Cloudflare Email Routing2 6000.33%
28Exclaimer (signatures)2 3480.3%
29Unisender (RU)2 2310.28%
30Freshdesk2 0470.26%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)6 8080.86%
2Shopify5 6030.71%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 3653 0990.39%
4BigCommerce2 1060.27%
5Trustpilot2 0320.26%
6KnowBe41 9000.24%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1 7490.22%
8Statuspage (Atlassian)1 7310.22%
9Firebase (Google)1 4860.19%
10Squarespace1 0560.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11ClickDimensions1 0420.13%
12NetSuite (Oracle)1 0370.13%
13Qualtrics7940.1%
14PayPal Braintree7000.09%
15One.com (DK hosting)6250.08%
16Docebo (LMS)6080.08%
17Zendesk5390.07%
18Greenhouse4910.06%
19Freshsales (Freshworks)4260.05%
20k.io (workspace)4160.05%
21ConnectWise3900.05%
22Sage Intacct3370.04%
23Umantis (Haufe HR)3310.04%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)3290.04%
25Gorgias3160.04%
26SchoolMessenger2770.04%
27HappyFox2710.03%
28Lark / Feishu2600.03%
29RetailCRM2590.03%
30Dixa2530.03%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com1 626
2mx00.1and1.com1 624
3mx.simply.com1 123
4mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net909
5mx01.1and1.co.uk798
6mx00.1and1.co.uk797
7mx1.netsolmail.net788
8mx01.1and1.fr744
9mx00.1and1.fr740
10localhost633
11mx01.1and1.es606
12mx00.1and1.es605
13mx1.jimdo.com596
14mx2.jimdo.com596
15nan514
16smtp-fwd.wordpress.com496
17smx2.web-hosting.com470
18smx1.web-hosting.com460
19smx3.web-hosting.com459
20mx-backup.serveriai.lt413
21antispam1.ihs.com.tr399
22antispam2.ihs.com.tr398
23mx-in05.natrohost.com367
24mx-in04.natrohost.com367
25mx-in05b.natrohost.com366
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in04b.natrohost.com364
27mx01.easyname.eu311
28mx02.easyname.eu309
29mx1.tmdhosting.com304
30mx2.tmdhosting.com300
31mailgw.nic.in295
32mx1.oderland.com287
33mx2.oderland.com285
34mx1.inbox.co.il269
35mx-in03.natrohost.com267
36mx-in03b.natrohost.com266
37mx3.oderland.com265
38mx4.oderland.com263
39mx1.spamfiltering.io255
40mx2.spamfiltering.io255
41mx01.schlund.de253
42mx00.schlund.de250
43mx1.emailowl.com249
44asp.reflexion.net249
45mta.hosts.net.nz248
46mx2.emailowl.com246
47mx3.emailowl.com243
48zonemx.eu221
49inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com206
50mx-100.reflexion.net205
51s.mail.dcsaas.net202
52sitemail.everyone.net197
53mx-110.reflexion.net197
54smtp.imcloud.org196
55mx-in01b.natrohost.com195
56mx-in01.natrohost.com193
57mx1.dandomain.dk193
58smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net192
59mx2.dandomain.dk192
60relay1.netnames.net191
61relay2.netnames.net191
62mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl187
63mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl187
64mx2.inbox.co.il185
65in.hes.trendmicro.eu185
66smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it184
67mx1.nz.smxemail.com182
68mx-in02.natrohost.com179
69mx-in02b.natrohost.com178
70mx1.onlinemail.io177
71mx2.onlinemail.io177
72mx2.nz.smxemail.com174
73mailme.enter-system.com174
74mx4.volusion.com171
75mx3.volusion.com170
76ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr170
77rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr168
78mta.1stdomains.net.nz162
79mx1.supremebox.com161
80mx2.supremebox.com161
81mta1.youcan.shop160
82mta2.youcan.shop160
83mx1.krystal.co.uk159
84fallback.axc.eu158
85mail-fr.securemail.pro158
86mx2.krystal.co.uk158
87mx.spamfilter.io157
88smx4.web-hosting.com154
89webmail2.sitebuildit.com152
90mx.usa.net151
91mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl150
92mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl149
93mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr147
94mx.zoho.com.au147
95mx2.zoho.com.au147
96mx3.zoho.com.au146
97mail1.sbnation.com143
98gmail22.gadmail.de143
99gmail23.gadmail.de143
100wmail23.gadmail.de143

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1_spf.automattic.com4 160
2bluehost.com3 415
3spf.a2hosting.com1 460
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com1 416
5_spfcls.natrohost.com1 402
6webhostbox.net1 358
7spf.flockmail.com1 285
8spf.webapps.net1 128
9cmail1.com1 049
10_spf.transip.email1 049
11spf.improvmx.com1 033
12infusionmail.com1 026
13spf.autopilothq.com973
14spf.simply.com960
15outlook.com881
16spf.mailanyone.net818
17spf.serveriai.lt795
18send.aweber.com777
19spf.mail.intercom.io753
20spf.jabatus.fr745
21spf.nl2go.com734
22mailcontrol.com731
23spf.afas.online678
24_spf.domeneshop.no671
25smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg668
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com654
27turbo-smtp.com634
28sender.zohobooks.com631
29nicmail.ru631
30_spf.turhost.com615
31e2ma.net614
32spf.mailcluster.com.au578
33spf.easywp.com575
34spf.hostingplatform.net.au573
35_spf.mixhost.jp565
36smtp.servconfig.com562
37_spf.anpdm.com558
38_spf.cyberfolks.pl556
39hostmonster.com552
40spf.hostmar.com543
41_spf.trwww.com539
42_spf.nicegrup.com539
43spf.hes.trendmicro.com534
44spf.topdesk.net523
45email-od.com519
46spf.registeredsite.com514
47_spf.hostnet.nl512
48spf.linuxpl.com510
49icpbounce.com505
50_spf.protection.veridyen.com501
51spf.tld.pl497
52_spf.serviciodecorreo.es496
53_spf.act-on.net495
54msgfocus.com478
55mxlogin.com474
56_vsp.oderland.com469
57_mail.dhosting.pl459
58spf.w4ymail.at452
59_spf.syrahost.com449
60_spf.zenbox.pl447
61relay.is.cc442
62_spf.hoster.by442
63spf.zixsmbhosted.com441
64spf.lianamailer.com439
65email.freshservice.com430
66google.com414
67customer.mailguard.com.au404
68_netblocks.google.com399
69_spf.websupport.sk394
70_spf.sui-inter.net389
71spf.mtaroutes.com383
72emailus.freshservice.com376
73bmsend.com373
74spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl373
75smtp.groovehq.com370
76hotmail.com366
77spf.migadu.com362
78spf.dandomain.dk361
79_spf.embluemail.com360
80outboundmail.convio.net359
81md02.com358
82spf.totaalholding.nl356
83spf.flowmailer.net352
84_spf.srv.cat348
85spf.mail.hostpoint.ch348
86spf.ihs.com.tr338
87_netblocks2.google.com338
88_spf.fastmail.gr338
89spf.mindbox.ru337
90spf.ess.uk.barracudanetworks.com336
91reflexion.net336
92emailserver.vn336
93spf.raiolanetworks.com335
94_spf.5g-soft.com335
95_spf.acquia.com333
96_netblocks3.google.com332
97_spf.conoha.ne.jp329
98spf.tipalti.com328
99spfhost.messageprovider.com327
100appriver.com324

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-07-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:22:29Z.