Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-07-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 274 941 | 28.39% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 204 165 | 21.08% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 130 009 | 13.43% |
| 4 | Unknown / Other | 68 880 | 7.11% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 32 934 | 3.4% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 22 573 | 2.33% |
| 7 | GoDaddy | 14 910 | 1.54% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 12 904 | 1.33% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 11 432 | 1.18% |
| 10 | Mimecast | 11 360 | 1.17% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 10 620 | 1.1% |
| 12 | Proofpoint | 9 614 | 0.99% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 9 331 | 0.96% |
| 14 | Hostinger | 9 059 | 0.94% |
| 15 | OVH Mail | 8 983 | 0.93% |
| 16 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 6 211 | 0.64% |
| 17 | Rackspace Email | 6 151 | 0.64% |
| 18 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 6 102 | 0.63% |
| 19 | Barracuda | 5 893 | 0.61% |
| 20 | Jellyfish (Namecheap) | 5 582 | 0.58% |
| 21 | 1&1 IONOS | 5 319 | 0.55% |
| 22 | Proofpoint Essentials | 3 833 | 0.4% |
| 23 | Beget (RU) | 3 783 | 0.39% |
| 24 | Amazon WorkMail | 3 453 | 0.36% |
| 25 | One.com mailpod | 3 330 | 0.34% |
| 26 | Cisco IronPort | 2 979 | 0.31% |
| 27 | Mail.ru for Business | 2 911 | 0.3% |
| 28 | Namecheap PrivateEmail | 2 808 | 0.29% |
| 29 | Gandi Mail | 2 586 | 0.27% |
| 30 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 473 | 0.26% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 33 854 | 4.29% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 30 090 | 3.81% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 28 829 | 3.65% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 24 828 | 3.14% |
| 5 | Amazon SES | 24 267 | 3.07% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 21 790 | 2.76% |
| 7 | MailChannels | 14 772 | 1.87% |
| 8 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 11 373 | 1.44% |
| 9 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 10 788 | 1.37% |
| 10 | Namecheap Forwarding | 10 774 | 1.36% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 9 880 | 1.25% |
| 12 | Salesforce | 9 717 | 1.23% |
| 13 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 9 389 | 1.19% |
| 14 | Elastic Email | 4 697 | 0.59% |
| 15 | Emsd1 (transactional) | 4 026 | 0.51% |
| 16 | MailerSend | 3 970 | 0.5% |
| 17 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 908 | 0.49% |
| 18 | SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud) | 3 492 | 0.44% |
| 19 | Barracuda Essentials | 3 281 | 0.42% |
| 20 | Constant Contact | 3 148 | 0.4% |
| 21 | Help Scout | 3 131 | 0.4% |
| 22 | Zoho Campaigns | 3 057 | 0.39% |
| 23 | SendPulse | 2 831 | 0.36% |
| 24 | Zoho ZeptoMail | 2 809 | 0.36% |
| 25 | Postmark | 2 740 | 0.35% |
| 26 | SparkPost | 2 662 | 0.34% |
| 27 | Cloudflare Email Routing | 2 600 | 0.33% |
| 28 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 2 348 | 0.3% |
| 29 | Unisender (RU) | 2 231 | 0.28% |
| 30 | Freshdesk | 2 047 | 0.26% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 808 | 0.86% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 603 | 0.71% |
| 3 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 3 099 | 0.39% |
| 4 | BigCommerce | 2 106 | 0.27% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 2 032 | 0.26% |
| 6 | KnowBe4 | 1 900 | 0.24% |
| 7 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 749 | 0.22% |
| 8 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 731 | 0.22% |
| 9 | Firebase (Google) | 1 486 | 0.19% |
| 10 | Squarespace | 1 056 | 0.13% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | ClickDimensions | 1 042 | 0.13% |
| 12 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 1 037 | 0.13% |
| 13 | Qualtrics | 794 | 0.1% |
| 14 | PayPal Braintree | 700 | 0.09% |
| 15 | One.com (DK hosting) | 625 | 0.08% |
| 16 | Docebo (LMS) | 608 | 0.08% |
| 17 | Zendesk | 539 | 0.07% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 491 | 0.06% |
| 19 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 426 | 0.05% |
| 20 | k.io (workspace) | 416 | 0.05% |
| 21 | ConnectWise | 390 | 0.05% |
| 22 | Sage Intacct | 337 | 0.04% |
| 23 | Umantis (Haufe HR) | 331 | 0.04% |
| 24 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 329 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Gorgias | 316 | 0.04% |
| 26 | SchoolMessenger | 277 | 0.04% |
| 27 | HappyFox | 271 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Lark / Feishu | 260 | 0.03% |
| 29 | RetailCRM | 259 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Dixa | 253 | 0.03% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx01.1and1.com | 1 626 |
| 2 | mx00.1and1.com | 1 624 |
| 3 | mx.simply.com | 1 123 |
| 4 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 909 |
| 5 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 798 |
| 6 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 797 |
| 7 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 788 |
| 8 | mx01.1and1.fr | 744 |
| 9 | mx00.1and1.fr | 740 |
| 10 | localhost | 633 |
| 11 | mx01.1and1.es | 606 |
| 12 | mx00.1and1.es | 605 |
| 13 | mx1.jimdo.com | 596 |
| 14 | mx2.jimdo.com | 596 |
| 15 | nan | 514 |
| 16 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 496 |
| 17 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 470 |
| 18 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 460 |
| 19 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 459 |
| 20 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 413 |
| 21 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 399 |
| 22 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 398 |
| 23 | mx-in05.natrohost.com | 367 |
| 24 | mx-in04.natrohost.com | 367 |
| 25 | mx-in05b.natrohost.com | 366 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx-in04b.natrohost.com | 364 |
| 27 | mx01.easyname.eu | 311 |
| 28 | mx02.easyname.eu | 309 |
| 29 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 304 |
| 30 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 300 |
| 31 | mailgw.nic.in | 295 |
| 32 | mx1.oderland.com | 287 |
| 33 | mx2.oderland.com | 285 |
| 34 | mx1.inbox.co.il | 269 |
| 35 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 267 |
| 36 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 266 |
| 37 | mx3.oderland.com | 265 |
| 38 | mx4.oderland.com | 263 |
| 39 | mx1.spamfiltering.io | 255 |
| 40 | mx2.spamfiltering.io | 255 |
| 41 | mx01.schlund.de | 253 |
| 42 | mx00.schlund.de | 250 |
| 43 | mx1.emailowl.com | 249 |
| 44 | asp.reflexion.net | 249 |
| 45 | mta.hosts.net.nz | 248 |
| 46 | mx2.emailowl.com | 246 |
| 47 | mx3.emailowl.com | 243 |
| 48 | zonemx.eu | 221 |
| 49 | inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com | 206 |
| 50 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 205 |
| 51 | s.mail.dcsaas.net | 202 |
| 52 | sitemail.everyone.net | 197 |
| 53 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 197 |
| 54 | smtp.imcloud.org | 196 |
| 55 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 195 |
| 56 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 193 |
| 57 | mx1.dandomain.dk | 193 |
| 58 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 192 |
| 59 | mx2.dandomain.dk | 192 |
| 60 | relay1.netnames.net | 191 |
| 61 | relay2.netnames.net | 191 |
| 62 | mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl | 187 |
| 63 | mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl | 187 |
| 64 | mx2.inbox.co.il | 185 |
| 65 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 185 |
| 66 | smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it | 184 |
| 67 | mx1.nz.smxemail.com | 182 |
| 68 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 179 |
| 69 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 178 |
| 70 | mx1.onlinemail.io | 177 |
| 71 | mx2.onlinemail.io | 177 |
| 72 | mx2.nz.smxemail.com | 174 |
| 73 | mailme.enter-system.com | 174 |
| 74 | mx4.volusion.com | 171 |
| 75 | mx3.volusion.com | 170 |
| 76 | ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 170 |
| 77 | rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 168 |
| 78 | mta.1stdomains.net.nz | 162 |
| 79 | mx1.supremebox.com | 161 |
| 80 | mx2.supremebox.com | 161 |
| 81 | mta1.youcan.shop | 160 |
| 82 | mta2.youcan.shop | 160 |
| 83 | mx1.krystal.co.uk | 159 |
| 84 | fallback.axc.eu | 158 |
| 85 | mail-fr.securemail.pro | 158 |
| 86 | mx2.krystal.co.uk | 158 |
| 87 | mx.spamfilter.io | 157 |
| 88 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 154 |
| 89 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 152 |
| 90 | mx.usa.net | 151 |
| 91 | mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl | 150 |
| 92 | mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl | 149 |
| 93 | mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr | 147 |
| 94 | mx.zoho.com.au | 147 |
| 95 | mx2.zoho.com.au | 147 |
| 96 | mx3.zoho.com.au | 146 |
| 97 | mail1.sbnation.com | 143 |
| 98 | gmail22.gadmail.de | 143 |
| 99 | gmail23.gadmail.de | 143 |
| 100 | wmail23.gadmail.de | 143 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.automattic.com | 4 160 |
| 2 | bluehost.com | 3 415 |
| 3 | spf.a2hosting.com | 1 460 |
| 4 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 1 416 |
| 5 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 1 402 |
| 6 | webhostbox.net | 1 358 |
| 7 | spf.flockmail.com | 1 285 |
| 8 | spf.webapps.net | 1 128 |
| 9 | cmail1.com | 1 049 |
| 10 | _spf.transip.email | 1 049 |
| 11 | spf.improvmx.com | 1 033 |
| 12 | infusionmail.com | 1 026 |
| 13 | spf.autopilothq.com | 973 |
| 14 | spf.simply.com | 960 |
| 15 | outlook.com | 881 |
| 16 | spf.mailanyone.net | 818 |
| 17 | spf.serveriai.lt | 795 |
| 18 | send.aweber.com | 777 |
| 19 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 753 |
| 20 | spf.jabatus.fr | 745 |
| 21 | spf.nl2go.com | 734 |
| 22 | mailcontrol.com | 731 |
| 23 | spf.afas.online | 678 |
| 24 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 671 |
| 25 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 668 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 654 |
| 27 | turbo-smtp.com | 634 |
| 28 | sender.zohobooks.com | 631 |
| 29 | nicmail.ru | 631 |
| 30 | _spf.turhost.com | 615 |
| 31 | e2ma.net | 614 |
| 32 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 578 |
| 33 | spf.easywp.com | 575 |
| 34 | spf.hostingplatform.net.au | 573 |
| 35 | _spf.mixhost.jp | 565 |
| 36 | smtp.servconfig.com | 562 |
| 37 | _spf.anpdm.com | 558 |
| 38 | _spf.cyberfolks.pl | 556 |
| 39 | hostmonster.com | 552 |
| 40 | spf.hostmar.com | 543 |
| 41 | _spf.trwww.com | 539 |
| 42 | _spf.nicegrup.com | 539 |
| 43 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 534 |
| 44 | spf.topdesk.net | 523 |
| 45 | email-od.com | 519 |
| 46 | spf.registeredsite.com | 514 |
| 47 | _spf.hostnet.nl | 512 |
| 48 | spf.linuxpl.com | 510 |
| 49 | icpbounce.com | 505 |
| 50 | _spf.protection.veridyen.com | 501 |
| 51 | spf.tld.pl | 497 |
| 52 | _spf.serviciodecorreo.es | 496 |
| 53 | _spf.act-on.net | 495 |
| 54 | msgfocus.com | 478 |
| 55 | mxlogin.com | 474 |
| 56 | _vsp.oderland.com | 469 |
| 57 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 459 |
| 58 | spf.w4ymail.at | 452 |
| 59 | _spf.syrahost.com | 449 |
| 60 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 447 |
| 61 | relay.is.cc | 442 |
| 62 | _spf.hoster.by | 442 |
| 63 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 441 |
| 64 | spf.lianamailer.com | 439 |
| 65 | email.freshservice.com | 430 |
| 66 | google.com | 414 |
| 67 | customer.mailguard.com.au | 404 |
| 68 | _netblocks.google.com | 399 |
| 69 | _spf.websupport.sk | 394 |
| 70 | _spf.sui-inter.net | 389 |
| 71 | spf.mtaroutes.com | 383 |
| 72 | emailus.freshservice.com | 376 |
| 73 | bmsend.com | 373 |
| 74 | spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl | 373 |
| 75 | smtp.groovehq.com | 370 |
| 76 | hotmail.com | 366 |
| 77 | spf.migadu.com | 362 |
| 78 | spf.dandomain.dk | 361 |
| 79 | _spf.embluemail.com | 360 |
| 80 | outboundmail.convio.net | 359 |
| 81 | md02.com | 358 |
| 82 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 356 |
| 83 | spf.flowmailer.net | 352 |
| 84 | _spf.srv.cat | 348 |
| 85 | spf.mail.hostpoint.ch | 348 |
| 86 | spf.ihs.com.tr | 338 |
| 87 | _netblocks2.google.com | 338 |
| 88 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 338 |
| 89 | spf.mindbox.ru | 337 |
| 90 | spf.ess.uk.barracudanetworks.com | 336 |
| 91 | reflexion.net | 336 |
| 92 | emailserver.vn | 336 |
| 93 | spf.raiolanetworks.com | 335 |
| 94 | _spf.5g-soft.com | 335 |
| 95 | _spf.acquia.com | 333 |
| 96 | _netblocks3.google.com | 332 |
| 97 | _spf.conoha.ne.jp | 329 |
| 98 | spf.tipalti.com | 328 |
| 99 | spfhost.messageprovider.com | 327 |
| 100 | appriver.com | 324 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.