Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-06-01.

1 026 911
Domains with MX
833 170
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 026 911
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted309 95830.18%
2Google Workspace206 48920.11%
3Microsoft 365127 07012.37%
4Unknown / Other73 0547.11%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)34 8523.39%
6Yandex 36026 2482.56%
7GoDaddy15 3511.49%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)13 5171.32%
9Zoho Mail12 4561.21%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding11 7011.14%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast10 6101.03%
12SpamExperts (SolarWinds)10 1240.99%
13Hostinger10 0410.98%
14OVH Mail9 9000.96%
15Proofpoint8 8800.86%
16QQ Mail (Tencent)7 4690.73%
17Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 5870.64%
18Rackspace Email6 1410.6%
19Jellyfish (Namecheap)5 8030.57%
201&1 IONOS5 7650.56%
21Barracuda5 2700.51%
22Beget (RU)4 3990.43%
23One.com mailpod3 9640.39%
24Amazon WorkMail3 4800.34%
25Proofpoint Essentials3 3370.32%
26Mail.ru for Business3 2770.32%
27Namecheap PrivateEmail3 0810.3%
28Cisco IronPort2 8800.28%
29Gandi Mail2 7170.26%
30All-Inkl (DE)2 6170.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.01%
123 316 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
45 171
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
30.2%
310 088 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp34 2074.11%
2SendGrid (Twilio)30 5473.67%
3Mandrill29 1143.49%
4Zendesk25 4243.05%
5Amazon SES23 8392.86%
6Mailgun21 7792.61%
7MailChannels16 2981.96%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)12 1111.45%
9Namecheap Forwarding11 9181.43%
10Mailjet (Sinch)11 0751.33%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)9 5151.14%
12Salesforce9 2691.11%
13Mimecast9 2631.11%
14Elastic Email4 9650.6%
15MailerSend4 1030.49%
16Emsd1 (transactional)4 0060.48%
17SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)3 8350.46%
18Marketo (Adobe)3 6160.43%
19Help Scout3 0920.37%
20Zoho Campaigns3 0580.37%
21SendPulse3 0170.36%
22Constant Contact2 8600.34%
23Barracuda Essentials2 8000.34%
24Postmark2 7430.33%
25SparkPost2 7310.33%
26Zoho ZeptoMail2 7290.33%
27Cloudflare Email Routing2 4980.3%
28Unisender (RU)2 4390.29%
29Exclaimer (signatures)2 2390.27%
30Freshdesk2 0230.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)6 2250.75%
2Shopify5 9170.71%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 3652 8450.34%
4BigCommerce2 1890.26%
5Trustpilot2 1270.26%
6Statuspage (Atlassian)1 7060.2%
7KnowBe41 6850.2%
8Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1 6010.19%
9Firebase (Google)1 5170.18%
10Squarespace1 0580.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle)9750.12%
12ClickDimensions9640.12%
13Qualtrics7450.09%
14PayPal Braintree6840.08%
15One.com (DK hosting)6600.08%
16Docebo (LMS)5480.07%
17Zendesk5190.06%
18Greenhouse4720.06%
19k.io (workspace)4570.05%
20Freshsales (Freshworks)4250.05%
21ConnectWise3540.04%
22Umantis (Haufe HR)3310.04%
23Gorgias3150.04%
24RetailCRM2930.04%
25Autotask (ConnectWise)2920.04%
26Sage Intacct2680.03%
27HappyFox2660.03%
28Lark / Feishu2510.03%
29Dixa2460.03%
30Brightspace (D2L)2340.03%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx00.1and1.com1 643
2mx01.1and1.com1 638
3mx.simply.com1 219
4mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net929
5mx01.1and1.co.uk881
6mx00.1and1.co.uk879
7mx01.1and1.fr779
8mx00.1and1.fr776
9mx01.1and1.es743
10mx00.1and1.es739
11mx1.netsolmail.net729
12mx1.jimdo.com671
13mx2.jimdo.com671
14localhost619
15smx2.web-hosting.com534
16smtp-fwd.wordpress.com532
17smx1.web-hosting.com532
18smx3.web-hosting.com521
19mx-in04.natrohost.com518
20mx-in04b.natrohost.com517
21mx-in05b.natrohost.com506
22mx-in05.natrohost.com504
23nan474
24mx-backup.serveriai.lt434
25antispam1.ihs.com.tr407
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26antispam2.ihs.com.tr405
27mx1.oderland.com359
28mx2.oderland.com357
29mx-in03.natrohost.com338
30mx-in03b.natrohost.com333
31mx3.oderland.com332
32mx4.oderland.com331
33mx1.tmdhosting.com320
34mailgw.nic.in319
35mx01.schlund.de318
36mx2.tmdhosting.com317
37mx00.schlund.de317
38mx1.inbox.co.il295
39mx1.emailowl.com285
40mx2.emailowl.com281
41mx3.emailowl.com277
42mx1.spamfiltering.io264
43mx2.spamfiltering.io264
44mx01.easyname.eu256
45mx02.easyname.eu255
46mx-in01b.natrohost.com251
47mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl251
48mx-in01.natrohost.com250
49mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl249
50s.mail.dcsaas.net244
51mta.hosts.net.nz241
52smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it237
53asp.reflexion.net226
54mx1.dandomain.dk225
55mx-in02.natrohost.com225
56mx-in02b.natrohost.com225
57smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net222
58mx2.dandomain.dk219
59mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr218
60inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com217
61ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr213
62rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr212
63mta1.youcan.shop211
64mta2.youcan.shop211
65mx1.supremebox.com206
66zonemx.eu206
67mx2.supremebox.com205
68mx1.krystal.co.uk201
69mx2.krystal.co.uk201
70relay1.netnames.net196
71relay2.netnames.net196
72mx1.nz.smxemail.com195
73smtp.imcloud.org192
74mailme.enter-system.com189
75mx2.nz.smxemail.com189
76in.hes.trendmicro.eu188
77mx-100.reflexion.net185
78sitemail.everyone.net184
79mx-110.reflexion.net181
80smx4.web-hosting.com180
81mx2.inbox.co.il179
82fallback.axc.eu178
83mail-fr.securemail.pro177
84mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl174
85mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl174
86mx.hetemail.jp171
87mx.zoho.com.au167
88mx.spamfilter.io167
89mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk164
90mx2.zoho.com.au163
91mx01.glesys.se163
92mx02.glesys.se163
93mta.1stdomains.net.nz161
94mx3.zoho.com.au161
95webmail2.sitebuildit.com159
96mx1.onlinemail.io157
97mx2.onlinemail.io157
98relay.bestofpost.com155
99mx3.name.com150
100mail-s30.1gb.ru148

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1_spf.automattic.com4 978
2bluehost.com3 616
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com1 894
4_spfcls.natrohost.com1 885
5webhostbox.net1 603
6spf.a2hosting.com1 564
7spf.flockmail.com1 457
8spf.webapps.net1 225
9spf.improvmx.com1 193
10_spf.transip.email1 168
11cmail1.com1 078
12spf.simply.com1 020
13infusionmail.com987
14spf.autopilothq.com925
15outlook.com844
16spf.serveriai.lt807
17_spf.turhost.com806
18send.aweber.com803
19spf.mailanyone.net797
20spf.jabatus.fr782
21_spf.mixhost.jp776
22nicmail.ru770
23spf.nl2go.com746
24spf.mail.intercom.io745
25mailcontrol.com742
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.afas.online720
27_spf.domeneshop.no702
28_spf.nicegrup.com681
29_spf.trwww.com668
30turbo-smtp.com653
31smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg649
32_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com649
33sender.zohobooks.com643
34spf.easywp.com636
35_spf.protection.veridyen.com628
36_spf.hostnet.nl620
37_spf.anpdm.com617
38spf.linuxpl.com611
39_spf.cyberfolks.pl593
40spf.mailcluster.com.au587
41spf.hostingplatform.net.au586
42smtp.servconfig.com582
43_spf.serviciodecorreo.es571
44spf.hes.trendmicro.com571
45spf.hostmar.com560
46relay.is.cc557
47e2ma.net555
48_vsp.oderland.com528
49hostmonster.com526
50_spf.zenbox.pl525
51spf.topdesk.net523
52_spf.hoster.by512
53_mail.dhosting.pl499
54email-od.com498
55_spf.syrahost.com498
56mxlogin.com484
57spf.lianamailer.com484
58spf.tld.pl480
59spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl468
60spf.registeredsite.com468
61msgfocus.com461
62_spf.5g-soft.com457
63spf.w4ymail.at449
64icpbounce.com447
65_spf.act-on.net444
66spf.totaalholding.nl430
67email.freshservice.com422
68customer.mailguard.com.au418
69google.com412
70_netblocks.google.com412
71_spf.websupport.sk412
72bmsend.com411
73spf.dandomain.dk391
74spf.raiolanetworks.com389
75_spf.srv.cat386
76_spf.embluemail.com382
77emailus.freshservice.com381
78_spf.conoha.ne.jp379
79smtp.groovehq.com378
80hotmail.com372
81spf.migadu.com370
82_spf.sui-inter.net369
83md02.com368
84_spf.acquia.com368
85spf.mtaroutes.com363
86srs.mailii.org360
87_netblocks2.google.com354
88_spf.fastmail.gr351
89outboundmail.convio.net347
90spf.ihs.com.tr346
91spf.zixsmbhosted.com341
92_netblocks3.google.com340
93emailserver.vn340
94spf.mindbox.ru339
95spf.ess.uk.barracudanetworks.com338
96spf.flowmailer.net335
97spf.hostedmail.net.au331
98_spf.heteml.jp330
99spf.securemx.jp328
100spf.masterbase.com325

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-06-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:28:48Z.