Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-05-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 279 539 | 30.33% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 189 704 | 20.58% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 112 989 | 12.26% |
| 4 | Unknown / Other | 64 106 | 6.96% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 30 095 | 3.27% |
| 6 | Yandex 360 | 24 175 | 2.62% |
| 7 | GoDaddy | 14 599 | 1.58% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 12 077 | 1.31% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 11 253 | 1.22% |
| 10 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 10 628 | 1.15% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 10 019 | 1.09% |
| 12 | Hostinger | 9 758 | 1.06% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 9 048 | 0.98% |
| 14 | Proofpoint | 8 590 | 0.93% |
| 15 | OVH Mail | 8 153 | 0.88% |
| 16 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 6 113 | 0.66% |
| 17 | Rackspace Email | 5 705 | 0.62% |
| 18 | Jellyfish (Namecheap) | 5 304 | 0.58% |
| 19 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 5 102 | 0.55% |
| 20 | 1&1 IONOS | 5 029 | 0.55% |
| 21 | Barracuda | 4 985 | 0.54% |
| 22 | Beget (RU) | 3 916 | 0.42% |
| 23 | Amazon WorkMail | 3 269 | 0.35% |
| 24 | Proofpoint Essentials | 3 248 | 0.35% |
| 25 | One.com mailpod | 3 111 | 0.34% |
| 26 | Namecheap PrivateEmail | 2 955 | 0.32% |
| 27 | Mail.ru for Business | 2 916 | 0.32% |
| 28 | Cisco IronPort | 2 812 | 0.31% |
| 29 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 362 | 0.26% |
| 30 | Gandi Mail | 2 276 | 0.25% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 31 803 | 4.25% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 27 536 | 3.68% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 26 522 | 3.54% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 22 785 | 3.04% |
| 5 | Amazon SES | 22 307 | 2.98% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 20 079 | 2.68% |
| 7 | MailChannels | 15 053 | 2.01% |
| 8 | Namecheap Forwarding | 10 837 | 1.45% |
| 9 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 10 772 | 1.44% |
| 10 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 9 579 | 1.28% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 8 753 | 1.17% |
| 12 | Salesforce | 8 752 | 1.17% |
| 13 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 8 412 | 1.12% |
| 14 | Elastic Email | 4 453 | 0.6% |
| 15 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 619 | 0.48% |
| 16 | MailerSend | 3 546 | 0.47% |
| 17 | Emsd1 (transactional) | 3 534 | 0.47% |
| 18 | Help Scout | 2 947 | 0.39% |
| 19 | SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud) | 2 806 | 0.37% |
| 20 | SendPulse | 2 785 | 0.37% |
| 21 | Constant Contact | 2 733 | 0.37% |
| 22 | Barracuda Essentials | 2 702 | 0.36% |
| 23 | Zoho Campaigns | 2 649 | 0.35% |
| 24 | Postmark | 2 620 | 0.35% |
| 25 | Zoho ZeptoMail | 2 513 | 0.34% |
| 26 | SparkPost | 2 507 | 0.33% |
| 27 | Unisender (RU) | 2 128 | 0.28% |
| 28 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 994 | 0.27% |
| 29 | Cloudflare Email Routing | 1 928 | 0.26% |
| 30 | Freshdesk | 1 832 | 0.24% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 6 068 | 0.81% |
| 2 | Shopify | 5 381 | 0.72% |
| 3 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 2 602 | 0.35% |
| 4 | BigCommerce | 2 281 | 0.3% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 855 | 0.25% |
| 6 | KnowBe4 | 1 669 | 0.22% |
| 7 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 644 | 0.22% |
| 8 | Firebase (Google) | 1 425 | 0.19% |
| 9 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 1 420 | 0.19% |
| 10 | Squarespace | 959 | 0.13% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 952 | 0.13% |
| 12 | ClickDimensions | 924 | 0.12% |
| 13 | Qualtrics | 744 | 0.1% |
| 14 | PayPal Braintree | 688 | 0.09% |
| 15 | One.com (DK hosting) | 518 | 0.07% |
| 16 | Docebo (LMS) | 515 | 0.07% |
| 17 | Zendesk | 506 | 0.07% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 459 | 0.06% |
| 19 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 397 | 0.05% |
| 20 | ConnectWise | 355 | 0.05% |
| 21 | k.io (workspace) | 337 | 0.05% |
| 22 | Umantis (Haufe HR) | 299 | 0.04% |
| 23 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 297 | 0.04% |
| 24 | SchoolMessenger | 293 | 0.04% |
| 25 | Gorgias | 283 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Sage Intacct | 278 | 0.04% |
| 27 | RetailCRM | 256 | 0.03% |
| 28 | HappyFox | 249 | 0.03% |
| 29 | Oracle Cloud Email | 218 | 0.03% |
| 30 | Brightspace (D2L) | 214 | 0.03% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx00.1and1.com | 1 568 |
| 2 | mx01.1and1.com | 1 561 |
| 3 | mx.simply.com | 935 |
| 4 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 835 |
| 5 | mx00.1and1.es | 748 |
| 6 | mx01.1and1.es | 747 |
| 7 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 737 |
| 8 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 731 |
| 9 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 730 |
| 10 | mx01.1and1.fr | 645 |
| 11 | mx00.1and1.fr | 641 |
| 12 | localhost | 569 |
| 13 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 542 |
| 14 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 534 |
| 15 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 534 |
| 16 | mx2.jimdo.com | 508 |
| 17 | mx1.jimdo.com | 507 |
| 18 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 507 |
| 19 | mx-in04.natrohost.com | 483 |
| 20 | mx-in04b.natrohost.com | 481 |
| 21 | mx-in05b.natrohost.com | 471 |
| 22 | mx-in05.natrohost.com | 469 |
| 23 | nan | 442 |
| 24 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 394 |
| 25 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 392 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 362 |
| 27 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 324 |
| 28 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 324 |
| 29 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 323 |
| 30 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 322 |
| 31 | mailgw.nic.in | 317 |
| 32 | mx1.oderland.com | 286 |
| 33 | mx2.oderland.com | 285 |
| 34 | mx1.emailowl.com | 264 |
| 35 | mx3.oderland.com | 263 |
| 36 | mx4.oderland.com | 262 |
| 37 | mx2.emailowl.com | 261 |
| 38 | mx1.spamfiltering.io | 258 |
| 39 | mx2.spamfiltering.io | 258 |
| 40 | mx3.emailowl.com | 257 |
| 41 | rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 234 |
| 42 | ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 231 |
| 43 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 231 |
| 44 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 231 |
| 45 | mx00.schlund.de | 228 |
| 46 | mx01.schlund.de | 228 |
| 47 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 226 |
| 48 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 225 |
| 49 | s.mail.dcsaas.net | 224 |
| 50 | smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it | 214 |
| 51 | mx01.easyname.eu | 210 |
| 52 | mx02.easyname.eu | 210 |
| 53 | asp.reflexion.net | 201 |
| 54 | relay2.netnames.net | 189 |
| 55 | smtp.imcloud.org | 187 |
| 56 | mx1.supremebox.com | 185 |
| 57 | relay1.netnames.net | 185 |
| 58 | mx2.supremebox.com | 183 |
| 59 | mx1.inbox.co.il | 181 |
| 60 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 181 |
| 61 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 177 |
| 62 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 177 |
| 63 | mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr | 177 |
| 64 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 176 |
| 65 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 170 |
| 66 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 168 |
| 67 | mta.hosts.net.nz | 168 |
| 68 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 168 |
| 69 | mx1.nz.smxemail.com | 165 |
| 70 | mx2.nz.smxemail.com | 164 |
| 71 | inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com | 160 |
| 72 | mx1.krystal.co.uk | 157 |
| 73 | sitemail.everyone.net | 156 |
| 74 | zonemx.eu | 155 |
| 75 | mx.spamfilter.io | 155 |
| 76 | mx2.krystal.co.uk | 155 |
| 77 | mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl | 154 |
| 78 | mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl | 153 |
| 79 | mta1.youcan.shop | 151 |
| 80 | mta2.youcan.shop | 150 |
| 81 | mx.usa.net | 148 |
| 82 | relay.bestofpost.com | 147 |
| 83 | mx3.volusion.com | 145 |
| 84 | mx4.volusion.com | 145 |
| 85 | mx.hetemail.jp | 141 |
| 86 | mx01.vargonen.net | 141 |
| 87 | mx3.name.com | 137 |
| 88 | fallback.axc.eu | 137 |
| 89 | mx4.name.com | 136 |
| 90 | mx5.name.com | 136 |
| 91 | mx1.dandomain.dk | 136 |
| 92 | mx8.name.com | 135 |
| 93 | mx6.name.com | 135 |
| 94 | maildrop1.argewebhosting.nl | 135 |
| 95 | maildrop2.argewebhosting.nl | 135 |
| 96 | maildrop3.argewebhosting.nl | 135 |
| 97 | mx2.dandomain.dk | 135 |
| 98 | mx2.onlinemail.io | 134 |
| 99 | mx1.onlinemail.io | 133 |
| 100 | mx7.name.com | 132 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | _spf.automattic.com | 3 683 |
| 2 | bluehost.com | 3 345 |
| 3 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 1 750 |
| 4 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 1 737 |
| 5 | webhostbox.net | 1 646 |
| 6 | spf.flockmail.com | 1 478 |
| 7 | spf.a2hosting.com | 1 438 |
| 8 | spf.improvmx.com | 1 122 |
| 9 | spf.webapps.net | 1 036 |
| 10 | cmail1.com | 980 |
| 11 | _spf.transip.email | 942 |
| 12 | infusionmail.com | 907 |
| 13 | send.aweber.com | 841 |
| 14 | spf.autopilothq.com | 832 |
| 15 | outlook.com | 794 |
| 16 | _spf.turhost.com | 794 |
| 17 | spf.simply.com | 783 |
| 18 | spf.mailanyone.net | 768 |
| 19 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 726 |
| 20 | spf.jabatus.fr | 690 |
| 21 | spf.serveriai.lt | 674 |
| 22 | _spf.mixhost.jp | 673 |
| 23 | _spf.protection.veridyen.com | 670 |
| 24 | mailcontrol.com | 655 |
| 25 | spf.easywp.com | 625 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | nicmail.ru | 624 |
| 27 | _spf.trwww.com | 621 |
| 28 | spf.nl2go.com | 613 |
| 29 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 603 |
| 30 | spf.afas.online | 593 |
| 31 | sender.zohobooks.com | 571 |
| 32 | _spf.anpdm.com | 567 |
| 33 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 560 |
| 34 | turbo-smtp.com | 554 |
| 35 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 551 |
| 36 | _spf.nicegrup.com | 549 |
| 37 | e2ma.net | 544 |
| 38 | _spf.serviciodecorreo.es | 535 |
| 39 | hostmonster.com | 531 |
| 40 | spf.linuxpl.com | 526 |
| 41 | smtp.servconfig.com | 524 |
| 42 | _spf.cyberfolks.pl | 522 |
| 43 | _spf.hostnet.nl | 503 |
| 44 | spf.tld.pl | 494 |
| 45 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 487 |
| 46 | spf.topdesk.net | 482 |
| 47 | relay.is.cc | 481 |
| 48 | email-od.com | 479 |
| 49 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 476 |
| 50 | spf.hostingplatform.net.au | 475 |
| 51 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 474 |
| 52 | _spf.act-on.net | 472 |
| 53 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 470 |
| 54 | spf.hostmar.com | 461 |
| 55 | _spf.hoster.by | 449 |
| 56 | _spf.5g-soft.com | 443 |
| 57 | _vsp.oderland.com | 439 |
| 58 | spf.lianamailer.com | 426 |
| 59 | mxlogin.com | 424 |
| 60 | spf.registeredsite.com | 420 |
| 61 | icpbounce.com | 416 |
| 62 | google.com | 411 |
| 63 | msgfocus.com | 409 |
| 64 | email.freshservice.com | 409 |
| 65 | _spf.syrahost.com | 404 |
| 66 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 399 |
| 67 | _netblocks.google.com | 392 |
| 68 | spf.w4ymail.at | 387 |
| 69 | bmsend.com | 384 |
| 70 | emailus.freshservice.com | 382 |
| 71 | _spf.srv.cat | 374 |
| 72 | md02.com | 373 |
| 73 | _spf.acquia.com | 373 |
| 74 | spf.raiolanetworks.com | 362 |
| 75 | spf.migadu.com | 345 |
| 76 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 344 |
| 77 | smtp.groovehq.com | 344 |
| 78 | _spf.conoha.ne.jp | 336 |
| 79 | appriver.com | 335 |
| 80 | hotmail.com | 334 |
| 81 | _spf.embluemail.com | 333 |
| 82 | spf.mindbox.ru | 332 |
| 83 | _netblocks2.google.com | 331 |
| 84 | _spf.websupport.sk | 327 |
| 85 | outboundmail.convio.net | 325 |
| 86 | _netblocks3.google.com | 323 |
| 87 | spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl | 320 |
| 88 | spf.ihs.com.tr | 319 |
| 89 | _spf.gestiondeservidor.net | 312 |
| 90 | spf.flowmailer.net | 311 |
| 91 | customer.mailguard.com.au | 308 |
| 92 | spf.dondominio.com | 304 |
| 93 | ncapp02.com | 302 |
| 94 | spf.masterbase.com | 298 |
| 95 | spf.tipalti.com | 296 |
| 96 | _spf.heteml.jp | 296 |
| 97 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 295 |
| 98 | spf.mtaroutes.com | 292 |
| 99 | ncfp.asia | 290 |
| 100 | mh.blackboard.com | 288 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.