Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-04-01.

1 217 939
Domains with MX
976 244
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 217 939
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted349 31628.68%
2Google Workspace258 16221.2%
3Microsoft 365158 29913.0%
4Unknown / Other85 2957.0%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)40 5443.33%
6Yandex 36029 2222.4%
7GoDaddy22 3591.84%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)15 5811.28%
9Zoho Mail14 6141.2%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding13 6951.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast13 5781.11%
12OVH Mail13 1371.08%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)12 7671.05%
14Hostinger11 4760.94%
15Proofpoint10 6430.87%
16Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)9 1440.75%
17Rackspace Email8 3470.69%
18Barracuda7 5590.62%
191&1 IONOS7 2300.59%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)6 6120.54%
21Jellyfish (Namecheap)6 2720.51%
22Proofpoint Essentials5 3810.44%
23Beget (RU)4 6350.38%
24Amazon WorkMail4 1950.34%
25One.com mailpod4 0350.33%
26Namecheap PrivateEmail3 7160.31%
27Gandi Mail3 4840.29%
28Cisco IronPort3 4730.29%
29Mail.ru for Business3 4280.28%
30All-Inkl (DE)3 0250.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.79%
143 539 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
51 258
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
28.69%
349 450 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp41 4964.25%
2SendGrid (Twilio)35 6663.65%
3Mandrill33 6333.45%
4Zendesk28 4362.91%
5Amazon SES26 8842.75%
6Mailgun25 7202.63%
7MailChannels20 0652.06%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)15 2631.56%
9Namecheap Forwarding13 9661.43%
10Mailjet (Sinch)12 6881.3%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast11 9011.22%
12Salesforce10 8131.11%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)10 3061.06%
14Elastic Email5 4340.56%
15Emsd1 (transactional)4 4260.45%
16MailerSend4 4070.45%
17Marketo (Adobe)4 4050.45%
18SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)4 3830.45%
19Barracuda Essentials4 2000.43%
20Constant Contact3 8690.4%
21Zoho Campaigns3 6720.38%
22Help Scout3 6130.37%
23Postmark3 3630.34%
24Zoho ZeptoMail3 3120.34%
25SendPulse3 2350.33%
26SparkPost3 0640.31%
27Exclaimer (signatures)2 8060.29%
28Unisender (RU)2 3970.25%
29Freshdesk2 3570.24%
30MailHostBox2 1290.22%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)8 2160.84%
2Shopify6 9440.71%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 3653 4730.36%
4BigCommerce3 0840.32%
5Trustpilot2 2550.23%
6KnowBe42 2220.23%
7Statuspage (Atlassian)1 9300.2%
8Firebase (Google)1 7420.18%
9Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1 6710.17%
10Squarespace1 5390.16%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle)1 2520.13%
12ClickDimensions1 2070.12%
13Qualtrics8730.09%
14PayPal Braintree8060.08%
15One.com (DK hosting)7310.07%
16Docebo (LMS)6490.07%
17Zendesk6160.06%
18ConnectWise5600.06%
19Greenhouse5350.05%
20Freshsales (Freshworks)5140.05%
21k.io (workspace)5120.05%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)4230.04%
23SchoolMessenger4160.04%
24Gorgias3720.04%
25Sage Intacct3650.04%
26Umantis (Haufe HR)3410.03%
27HappyFox3260.03%
28RetailCRM2830.03%
29Brightspace (D2L)2520.03%
30Gannett (USA Today)2500.03%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx00.1and1.com2 537
2mx01.1and1.com2 533
3mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 360
4mx.simply.com1 284
5mx1.netsolmail.net1 225
6mx01.1and1.co.uk1 074
7mx00.1and1.co.uk1 071
8mx00.1and1.fr1 057
9mx01.1and1.fr1 057
10mx01.1and1.es962
11mx00.1and1.es959
12localhost849
13mx1.jimdo.com765
14mx2.jimdo.com765
15smx2.web-hosting.com738
16smx1.web-hosting.com735
17smtp-fwd.wordpress.com730
18smx3.web-hosting.com730
19mx-in04.natrohost.com652
20mx-in04b.natrohost.com648
21mx-in05.natrohost.com593
22mx-in05b.natrohost.com592
23nan588
24antispam1.ihs.com.tr530
25antispam2.ihs.com.tr530
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in03b.natrohost.com437
27mx-in03.natrohost.com436
28asp.reflexion.net407
29mx1.tmdhosting.com374
30mx2.tmdhosting.com371
31mx-in01b.natrohost.com338
32mx-in01.natrohost.com336
33mailgw.nic.in334
34mx01.schlund.de331
35mx00.schlund.de330
36mx1.oderland.com328
37mx1.emailowl.com327
38mx2.oderland.com327
39mx-100.reflexion.net325
40mx2.emailowl.com324
41mx3.emailowl.com321
42mx-110.reflexion.net316
43mx-in02b.natrohost.com307
44mx-in02.natrohost.com306
45mx1.spamfiltering.io300
46mx2.spamfiltering.io300
47mx3.oderland.com295
48mx4.oderland.com294
49sitemail.everyone.net287
50smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it287
51mx01.easyname.eu286
52s.mail.dcsaas.net285
53mx02.easyname.eu284
54mta2.youcan.shop281
55rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr280
56mta1.youcan.shop280
57ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr279
58in.hes.trendmicro.eu271
59mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr265
60mx4.volusion.com264
61smx4.web-hosting.com262
62mx3.volusion.com262
63mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk261
64mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl259
65mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl258
66inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com257
67mx1.supremebox.com250
68mx2.supremebox.com250
69mail-fr.securemail.pro248
70mx2.krystal.co.uk235
71mx1.krystal.co.uk234
72smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net231
73mx-backup.serveriai.lt230
74relay2.netnames.net227
75relay1.netnames.net224
76webmail2.sitebuildit.com221
77mx.usa.net216
78mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl203
79mailme.enter-system.com203
80mx6.name.com202
81mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl202
82mx3.name.com201
83inbound.registeredsite.com200
84mx1.inbox.co.il199
85mx8.name.com199
86mx5.name.com198
87mx4.name.com198
88mx7.name.com197
89zonemx.eu193
90mx1.dandomain.dk189
91mx2.dandomain.dk188
92mx.spamfilter.io187
93mail1.sbnation.com187
94fallback.axc.eu184
95mx.hetemail.jp180
96mx01.vargonen.net175
97mta.hosts.net.nz174
98gmail22.gadmail.de174
99gmail23.gadmail.de173
100wmail22.gadmail.de173

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1_spf.automattic.com5 414
2bluehost.com5 227
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 419
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 391
5webhostbox.net2 120
6spf.flockmail.com1 917
7spf.a2hosting.com1 859
8spf.webapps.net1 531
9infusionmail.com1 337
10spf.improvmx.com1 328
11_spf.transip.email1 302
12cmail1.com1 288
13outlook.com1 109
14spf.autopilothq.com1 106
15spf.jabatus.fr1 037
16_spf.turhost.com1 029
17spf.simply.com1 024
18send.aweber.com1 019
19spf.mailanyone.net908
20_spf.protection.veridyen.com899
21_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com861
22spf.nl2go.com860
23_spf.trwww.com855
24_spf.nicegrup.com846
25mailcontrol.com840
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.mail.intercom.io840
27nicmail.ru832
28spf.afas.online817
29spf.easywp.com811
30sender.zohobooks.com809
31_spf.mixhost.jp800
32e2ma.net783
33hostmonster.com775
34_spf.domeneshop.no746
35smtp.servconfig.com741
36_spf.serviciodecorreo.es732
37spf.registeredsite.com731
38_spf.cyberfolks.pl728
39spf.linuxpl.com725
40turbo-smtp.com722
41spf.hes.trendmicro.com706
42_spf.hostnet.nl704
43spf.mailcluster.com.au700
44relay.is.cc668
45email-od.com646
46icpbounce.com646
47_spf.anpdm.com642
48_spf.zenbox.pl640
49spf.zixsmbhosted.com630
50spf.tld.pl624
51_spf.act-on.net618
52spf.hostingplatform.net.au615
53_spf.hoster.by615
54_spf.5g-soft.com582
55email.freshservice.com580
56spf.topdesk.net567
57msgfocus.com559
58spf.hostmar.com550
59_spf.syrahost.com545
60_mail.dhosting.pl543
61smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg532
62bmsend.com522
63_vsp.oderland.com521
64spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl515
65google.com512
66mxlogin.com509
67appriver.com507
68spf.lianamailer.com497
69spf.totaalholding.nl493
70spf.raiolanetworks.com487
71_spf.srv.cat481
72reflexion.net479
73emailus.freshservice.com473
74spf.w4ymail.at472
75outboundmail.convio.net467
76_spf.acquia.com459
77spf.cloudus.rs.oxcs.net454
78md02.com450
79_netblocks.google.com442
80smtp.groovehq.com436
81spf.migadu.com431
82customer.mailguard.com.au429
83spf.serveriai.lt428
84hotmail.com427
85spf.mtaroutes.com417
86_spf.conoha.ne.jp413
87spf.hostedmail.net.au413
88_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com404
89_spf.sui-inter.net402
90spf.ihs.com.tr401
91emailserver.vn397
92spf.ess.uk.barracudanetworks.com391
93spf.us.exclaimer.net391
94spf.dondominio.com389
95_spf.emfwd.name-services.com384
96spf.web-dns1.com383
97_spf.embluemail.com383
98_spf.yourfilter.nl383
99_netblocks2.google.com378
100_netblocks3.google.com373

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-04-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:42:05Z.