Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-03-01.

975 521
Domains with MX
779 131
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
975 521
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted308 62331.64%
2Google Workspace199 86020.49%
3Microsoft 365111 87811.47%
4Unknown / Other66 2776.79%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)31 2963.21%
6Yandex 36024 5862.52%
7GoDaddy16 9691.74%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)12 4671.28%
9Zoho Mail12 2051.25%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding12 0921.24%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger10 0431.03%
12Mimecast9 9721.02%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 9181.02%
14OVH Mail9 3630.96%
15Proofpoint8 4780.87%
16Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)7 2300.74%
17Rackspace Email6 3740.65%
181&1 IONOS5 7470.59%
19Jellyfish (Namecheap)5 3800.55%
20Barracuda5 1800.53%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)5 1030.52%
22Beget (RU)3 9030.4%
23Proofpoint Essentials3 4930.36%
24Amazon WorkMail3 3410.34%
25Namecheap PrivateEmail3 2640.33%
26One.com mailpod2 8720.29%
27Mail.ru for Business2 7110.28%
28Cisco IronPort2 6790.27%
29Mailgun (inbound)2 6020.27%
30Gandi Mail2 4160.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.46%
111 778 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
41 575
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
31.65%
308 754 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp32 6614.19%
2SendGrid (Twilio)29 6083.8%
3Mandrill26 8403.44%
4Zendesk24 9183.2%
5Amazon SES21 7892.8%
6Mailgun20 3842.62%
7MailChannels16 3182.09%
8Namecheap Forwarding12 2661.57%
9SpamExperts (SolarWinds)11 8141.52%
10Mailjet (Sinch)9 5161.22%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast8 6551.11%
12Salesforce8 5291.09%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)8 2141.05%
14Elastic Email4 3570.56%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 6860.47%
16MailerSend3 4630.44%
17Emsd1 (transactional)3 3930.44%
18SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)3 0790.4%
19Help Scout3 0450.39%
20Zoho Campaigns2 7290.35%
21Postmark2 7070.35%
22Barracuda Essentials2 6950.35%
23Constant Contact2 6630.34%
24SendPulse2 6600.34%
25SparkPost2 4580.32%
26Zoho ZeptoMail2 4430.31%
27Unisender (RU)2 0020.26%
28Freshdesk1 9950.26%
29Exclaimer (signatures)1 8860.24%
30MailHostBox1 7200.22%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)6 2590.8%
2Shopify5 9400.76%
3BigCommerce2 4360.31%
4CodeTwo Email Signatures 3652 3350.3%
5Trustpilot1 9310.25%
6Statuspage (Atlassian)1 6320.21%
7KnowBe41 5090.19%
8Firebase (Google)1 4420.19%
9Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1 1350.15%
10Squarespace1 0260.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle)9640.12%
12ClickDimensions9010.12%
13Qualtrics7480.1%
14PayPal Braintree7050.09%
15Zendesk5290.07%
16One.com (DK hosting)4800.06%
17Docebo (LMS)4780.06%
18Greenhouse4650.06%
19Freshsales (Freshworks)4120.05%
20k.io (workspace)4040.05%
21ConnectWise3920.05%
22Gorgias3380.04%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)3020.04%
24Sage Intacct2700.03%
25HappyFox2480.03%
26Umantis (Haufe HR)2410.03%
27SchoolMessenger2260.03%
28Gannett (USA Today)2190.03%
29Brightspace (D2L)2110.03%
30RetailCRM1960.03%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com1 927
2mx00.1and1.com1 922
3mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 077
4mx1.netsolmail.net1 043
5mx00.1and1.co.uk868
6mx01.1and1.co.uk867
7mx.simply.com841
8mx01.1and1.fr739
9mx00.1and1.fr735
10localhost678
11smx2.web-hosting.com668
12smx1.web-hosting.com657
13smx3.web-hosting.com655
14mx1.jimdo.com636
15mx2.jimdo.com635
16mx01.1and1.es633
17mx00.1and1.es630
18mx-in04b.natrohost.com582
19mx-in04.natrohost.com578
20smtp-fwd.wordpress.com547
21antispam1.ihs.com.tr466
22antispam2.ihs.com.tr465
23mx-in05.natrohost.com460
24mx-in05b.natrohost.com458
25nan419
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx1.tmdhosting.com379
27mx-in03.natrohost.com378
28mx-in03b.natrohost.com376
29mx2.tmdhosting.com372
30mx01.schlund.de323
31mx00.schlund.de321
32mx1.emailowl.com307
33mx2.emailowl.com300
34mx3.emailowl.com297
35asp.reflexion.net277
36mx-in01.natrohost.com274
37mx-in01b.natrohost.com274
38mx-in02.natrohost.com272
39mx-in02b.natrohost.com272
40mailgw.nic.in261
41mx1.oderland.com254
42mx2.oderland.com253
43ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr245
44rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr242
45smx4.web-hosting.com239
46sitemail.everyone.net239
47smtp.imcloud.org238
48mx3.oderland.com229
49smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net229
50mx4.oderland.com227
51mx-100.reflexion.net224
52in.hes.trendmicro.eu223
53smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it223
54mx-110.reflexion.net222
55mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk221
56mx.hetemail.jp219
57mx01.easyname.eu218
58mx02.easyname.eu218
59s.mail.dcsaas.net210
60mx1.inbox.co.il201
61mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr201
62mta1.youcan.shop198
63mta2.youcan.shop198
64mx1.supremebox.com194
65mx3.volusion.com194
66mx4.volusion.com194
67mx2.supremebox.com192
68mta.hosts.net.nz190
69mx3.name.com177
70mailfilter2b.mijndomein.nl176
71mx6.name.com175
72mailfilter1b.mijndomein.nl174
73mx8.name.com174
74relay2.netnames.net174
75mx1.krystal.co.uk174
76mx4.name.com173
77mx5.name.com173
78webmail2.sitebuildit.com173
79mx2.krystal.co.uk173
80relay1.netnames.net172
81mx7.name.com171
82mail-fr.securemail.pro171
83mx-backup.serveriai.lt169
84relay.bestofpost.com168
85mail2.infomart2000.com159
86mailme.enter-system.com155
87mx.usa.net153
88inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com153
89mx1.nz.smxemail.com152
90mx1.dandomain.dk149
91mx01.vargonen.net149
92mx2.nz.smxemail.com149
93mx2.dandomain.dk148
94zonemx.eu147
95fallback.axc.eu147
96mxgw.bcc.gov.bd146
97mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk145
98mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk145
99inbound.registeredsite.com144
100smtp-avas.seeweb.it140

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1_spf.automattic.com5 726
2bluehost.com4 107
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 025
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 010
5spf.flockmail.com1 679
6webhostbox.net1 662
7spf.a2hosting.com1 535
8spf.improvmx.com1 238
9cmail1.com1 031
10infusionmail.com994
11_spf.turhost.com988
12_spf.transip.email960
13send.aweber.com936
14spf.webapps.net924
15spf.autopilothq.com876
16_spf.mixhost.jp867
17_spf.protection.veridyen.com780
18outlook.com749
19spf.easywp.com740
20_spf.trwww.com740
21spf.mail.intercom.io732
22spf.jabatus.fr711
23spf.simply.com667
24spf.nl2go.com632
25mailcontrol.com621
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26sender.zohobooks.com620
27nicmail.ru603
28e2ma.net590
29spf.mailanyone.net583
30hostmonster.com582
31relay.is.cc577
32spf.linuxpl.com564
33_spf.nicegrup.com560
34_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com558
35smtp.servconfig.com553
36spf.hes.trendmicro.com550
37spf.mailcluster.com.au547
38turbo-smtp.com534
39_spf.5g-soft.com530
40_spf.conoha.ne.jp521
41spf.hostingplatform.net.au514
42spf.afas.online500
43_spf.anpdm.com500
44_spf.cyberfolks.pl499
45icpbounce.com497
46_spf.domeneshop.no495
47email-od.com493
48_spf.hostnet.nl469
49_spf.hoster.by461
50_mail.dhosting.pl456
51_spf.serviciodecorreo.es451
52mxlogin.com448
53_spf.act-on.net444
54spf.tld.pl443
55msgfocus.com441
56_spf.syrahost.com440
57_spf.zenbox.pl419
58_spf.heteml.jp412
59spf.zixsmbhosted.com408
60email.freshservice.com407
61spf.topdesk.net405
62_spf.acquia.com403
63_vsp.oderland.com402
64smtp.groovehq.com398
65bmsend.com395
66_netblocks.google.com390
67google.com384
68spf.migadu.com381
69md02.com378
70spf.lianamailer.com378
71spf.registeredsite.com368
72spf.totaalholding.nl366
73emailus.freshservice.com357
74outboundmail.convio.net355
75reflexion.net352
76appriver.com351
77spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl348
78customer.mailguard.com.au340
79spf.w4ymail.at339
80srs.mailii.org338
81smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg335
82spf.secure.ne.jp333
83spf.raiolanetworks.com331
84datadrivenemail.com331
85spf.hostedmail.net.au328
86_netblocks2.google.com328
87hotmail.com325
88spf.serveriai.lt323
89_netblocks3.google.com321
90spf.securemx.jp317
91_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com316
92_spf.emfwd.name-services.com312
93spf.mindbox.ru311
94ncfp.asia300
95_spf.sui-inter.net300
96spf.hostmar.com298
97spf.web-dns1.com296
98spf.mtaroutes.com294
99spf.forwardemail.net292
100spf.maropost.com291

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-03-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:48:12Z.