Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2022-01-01.

552 174
Domains with MX
447 427
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
552 174
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted194 12235.16%
2Google Workspace120 26021.78%
3Microsoft 36550 2039.09%
4Unknown / Other30 8515.59%
5Yandex 36019 5613.54%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)12 3862.24%
7GoDaddy10 2511.86%
8Zoho Mail9 2691.68%
9Hostinger8 1381.47%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding7 3761.34%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Generic / unmatched (mail.*)5 8171.05%
12SpamExperts (SolarWinds)5 3990.98%
13Mimecast5 2430.95%
14Proofpoint5 0460.91%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)3 6980.67%
16Jellyfish (Namecheap)3 6070.65%
17Rackspace Email3 4890.63%
18OVH Mail2 8670.52%
19Beget (RU)2 8400.51%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)2 7590.5%
21Barracuda2 3700.43%
22Namecheap PrivateEmail2 1610.39%
231&1 IONOS1 9450.35%
24Amazon WorkMail1 9440.35%
25Mail.ru for Business1 8800.34%
26Proofpoint Essentials1 6380.3%
27Cisco IronPort1 5090.27%
28Ukraine.com.ua hosting1 4930.27%
29Mailgun (inbound)1 4590.26%
30MailHostBox1 2900.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.03%
49 887 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
20 955
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
35.18%
194 229 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp17 1843.84%
2Mandrill14 2483.18%
3SendGrid (Twilio)13 9773.12%
4Amazon SES12 5892.81%
5Zendesk11 8992.66%
6Mailgun11 3692.54%
7MailChannels10 5672.36%
8Namecheap Forwarding7 5331.68%
9SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 5051.45%
10Salesforce5 1431.15%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast4 5551.02%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)4 3390.97%
13Mailjet (Sinch)4 0710.91%
14Elastic Email2 8860.65%
15Marketo (Adobe)2 3810.53%
16SendPulse2 1470.48%
17MailerSend2 0450.46%
18Help Scout1 9690.44%
19SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 9090.43%
20Emsd1 (transactional)1 7450.39%
21Zoho Campaigns1 6890.38%
22Unisender (RU)1 6190.36%
23Postmark1 5800.35%
24Zoho ZeptoMail1 5610.35%
25MailHostBox1 5510.35%
26SparkPost1 3710.31%
27Barracuda Essentials1 2310.28%
28Constant Contact1 0700.24%
29Freshdesk1 0150.23%
30A Random Server (parking)8160.18%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)3 6060.81%
2Shopify3 0820.69%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)1 1460.26%
4BigCommerce1 0820.24%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3659690.22%
6Firebase (Google)9110.2%
7KnowBe47650.17%
8Trustpilot6820.15%
9NetSuite (Oracle)5810.13%
10Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5580.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Qualtrics4770.11%
12PayPal Braintree4640.1%
13Squarespace4160.09%
14ClickDimensions4080.09%
15Greenhouse3230.07%
16Zendesk3220.07%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)3210.07%
18Docebo (LMS)2790.06%
19Gorgias2010.04%
20ConnectWise1920.04%
21RetailCRM1880.04%
22k.io (workspace)1780.04%
23Sage Intacct1610.04%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)1420.03%
25Brightspace (D2L)1300.03%
26Gannett (USA Today)1270.03%
27HappyFox1130.03%
28Oracle Cloud1010.02%
29Oracle Cloud Email990.02%
30Recurly920.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx00.1and1.com973
2mx01.1and1.com970
3smx2.web-hosting.com623
4smx1.web-hosting.com619
5smx3.web-hosting.com615
6mx-in04b.natrohost.com554
7mx-in04.natrohost.com553
8mx1.netsolmail.net550
9mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net506
10localhost470
11mx-in05.natrohost.com395
12mx-in05b.natrohost.com392
13antispam1.ihs.com.tr381
14antispam2.ihs.com.tr379
15mx-in03.natrohost.com355
16mx-in03b.natrohost.com354
17mx01.1and1.co.uk316
18mx00.1and1.co.uk314
19mailgw.nic.in288
20mx1.emailowl.com265
21mx2.emailowl.com262
22mx3.emailowl.com258
23smtp-fwd.wordpress.com250
24mx-in01.natrohost.com239
25mx-in01b.natrohost.com239
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26smx4.web-hosting.com238
27mx01.1and1.fr229
28mx-in02b.natrohost.com228
29mx00.1and1.fr227
30mx-in02.natrohost.com227
31ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr219
32rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr217
33nan217
34mx2.tmdhosting.com208
35mx1.tmdhosting.com207
36smtp.imcloud.org194
37mta1.youcan.shop187
38mta2.youcan.shop185
39mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr174
40mx00.1and1.es151
41mx01.1and1.es149
42mx1.inbox.co.il146
43mailme.enter-system.com138
44mx01.vargonen.net132
45asp.reflexion.net130
46mx1.supremebox.com128
47smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net127
48mx2.supremebox.com125
49mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk120
50sitemail.everyone.net118
51relay.bestofpost.com116
52mx-100.reflexion.net106
53mx-110.reflexion.net104
54mx4.name.com103
55mx5.name.com102
56mx3.name.com102
57mx6.name.com101
58ssl.emailserver.vn101
59webmail2.sitebuildit.com101
60mx8.name.com100
61mx7.name.com100
62cyber.mail.trdns.com99
63mx1.nepal.gov.np99
64mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua98
65mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua98
66mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua98
67mx2.nepal.gov.np97
68mxgw.bcc.gov.bd95
69mail1.sbnation.com94
70mx2.inbox.co.il93
71mail.municipality.gov.np90
72mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk87
73mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk87
74mx3.volusion.com83
75posta.muhtar.gov.tr83
76in.hes.trendmicro.eu83
77mx4.volusion.com82
78s0.protection.netiyi.com81
79mx07.register.com80
80mx-backup.serveriai.lt77
81mx1.jimdo.com77
82mx2.jimdo.com77
83ntvirus.url.com.tw75
84ntvirus2.url.com.tw75
85mr.pavietnam.vn74
86mx02.ofis.net74
87mx.simply.com73
88mx01.ofis.net73
89mx1.hosting24.com72
90mxs.activeby.net71
91mx1.krystal.co.uk71
92mx2.krystal.co.uk71
93mx.turkticaret.net70
94mxbackup01.ofis.net70
95mailme-backup.enter-system.com70
96mx2.flockmail.com69
97mx.usa.net69
98mx1.flockmail.com68
99mail.aasaam.net67
100inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com66

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com2 021
2_netblockshalon.natrohost.com1 816
3_spfcls.natrohost.com1 801
4webhostbox.net1 744
5spf.flockmail.com1 555
6_spf.automattic.com1 045
7spf.a2hosting.com1 025
8_spf.turhost.com832
9spf.improvmx.com798
10_spf.protection.veridyen.com738
11_spf.trwww.com608
12infusionmail.com606
13send.aweber.com574
14spf.autopilothq.com561
15spf.mail.intercom.io535
16relay.is.cc502
17_spf.nicegrup.com498
18spf.easywp.com471
19cmail1.com465
20_spf.5g-soft.com435
21sender.zohobooks.com420
22nicmail.ru384
23_spf.hoster.by358
24outlook.com358
25emailserver.vn331
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26e2ma.net310
27smtp.servconfig.com308
28ncfp.asia301
29hostmonster.com300
30datadrivenemail.com289
31mxlogin.com286
32email-od.com282
33ncapp02.com280
34icpbounce.com273
35mailcontrol.com273
36msgfocus.com270
37spf.hostmar.com265
38_spf.act-on.net260
39spf.mindbox.ru259
40hotmail.com256
41_netblocks.google.com253
42webmail.ihs.com.tr249
43_spf.acquia.com245
44_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com236
45bmsend.com236
46turbo-smtp.com232
47spf.migadu.com231
48srs.mailii.org231
49_spf.mx1.mirohost.net226
50_spf.embluemail.com223
51spf.jabatus.fr222
52smtp.groovehq.com221
53_netblocks2.google.com217
54email.freshservice.com215
55_spf.cenuta.com214
56google.com211
57spf.masterbase.com208
58spf.tipalti.com208
59_netblocks3.google.com208
60emailus.freshservice.com207
61spf.mailcluster.com.au206
62_spf2.trwww.com205
63spf.hes.trendmicro.com204
64spf.imcloud.org200
65spf.useinbox.net200
66beget.ru199
67_spf.syrahost.com188
68dnsexit.com185
69spf.mschosting.com184
70outboundmail.convio.net184
71spf.zixsmbhosted.com182
72spf.maropost.com179
73spf.webapps.net176
74appriver.com175
75spf.hostingplatform.net.au175
76spf.dhs.com.tr173
77_spf.emfwd.name-services.com171
78_spfnew.logix.in169
79spf.forwardemail.net169
80smtp1.uservoice.com165
81gmail.com165
82_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com164
83mh.blackboard.com163
84md02.com162
85_spf.ofis.net157
86justhost.com156
87_spf.amocrmmail.com156
88spf.unione.io156
89_spf.site4now.net156
90reflexion.net155
91spf.mailigen.com152
92spfhost.messageprovider.com151
93spf.nl2go.com146
94namebrightmail.com145
95_spf.gestiondeservidor.net143
96_spf.reply.io140
97spf.mailanyone.net139
98azdigi-mailgateway.com138
99reliablemail.org138
100sender.zohoinvoice.com138

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2022-01-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:54:53Z.