Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-12-01.

786 477
Domains with MX
631 833
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
786 477
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted266 78033.92%
2Google Workspace173 06122.0%
3Microsoft 36578 1709.94%
4Unknown / Other44 3925.64%
5Yandex 36030 3573.86%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)18 9402.41%
7GoDaddy14 6111.86%
8Zoho Mail12 0731.54%
9Hostinger9 2181.17%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding8 7961.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast8 0301.02%
12Generic / unmatched (mail.*)8 0261.02%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 5690.96%
14Proofpoint6 6100.84%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 1870.79%
16Beget (RU)5 3980.69%
17Rackspace Email4 9250.63%
18Jellyfish (Namecheap)3 9800.51%
19Barracuda3 8520.49%
20OVH Mail3 7750.48%
21Mail.ru for Business3 6410.46%
22QQ Mail (Tencent)3 4110.43%
23Ukraine.com.ua hosting3 1890.41%
241&1 IONOS2 8270.36%
25Proofpoint Essentials2 8000.36%
26Namecheap PrivateEmail2 7820.35%
27Amazon WorkMail2 5930.33%
28Timeweb (RU)2 1340.27%
29Cisco IronPort2 0690.26%
30Mailgun (inbound)1 8700.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.22%
72 546 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
28 668
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
33.94%
266 908 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp25 1563.98%
2Mandrill19 9473.16%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 1283.03%
4Amazon SES16 8282.66%
5Zendesk16 0602.54%
6Mailgun15 7702.5%
7MailChannels13 8002.18%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 2341.46%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 9661.42%
10Salesforce7 1181.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast7 0191.11%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)5 6870.9%
13Mailjet (Sinch)5 5430.88%
14Elastic Email3 7560.59%
15SendPulse3 4790.55%
16Marketo (Adobe)3 3660.53%
17Unisender (RU)2 6970.43%
18MailerSend2 6330.42%
19SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)2 5520.4%
20Help Scout2 5250.4%
21Zoho Campaigns2 4380.39%
22Emsd1 (transactional)2 3570.37%
23Zoho ZeptoMail2 1160.33%
24Postmark2 1010.33%
25Barracuda Essentials2 0540.33%
26MailHostBox1 8920.3%
27SparkPost1 8460.29%
28Constant Contact1 7360.27%
29Freshdesk1 4240.23%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 2460.2%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 6310.89%
2Shopify4 9730.79%
3BigCommerce1 9350.31%
4CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 6210.26%
5Statuspage (Atlassian)1 5090.24%
6Firebase (Google)1 1970.19%
7KnowBe41 1510.18%
8Trustpilot9420.15%
9NetSuite (Oracle)8850.14%
10Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)7930.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Squarespace7730.12%
12Qualtrics6700.11%
13ClickDimensions6630.1%
14PayPal Braintree6230.1%
15Greenhouse4360.07%
16Zendesk4150.07%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)4090.06%
18Docebo (LMS)4000.06%
19RetailCRM3370.05%
20ConnectWise3300.05%
21Gorgias3180.05%
22k.io (workspace)2490.04%
23Sage Intacct2410.04%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)2380.04%
25HappyFox2060.03%
26Gannett (USA Today)1880.03%
27Brightspace (D2L)1720.03%
28SchoolMessenger1590.03%
29One.com (DK hosting)1300.02%
30Oracle Cloud Email1270.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx00.1and1.com1 414
2mx01.1and1.com1 412
3mx1.netsolmail.net918
4mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net770
5smx2.web-hosting.com735
6mx-in04b.natrohost.com729
7smx1.web-hosting.com728
8smx3.web-hosting.com727
9mx-in04.natrohost.com724
10localhost628
11mx76.mb1p.com540
12mx76.m2bp.com540
13antispam2.ihs.com.tr525
14antispam1.ihs.com.tr523
15mx-in03.natrohost.com510
16mx-in03b.natrohost.com509
17mx00.1and1.co.uk495
18mx01.1and1.co.uk494
19mx-in05.natrohost.com462
20mx-in05b.natrohost.com461
21smtp-fwd.wordpress.com375
22mx-in01.natrohost.com347
23mx-in01b.natrohost.com346
24mailgw.nic.in343
25mx-in02.natrohost.com339
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in02b.natrohost.com339
27mx01.1and1.fr330
28mx00.1and1.fr325
29smtp.imcloud.org292
30nan277
31rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr275
32smx4.web-hosting.com274
33ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr274
34mx1.tmdhosting.com271
35mx2.tmdhosting.com269
36asp.reflexion.net251
37mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr235
38mx00.1and1.es231
39mx01.1and1.es230
40mx1.emailowl.com220
41mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua218
42mta1.youcan.shop218
43mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua217
44mta2.youcan.shop217
45mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua216
46mx2.emailowl.com216
47mx3.emailowl.com215
48mx-100.reflexion.net210
49mx-110.reflexion.net205
50mx1.supremebox.com192
51mx2.supremebox.com191
52mx01.vargonen.net173
53mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk172
54mx3.volusion.com167
55mx4.volusion.com167
56mx1.inbox.co.il163
57sitemail.everyone.net152
58mxgw.bcc.gov.bd149
59mx2.jimdo.com147
60mx1.jimdo.com146
61mailme.enter-system.com142
62mx5.name.com140
63mx4.name.com139
64mx3.name.com139
65mx8.name.com138
66mx6.name.com138
67mail1.sbnation.com137
68mx7.name.com136
69mxs.activeby.net135
70mail-s30.1gb.ru134
71webmail2.sitebuildit.com128
72cyber.mail.trdns.com128
73relay2.netnames.net126
74relay1.netnames.net124
75mxs.oml.ru122
76relay.bestofpost.com122
77in.hes.trendmicro.eu121
78smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net121
79ssl.emailserver.vn120
80mx.zoho.com.au115
81mmxs.majordomo.ru114
82mx-backup.serveriai.lt113
83mx07.register.com113
84mx2.zoho.com.au112
85mx3.zoho.com.au111
86mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk110
87mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk110
88mx.usa.net110
89ntvirus.url.com.tw109
90ntvirus2.url.com.tw109
91mx.simply.com109
92mail2.utabweb.net108
93mx1.dewaspamguard.com107
94mx2.dewaspamguard.com107
951-grid-mx01.co.za107
961-grid-mx02.com107
971-grid-mx03.co.za107
981-grid-mx04.com107
99mx01.ofis.net105
100mail2.infomart2000.com105

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com3 248
2_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 427
3_spfcls.natrohost.com2 413
4webhostbox.net2 049
5spf.flockmail.com1 875
6spf.a2hosting.com1 301
7_spf.automattic.com1 201
8_spf.turhost.com1 017
9spf.improvmx.com1 013
10nicmail.ru926
11infusionmail.com872
12_spf.protection.veridyen.com867
13spf.autopilothq.com834
14_spf.hoster.by798
15_spf.trwww.com797
16send.aweber.com756
17spf.mail.intercom.io693
18cmail1.com682
19_spf.nicegrup.com654
20spf.easywp.com627
21relay.is.cc618
22outlook.com594
23_spf.5g-soft.com553
24sender.zohobooks.com529
25e2ma.net486
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26smtp.servconfig.com472
27spf.hostmar.com463
28_spf.mx1.mirohost.net441
29hostmonster.com438
30icpbounce.com437
31emailserver.vn429
32_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com427
33_spf.act-on.net418
34email-od.com405
35spf.hes.trendmicro.com385
36mailcontrol.com377
37spf.mailcluster.com.au372
38mxlogin.com370
39beget.ru363
40msgfocus.com362
41bmsend.com356
42srs.mailii.org353
43hotmail.com352
44spf.jabatus.fr346
45datadrivenemail.com344
46spf.mindbox.ru344
47ncfp.asia336
48_spf.acquia.com335
49spf.webapps.net326
50_spf.syrahost.com325
51spf.migadu.com323
52_spf.embluemail.com322
53_netblocks.google.com322
54smtp.groovehq.com321
55spf.zixsmbhosted.com316
56spf.hostingplatform.net.au315
57ncapp02.com315
58webmail.ihs.com.tr313
59email.freshservice.com310
60turbo-smtp.com307
61reflexion.net306
62spf.imcloud.org302
63emailus.freshservice.com298
64google.com291
65md02.com280
66appriver.com275
67_netblocks2.google.com272
68_netblocks3.google.com268
69spf.masterbase.com264
70_spf.emfwd.name-services.com264
71outboundmail.convio.net263
72spf.tipalti.com258
73smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg254
74customer.mailguard.com.au250
75_spf.amocrmmail.com248
76spf.forwardemail.net246
77_spf2.trwww.com242
78mh.blackboard.com242
79netangels.ru240
80spf.web-dns1.com239
81dnsexit.com237
82getcourse.ru236
83_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com235
84_spf.cenuta.com235
85gmail.com232
86spf.unione.io229
87spf.mschosting.com228
88justhost.com225
89_spf.site4now.net224
90mxroute.com223
91spf.serveriai.lt222
92spf.registeredsite.com220
93spf.maropost.com217
94spf.mailigen.com214
95spf.useinbox.net213
96spf.aserv.co.za211
97sender.zohoinvoice.com207
98_spf.ofis.net205
99spf.securemx.jp205
100spf.mailanyone.net205

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2021-12-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T10:59:07Z.