Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-10-01.

794 460
Domains with MX
633 349
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
794 460
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted267 67233.69%
2Google Workspace176 84022.26%
3Microsoft 36579 58410.02%
4Unknown / Other46 4465.85%
5Yandex 36029 3143.69%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)19 5082.46%
7GoDaddy16 1722.04%
8Zoho Mail12 2991.55%
9Hostinger9 3911.18%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding9 0021.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast8 2341.04%
12Generic / unmatched (mail.*)8 0221.01%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 9241.0%
14Proofpoint6 6530.84%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 2720.79%
16Beget (RU)5 3010.67%
17Rackspace Email5 1660.65%
18OVH Mail3 9160.49%
19Barracuda3 8930.49%
20Mail.ru for Business3 4970.44%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)3 4680.44%
22Proofpoint Essentials2 9300.37%
23Ukraine.com.ua hosting2 9140.37%
241&1 IONOS2 8080.35%
25Namecheap PrivateEmail2 6970.34%
26Amazon WorkMail2 6070.33%
27Cisco IronPort2 0700.26%
28Timeweb (RU)2 0420.26%
29Mailgun (inbound)1 9720.25%
30MailChannels1 7530.22%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.46%
75 131 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
29 097
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
33.71%
267 796 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp26 0514.11%
2Mandrill20 0013.16%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 3543.06%
4Amazon SES16 7412.64%
5Zendesk15 8992.51%
6Mailgun15 8102.5%
7MailChannels14 7542.33%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 5321.51%
9Namecheap Forwarding9 1951.45%
10Mimecast7 1001.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce7 0101.11%
12Mailjet (Sinch)5 5040.87%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)5 1840.82%
14Elastic Email3 5740.56%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 5390.56%
16SendPulse3 1850.5%
17SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)2 5640.4%
18Unisender (RU)2 5550.4%
19Help Scout2 5080.4%
20Zoho Campaigns2 4860.39%
21Emsd1 (transactional)2 3840.38%
22MailerSend2 3820.38%
23Postmark2 2080.35%
24Barracuda Essentials2 0940.33%
25Zoho ZeptoMail2 0730.33%
26MailHostBox1 9880.31%
27SparkPost1 8570.29%
28Constant Contact1 6920.27%
29Freshdesk1 4150.22%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 2350.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)6 0060.95%
2Shopify5 0560.8%
3BigCommerce2 0150.32%
4CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 5210.24%
5Statuspage (Atlassian)1 5000.24%
6Firebase (Google)1 1770.19%
7KnowBe41 0850.17%
8Trustpilot9230.15%
9NetSuite (Oracle)9100.14%
10Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)7960.13%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Squarespace7760.12%
12ClickDimensions6860.11%
13Qualtrics6860.11%
14PayPal Braintree6020.1%
15Zendesk4300.07%
16Greenhouse4190.07%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)4110.06%
18Docebo (LMS)3890.06%
19ConnectWise3380.05%
20RetailCRM3260.05%
21Gorgias3100.05%
22k.io (workspace)2470.04%
23Sage Intacct2440.04%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)2430.04%
25Gannett (USA Today)1930.03%
26HappyFox1890.03%
27SchoolMessenger1730.03%
28Brightspace (D2L)1630.03%
29Oracle Cloud Email1350.02%
30Oracle Cloud1260.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com2 118
2smx1.web-hosting.com2 101
3smx3.web-hosting.com2 091
4mx00.1and1.com1 550
5mx01.1and1.com1 547
6smx4.web-hosting.com976
7mx1.netsolmail.net931
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net824
9mx-in04b.natrohost.com816
10mx-in04.natrohost.com811
11localhost662
12mx00.1and1.co.uk532
13mx01.1and1.co.uk532
14mx76.mb1p.com503
15mx76.m2bp.com503
16mx-in03.natrohost.com502
17mx-in03b.natrohost.com500
18antispam1.ihs.com.tr466
19antispam2.ihs.com.tr462
20mx-in05.natrohost.com373
21mx-in05b.natrohost.com372
22mailgw.nic.in367
23smtp-fwd.wordpress.com364
24mx-in01.natrohost.com348
25mx-in02b.natrohost.com348
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in01b.natrohost.com347
27mx-in02.natrohost.com347
28mx01.1and1.fr332
29mx00.1and1.fr331
30mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr275
31asp.reflexion.net273
32mx1.tmdhosting.com270
33mx2.tmdhosting.com270
34nan268
35mx00.1and1.es262
36mx01.1and1.es262
37mta1.youcan.shop260
38mta2.youcan.shop259
39mx1.emailowl.com243
40rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr237
41ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr237
42mx2.emailowl.com234
43mx3.emailowl.com230
44mx-100.reflexion.net227
45mx-110.reflexion.net221
46smtp.imcloud.org213
47mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua205
48mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua205
49mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua204
50mx1.inbox.co.il199
51mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk193
52mx1.supremebox.com185
53mx2.supremebox.com184
54mx4.volusion.com176
55mx3.volusion.com175
56cyber.mail.trdns.com167
57mail-s30.1gb.ru165
58mailme.enter-system.com165
59mx1.jimdo.com163
60mx2.jimdo.com163
61mx01.vargonen.net160
62sitemail.everyone.net157
63mx3.name.com152
64mx4.name.com150
65mx6.name.com148
66mx5.name.com148
67mx8.name.com147
68mx7.name.com147
69in.hes.trendmicro.eu144
70mxgw.bcc.gov.bd135
71mmxs.majordomo.ru133
72mail1.sbnation.com133
73ntvirus.url.com.tw131
74ntvirus2.url.com.tw129
75relay2.netnames.net125
76smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net125
77mx07.register.com124
78mxs.oml.ru124
79mx-backup.serveriai.lt123
80relay1.netnames.net122
81mx.usa.net122
82mx1.krystal.co.uk117
83mx2.krystal.co.uk117
84inbound.registeredsite.com116
85mx.zoho.com.au116
86mx.simply.com113
87mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk112
88mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk112
89mx2.zoho.com.au111
90webmail2.sitebuildit.com110
91mx2.inbox.co.il109
92mx3.zoho.com.au108
93posta.muhtar.gov.tr107
94relay.bestofpost.com105
95mail2.infomart2000.com104
96mail.municipality.gov.np104
97mx1.nepal.gov.np103
98mx2.nepal.gov.np101
99mx00.schlund.de99
100mx01.schlund.de99

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com3 535
2_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 443
3_spfcls.natrohost.com2 434
4webhostbox.net2 350
5spf.flockmail.com2 164
6spf.a2hosting.com1 321
7_spf.automattic.com1 277
8_spf.turhost.com1 041
9spf.improvmx.com992
10_spf.protection.veridyen.com907
11infusionmail.com904
12spf.autopilothq.com900
13nicmail.ru886
14_spf.trwww.com773
15send.aweber.com739
16cmail1.com713
17spf.mail.intercom.io690
18relay.is.cc687
19outlook.com655
20_spf.hoster.by651
21_spf.nicegrup.com615
22spf.easywp.com552
23spf.hostmar.com549
24sender.zohobooks.com525
25e2ma.net501
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26hostmonster.com482
27smtp.servconfig.com464
28_spf.act-on.net449
29_spf.mx1.mirohost.net448
30icpbounce.com446
31spf.hes.trendmicro.com418
32hotmail.com406
33msgfocus.com404
34email-od.com404
35spf.mailcluster.com.au398
36beget.ru392
37_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com391
38mailcontrol.com376
39_spf.syrahost.com373
40appriver.com358
41datadrivenemail.com356
42mxlogin.com352
43bmsend.com349
44smtp.groovehq.com347
45ncfp.asia345
46emailserver.vn337
47_spf.acquia.com335
48_spf.embluemail.com331
49spf.hostingplatform.net.au331
50reflexion.net329
51ncapp02.com327
52google.com325
53spf.zixsmbhosted.com322
54email.freshservice.com320
55spf.mindbox.ru315
56_netblocks.google.com315
57spf.migadu.com312
58emailus.freshservice.com300
59spf.masterbase.com294
60spf.webapps.net291
61spf.jabatus.fr284
62turbo-smtp.com278
63srs.mailii.org275
64webmail.ihs.com.tr269
65_netblocks2.google.com268
66_spf.emfwd.name-services.com263
67justhost.com260
68_netblocks3.google.com260
69md02.com259
70mh.blackboard.com256
71_spf.site4now.net250
72spf.registeredsite.com249
73spf.tipalti.com248
74spf.web-dns1.com248
75outboundmail.convio.net248
76customer.mailguard.com.au248
77spf.mschosting.com243
78gmail.com242
79spf.serveriai.lt232
80_spf.amocrmmail.com229
81smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg228
82sharepointonline.com227
83spf.maropost.com225
84spf.hostedmail.net.au225
85spf.nl2go.com223
86dnsexit.com222
87spf.mailigen.com222
88spf.forwardemail.net220
89spf.imcloud.org218
90spf.fromdoppler.com218
91_spf2.trwww.com214
92reliablemail.org212
93getcourse.ru212
94_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com212
95smtp1.uservoice.com210
96_spf.ps.kz208
97_spf.eee.tw208
98_spf.transip.email206
99_spf.reply.io205
100mxroute.com202

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2021-10-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:06:35Z.