Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-09-01.

788 407
Domains with MX
628 585
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
788 407
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted273 24934.66%
2Google Workspace172 49921.88%
3Microsoft 36577 1409.78%
4Unknown / Other47 2525.99%
5Yandex 36028 8313.66%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)19 3362.45%
7GoDaddy15 8362.01%
8Zoho Mail12 1701.54%
9Hostinger9 1481.16%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding8 7171.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast8 0291.02%
12Generic / unmatched (mail.*)7 9801.01%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 8200.99%
14Proofpoint6 4940.82%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 0310.76%
16Rackspace Email5 0510.64%
17Beget (RU)4 9930.63%
18Barracuda3 8550.49%
19OVH Mail3 7500.48%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)3 3840.43%
21Mail.ru for Business3 3640.43%
22Ukraine.com.ua hosting2 9760.38%
23Proofpoint Essentials2 7100.34%
24Namecheap PrivateEmail2 6560.34%
251&1 IONOS2 6320.33%
26Amazon WorkMail2 5520.32%
27Cisco IronPort2 0870.26%
28Timeweb (RU)1 9940.25%
29Mailgun (inbound)1 9200.24%
30Reg.ru1 7900.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.62%
75 811 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
29 215
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
34.67%
273 372 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp25 6694.08%
2Mandrill19 5993.12%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 2503.06%
4Amazon SES16 1342.57%
5Mailgun15 7502.51%
6Zendesk15 5922.48%
7MailChannels14 6922.34%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 2981.48%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 9421.42%
10Mimecast6 9781.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce6 7611.08%
12Mailjet (Sinch)5 3830.86%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)5 0650.81%
14Elastic Email3 4840.55%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 4690.55%
16SendPulse3 1220.5%
17Unisender (RU)2 5270.4%
18Help Scout2 4780.39%
19SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)2 4630.39%
20MailerSend2 3860.38%
21Zoho Campaigns2 3610.38%
22Emsd1 (transactional)2 2410.36%
23Postmark2 1490.34%
24Barracuda Essentials2 0580.33%
25Zoho ZeptoMail2 0270.32%
26MailHostBox1 8840.3%
27SparkPost1 8550.3%
28Constant Contact1 6850.27%
29Freshdesk1 3870.22%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 2410.2%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 7260.91%
2Shopify4 8550.77%
3BigCommerce1 9220.31%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 4930.24%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 4880.24%
6Firebase (Google)1 1310.18%
7KnowBe49970.16%
8Trustpilot9170.15%
9NetSuite (Oracle)8740.14%
10Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)7710.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Squarespace7310.12%
12Qualtrics6950.11%
13ClickDimensions6500.1%
14PayPal Braintree6060.1%
15Freshsales (Freshworks)4600.07%
16Zendesk4480.07%
17Greenhouse4000.06%
18Docebo (LMS)3770.06%
19RetailCRM3240.05%
20Gorgias3230.05%
21ConnectWise3220.05%
22Sage Intacct2270.04%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)2240.04%
24k.io (workspace)2160.03%
25Gannett (USA Today)1790.03%
26HappyFox1720.03%
27SchoolMessenger1720.03%
28Brightspace (D2L)1680.03%
29One.com (DK hosting)1320.02%
30Oracle Cloud Email1170.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com3 046
2smx1.web-hosting.com3 014
3smx3.web-hosting.com3 009
4mx01.1and1.com1 513
5mx00.1and1.com1 509
6smx4.web-hosting.com1 414
7mx1.netsolmail.net934
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net857
9mx-in04b.natrohost.com740
10mx-in04.natrohost.com739
11localhost658
12antispam1.ihs.com.tr511
13antispam2.ihs.com.tr510
14mx01.1and1.co.uk501
15mx00.1and1.co.uk499
16mx-in03.natrohost.com484
17mx-in03b.natrohost.com483
18mx76.mb1p.com481
19mx76.m2bp.com480
20smtp-fwd.wordpress.com358
21mx-in05b.natrohost.com345
22mx-in05.natrohost.com344
23mailgw.nic.in336
24mx01.1and1.fr330
25mx00.1and1.fr327
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in01.natrohost.com308
27mx-in01b.natrohost.com308
28mx-in02.natrohost.com292
29mx-in02b.natrohost.com291
30mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr286
31asp.reflexion.net279
32mx2.tmdhosting.com275
33smtp.imcloud.org274
34nan273
35mx1.tmdhosting.com272
36mx00.1and1.es248
37mx01.1and1.es247
38mx1.emailowl.com241
39mx2.supremebox.com241
40mx1.supremebox.com240
41mx2.emailowl.com238
42mx3.emailowl.com236
43mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk235
44rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr230
45mx-100.reflexion.net229
46ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr228
47mx1.inbox.co.il222
48mx-110.reflexion.net220
49mta2.youcan.shop196
50mta1.youcan.shop194
51mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua184
52mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua182
53mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua182
54mx3.volusion.com163
55mx4.volusion.com163
56sitemail.everyone.net159
57mx2.inbox.co.il155
58mx1.jimdo.com146
59mx2.jimdo.com146
60webmail2.sitebuildit.com146
61cyber.mail.trdns.com145
62mx01.vargonen.net143
63in.hes.trendmicro.eu141
64mail1.sbnation.com140
65mx5.name.com137
66mx3.name.com137
67mx4.name.com137
68mail-s30.1gb.ru137
69mxgw.bcc.gov.bd136
70mx8.name.com135
71mx6.name.com135
72mx7.name.com134
73mxs.activeby.net133
74mailme.enter-system.com131
75ntvirus2.url.com.tw130
76ntvirus.url.com.tw129
77mx-backup.serveriai.lt127
78mx.simply.com123
79mx07.register.com120
80relay2.netnames.net119
81smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net118
82relay1.netnames.net116
83mail2.infomart2000.com116
84mx.hetemail.jp112
85mx.zoho.com.au111
86mxs.oml.ru108
87mx3.zoho.com.au105
88mx.usa.net105
89mx1.krystal.co.uk104
90mx2.krystal.co.uk104
911-grid-mx01.co.za104
921-grid-mx03.co.za104
93mx2.zoho.com.au104
941-grid-mx02.com103
951-grid-mx04.com103
96mmxs.majordomo.ru101
97mx1.nepal.gov.np101
98mx2.nepal.gov.np99
99mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk98
100mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk98

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com3 560
2spf.flockmail.com2 261
3webhostbox.net2 256
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 235
5_spfcls.natrohost.com2 225
6spf.a2hosting.com1 306
7_spf.automattic.com1 277
8spf.improvmx.com1 001
9_spf.turhost.com946
10_spf.protection.veridyen.com904
11spf.autopilothq.com896
12nicmail.ru892
13infusionmail.com890
14send.aweber.com766
15_spf.hoster.by736
16_spf.trwww.com709
17spf.mail.intercom.io709
18relay.is.cc683
19cmail1.com679
20outlook.com651
21spf.easywp.com575
22_spf.nicegrup.com573
23spf.hostmar.com534
24sender.zohobooks.com516
25hostmonster.com506
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26e2ma.net484
27smtp.servconfig.com465
28icpbounce.com464
29spf.hes.trendmicro.com447
30spf.mailcluster.com.au425
31_spf.mx1.mirohost.net424
32email-od.com414
33_spf.act-on.net407
34hotmail.com387
35mailcontrol.com380
36_spf.acquia.com366
37_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com360
38msgfocus.com356
39_spf.syrahost.com349
40datadrivenemail.com346
41beget.ru344
42spf.zixsmbhosted.com341
43emailserver.vn340
44ncfp.asia339
45mxlogin.com336
46smtp.groovehq.com332
47bmsend.com327
48_netblocks.google.com327
49ncapp02.com322
50_spf.embluemail.com322
51srs.mailii.org320
52appriver.com311
53google.com309
54spf.masterbase.com308
55spf.hostingplatform.net.au308
56spf.mindbox.ru308
57webmail.ihs.com.tr303
58reflexion.net300
59emailus.freshservice.com298
60email.freshservice.com296
61spf.migadu.com295
62_netblocks2.google.com278
63spf.imcloud.org277
64_spf.emfwd.name-services.com273
65turbo-smtp.com272
66customer.mailguard.com.au270
67_netblocks3.google.com268
68justhost.com266
69md02.com266
70spf.webapps.net258
71_spf.site4now.net256
72outboundmail.convio.net255
73mh.blackboard.com251
74dnsexit.com246
75_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com244
76spf.aserv.co.za243
77spf.hostedmail.net.au240
78spf.forwardemail.net236
79gmail.com232
80spf.tipalti.com230
81spf.jabatus.fr229
82spf.mailanyone.net228
83getcourse.ru225
84spf.web-dns1.com222
85spf.registeredsite.com221
86_spf.amocrmmail.com219
87spf.mailigen.com219
88reliablemail.org219
89_spf.eee.tw216
90spf.mschosting.com216
91sharepointonline.com215
92spf.securemx.jp215
93app.sgizmo.com212
94spf.serveriai.lt210
95spfhost.messageprovider.com210
96spf.maropost.com204
97smtp1.uservoice.com202
98sender.zohoinvoice.com201
99mxroute.com200
100spf.nl2go.com199

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2021-09-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:10:51Z.