Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-08-01.

619 384
Domains with MX
493 457
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
619 384
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted222 59335.94%
2Google Workspace132 91321.46%
3Microsoft 36555 0498.89%
4Unknown / Other36 9195.96%
5Yandex 36022 9953.71%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)14 7832.39%
7GoDaddy12 6412.04%
8Zoho Mail9 9551.61%
9Hostinger7 9911.29%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding7 2241.17%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Generic / unmatched (mail.*)6 2191.0%
12SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 2101.0%
13Mimecast5 8600.95%
14Proofpoint5 2710.85%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 6540.75%
16Rackspace Email3 9660.64%
17Beget (RU)3 9100.63%
18OVH Mail2 8460.46%
19QQ Mail (Tencent)2 8430.46%
20Barracuda2 6580.43%
21Mail.ru for Business2 5810.42%
22Namecheap PrivateEmail2 1770.35%
23Ukraine.com.ua hosting2 1690.35%
24Amazon WorkMail2 0660.33%
251&1 IONOS1 9700.32%
26Proofpoint Essentials1 8560.3%
27Cisco IronPort1 7020.27%
28Mailgun (inbound)1 6020.26%
29Timeweb (RU)1 4900.24%
30MailHostBox1 4300.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.51%
58 890 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
23 677
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
35.96%
222 706 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp20 1694.09%
2Mandrill15 5673.15%
3SendGrid (Twilio)15 2823.1%
4Amazon SES13 2152.68%
5Zendesk12 8212.6%
6Mailgun12 3502.5%
7MailChannels12 2562.48%
8Namecheap Forwarding7 3711.49%
9SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 2741.47%
10Salesforce5 3691.09%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast5 0351.02%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 1380.84%
13Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)3 9460.8%
14Elastic Email3 0300.61%
15Marketo (Adobe)2 8340.57%
16SendPulse2 4490.5%
17Help Scout2 1440.43%
18Unisender (RU)2 0400.41%
19SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 8800.38%
20MailerSend1 8390.37%
21Postmark1 7720.36%
22Zoho Campaigns1 7660.36%
23Emsd1 (transactional)1 7080.35%
24MailHostBox1 7060.35%
25Zoho ZeptoMail1 5240.31%
26SparkPost1 4940.3%
27Barracuda Essentials1 3550.27%
28Freshdesk1 1440.23%
29Constant Contact1 1310.23%
30A Random Server (parking)9480.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 3300.88%
2Shopify3 7660.76%
3BigCommerce1 4050.28%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 2680.26%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3659760.2%
6Firebase (Google)9160.19%
7Trustpilot7930.16%
8KnowBe47140.14%
9NetSuite (Oracle)6690.14%
10Qualtrics5950.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5610.11%
12PayPal Braintree5200.11%
13ClickDimensions5040.1%
14Squarespace4730.1%
15Zendesk4060.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)3520.07%
17Greenhouse3280.07%
18Docebo (LMS)3080.06%
19Gorgias2440.05%
20RetailCRM2420.05%
21ConnectWise2140.04%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)1700.03%
23Sage Intacct1660.03%
24k.io (workspace)1650.03%
25Brightspace (D2L)1430.03%
26HappyFox1330.03%
27Gannett (USA Today)1310.03%
28Recurly1070.02%
29Chargebee1050.02%
30Oracle Cloud Email960.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com2 523
2smx1.web-hosting.com2 494
3smx3.web-hosting.com2 491
4mx01.1and1.com1 178
5mx00.1and1.com1 172
6smx4.web-hosting.com1 122
7mx1.netsolmail.net712
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net705
9mx-in04.natrohost.com643
10mx-in04b.natrohost.com641
11localhost573
12mx-in03.natrohost.com410
13mx-in03b.natrohost.com406
14mx00.1and1.co.uk403
15mx01.1and1.co.uk402
16antispam2.ihs.com.tr375
17mx76.mb1p.com373
18mx76.m2bp.com373
19antispam1.ihs.com.tr373
20mailgw.nic.in306
21smtp-fwd.wordpress.com288
22mx-in01.natrohost.com287
23mx-in01b.natrohost.com287
24mx2.tmdhosting.com252
25mx1.tmdhosting.com251
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-in02b.natrohost.com240
27mx-in02.natrohost.com239
28mx-in05b.natrohost.com230
29mx-in05.natrohost.com227
30mx01.1and1.fr222
31nan220
32mx00.1and1.fr220
33smtp.imcloud.org219
34ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr208
35rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr208
36mx00.1and1.es204
37mx01.1and1.es203
38mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr201
39asp.reflexion.net193
40mx1.emailowl.com181
41mx2.emailowl.com181
42mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk177
43mxgw.bcc.gov.bd177
44mx3.emailowl.com176
45mx1.supremebox.com170
46mx2.supremebox.com170
47mx-100.reflexion.net165
48mx-110.reflexion.net162
49mta1.youcan.shop153
50mta2.youcan.shop153
51mx1.inbox.co.il137
52mx01.vargonen.net135
53mx3.name.com132
54sitemail.everyone.net131
55mx4.name.com130
56mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua129
57mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua129
58mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua129
59mx5.name.com129
60mx6.name.com128
61mx8.name.com127
62mx7.name.com126
63mx1.jimdo.com111
64mx2.jimdo.com111
65cyber.mail.trdns.com109
66mail1.sbnation.com109
67mail-s30.1gb.ru108
68webmail2.sitebuildit.com105
69smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net105
70mx3.volusion.com104
71mx4.volusion.com104
72mx7.webfaction.com102
73mx8.webfaction.com101
74mx9.webfaction.com95
75mx2.inbox.co.il95
76in.hes.trendmicro.eu93
77mailme.enter-system.com91
78relay.bestofpost.com90
79mx.usa.net90
80mx1.nepal.gov.np88
81mx2.nepal.gov.np86
82mx.simply.com85
83mx5.mail.go.th85
84mxs.oml.ru84
85mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk84
86mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk84
87mx4.mail.go.th84
88mx-backup.serveriai.lt83
89mx1.flockmail.com82
90mx2.flockmail.com80
91mx1.krystal.co.uk79
92mx2.krystal.co.uk79
931-grid-mx03.co.za79
941-grid-mx04.com79
951-grid-mx01.co.za78
961-grid-mx02.com78
97mxs.activeby.net77
98mmxs.majordomo.ru76
99mail2.infomart2000.com76
100posta.muhtar.gov.tr76

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com2 662
2webhostbox.net2 124
3spf.flockmail.com2 095
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com1 868
5_spfcls.natrohost.com1 866
6_spf.automattic.com1 173
7spf.a2hosting.com1 000
8spf.improvmx.com831
9_spf.turhost.com769
10_spf.protection.veridyen.com743
11infusionmail.com660
12spf.autopilothq.com650
13send.aweber.com645
14_spf.trwww.com641
15spf.mail.intercom.io637
16nicmail.ru592
17relay.is.cc583
18cmail1.com570
19_spf.hoster.by499
20_spf.nicegrup.com489
21outlook.com460
22spf.easywp.com459
23e2ma.net378
24spf.hostmar.com377
25sender.zohobooks.com375
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26hostmonster.com375
27icpbounce.com338
28_spf.act-on.net324
29email-od.com320
30smtp.servconfig.com318
31spf.hes.trendmicro.com312
32datadrivenemail.com308
33_spf.mx1.mirohost.net306
34mailcontrol.com306
35ncapp02.com303
36ncfp.asia300
37hotmail.com296
38smtp.groovehq.com292
39msgfocus.com290
40_spf.acquia.com288
41spf.mindbox.ru280
42_netblocks.google.com279
43beget.ru278
44mxlogin.com275
45spf.mailcluster.com.au273
46_spf.syrahost.com269
47bmsend.com268
48spf.masterbase.com259
49emailserver.vn257
50_spf.embluemail.com256
51spf.migadu.com253
52srs.mailii.org253
53_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com251
54google.com241
55_netblocks2.google.com237
56turbo-smtp.com236
57webmail.ihs.com.tr234
58_netblocks3.google.com226
59emailus.freshservice.com224
60spf.imcloud.org223
61_spf.emfwd.name-services.com222
62spf.zixsmbhosted.com222
63appriver.com218
64email.freshservice.com218
65reflexion.net209
66mh.blackboard.com208
67spf.webapps.net207
68gmail.com199
69_spf.site4now.net199
70spf.tipalti.com197
71spf.hostingplatform.net.au197
72justhost.com194
73spfhost.messageprovider.com194
74spf.forwardemail.net194
75getcourse.ru191
76_spfnew.logix.in191
77outboundmail.convio.net190
78smtp1.uservoice.com186
79md02.com182
80_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com180
81_spf.cenuta.com180
82_spf2.trwww.com178
83spf.mschosting.com178
84spf.maropost.com178
85spf.fromdoppler.com176
86customer.mailguard.com.au169
87spf.aserv.co.za168
88spf.securemx.jp162
89dnsexit.com161
90sharepointonline.com161
91_spf.amocrmmail.com160
92gridhost.co.uk159
93salesforce.com159
94app.sgizmo.com157
95spf.unione.io155
96_spf.zdsys.com154
97spf.mailigen.com153
98spf.serveriai.lt151
99spf.registeredsite.com150
100smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg150

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2021-08-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:14:24Z.