Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-05-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 274 136 | 34.77% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 168 451 | 21.37% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 74 075 | 9.4% |
| 4 | Unknown / Other | 47 831 | 6.07% |
| 5 | Yandex 360 | 31 784 | 4.03% |
| 6 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 20 409 | 2.59% |
| 7 | GoDaddy | 17 036 | 2.16% |
| 8 | Zoho Mail | 11 624 | 1.47% |
| 9 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 8 407 | 1.07% |
| 10 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 8 238 | 1.05% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 7 789 | 0.99% |
| 12 | Mimecast | 7 789 | 0.99% |
| 13 | Hostinger | 7 524 | 0.95% |
| 14 | Proofpoint | 6 312 | 0.8% |
| 15 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 6 196 | 0.79% |
| 16 | Beget (RU) | 6 038 | 0.77% |
| 17 | Rackspace Email | 5 209 | 0.66% |
| 18 | OVH Mail | 4 306 | 0.55% |
| 19 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 970 | 0.5% |
| 20 | Barracuda | 3 670 | 0.47% |
| 21 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 3 381 | 0.43% |
| 22 | Ukraine.com.ua hosting | 3 188 | 0.4% |
| 23 | Proofpoint Essentials | 2 660 | 0.34% |
| 24 | 1&1 IONOS | 2 618 | 0.33% |
| 25 | Amazon WorkMail | 2 543 | 0.32% |
| 26 | Timeweb (RU) | 2 444 | 0.31% |
| 27 | Namecheap PrivateEmail | 2 373 | 0.3% |
| 28 | Reg.ru | 2 187 | 0.28% |
| 29 | Cisco IronPort | 2 022 | 0.26% |
| 30 | Mailgun (inbound) | 1 903 | 0.24% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 26 948 | 4.35% |
| 2 | Mandrill | 19 613 | 3.16% |
| 3 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 18 889 | 3.05% |
| 4 | Amazon SES | 15 282 | 2.46% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 15 165 | 2.45% |
| 6 | Mailgun | 15 126 | 2.44% |
| 7 | MailChannels | 14 980 | 2.42% |
| 8 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 9 505 | 1.53% |
| 9 | Namecheap Forwarding | 8 118 | 1.31% |
| 10 | Mimecast | 6 763 | 1.09% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Salesforce | 6 315 | 1.02% |
| 12 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 5 219 | 0.84% |
| 13 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 4 078 | 0.66% |
| 14 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 490 | 0.56% |
| 15 | Elastic Email | 3 468 | 0.56% |
| 16 | SendPulse | 3 180 | 0.51% |
| 17 | Unisender (RU) | 2 719 | 0.44% |
| 18 | Help Scout | 2 414 | 0.39% |
| 19 | Postmark | 2 227 | 0.36% |
| 20 | Zoho Campaigns | 2 182 | 0.35% |
| 21 | SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud) | 2 179 | 0.35% |
| 22 | Emsd1 (transactional) | 2 121 | 0.34% |
| 23 | MailerSend | 2 050 | 0.33% |
| 24 | SparkPost | 1 903 | 0.31% |
| 25 | MailHostBox | 1 862 | 0.3% |
| 26 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 858 | 0.3% |
| 27 | Zoho ZeptoMail | 1 767 | 0.28% |
| 28 | Constant Contact | 1 532 | 0.25% |
| 29 | Freshdesk | 1 389 | 0.22% |
| 30 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 208 | 0.19% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 607 | 0.9% |
| 2 | Shopify | 4 657 | 0.75% |
| 3 | BigCommerce | 2 197 | 0.35% |
| 4 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 473 | 0.24% |
| 5 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 1 327 | 0.21% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 1 011 | 0.16% |
| 7 | Trustpilot | 927 | 0.15% |
| 8 | KnowBe4 | 883 | 0.14% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 877 | 0.14% |
| 10 | Qualtrics | 723 | 0.12% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Squarespace | 723 | 0.12% |
| 12 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 709 | 0.11% |
| 13 | ClickDimensions | 650 | 0.1% |
| 14 | PayPal Braintree | 602 | 0.1% |
| 15 | Zendesk | 481 | 0.08% |
| 16 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 462 | 0.07% |
| 17 | Greenhouse | 393 | 0.06% |
| 18 | Docebo (LMS) | 353 | 0.06% |
| 19 | RetailCRM | 352 | 0.06% |
| 20 | ConnectWise | 339 | 0.05% |
| 21 | Gorgias | 274 | 0.04% |
| 22 | k.io (workspace) | 255 | 0.04% |
| 23 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 227 | 0.04% |
| 24 | Sage Intacct | 201 | 0.03% |
| 25 | Brightspace (D2L) | 193 | 0.03% |
| 26 | SchoolMessenger | 166 | 0.03% |
| 27 | HappyFox | 161 | 0.03% |
| 28 | Gannett (USA Today) | 159 | 0.03% |
| 29 | One.com (DK hosting) | 118 | 0.02% |
| 30 | Recurly | 111 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 2 458 |
| 2 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 2 421 |
| 3 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 2 420 |
| 4 | mx00.1and1.com | 1 624 |
| 5 | mx01.1and1.com | 1 619 |
| 6 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 1 013 |
| 7 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 1 007 |
| 8 | mx-in04b.natrohost.com | 961 |
| 9 | mx-in04.natrohost.com | 959 |
| 10 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 931 |
| 11 | localhost | 821 |
| 12 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 557 |
| 13 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 555 |
| 14 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 535 |
| 15 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 533 |
| 16 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 507 |
| 17 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 505 |
| 18 | mx76.mb1p.com | 470 |
| 19 | mx76.m2bp.com | 470 |
| 20 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 393 |
| 21 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 376 |
| 22 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 376 |
| 23 | mx00.1and1.fr | 363 |
| 24 | mx01.1and1.fr | 363 |
| 25 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 339 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 338 |
| 27 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 293 |
| 28 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 292 |
| 29 | asp.reflexion.net | 283 |
| 30 | nan | 277 |
| 31 | mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr | 276 |
| 32 | mailgw.nic.in | 276 |
| 33 | mx01.1and1.es | 269 |
| 34 | mx00.1and1.es | 268 |
| 35 | rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 245 |
| 36 | ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 243 |
| 37 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 239 |
| 38 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 235 |
| 39 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 213 |
| 40 | mx1.supremebox.com | 204 |
| 41 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 204 |
| 42 | mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 203 |
| 43 | mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 203 |
| 44 | mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 203 |
| 45 | mx2.supremebox.com | 202 |
| 46 | mx1.emailowl.com | 200 |
| 47 | mx2.emailowl.com | 200 |
| 48 | mx-in05b.natrohost.com | 198 |
| 49 | mx01.vargonen.net | 197 |
| 50 | mx3.emailowl.com | 196 |
| 51 | smtp.imcloud.org | 196 |
| 52 | mx-in05.natrohost.com | 195 |
| 53 | mail-s30.1gb.ru | 187 |
| 54 | mx7.webfaction.com | 177 |
| 55 | mx8.webfaction.com | 177 |
| 56 | mx9.webfaction.com | 174 |
| 57 | mx1.inbox.co.il | 171 |
| 58 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 170 |
| 59 | mx1.jimdo.com | 169 |
| 60 | mx2.jimdo.com | 169 |
| 61 | sitemail.everyone.net | 168 |
| 62 | cyber.mail.trdns.com | 164 |
| 63 | mxs.activeby.net | 163 |
| 64 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 163 |
| 65 | mx3.volusion.com | 156 |
| 66 | mx4.volusion.com | 155 |
| 67 | mx3.name.com | 152 |
| 68 | mx4.name.com | 151 |
| 69 | mx5.name.com | 151 |
| 70 | mmxs.majordomo.ru | 149 |
| 71 | mx6.name.com | 148 |
| 72 | mx8.name.com | 148 |
| 73 | mx7.name.com | 146 |
| 74 | 1-grid-mx01.co.za | 141 |
| 75 | 1-grid-mx02.com | 141 |
| 76 | 1-grid-mx03.co.za | 141 |
| 77 | 1-grid-mx04.com | 141 |
| 78 | mx07.register.com | 138 |
| 79 | mx.usa.net | 136 |
| 80 | relay2.netnames.net | 133 |
| 81 | posta.muhtar.gov.tr | 132 |
| 82 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 130 |
| 83 | relay1.netnames.net | 130 |
| 84 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 128 |
| 85 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 128 |
| 86 | mx1.flockmail.com | 126 |
| 87 | mx2.flockmail.com | 124 |
| 88 | mxs.oml.ru | 118 |
| 89 | mailme.enter-system.com | 117 |
| 90 | mx.otenet.gr | 115 |
| 91 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 113 |
| 92 | mx1.krystal.co.uk | 112 |
| 93 | mx2.krystal.co.uk | 112 |
| 94 | mta1.youcan.shop | 111 |
| 95 | mta2.youcan.shop | 111 |
| 96 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 110 |
| 97 | mail1.sbnation.com | 107 |
| 98 | mx1.spamfilter.gr | 106 |
| 99 | mx1.dewaspamguard.com | 105 |
| 100 | mx2.dewaspamguard.com | 105 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bluehost.com | 3 980 |
| 2 | spf.flockmail.com | 2 645 |
| 3 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 2 439 |
| 4 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 2 427 |
| 5 | webhostbox.net | 2 206 |
| 6 | _spf.automattic.com | 1 316 |
| 7 | spf.a2hosting.com | 1 068 |
| 8 | nicmail.ru | 1 059 |
| 9 | _spf.turhost.com | 1 035 |
| 10 | _spf.protection.veridyen.com | 1 015 |
| 11 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 984 |
| 12 | infusionmail.com | 890 |
| 13 | spf.autopilothq.com | 877 |
| 14 | _spf.hoster.by | 861 |
| 15 | spf.improvmx.com | 859 |
| 16 | cmail1.com | 792 |
| 17 | send.aweber.com | 733 |
| 18 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 693 |
| 19 | _spf.trwww.com | 691 |
| 20 | relay.is.cc | 683 |
| 21 | _spf.nicegrup.com | 665 |
| 22 | outlook.com | 634 |
| 23 | hostmonster.com | 548 |
| 24 | spf.hostmar.com | 546 |
| 25 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 506 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | icpbounce.com | 480 |
| 27 | _spf.mx1.mirohost.net | 477 |
| 28 | e2ma.net | 476 |
| 29 | beget.ru | 459 |
| 30 | sender.zohobooks.com | 432 |
| 31 | smtp.servconfig.com | 428 |
| 32 | _spf.act-on.net | 417 |
| 33 | spf.easywp.com | 407 |
| 34 | email-od.com | 407 |
| 35 | msgfocus.com | 403 |
| 36 | mailcontrol.com | 372 |
| 37 | hotmail.com | 370 |
| 38 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 365 |
| 39 | appriver.com | 364 |
| 40 | datadrivenemail.com | 352 |
| 41 | _spf.syrahost.com | 346 |
| 42 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 344 |
| 43 | webmail.ihs.com.tr | 339 |
| 44 | bmsend.com | 337 |
| 45 | email.freshservice.com | 335 |
| 46 | _spf.acquia.com | 334 |
| 47 | emailus.freshservice.com | 334 |
| 48 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 330 |
| 49 | spf.masterbase.com | 325 |
| 50 | ncfp.asia | 325 |
| 51 | mxlogin.com | 325 |
| 52 | smtp.groovehq.com | 324 |
| 53 | _spf.embluemail.com | 315 |
| 54 | reflexion.net | 315 |
| 55 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 314 |
| 56 | spf.mindbox.ru | 311 |
| 57 | google.com | 302 |
| 58 | ncapp02.com | 299 |
| 59 | turbo-smtp.com | 296 |
| 60 | spf.webapps.net | 295 |
| 61 | _netblocks.google.com | 284 |
| 62 | spf.jabatus.fr | 283 |
| 63 | getcourse.ru | 276 |
| 64 | spf.migadu.com | 275 |
| 65 | outboundmail.convio.net | 272 |
| 66 | justhost.com | 271 |
| 67 | emailserver.vn | 270 |
| 68 | md02.com | 259 |
| 69 | spf.hostingplatform.net.au | 256 |
| 70 | _spf.cretaforce.gr | 253 |
| 71 | mh.blackboard.com | 253 |
| 72 | _spf.ps.kz | 242 |
| 73 | _spf.amocrmmail.com | 241 |
| 74 | sharepointonline.com | 240 |
| 75 | gmail.com | 238 |
| 76 | _netblocks2.google.com | 233 |
| 77 | customer.mailguard.com.au | 232 |
| 78 | spf.hostedmail.net.au | 231 |
| 79 | netangels.ru | 230 |
| 80 | _netblocks3.google.com | 229 |
| 81 | _spf.site4now.net | 225 |
| 82 | spf.aserv.co.za | 220 |
| 83 | spf.serveriai.lt | 219 |
| 84 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 219 |
| 85 | _spf.reply.io | 216 |
| 86 | spf.forwardemail.net | 216 |
| 87 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 215 |
| 88 | spf.maropost.com | 213 |
| 89 | spf.mailigen.com | 213 |
| 90 | spf.fromdoppler.com | 213 |
| 91 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 212 |
| 92 | spf.mschosting.com | 211 |
| 93 | spf.web-dns1.com | 211 |
| 94 | _spf.ofis.net | 208 |
| 95 | spf.nl2go.com | 208 |
| 96 | spfhost.messageprovider.com | 207 |
| 97 | spf.tipalti.com | 205 |
| 98 | app.sgizmo.com | 203 |
| 99 | salesforce.com | 200 |
| 100 | spf.imcloud.org | 199 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.