Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-03-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 257 536 | 39.84% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 121 630 | 18.81% |
| 3 | Microsoft 365 | 47 469 | 7.34% |
| 4 | Unknown / Other | 38 634 | 5.98% |
| 5 | Yandex 360 | 28 480 | 4.41% |
| 6 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 16 711 | 2.59% |
| 7 | GoDaddy | 12 702 | 1.96% |
| 8 | Zoho Mail | 9 902 | 1.53% |
| 9 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 7 338 | 1.14% |
| 10 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 6 886 | 1.07% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 6 333 | 0.98% |
| 12 | Hostinger | 6 286 | 0.97% |
| 13 | Beget (RU) | 5 937 | 0.92% |
| 14 | Mimecast | 5 117 | 0.79% |
| 15 | Proofpoint | 4 763 | 0.74% |
| 16 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 4 056 | 0.63% |
| 17 | Rackspace Email | 3 606 | 0.56% |
| 18 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 585 | 0.55% |
| 19 | OVH Mail | 3 469 | 0.54% |
| 20 | Ukraine.com.ua hosting | 3 047 | 0.47% |
| 21 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 2 547 | 0.39% |
| 22 | Timeweb (RU) | 2 256 | 0.35% |
| 23 | Barracuda | 2 189 | 0.34% |
| 24 | Reg.ru | 2 033 | 0.31% |
| 25 | Amazon WorkMail | 1 966 | 0.3% |
| 26 | 1&1 IONOS | 1 949 | 0.3% |
| 27 | Namecheap PrivateEmail | 1 842 | 0.28% |
| 28 | Mailgun (inbound) | 1 626 | 0.25% |
| 29 | Cisco IronPort | 1 463 | 0.23% |
| 30 | MailHostBox | 1 362 | 0.21% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 19 885 | 3.92% |
| 2 | MailChannels | 14 910 | 2.94% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 14 707 | 2.9% |
| 4 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 14 006 | 2.76% |
| 5 | Amazon SES | 11 842 | 2.33% |
| 6 | Zendesk | 11 637 | 2.29% |
| 7 | Mailgun | 11 498 | 2.26% |
| 8 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 7 125 | 1.4% |
| 9 | Namecheap Forwarding | 7 087 | 1.4% |
| 10 | Salesforce | 4 450 | 0.88% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 4 254 | 0.84% |
| 12 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 3 958 | 0.78% |
| 13 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 2 893 | 0.57% |
| 14 | Elastic Email | 2 862 | 0.56% |
| 15 | SendPulse | 2 770 | 0.55% |
| 16 | Marketo (Adobe) | 2 532 | 0.5% |
| 17 | Unisender (RU) | 2 508 | 0.49% |
| 18 | Help Scout | 1 909 | 0.38% |
| 19 | Postmark | 1 737 | 0.34% |
| 20 | MailerSend | 1 635 | 0.32% |
| 21 | MailHostBox | 1 628 | 0.32% |
| 22 | SparkPost | 1 508 | 0.3% |
| 23 | SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud) | 1 486 | 0.29% |
| 24 | Emsd1 (transactional) | 1 464 | 0.29% |
| 25 | Zoho Campaigns | 1 408 | 0.28% |
| 26 | Zoho ZeptoMail | 1 094 | 0.22% |
| 27 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 073 | 0.21% |
| 28 | Freshdesk | 1 064 | 0.21% |
| 29 | A Random Server (parking) | 995 | 0.2% |
| 30 | Constant Contact | 975 | 0.19% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 3 662 | 0.72% |
| 2 | Shopify | 2 749 | 0.54% |
| 3 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 138 | 0.22% |
| 4 | BigCommerce | 1 102 | 0.22% |
| 5 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 831 | 0.16% |
| 6 | Firebase (Google) | 728 | 0.14% |
| 7 | Trustpilot | 722 | 0.14% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 602 | 0.12% |
| 9 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 589 | 0.12% |
| 10 | KnowBe4 | 534 | 0.11% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | PayPal Braintree | 493 | 0.1% |
| 12 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 461 | 0.09% |
| 13 | ClickDimensions | 456 | 0.09% |
| 14 | Zendesk | 393 | 0.08% |
| 15 | Squarespace | 375 | 0.07% |
| 16 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 339 | 0.07% |
| 17 | RetailCRM | 336 | 0.07% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 280 | 0.06% |
| 19 | Docebo (LMS) | 227 | 0.04% |
| 20 | k.io (workspace) | 198 | 0.04% |
| 21 | Brightspace (D2L) | 159 | 0.03% |
| 22 | ConnectWise | 152 | 0.03% |
| 23 | Gorgias | 150 | 0.03% |
| 24 | Sage Intacct | 131 | 0.03% |
| 25 | SchoolMessenger | 127 | 0.03% |
| 26 | Gannett (USA Today) | 110 | 0.02% |
| 27 | Recurly | 108 | 0.02% |
| 28 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 104 | 0.02% |
| 29 | One.com (DK hosting) | 96 | 0.02% |
| 30 | HappyFox | 95 | 0.02% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 2 165 |
| 2 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 2 133 |
| 3 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 2 131 |
| 4 | mx00.1and1.com | 1 267 |
| 5 | mx01.1and1.com | 1 266 |
| 6 | mx-in04.natrohost.com | 950 |
| 7 | mx-in04b.natrohost.com | 948 |
| 8 | localhost | 728 |
| 9 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 675 |
| 10 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 667 |
| 11 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 631 |
| 12 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 478 |
| 13 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 477 |
| 14 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 453 |
| 15 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 452 |
| 16 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 432 |
| 17 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 431 |
| 18 | mx76.mb1p.com | 415 |
| 19 | mx76.m2bp.com | 415 |
| 20 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 332 |
| 21 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 331 |
| 22 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 331 |
| 23 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 330 |
| 24 | mx01.1and1.fr | 324 |
| 25 | mx00.1and1.fr | 323 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 303 |
| 27 | mailgw.nic.in | 296 |
| 28 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 283 |
| 29 | smtp.imcloud.org | 283 |
| 30 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 281 |
| 31 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 273 |
| 32 | rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 231 |
| 33 | ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr | 231 |
| 34 | mx00.1and1.es | 229 |
| 35 | mx01.1and1.es | 228 |
| 36 | mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr | 222 |
| 37 | mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 217 |
| 38 | mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 216 |
| 39 | mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 216 |
| 40 | mail.net4india.com | 207 |
| 41 | nan | 204 |
| 42 | mx1.inbox.co.il | 178 |
| 43 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 177 |
| 44 | mx1.emailowl.com | 175 |
| 45 | mx2.emailowl.com | 174 |
| 46 | mx3.emailowl.com | 172 |
| 47 | mail-s30.1gb.ru | 168 |
| 48 | mx4.name.com | 165 |
| 49 | mx5.name.com | 165 |
| 50 | mx3.name.com | 163 |
| 51 | mx6.name.com | 161 |
| 52 | mx8.name.com | 161 |
| 53 | mx7.name.com | 161 |
| 54 | asp.reflexion.net | 161 |
| 55 | mx1.supremebox.com | 159 |
| 56 | mx2.supremebox.com | 159 |
| 57 | mx01.vargonen.net | 152 |
| 58 | mx1.jimdo.com | 151 |
| 59 | mx2.jimdo.com | 151 |
| 60 | mta1.youcan.shop | 151 |
| 61 | mta2.youcan.shop | 151 |
| 62 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 148 |
| 63 | mailme.enter-system.com | 137 |
| 64 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 132 |
| 65 | mx7.webfaction.com | 130 |
| 66 | mx8.webfaction.com | 130 |
| 67 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 130 |
| 68 | mxs.activeby.net | 128 |
| 69 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 127 |
| 70 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 127 |
| 71 | sitemail.everyone.net | 125 |
| 72 | mxs.oml.ru | 125 |
| 73 | cyber.mail.trdns.com | 123 |
| 74 | mx9.webfaction.com | 122 |
| 75 | mmxs.majordomo.ru | 121 |
| 76 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 118 |
| 77 | mx1.flockmail.com | 110 |
| 78 | mx2.flockmail.com | 110 |
| 79 | mxgw.bcc.gov.bd | 108 |
| 80 | mx1.filterantispam.com | 106 |
| 81 | mx2.filterantispam.com | 106 |
| 82 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 103 |
| 83 | relay.bestofpost.com | 99 |
| 84 | mail2.utabweb.net | 98 |
| 85 | posta.muhtar.gov.tr | 97 |
| 86 | mx3.volusion.com | 97 |
| 87 | s0.protection.netiyi.com | 96 |
| 88 | mx4.volusion.com | 96 |
| 89 | mx.simply.com | 95 |
| 90 | mx1.nepal.gov.np | 95 |
| 91 | mx2.inbox.co.il | 93 |
| 92 | mx1.spamfilter.gr | 93 |
| 93 | mx07.register.com | 92 |
| 94 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 92 |
| 95 | mx2.nepal.gov.np | 91 |
| 96 | mx0.spamfilter.gr | 91 |
| 97 | mx01.ofis.net | 89 |
| 98 | mx02.ofis.net | 89 |
| 99 | mail.haya-tech.com | 88 |
| 100 | relay2.netnames.net | 88 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | spf.flockmail.com | 3 484 |
| 2 | bluehost.com | 3 007 |
| 3 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 2 209 |
| 4 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 2 202 |
| 5 | webhostbox.net | 2 100 |
| 6 | _spf.automattic.com | 1 177 |
| 7 | _spf.protection.veridyen.com | 961 |
| 8 | _spf.turhost.com | 954 |
| 9 | nicmail.ru | 926 |
| 10 | spf.a2hosting.com | 905 |
| 11 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 872 |
| 12 | spf.improvmx.com | 724 |
| 13 | infusionmail.com | 674 |
| 14 | relay.is.cc | 671 |
| 15 | _spf.trwww.com | 666 |
| 16 | _spf.hoster.by | 650 |
| 17 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 637 |
| 18 | send.aweber.com | 626 |
| 19 | spf.autopilothq.com | 611 |
| 20 | cmail1.com | 581 |
| 21 | beget.ru | 497 |
| 22 | _spf.nicegrup.com | 488 |
| 23 | outlook.com | 475 |
| 24 | _spf.mx1.mirohost.net | 413 |
| 25 | hostmonster.com | 406 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | icpbounce.com | 341 |
| 27 | e2ma.net | 339 |
| 28 | hotmail.com | 334 |
| 29 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 326 |
| 30 | spf.easywp.com | 323 |
| 31 | datadrivenemail.com | 320 |
| 32 | getcourse.ru | 308 |
| 33 | spf.hostmar.com | 308 |
| 34 | smtp.servconfig.com | 302 |
| 35 | spf.mindbox.ru | 294 |
| 36 | mailcontrol.com | 286 |
| 37 | webmail.ihs.com.tr | 284 |
| 38 | spf.imcloud.org | 284 |
| 39 | ncfp.asia | 279 |
| 40 | msgfocus.com | 278 |
| 41 | sender.zohobooks.com | 276 |
| 42 | email-od.com | 269 |
| 43 | ncapp02.com | 266 |
| 44 | _spf.acquia.com | 263 |
| 45 | smtp.groovehq.com | 261 |
| 46 | _spf.act-on.net | 259 |
| 47 | google.com | 255 |
| 48 | bmsend.com | 254 |
| 49 | _netblocks.google.com | 247 |
| 50 | mxlogin.com | 241 |
| 51 | _spf.syrahost.com | 237 |
| 52 | spf.masterbase.com | 235 |
| 53 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 232 |
| 54 | spf.migadu.com | 231 |
| 55 | _spf.ofis.net | 228 |
| 56 | justhost.com | 225 |
| 57 | appriver.com | 222 |
| 58 | _spf.cretaforce.gr | 219 |
| 59 | _spf.site4now.net | 217 |
| 60 | emailus.freshservice.com | 217 |
| 61 | _spf.embluemail.com | 215 |
| 62 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 214 |
| 63 | gmail.com | 214 |
| 64 | mh.blackboard.com | 214 |
| 65 | spf.webapps.net | 213 |
| 66 | emailserver.vn | 213 |
| 67 | turbo-smtp.com | 210 |
| 68 | _netblocks2.google.com | 201 |
| 69 | _spf.amocrmmail.com | 197 |
| 70 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 197 |
| 71 | _netblocks3.google.com | 197 |
| 72 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 196 |
| 73 | spf.serveriai.lt | 189 |
| 74 | email.freshservice.com | 189 |
| 75 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 187 |
| 76 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 186 |
| 77 | netangels.ru | 183 |
| 78 | _spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com | 182 |
| 79 | outboundmail.convio.net | 182 |
| 80 | _spf.ps.kz | 178 |
| 81 | spf.mailigen.com | 176 |
| 82 | spf.forwardemail.net | 172 |
| 83 | spf.maropost.com | 172 |
| 84 | sharepointonline.com | 169 |
| 85 | md02.com | 166 |
| 86 | reflexion.net | 165 |
| 87 | spf.get-n-post.ru | 164 |
| 88 | spf.hostingplatform.net.au | 163 |
| 89 | spf.jabatus.fr | 163 |
| 90 | spf.web-dns1.com | 161 |
| 91 | _spf.transip.email | 160 |
| 92 | dnsexit.com | 158 |
| 93 | spfhost.messageprovider.com | 158 |
| 94 | _spf.reply.io | 157 |
| 95 | netcore.co.in | 157 |
| 96 | customer.mailguard.com.au | 157 |
| 97 | salesforce.com | 155 |
| 98 | _spf.websupport.sk | 152 |
| 99 | mail.insales.ru | 151 |
| 100 | mail.sent2mail.com | 150 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.