Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2021-02-01.

430 383
Domains with MX
339 425
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
430 383
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted171 58639.87%
2Google Workspace83 98619.51%
3Microsoft 36530 8937.18%
4Unknown / Other25 4415.91%
5Yandex 36018 8824.39%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)10 5072.44%
7GoDaddy8 3271.93%
8Zoho Mail6 7831.58%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)4 9481.15%
10Namecheap Email Forwarding4 5351.05%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger4 1040.95%
12SpamExperts (SolarWinds)4 0830.95%
13Beget (RU)3 6260.84%
14Mimecast3 5320.82%
15Proofpoint3 4410.8%
16Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)2 5550.59%
17Rackspace Email2 4970.58%
18Mail.ru for Business2 2580.52%
19OVH Mail2 1920.51%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)1 8480.43%
21Ukraine.com.ua hosting1 8110.42%
22Barracuda1 4130.33%
23Timeweb (RU)1 3650.32%
24Amazon WorkMail1 3470.31%
25Reg.ru1 2680.29%
26Namecheap PrivateEmail1 2290.29%
271&1 IONOS1 1320.26%
28Mailgun (inbound)1 1240.26%
29Cisco IronPort1 1200.26%
30MailHostBox1 0010.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
9.68%
41 643 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
17 858
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
39.89%
171 693 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp14 1214.16%
2Mandrill10 6473.14%
3SendGrid (Twilio)10 2683.03%
4MailChannels9 6892.85%
5Amazon SES8 7292.57%
6Zendesk8 5752.53%
7Mailgun8 1702.41%
8Namecheap Forwarding4 6951.38%
9SpamExperts (SolarWinds)4 5551.34%
10Salesforce3 2410.95%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast2 9700.88%
12Mailjet (Sinch)2 7660.81%
13Elastic Email2 1520.63%
14Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 0180.59%
15Marketo (Adobe)1 9530.58%
16SendPulse1 8780.55%
17Unisender (RU)1 6510.49%
18Help Scout1 4330.42%
19Postmark1 3550.4%
20MailerSend1 1540.34%
21MailHostBox1 1440.34%
22SparkPost1 1170.33%
23Emsd1 (transactional)1 0640.31%
24Zoho Campaigns9630.28%
25SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)9090.27%
26Freshdesk7910.23%
27Zoho ZeptoMail7260.21%
28Barracuda Essentials6980.21%
29Constant Contact6340.19%
30A Random Server (parking)6020.18%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)2 5680.76%
2Shopify1 7600.52%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)9250.27%
4BigCommerce6860.2%
5Trustpilot5610.17%
6Firebase (Google)5200.15%
7CodeTwo Email Signatures 3655020.15%
8Qualtrics4820.14%
9NetSuite (Oracle)4240.12%
10PayPal Braintree4190.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11KnowBe43500.1%
12Zendesk3040.09%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)2980.09%
14ClickDimensions2940.09%
15Squarespace2620.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)2530.07%
17RetailCRM2480.07%
18Greenhouse2400.07%
19Docebo (LMS)1740.05%
20k.io (workspace)1330.04%
21Brightspace (D2L)1260.04%
22Gannett (USA Today)1010.03%
23Recurly880.03%
24ConnectWise850.03%
25Gorgias830.02%
26Sage Intacct790.02%
27SchoolMessenger790.02%
28Autotask (ConnectWise)680.02%
29One.com (DK hosting)620.02%
30Chargebee620.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com1 303
2smx3.web-hosting.com1 287
3smx1.web-hosting.com1 284
4mx00.1and1.com742
5mx01.1and1.com737
6mx-in04.natrohost.com616
7mx-in04b.natrohost.com614
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net392
9mx1.netsolmail.net385
10localhost376
11mx-in03.natrohost.com368
12mx-in03b.natrohost.com366
13antispam1.ihs.com.tr321
14antispam2.ihs.com.tr319
15smx4.web-hosting.com306
16mx01.1and1.co.uk268
17mx00.1and1.co.uk267
18mailgw.nic.in234
19mx76.mb1p.com215
20mx76.m2bp.com215
21mx-in01.natrohost.com209
22mx-in01b.natrohost.com209
23mx00.1and1.fr203
24mx01.1and1.fr203
25mx-in02b.natrohost.com201
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26smtp.imcloud.org199
27mx-in02.natrohost.com198
28smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net182
29mx2.tmdhosting.com177
30mx1.tmdhosting.com176
31mail.net4india.com172
32smtp-fwd.wordpress.com170
33ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr161
34rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr158
35mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr152
36nan150
37mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua133
38mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua132
39mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua132
40mx00.1and1.es121
41mx01.1and1.es121
42asp.reflexion.net107
43mx1.supremebox.com106
44mx2.supremebox.com105
45mx1.emailowl.com104
46mx2.emailowl.com104
47mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk104
48mx3.name.com102
49mx4.name.com101
50mx3.emailowl.com101
51mail-s30.1gb.ru101
52mx5.name.com100
53mx6.name.com99
54in.hes.trendmicro.eu99
55mx8.name.com98
56mx7.name.com98
57mx7.webfaction.com97
58mx8.webfaction.com97
59mx-100.reflexion.net96
60relay.bestofpost.com95
61mx-110.reflexion.net94
62mx9.webfaction.com93
63mx1.inbox.co.il92
64mx01.vargonen.net87
65cyber.mail.trdns.com86
66sitemail.everyone.net84
67mx1.flockmail.com79
68mx2.flockmail.com78
69webmail2.sitebuildit.com77
70mx1.jimdo.com75
71mx2.jimdo.com75
72mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk73
73mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk73
74mailme.enter-system.com72
75mx.otenet.gr72
76mta1.youcan.shop72
77mta2.youcan.shop72
78mail1.sbnation.com70
79mx-backup.serveriai.lt68
80mxs.activeby.net64
81relay2.netnames.net64
82mail-s27.1gb.ru63
831-grid-mx01.co.za62
841-grid-mx02.com62
851-grid-mx03.co.za62
861-grid-mx04.com62
87mmxs.majordomo.ru62
88relay1.netnames.net62
89mx2.otenet.gr60
90mail.aasaam.net59
91mx1.spamfilter.gr59
92mx3.otenet.gr59
93mail.haya-tech.com58
94mail.cmposta.com58
95mxs.ht-systems.ru57
96posta.muhtar.gov.tr57
97mx0.spamfilter.gr57
98mxgw.bcc.gov.bd57
99mx4.otenet.gr57
100mx1.filterantispam.com57

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.flockmail.com2 423
2bluehost.com1 792
3webhostbox.net1 527
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com1 436
5_spfcls.natrohost.com1 424
6_spf.automattic.com749
7_spf.protection.veridyen.com708
8_spf.turhost.com654
9_spf.fastmail.gr606
10nicmail.ru535
11spf.a2hosting.com529
12spf.improvmx.com503
13spf.mail.intercom.io498
14infusionmail.com480
15spf.autopilothq.com476
16send.aweber.com432
17cmail1.com426
18relay.is.cc422
19_spf.trwww.com419
20_spf.hoster.by365
21_spf.nicegrup.com355
22outlook.com303
23beget.ru292
24_spf.mx1.mirohost.net260
25datadrivenemail.com247
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26ncfp.asia244
27hotmail.com240
28e2ma.net235
29hostmonster.com233
30spf.mindbox.ru229
31ncapp02.com228
32getcourse.ru223
33icpbounce.com222
34mailcontrol.com213
35smtp.groovehq.com212
36webmail.ihs.com.tr209
37msgfocus.com207
38spf.hes.trendmicro.com205
39spf.imcloud.org201
40sender.zohobooks.com199
41spf.hostmar.com199
42_netblocks.google.com194
43spf.easywp.com187
44smtp.servconfig.com186
45email-od.com184
46bmsend.com184
47_spf.acquia.com182
48mh.blackboard.com181
49google.com180
50spf.masterbase.com167
51spf.migadu.com165
52_spf.act-on.net165
53gmail.com164
54_spf.ofis.net161
55_netblocks2.google.com159
56_netblocks3.google.com154
57mxlogin.com149
58smtp1.uservoice.com149
59emailserver.vn145
60outboundmail.convio.net144
61_spf.emfwd.name-services.com143
62_spf.embluemail.com142
63_spf.cretaforce.gr142
64email.freshservice.com142
65justhost.com141
66_spf.syrahost.com141
67appriver.com140
68_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com138
69turbo-smtp.com137
70emailus.freshservice.com137
71sharepointonline.com136
72_spf.site4now.net135
73spf.get-n-post.ru134
74salesforce.com132
75smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg129
76spf.zixsmbhosted.com128
77spf.webapps.net128
78spf.mailcluster.com.au127
79rnmk.com123
80spf.forwardemail.net119
81spf.falconide.com118
82spf.tipalti.com118
83netcore.co.in118
84spf.serveriai.lt116
85spf.maropost.com115
86mail.sent2mail.com114
87spf.mailigen.com114
88_spf.amocrmmail.com114
89reflexion.net114
90spf.jabatus.fr113
91spfhost.messageprovider.com112
92_spf.zdsys.com112
93spf1.mailchannels.net107
94_spfnew.logix.in103
95_spf.transip.email103
96_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com102
97jangomail.com101
98_spf.ps.kz101
99md02.com101
100spf.nl2go.com101

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2021-02-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:36:43Z.