Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-12-01.

814 029
Domains with MX
629 118
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
814 029
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted309 01537.96%
2Google Workspace155 73019.13%
3Microsoft 36564 8307.96%
4Unknown / Other49 9036.13%
5Yandex 36036 7184.51%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)22 6092.78%
7GoDaddy16 9612.08%
8Zoho Mail11 8441.45%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)9 6601.19%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 2181.01%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Beget (RU)7 8140.96%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding7 7040.95%
13Mimecast6 8420.84%
14Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 2110.76%
15Hostinger6 0480.74%
16Proofpoint5 8190.71%
17Mail.ru for Business4 9550.61%
18OVH Mail4 8550.6%
19Rackspace Email4 8520.6%
20Ukraine.com.ua hosting4 3520.53%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)3 5220.43%
22Timeweb (RU)3 2370.4%
23Barracuda3 0680.38%
24Reg.ru2 7930.34%
251&1 IONOS2 4870.31%
26Amazon WorkMail2 2360.27%
27Namecheap PrivateEmail2 1210.26%
28Proofpoint Essentials1 9640.24%
29Mailgun (inbound)1 9340.24%
30Cisco IronPort1 8630.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
10.26%
83 523 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
31 244
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.98%
309 151 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp26 6234.23%
2Mandrill18 6832.97%
3SendGrid (Twilio)17 8302.83%
4MailChannels16 0462.55%
5Zendesk14 5312.31%
6Mailgun14 0292.23%
7Amazon SES13 7862.19%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 2221.47%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 0101.27%
10Mimecast5 7460.91%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce5 2180.83%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 8770.78%
13SendPulse3 3700.54%
14Elastic Email3 3470.53%
15Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)3 2520.52%
16Marketo (Adobe)3 1480.5%
17Unisender (RU)3 0810.49%
18Help Scout2 2980.37%
19Postmark2 2030.35%
20SparkPost1 8320.29%
21MailHostBox1 8180.29%
22Emsd1 (transactional)1 8110.29%
23Zoho Campaigns1 7940.29%
24MailerSend1 7830.28%
25SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 7100.27%
26Barracuda Essentials1 5280.24%
27Freshdesk1 3270.21%
28Constant Contact1 3260.21%
29Zoho ZeptoMail1 2310.2%
30A Random Server (parking)1 1370.18%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 7630.76%
2Shopify3 7060.59%
3BigCommerce1 5650.25%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 3220.21%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0670.17%
6Trustpilot9660.15%
7Firebase (Google)8210.13%
8NetSuite (Oracle)7740.12%
9KnowBe47120.11%
10Qualtrics6880.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree6090.1%
12ClickDimensions6030.1%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5680.09%
14Squarespace5180.08%
15Zendesk4740.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)4520.07%
17RetailCRM4290.07%
18Greenhouse3270.05%
19Docebo (LMS)2890.05%
20ConnectWise2400.04%
21k.io (workspace)1800.03%
22SchoolMessenger1720.03%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)1690.03%
24Gannett (USA Today)1660.03%
25Brightspace (D2L)1550.02%
26One.com (DK hosting)1410.02%
27Gorgias1410.02%
28Sage Intacct1400.02%
29Recurly1230.02%
30HappyFox1170.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com2 167
2smx1.web-hosting.com2 123
3smx3.web-hosting.com2 123
4mx00.1and1.com1 652
5mx01.1and1.com1 651
6mx-in04b.natrohost.com1 065
7mx-in04.natrohost.com1 064
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net926
9localhost908
10mx1.netsolmail.net867
11mx-in03.natrohost.com657
12mx-in03b.natrohost.com656
13mx00.1and1.co.uk621
14mx01.1and1.co.uk620
15antispam1.ihs.com.tr590
16antispam2.ihs.com.tr590
17mx01.1and1.fr495
18mx00.1and1.fr493
19mx-in01.natrohost.com430
20mx-in01b.natrohost.com430
21mx-in02.natrohost.com407
22mx-in02b.natrohost.com407
23mx76.mb1p.com392
24mx76.m2bp.com392
25mx01.1and1.es357
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx00.1and1.es356
27smtp-fwd.wordpress.com353
28mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua319
29mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua318
30mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua317
31smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net315
32mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr306
33mail-s30.1gb.ru302
34mx2.tmdhosting.com302
35mx1.tmdhosting.com301
36mx7.webfaction.com298
37mx8.webfaction.com293
38asp.reflexion.net288
39mail.net4india.com288
40mx9.webfaction.com285
41ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr277
42rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr277
43smx4.web-hosting.com274
44nan270
45mailgw.nic.in263
46mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk247
47mx-100.reflexion.net240
48mx1.inbox.co.il236
49mx-110.reflexion.net234
50mx1.supremebox.com222
51mx2.supremebox.com220
52smtp.imcloud.org214
53mx1.jimdo.com209
54mx2.jimdo.com209
55in.hes.trendmicro.eu208
56mmxs.majordomo.ru198
57mxs.activeby.net193
58mx1.emailowl.com184
59mx01.vargonen.net184
60mx2.emailowl.com183
61mx3.emailowl.com180
62mx3.name.com174
63mx4.name.com172
64mx5.name.com172
65sitemail.everyone.net172
66mx2.filterantispam.com172
67mta1.youcan.shop171
68mta2.youcan.shop171
69mx3.volusion.com171
70mx1.filterantispam.com171
71mx4.volusion.com170
72mx6.name.com168
73mx8.name.com168
74mx7.name.com166
75mailme.enter-system.com162
76mx1.flockmail.com158
77mx2.flockmail.com155
78mx-backup.serveriai.lt154
79mxs.oml.ru152
80cyber.mail.trdns.com151
81webmail2.sitebuildit.com150
82relay2.netnames.net148
83mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk148
84mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk148
85relay1.netnames.net145
86cluster.relay.agava.net140
87mail.municipality.gov.np133
88mail1.sbnation.com132
89mx.otenet.gr125
90mx07.register.com123
911-grid-mx01.co.za122
921-grid-mx02.com122
931-grid-mx03.co.za122
941-grid-mx04.com122
95mail2.infomart2000.com121
96mx2.inbox.co.il121
97mx30.aha.ru120
98mx.ukrdomen.com117
99mx2.uh.com.ua115
100mail2.utabweb.net114

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.flockmail.com4 516
2bluehost.com4 209
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 682
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 670
5webhostbox.net2 552
6nicmail.ru1 558
7_spf.automattic.com1 551
8_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 184
9_spf.fastmail.gr1 133
10_spf.turhost.com1 078
11_spf.hoster.by979
12infusionmail.com895
13spf.a2hosting.com866
14getcourse.ru822
15cmail1.com811
16spf.autopilothq.com804
17spf.improvmx.com764
18relay.is.cc731
19spf.mail.intercom.io727
20outlook.com696
21_spf.trwww.com688
22send.aweber.com680
23beget.ru642
24_spf.mx1.mirohost.net620
25_spf.nicegrup.com598
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26hostmonster.com543
27spf.hes.trendmicro.com495
28spf.hostmar.com476
29e2ma.net459
30icpbounce.com445
31mailcontrol.com410
32hotmail.com407
33smtp.servconfig.com376
34webmail.ihs.com.tr372
35_spf.syrahost.com369
36datadrivenemail.com366
37msgfocus.com362
38spf.mailcluster.com.au349
39_spf.act-on.net348
40smtp.groovehq.com346
41appriver.com346
42bmsend.com345
43email-od.com334
44spf.zixsmbhosted.com321
45justhost.com320
46ncfp.asia317
47google.com316
48_spf.embluemail.com316
49netangels.ru314
50spf.mindbox.ru314
51emailserver.vn306
52_spf.acquia.com301
53email.freshservice.com299
54_spf.emfwd.name-services.com296
55sender.zohobooks.com292
56reflexion.net288
57spf.masterbase.com286
58gmail.com284
59spf.migadu.com284
60spf.webapps.net283
61spf.easywp.com282
62_netblocks.google.com280
63_spf.ofis.net273
64_spf.ps.kz268
65emailus.freshservice.com267
66outboundmail.convio.net265
67_spf.cretaforce.gr262
68mh.blackboard.com262
69turbo-smtp.com255
70ncapp02.com254
71spf.mschosting.com252
72sharepointonline.com252
73_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com252
74spf.serveriai.lt250
75mxlogin.com250
76smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg247
77_spf.site4now.net247
78spf.web-dns1.com246
79_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com245
80spf.jabatus.fr243
81spf.hostingplatform.net.au231
82_netblocks2.google.com227
83md02.com227
84smtp1.uservoice.com221
85spf.imcloud.org217
86spf.aserv.co.za217
87_netblocks3.google.com214
88_spf.amocrmmail.com211
89gridhost.co.uk211
90spf.maropost.com208
91spf.nl2go.com207
92spf.hostedmail.net.au205
93spf.mailigen.com200
94salesforce.com200
95_spf.serviciodecorreo.es199
96spfhost.messageprovider.com197
97_spf.transip.email195
98spf1.mailchannels.net194
99_spf.zdsys.com194
100spf.get-n-post.ru193

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-12-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:45:00Z.