Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-11-01.

748 490
Domains with MX
574 865
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
748 490
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted283 65637.9%
2Google Workspace145 25719.41%
3Microsoft 36558 0157.75%
4Unknown / Other46 0726.16%
5Yandex 36033 5644.48%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)20 9862.8%
7GoDaddy16 6182.22%
8Zoho Mail11 2591.5%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)8 8761.19%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 8161.04%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Namecheap Email Forwarding6 8800.92%
12Beget (RU)6 8690.92%
13Mimecast6 3650.85%
14Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 6640.76%
15Hostinger5 5990.75%
16Proofpoint5 4180.72%
17Rackspace Email4 4670.6%
18Mail.ru for Business4 3670.58%
19OVH Mail4 0580.54%
20Ukraine.com.ua hosting3 7460.5%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)3 3960.45%
22Barracuda2 8680.38%
23Timeweb (RU)2 7980.37%
24Reg.ru2 5190.34%
25Amazon WorkMail2 2240.3%
261&1 IONOS2 1100.28%
27Mailgun (inbound)1 8250.24%
28Namecheap PrivateEmail1 8220.24%
29Proofpoint Essentials1 7990.24%
30Cisco IronPort1 6640.22%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
10.31%
77 158 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
29 180
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.91%
283 786 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp24 7254.3%
2Mandrill17 3643.02%
3SendGrid (Twilio)16 5292.88%
4MailChannels14 4142.51%
5Zendesk13 0772.27%
6Mailgun13 0692.27%
7Amazon SES12 7722.22%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 7121.52%
9Namecheap Forwarding7 1811.25%
10Mimecast5 3280.93%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce4 7720.83%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 3500.76%
13Elastic Email3 2000.56%
14SendPulse2 9810.52%
15Marketo (Adobe)2 9600.51%
16Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 8790.5%
17Unisender (RU)2 8660.5%
18Help Scout2 1170.37%
19Postmark2 1100.37%
20MailHostBox1 9170.33%
21SparkPost1 7510.3%
22Zoho Campaigns1 6420.29%
23Emsd1 (transactional)1 6060.28%
24MailerSend1 6040.28%
25Barracuda Essentials1 3610.24%
26SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 2560.22%
27Freshdesk1 2100.21%
28Constant Contact1 1420.2%
29Zoho ZeptoMail1 1110.19%
30A Random Server (parking)1 0090.18%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 5470.79%
2Shopify3 1030.54%
3BigCommerce1 3120.23%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 3110.23%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3659320.16%
6Trustpilot8860.15%
7Firebase (Google)7230.13%
8Qualtrics7080.12%
9NetSuite (Oracle)6800.12%
10KnowBe46240.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree5620.1%
12ClickDimensions5530.1%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5060.09%
14Zendesk4530.08%
15Squarespace4400.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)4170.07%
17RetailCRM3790.07%
18Greenhouse3030.05%
19Docebo (LMS)2730.05%
20ConnectWise2260.04%
21Brightspace (D2L)1730.03%
22SchoolMessenger1590.03%
23Gannett (USA Today)1540.03%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)1530.03%
25Sage Intacct1310.02%
26Gorgias1260.02%
27Recurly1210.02%
28One.com (DK hosting)1080.02%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)950.02%
30pair Networks890.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com2 145
2smx1.web-hosting.com2 106
3smx3.web-hosting.com2 099
4mx00.1and1.com1 643
5mx01.1and1.com1 636
6mx-in04.natrohost.com1 041
7mx-in04b.natrohost.com1 036
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net874
9mx1.netsolmail.net858
10mx-in03.natrohost.com653
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com651
12mx00.1and1.co.uk556
13mx01.1and1.co.uk553
14antispam1.ihs.com.tr533
15antispam2.ihs.com.tr531
16mx-in01b.natrohost.com451
17mx-in01.natrohost.com450
18localhost440
19mx-in02.natrohost.com433
20mx-in02b.natrohost.com433
21mx76.mb1p.com387
22mx76.m2bp.com387
23mx00.1and1.es375
24mx01.1and1.es375
25mx00.1and1.fr371
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx01.1and1.fr371
27mx7.webfaction.com336
28mx8.webfaction.com333
29mx9.webfaction.com325
30smtp-fwd.wordpress.com313
31mx2.tmdhosting.com306
32mx1.tmdhosting.com305
33mx247.in-mx.com299
34mx247.in-mx.net299
35ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr286
36rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr285
37mailgw.nic.in284
38smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net281
39mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua280
40mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua278
41mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua278
42asp.reflexion.net270
43mail-s30.1gb.ru262
44mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr256
45mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk247
46nan245
47mail.net4india.com237
48mx1.supremebox.com217
49mx-100.reflexion.net216
50mx-110.reflexion.net216
51mx2.supremebox.com215
52mx1.jimdo.com213
53mx2.jimdo.com213
54mx1.emailowl.com208
55mx2.emailowl.com206
56mx3.emailowl.com203
57mx01.vargonen.net192
58smtp.imcloud.org186
59in.hes.trendmicro.eu184
60mxs.oml.ru178
61webmail2.sitebuildit.com172
62sitemail.everyone.net169
63smx4.web-hosting.com167
64mx3.name.com166
65mx4.name.com165
66mxs.activeby.net164
67mx1.filterantispam.com164
68mx5.name.com164
69mx2.filterantispam.com162
70mx8.name.com161
71mmxs.majordomo.ru160
72mx7.name.com160
73mx6.name.com160
74mx1.flockmail.com156
75mx2.flockmail.com154
76mx4.volusion.com147
77mx3.volusion.com146
78mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk143
79mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk143
80cyber.mail.trdns.com143
81mx.otenet.gr141
82mail.municipality.gov.np140
83mx07.register.com135
84mx1.inbox.co.il135
85relay2.netnames.net133
86mx-backup.serveriai.lt131
87relay1.netnames.net131
88mailme.enter-system.com130
89s0.protection.netiyi.com129
90mta1.youcan.shop126
91mta2.youcan.shop126
92mx4.otenet.gr123
93mx1.spamfilter.gr122
94mx0.spamfilter.gr121
95relay.bestofpost.com118
96mxs.ht-systems.ru113
97cluster.relay.agava.net113
98mail1.sbnation.com112
99mx2.otenet.gr110
100mx.simply.com110

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.flockmail.com4 012
2bluehost.com3 912
3webhostbox.net2 952
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 702
5_spfcls.natrohost.com2 699
6_spf.automattic.com1 433
7nicmail.ru1 291
8_spf.fastmail.gr1 027
9_spf.protection.veridyen.com999
10_spf.turhost.com949
11_spf.hoster.by836
12infusionmail.com773
13spf.a2hosting.com743
14cmail1.com739
15getcourse.ru730
16spf.autopilothq.com730
17spf.mail.intercom.io697
18_spf.trwww.com670
19relay.is.cc657
20spf.improvmx.com647
21outlook.com622
22send.aweber.com615
23beget.ru582
24_spf.nicegrup.com568
25hostmonster.com534
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26_spf.mx1.mirohost.net532
27spf.hostmar.com463
28spf.hes.trendmicro.com434
29icpbounce.com427
30e2ma.net427
31hotmail.com381
32msgfocus.com364
33mailcontrol.com347
34email-od.com344
35google.com337
36datadrivenemail.com337
37smtp.servconfig.com336
38_spf.act-on.net328
39ncfp.asia328
40emailserver.vn324
41bmsend.com323
42smtp.groovehq.com316
43justhost.com315
44webmail.ihs.com.tr313
45_spf.syrahost.com313
46_spf.acquia.com307
47appriver.com302
48spf.zixsmbhosted.com295
49spf.masterbase.com293
50spf.mailcluster.com.au293
51spf.mindbox.ru278
52sender.zohobooks.com277
53netangels.ru275
54_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com275
55_spf.embluemail.com274
56ncapp02.com269
57_spf.emfwd.name-services.com264
58reflexion.net263
59outboundmail.convio.net262
60spf.migadu.com256
61_spf.ps.kz255
62_netblocks.google.com250
63mh.blackboard.com250
64gmail.com247
65spf.webapps.net247
66spf.mschosting.com247
67turbo-smtp.com246
68email.freshservice.com242
69smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg241
70emailus.freshservice.com234
71sharepointonline.com234
72smtp1.uservoice.com229
73_spf.site4now.net229
74_spf.ofis.net227
75spf.easywp.com227
76_spf.cretaforce.gr221
77spf.hostingplatform.net.au220
78salesforce.com216
79spf1.mailchannels.net209
80spf.mailigen.com207
81spf.serveriai.lt205
82md02.com204
83mxlogin.com204
84gridhost.co.uk202
85_netblocks2.google.com199
86_spf.serviciodecorreo.es197
87spf.jabatus.fr191
88spf.imcloud.org190
89spf.nl2go.com190
90_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com190
91_netblocks3.google.com190
92_spf.zdsys.com187
93spf.raiolanetworks.com186
94dnsexit.com185
95spf.maropost.com184
96spfhost.messageprovider.com183
97_spf.transip.email181
98spf.get-n-post.ru180
99_spf.amocrmmail.com179
100mail.insales.ru179

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-11-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:48:59Z.