Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-10-01.

618 268
Domains with MX
476 027
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
618 268
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted228 68736.99%
2Google Workspace125 21320.25%
3Microsoft 36550 9668.24%
4Unknown / Other38 6156.25%
5Yandex 36026 7514.33%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)17 2842.8%
7GoDaddy13 4402.17%
8Zoho Mail9 3721.52%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)7 2341.17%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 2011.0%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast5 8340.94%
12Beget (RU)5 2040.84%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding5 1770.84%
14Proofpoint4 9570.8%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 5810.74%
16Hostinger4 1050.66%
17Rackspace Email3 9570.64%
18Mail.ru for Business3 5280.57%
19OVH Mail3 2330.52%
20Ukraine.com.ua hosting2 8610.46%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)2 7990.45%
22Barracuda2 5130.41%
23Timeweb (RU)2 2350.36%
24Amazon WorkMail1 8690.3%
25Reg.ru1 8470.3%
261&1 IONOS1 6810.27%
27Mailgun (inbound)1 6110.26%
28Proofpoint Essentials1 5930.26%
29Symantec MessageLabs1 5830.26%
30Cisco IronPort1 5760.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
10.38%
64 146 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
25 981
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.01%
228 805 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp21 9624.61%
2Mandrill15 6593.29%
3SendGrid (Twilio)14 7303.09%
4Zendesk11 6862.45%
5Mailgun11 6182.44%
6Amazon SES11 4302.4%
7MailChannels11 3222.38%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 8901.45%
9Namecheap Forwarding5 4431.14%
10Mimecast4 8941.03%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce4 5560.96%
12Mailjet (Sinch)3 7850.8%
13Marketo (Adobe)2 9260.61%
14Elastic Email2 7390.58%
15SendPulse2 4980.52%
16Unisender (RU)2 4070.51%
17Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 3070.48%
18Postmark1 9340.41%
19Help Scout1 8560.39%
20SparkPost1 5860.33%
21MailHostBox1 5590.33%
22Zoho Campaigns1 4130.3%
23Emsd1 (transactional)1 3990.29%
24MailerSend1 3610.29%
25Barracuda Essentials1 1970.25%
26Freshdesk1 1610.24%
27Constant Contact1 0530.22%
28SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 0460.22%
29SMTP2GO9170.19%
30Zoho ZeptoMail9130.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 2760.9%
2Shopify2 6150.55%
3BigCommerce1 3010.27%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 2450.26%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3658540.18%
6Trustpilot7440.16%
7NetSuite (Oracle)6900.14%
8Firebase (Google)6550.14%
9Qualtrics6470.14%
10KnowBe45510.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree5340.11%
12ClickDimensions5230.11%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)4700.1%
14Zendesk4140.09%
15Squarespace3720.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)3640.08%
17Greenhouse3250.07%
18RetailCRM3090.06%
19Docebo (LMS)2530.05%
20ConnectWise1760.04%
21SchoolMessenger1590.03%
22Brightspace (D2L)1530.03%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)1410.03%
24Sage Intacct1280.03%
25Recurly1230.03%
26Gannett (USA Today)1150.02%
27One.com (DK hosting)1010.02%
28Gorgias1010.02%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)760.02%
30Oracle Cloud750.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com1 774
2smx1.web-hosting.com1 747
3smx3.web-hosting.com1 747
4mx00.1and1.com1 288
5mx01.1and1.com1 281
6mx-in04.natrohost.com793
7mx-in04b.natrohost.com790
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net723
9mx1.netsolmail.net698
10mx-in03.natrohost.com526
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com526
12mx01.1and1.co.uk448
13mx00.1and1.co.uk447
14antispam1.ihs.com.tr413
15antispam2.ihs.com.tr413
16mx-in01.natrohost.com366
17mx-in01b.natrohost.com366
18mx-in02.natrohost.com344
19mx-in02b.natrohost.com344
20mx00.1and1.fr307
21mx01.1and1.fr307
22localhost302
23mx76.mb1p.com289
24mx76.m2bp.com289
25mail.net4india.com284
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx7.webfaction.com283
27mx8.webfaction.com281
28mx9.webfaction.com272
29mailgw.nic.in254
30mx01.1and1.es247
31mx00.1and1.es246
32mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua234
33mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua234
34mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua234
35mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr227
36mx247.in-mx.com227
37mx247.in-mx.net227
38asp.reflexion.net224
39rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr218
40ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr216
41smtp-fwd.wordpress.com210
42mx1.tmdhosting.com207
43mx2.tmdhosting.com206
44mx-100.reflexion.net185
45nan183
46mx-110.reflexion.net181
47mail-s30.1gb.ru179
48mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk178
49smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net175
50mx1.supremebox.com166
51mx2.supremebox.com165
52in.hes.trendmicro.eu164
53mx1.jimdo.com157
54mx2.jimdo.com157
55mx1.emailowl.com142
56mx2.emailowl.com141
57mx3.emailowl.com140
58mx-backup.serveriai.lt136
59smtp.imcloud.org135
60mxs.activeby.net133
61mx01.vargonen.net129
62smx4.web-hosting.com128
63mx1.inbox.co.il128
64mmxs.majordomo.ru126
65mx3.name.com125
66sitemail.everyone.net124
67mx4.name.com124
68mx5.name.com123
69mx7.name.com122
70mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk122
71mx8.name.com121
72mx6.name.com121
73mx1.flockmail.com121
74mx3.volusion.com120
75mx.otenet.gr120
76mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk120
77mx4.volusion.com119
78mx2.flockmail.com117
79webmail2.sitebuildit.com115
80mxs.oml.ru114
81mx1.filterantispam.com112
82mx2.filterantispam.com111
83mx07.register.com110
84cyber.mail.trdns.com108
85relay2.netnames.net104
86mail1.sbnation.com103
87mx4.otenet.gr102
88relay1.netnames.net100
89mx.usa.net100
90mx2.otenet.gr98
911-grid-mx01.co.za98
921-grid-mx03.co.za98
93mxs.ht-systems.ru97
94mx3.otenet.gr97
95cluster.relay.agava.net97
961-grid-mx02.com97
971-grid-mx04.com97
98mx1.spamfilter.gr97
99mx0.spamfilter.gr96
100mail2.utabweb.net96

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com3 289
2spf.flockmail.com2 799
3webhostbox.net2 219
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 105
5_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 102
6_spf.automattic.com1 060
7nicmail.ru1 031
8_spf.fastmail.gr854
9_spf.protection.veridyen.com821
10_spf.turhost.com746
11infusionmail.com694
12spf.mail.intercom.io673
13cmail1.com670
14_spf.hoster.by662
15spf.autopilothq.com657
16getcourse.ru639
17spf.a2hosting.com561
18outlook.com537
19_spf.trwww.com515
20send.aweber.com513
21relay.is.cc498
22_spf.nicegrup.com488
23hostmonster.com456
24spf.improvmx.com449
25_spf.mx1.mirohost.net429
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26beget.ru420
27icpbounce.com405
28e2ma.net373
29spf.hes.trendmicro.com372
30spf.hostmar.com361
31hotmail.com334
32msgfocus.com324
33datadrivenemail.com314
34_spf.act-on.net313
35email-od.com301
36appriver.com297
37google.com290
38mailcontrol.com287
39bmsend.com282
40spf.masterbase.com279
41ncfp.asia279
42smtp.groovehq.com278
43_spf.acquia.com276
44email.freshservice.com263
45webmail.ihs.com.tr255
46spf.mailcluster.com.au254
47ncapp02.com252
48spf.zixsmbhosted.com250
49smtp.servconfig.com250
50_spf.syrahost.com247
51sender.zohobooks.com241
52sharepointonline.com241
53spf.mindbox.ru240
54mh.blackboard.com237
55reflexion.net233
56outboundmail.convio.net230
57gmail.com229
58_netblocks.google.com227
59_spf.emfwd.name-services.com225
60justhost.com219
61smtp1.uservoice.com211
62netangels.ru210
63spf.serveriai.lt207
64smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg203
65_spf.ps.kz203
66_spf.ofis.net201
67_spf.embluemail.com199
68turbo-smtp.com198
69_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com197
70salesforce.com195
71spf.migadu.com194
72_netblocks2.google.com187
73_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com187
74_spf.zdsys.com184
75spf.maropost.com183
76md02.com182
77spf.hostedmail.net.au181
78spf.mschosting.com180
79_spf.cretaforce.gr180
80emailserver.vn178
81_netblocks3.google.com176
82_spf.site4now.net172
83spf.nl2go.com171
84spf.aserv.co.za171
85spf1.mailchannels.net170
86_spf.reply.io170
87spf.mailigen.com168
88_spf.amocrmmail.com164
89spf.hostingplatform.net.au163
90spf.webapps.net160
91spfhost.messageprovider.com155
92jangomail.com155
93mxlogin.com154
94spf.get-n-post.ru152
95spf.protection.3dcart.com152
96spf.web-dns1.com152
97app.sgizmo.com151
98_spf.heteml.jp151
99spf.workfront.com150
100rnmk.com150

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-10-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:52:27Z.