Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-09-01.

768 508
Domains with MX
586 561
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
768 508
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted288 79237.58%
2Google Workspace149 31819.43%
3Microsoft 36560 4037.86%
4Unknown / Other48 5586.32%
5Yandex 36033 2414.33%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)22 2582.9%
7GoDaddy17 7052.3%
8Zoho Mail11 7551.53%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)9 9101.29%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 0081.04%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Namecheap Email Forwarding7 0140.91%
12Beget (RU)6 6520.87%
13Mimecast6 5530.85%
14Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 9760.78%
15Proofpoint5 4120.7%
16Hostinger5 2170.68%
17Rackspace Email4 8120.63%
18OVH Mail4 1900.55%
19Mail.ru for Business4 1870.54%
20Ukraine.com.ua hosting3 7820.49%
21QQ Mail (Tencent)3 4090.44%
22Barracuda2 9880.39%
23Timeweb (RU)2 8940.38%
24Reg.ru2 4390.32%
25DreamHost2 3760.31%
26Amazon WorkMail2 2390.29%
271&1 IONOS2 1570.28%
28Mailgun (inbound)1 9180.25%
29Proofpoint Essentials1 8880.25%
30Symantec MessageLabs1 8820.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
10.67%
81 996 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
30 920
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.59%
288 914 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp26 2234.47%
2Mandrill18 1323.09%
3SendGrid (Twilio)17 3972.97%
4MailChannels14 3582.45%
5Zendesk13 8052.35%
6Mailgun13 5782.31%
7Amazon SES12 8632.19%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 7951.5%
9Namecheap Forwarding7 3271.25%
10Mimecast5 5490.95%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce4 7820.82%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 3650.74%
13Marketo (Adobe)3 1460.54%
14Elastic Email3 0930.53%
15SendPulse2 8290.48%
16Unisender (RU)2 7090.46%
17Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 6240.45%
18Postmark2 1720.37%
19Help Scout2 1690.37%
20SparkPost1 8720.32%
21MailHostBox1 7640.3%
22Zoho Campaigns1 6030.27%
23Emsd1 (transactional)1 5530.26%
24MailerSend1 5350.26%
25Barracuda Essentials1 4510.25%
26SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 3910.24%
27Freshdesk1 2460.21%
28A Random Server (parking)1 1770.2%
29Constant Contact1 1690.2%
30SMTP2GO1 0920.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 6510.79%
2Shopify2 9660.51%
3BigCommerce1 5150.26%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 3300.23%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0000.17%
6Trustpilot8860.15%
7NetSuite (Oracle)7420.13%
8Firebase (Google)7230.12%
9Qualtrics7140.12%
10PayPal Braintree6220.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11ClickDimensions5970.1%
12KnowBe45910.1%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)4930.08%
14Squarespace4790.08%
15Zendesk4780.08%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)4030.07%
17RetailCRM3790.06%
18Greenhouse3230.06%
19Docebo (LMS)2710.05%
20ConnectWise2320.04%
21SchoolMessenger2030.03%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)1640.03%
23Brightspace (D2L)1620.03%
24Recurly1330.02%
25Sage Intacct1280.02%
26One.com (DK hosting)1190.02%
27Gannett (USA Today)1180.02%
28Gorgias1120.02%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)1030.02%
30pair Networks950.02%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com2 414
2smx1.web-hosting.com2 370
3smx3.web-hosting.com2 367
4mx01.1and1.com1 744
5mx00.1and1.com1 742
6mx-in04.natrohost.com983
7mx-in04b.natrohost.com983
8mx1.netsolmail.net978
9mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net829
10mx-in03.natrohost.com674
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com672
12mx01.1and1.co.uk589
13mx00.1and1.co.uk587
14antispam2.ihs.com.tr571
15antispam1.ihs.com.tr570
16mail.pickelhost.com458
17mx01.1and1.fr456
18mx00.1and1.fr452
19mx-in02.natrohost.com439
20mx-in02b.natrohost.com439
21mx-in01.natrohost.com429
22mx-in01b.natrohost.com429
23mx76.mb1p.com391
24mx76.m2bp.com391
25mx00.1and1.es353
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx01.1and1.es353
27mail.net4india.com352
28mx247.in-mx.com333
29mx247.in-mx.net333
30smtp-fwd.wordpress.com328
31mx7.webfaction.com327
32mx8.webfaction.com321
33mx9.webfaction.com316
34smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net310
35mx2.tmdhosting.com305
36asp.reflexion.net304
37mx1.tmdhosting.com304
38mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr296
39mailgw.nic.in291
40mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua277
41mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua276
42mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua275
43mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk264
44mx-100.reflexion.net252
45mx-110.reflexion.net249
46nan245
47rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr240
48ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr239
49mx1.jimdo.com233
50mx2.jimdo.com233
51mail-s30.1gb.ru226
52mx1.inbox.co.il219
53mail1.sbnation.com214
54mx1.emailowl.com207
55mx2.emailowl.com206
56mx3.emailowl.com206
57mx1.supremebox.com203
58mx2.supremebox.com202
59in.hes.trendmicro.eu198
60mail.municipality.gov.np195
61mxs.activeby.net185
62smx4.web-hosting.com182
63mailme.enter-system.com180
64mxs.oml.ru176
65mx3.volusion.com176
66mx4.volusion.com176
67sitemail.everyone.net165
68mmxs.majordomo.ru163
69mx5.name.com162
70mx01.vargonen.net162
71webmail2.sitebuildit.com162
72mx4.name.com161
73mx3.name.com161
74mx8.name.com160
75mx7.name.com159
76mx6.name.com159
77mx1.flockmail.com155
78mx2.flockmail.com153
79cyber.mail.trdns.com153
80mx.otenet.gr149
81smtp.imcloud.org144
82mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk140
83mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk139
841-grid-mx01.co.za138
851-grid-mx03.co.za138
86mail2.infomart2000.com137
871-grid-mx02.com137
881-grid-mx04.com137
89relay2.netnames.net134
90mx07.register.com133
91relay1.netnames.net131
92mx4.otenet.gr130
93mx1.filterantispam.com130
94mx2.filterantispam.com130
95inbound.registeredsite.com124
96mx2.otenet.gr121
97mx3.otenet.gr121
98mxs.ht-systems.ru120
99mx-backup.serveriai.lt119
100mx.usa.net119

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com4 419
2spf.flockmail.com3 454
3webhostbox.net2 885
4_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 663
5_spfcls.natrohost.com2 655
6_spf.automattic.com1 839
7nicmail.ru1 316
8_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 074
9_spf.fastmail.gr986
10_spf.hoster.by959
11_spf.turhost.com927
12infusionmail.com821
13cmail1.com797
14spf.autopilothq.com771
15getcourse.ru758
16spf.mail.intercom.io756
17outlook.com683
18_spf.trwww.com670
19spf.a2hosting.com637
20beget.ru619
21send.aweber.com615
22hostmonster.com576
23relay.is.cc562
24_spf.mx1.mirohost.net548
25spf.improvmx.com545
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26_spf.nicegrup.com542
27spf.hes.trendmicro.com490
28spf.hostmar.com460
29e2ma.net443
30icpbounce.com434
31hotmail.com399
32spf.mailcluster.com.au376
33spf1.mailchannels.net374
34appriver.com369
35_spf.act-on.net366
36webmail.ihs.com.tr354
37datadrivenemail.com351
38msgfocus.com347
39mailcontrol.com346
40_spf.syrahost.com346
41spf2.mailchannels.net344
42google.com340
43ncfp.asia332
44bmsend.com329
45spf.masterbase.com329
46smtp.groovehq.com324
47reflexion.net320
48email-od.com316
49justhost.com314
50smtp.servconfig.com310
51email.freshservice.com307
52_spf.acquia.com298
53_spf.emfwd.name-services.com294
54_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com290
55spf.zixsmbhosted.com285
56_spf.embluemail.com283
57turbo-smtp.com271
58outboundmail.convio.net270
59spf.mindbox.ru269
60ncapp02.com268
61sharepointonline.com267
62mh.blackboard.com266
63_netblocks.google.com265
64netangels.ru263
65gmail.com260
66sender.zohobooks.com257
67spf.migadu.com256
68_spf.site4now.net254
69spf.webapps.net238
70smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg237
71salesforce.com237
72smtp1.uservoice.com235
73spf.serveriai.lt234
74_spf.ofis.net226
75mxlogin.com223
76gridhost.co.uk222
77emailserver.vn219
78spf.protection.3dcart.com218
79spf.hostedmail.net.au217
80spf.hostingplatform.net.au216
81_netblocks2.google.com214
82spf.nl2go.com211
83customer.mailguard.com.au211
84spf.maropost.com210
85_spf.prod.hydra.sophos.com208
86_spf.transip.email208
87spf.aserv.co.za207
88_spf.cretaforce.gr205
89md02.com201
90_netblocks3.google.com197
91_spf.zdsys.com197
92_spf.gestiondeservidor.net194
93spf.web-dns1.com194
94spf.mailigen.com192
95spf.securemx.jp190
96spf.raiolanetworks.com188
97_spf.bbnotify.net186
98dnsexit.com183
99spf.mschosting.com181
100jangomail.com179

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-09-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T11:56:36Z.