Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-07-01.

947 188
Domains with MX
717 066
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
947 188
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted352 50837.22%
2Google Workspace181 44019.16%
3Microsoft 36575 2837.95%
4Unknown / Other61 9796.54%
5Yandex 36042 0894.44%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)28 5083.01%
7GoDaddy22 5002.38%
8Zoho Mail14 1151.49%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)12 0171.27%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 7271.03%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Beget (RU)9 0560.96%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding8 0420.85%
13Mimecast7 7820.82%
14Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)7 2660.77%
15Proofpoint6 3080.67%
16Rackspace Email6 0840.64%
17Mail.ru for Business5 8170.61%
18Hostinger5 6200.59%
19OVH Mail5 2240.55%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)4 4720.47%
21Ukraine.com.ua hosting4 3710.46%
22Timeweb (RU)3 8980.41%
23Barracuda3 7010.39%
24Reg.ru3 2130.34%
25DreamHost2 8640.3%
26Amazon WorkMail2 5990.27%
271&1 IONOS2 5800.27%
28Symantec MessageLabs2 4870.26%
29Proofpoint Essentials2 4840.26%
30Mailgun (inbound)2 2650.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
10.98%
104 018 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
37 552
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.23%
352 645 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp31 8604.44%
2Mandrill21 3302.97%
3SendGrid (Twilio)20 6512.88%
4Zendesk15 9032.22%
5Mailgun15 8292.21%
6MailChannels15 4412.15%
7Amazon SES14 3572.0%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)10 7291.5%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 5201.19%
10Mimecast6 6070.92%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce5 3290.74%
12Mailjet (Sinch)5 0940.71%
13Marketo (Adobe)3 6700.51%
14Elastic Email3 6420.51%
15Unisender (RU)3 3490.47%
16SendPulse3 3150.46%
17Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 9370.41%
18Postmark2 5730.36%
19Help Scout2 4070.34%
20MailHostBox2 2280.31%
21SparkPost2 1900.31%
22Emsd1 (transactional)1 8260.25%
23Zoho Campaigns1 8090.25%
24Barracuda Essentials1 8040.25%
25SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 6980.24%
26MailerSend1 6770.23%
27A Random Server (parking)1 6130.22%
28Freshdesk1 4880.21%
29Constant Contact1 4320.2%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 3790.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 5750.78%
2Shopify3 3070.46%
3BigCommerce1 8290.26%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 4700.21%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 1250.16%
6Trustpilot1 0760.15%
7Firebase (Google)8220.11%
8NetSuite (Oracle)7940.11%
9Qualtrics7850.11%
10ClickDimensions7700.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11KnowBe46880.1%
12PayPal Braintree6820.1%
13Squarespace5680.08%
14Zendesk5650.08%
15Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5330.07%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)4650.06%
17RetailCRM4550.06%
18Greenhouse3600.05%
19Docebo (LMS)3040.04%
20ConnectWise2960.04%
21Autotask (ConnectWise)1980.03%
22Brightspace (D2L)1610.02%
23One.com (DK hosting)1570.02%
24Sage Intacct1450.02%
25Recurly1420.02%
26SchoolMessenger1410.02%
27Umantis (Haufe HR)1180.02%
28Gannett (USA Today)1040.01%
29Gorgias950.01%
30pair Networks900.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com3 172
2smx1.web-hosting.com3 120
3smx3.web-hosting.com3 118
4mx01.1and1.com2 287
5mx00.1and1.com2 285
6mx1.netsolmail.net1 191
7mx-in04.natrohost.com1 181
8mx-in04b.natrohost.com1 177
9mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 088
10mx-in03.natrohost.com917
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com917
12mx01.1and1.co.uk762
13mx00.1and1.co.uk761
14antispam1.ihs.com.tr715
15antispam2.ihs.com.tr713
16mx-in01.natrohost.com639
17mx-in01b.natrohost.com637
18mail.pickelhost.com593
19mx01.1and1.fr566
20mx00.1and1.fr565
21mx-in02.natrohost.com525
22mx-in02b.natrohost.com525
23mx247.in-mx.com486
24mx247.in-mx.net486
25mx00.1and1.es482
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx01.1and1.es480
27mx7.webfaction.com459
28mx76.mb1p.com458
29mx76.m2bp.com458
30mx8.webfaction.com457
31mx9.webfaction.com447
32mail.net4india.com443
33asp.reflexion.net418
34mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr391
35smtp-fwd.wordpress.com364
36smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net361
37mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk351
38mx-100.reflexion.net350
39mx-110.reflexion.net349
40mail-s30.1gb.ru348
41mx2.tmdhosting.com337
42mx1.tmdhosting.com336
43mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua326
44mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua325
45mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua325
46mailgw.nic.in307
47rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr302
48ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr301
49mx1.jimdo.com289
50mx2.jimdo.com289
51nan284
52mxs.activeby.net279
53mx1.supremebox.com262
54mx2.supremebox.com261
55in.hes.trendmicro.eu255
56mx1.inbox.co.il244
57sitemail.everyone.net239
58mx1.emailowl.com235
59mx2.emailowl.com231
60mx3.emailowl.com231
61cyber.mail.trdns.com231
62mxs.oml.ru225
63mx01.vargonen.net223
64mx3.volusion.com217
65mx4.volusion.com216
66mmxs.majordomo.ru205
67webmail2.sitebuildit.com202
68mx3.name.com198
69mx07.register.com196
70mx4.name.com196
71mx5.name.com196
72mx7.name.com193
73mx6.name.com193
74mx8.name.com193
75mx-backup.serveriai.lt190
76mx1.filterantispam.com190
77cluster.relay.agava.net188
78mx2.filterantispam.com188
79smx4.web-hosting.com186
801-grid-mx01.co.za184
811-grid-mx03.co.za184
821-grid-mx02.com183
831-grid-mx04.com183
84relay2.netnames.net182
85mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk182
86mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk181
87relay1.netnames.net180
88mx.otenet.gr170
89ntvirus.url.com.tw168
90ntvirus2.url.com.tw168
91mx.usa.net168
92mx1.flockmail.com165
93mx1.spamfilter.gr162
94mailme.enter-system.com161
95mx2.flockmail.com160
96mx0.spamfilter.gr159
97smtp.imcloud.org157
98mail-s27.1gb.ru155
99inbound.registeredsite.com155
100mxs.ht-systems.ru152

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com5 823
2webhostbox.net3 828
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com3 436
4_spfcls.natrohost.com3 406
5spf.flockmail.com3 041
6_spf.automattic.com2 277
7nicmail.ru1 891
8_spf.hoster.by1 384
9_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 235
10_spf.fastmail.gr1 207
11spf1.mailchannels.net1 127
12_spf.turhost.com1 106
13spf2.mailchannels.net1 093
14infusionmail.com1 053
15cmail1.com1 014
16getcourse.ru922
17spf.autopilothq.com896
18outlook.com869
19beget.ru847
20spf.mail.intercom.io847
21_spf.trwww.com771
22hostmonster.com770
23spf.a2hosting.com678
24_spf.nicegrup.com672
25_spf.mx1.mirohost.net668
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.hes.trendmicro.com611
27send.aweber.com590
28spf.hostmar.com589
29e2ma.net539
30icpbounce.com539
31appriver.com509
32hotmail.com508
33spf.improvmx.com486
34_spf.syrahost.com463
35msgfocus.com451
36webmail.ihs.com.tr449
37mailcontrol.com447
38justhost.com443
39_spf.act-on.net425
40spf.mailcluster.com.au423
41bmsend.com414
42google.com409
43_spf.emfwd.name-services.com387
44spf.zixsmbhosted.com387
45reflexion.net384
46datadrivenemail.com375
47ncfp.asia375
48email.freshservice.com371
49email-od.com362
50netangels.ru359
51smtp.groovehq.com357
52sharepointonline.com349
53spf.masterbase.com348
54smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg343
55_spf.acquia.com343
56spf.mschosting.com341
57smtp.servconfig.com340
58turbo-smtp.com339
59_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com332
60spf.webapps.net326
61gmail.com318
62spf.serveriai.lt316
63gridhost.co.uk315
64_spf.site4now.net308
65spf.migadu.com308
66_spf.embluemail.com307
67_spf.ofis.net301
68ncapp02.com301
69outboundmail.convio.net292
70spf.mindbox.ru290
71_spf.uni5.net287
72smtp1.uservoice.com286
73spf1.auinmeio.com.br286
74mh.blackboard.com286
75spf2.auinmeio.com.br285
76spf.hostedmail.net.au284
77emailserver.vn284
78_netblocks.google.com281
79salesforce.com279
80_spf.ps.kz276
81spf.aserv.co.za268
82sender.zohobooks.com261
83spf.nl2go.com260
84spf.hostingplatform.net.au258
85spf.protection.3dcart.com258
86_spf.heteml.jp251
87_spf.cretaforce.gr249
88spf.whservidor.com247
89md02.com246
90_spf.eee.tw245
91_spf.transip.email243
92mxlogin.com238
93spf.maropost.com236
94_spf.zdsys.com236
95customer.mailguard.com.au234
96_spf.amocrmmail.com230
97_spf.serviciodecorreo.es230
98jangomail.com229
99_netblocks2.google.com224
100spf.mailigen.com217

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-07-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:05:32Z.