Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-05-01.

965 680
Domains with MX
721 262
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
965 680
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted358 48637.12%
2Google Workspace180 66418.71%
3Microsoft 36573 1137.57%
4Unknown / Other63 6736.59%
5Yandex 36045 7094.73%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)30 0433.11%
7GoDaddy22 9552.38%
8Zoho Mail13 3601.38%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)12 5711.3%
10Beget (RU)11 4921.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 5670.99%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding7 9130.82%
13Mimecast7 7710.8%
14Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)6 9780.72%
15Mail.ru for Business6 6750.69%
16Proofpoint6 1690.64%
17Rackspace Email6 1660.64%
18Ukraine.com.ua hosting5 7990.6%
19OVH Mail5 4350.56%
20Hostinger5 2450.54%
21Timeweb (RU)4 8810.51%
22QQ Mail (Tencent)4 5200.47%
23Reg.ru3 9950.41%
24Barracuda3 7870.39%
25DreamHost3 1830.33%
261&1 IONOS2 7090.28%
27Symantec MessageLabs2 6590.28%
28NIC.RU Mail2 5480.26%
29Amazon WorkMail2 5320.26%
30Mailgun (inbound)2 3910.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.17%
107 860 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
38 292
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.14%
358 638 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp31 9184.43%
2Mandrill21 9223.04%
3SendGrid (Twilio)20 6382.86%
4Mailgun16 3372.27%
5Zendesk16 2172.25%
6Amazon SES13 8761.92%
7MailChannels13 6421.89%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)10 3361.43%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 4161.17%
10Mimecast6 6070.92%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce5 1150.71%
12Mailjet (Sinch)5 0600.7%
13Marketo (Adobe)3 7330.52%
14Unisender (RU)3 6830.51%
15SendPulse3 4980.48%
16Elastic Email3 4980.48%
17Postmark2 7450.38%
18Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 6030.36%
19Help Scout2 4440.34%
20SparkPost2 3180.32%
21MailHostBox2 0620.29%
22Barracuda Essentials1 7770.25%
23Zoho Campaigns1 7350.24%
24MailerSend1 6870.23%
25Emsd1 (transactional)1 6620.23%
26SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 5770.22%
27Freshdesk1 5290.21%
28A Random Server (parking)1 4960.21%
29Constant Contact1 4300.2%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 3550.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 4920.76%
2Shopify2 7630.38%
3BigCommerce1 8860.26%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 5060.21%
5CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0880.15%
6Trustpilot1 0810.15%
7Qualtrics8490.12%
8ClickDimensions8040.11%
9Firebase (Google)7960.11%
10NetSuite (Oracle)7760.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree6990.1%
12KnowBe46340.09%
13Zendesk6210.09%
14Squarespace5960.08%
15Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)5310.07%
16RetailCRM4830.07%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)4000.06%
18Greenhouse3600.05%
19Docebo (LMS)2800.04%
20ConnectWise2670.04%
21SchoolMessenger2340.03%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)2060.03%
23Brightspace (D2L)1580.02%
24Recurly1560.02%
25One.com (DK hosting)1510.02%
26Sage Intacct1290.02%
27Gannett (USA Today)1110.02%
28pair Networks1050.01%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)970.01%
30HappyFox810.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com4 026
2smx1.web-hosting.com3 963
3smx3.web-hosting.com3 962
4mx01.1and1.com2 494
5mx00.1and1.com2 492
6mx1.netsolmail.net1 200
7mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 149
8mx-in04.natrohost.com971
9mx-in04b.natrohost.com970
10mx-in03.natrohost.com864
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com863
12mx00.1and1.co.uk825
13mx01.1and1.co.uk825
14mail.pickelhost.com678
15antispam1.ihs.com.tr647
16antispam2.ihs.com.tr646
17mx-in01.natrohost.com594
18mx01.1and1.fr594
19mx-in01b.natrohost.com592
20mx00.1and1.fr590
21mx01.1and1.es504
22mx-in02b.natrohost.com504
23mx-in02.natrohost.com503
24mx00.1and1.es502
25mx7.webfaction.com502
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx247.in-mx.com500
27mx247.in-mx.net500
28mx8.webfaction.com499
29mx76.mb1p.com493
30mx76.m2bp.com493
31mx9.webfaction.com491
32mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua474
33mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua474
34mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua473
35asp.reflexion.net430
36mail-s30.1gb.ru429
37mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk353
38mx-100.reflexion.net352
39mx1.jimdo.com351
40mx2.jimdo.com351
41mx-110.reflexion.net349
42smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net349
43mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr343
44smtp-fwd.wordpress.com340
45mmxs.majordomo.ru339
46ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr323
47rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr323
48mxs.activeby.net302
49mx2.tmdhosting.com302
50mx1.tmdhosting.com301
51in.hes.trendmicro.eu285
52mx2.supremebox.com284
53mx1.supremebox.com283
54mxs.oml.ru280
55cluster.relay.agava.net272
56mailgw.nic.in272
57igw5002.site4now.net258
58mail.net4india.com257
59mx1.emailowl.com257
60webmail2.sitebuildit.com254
61mx2.emailowl.com253
62mx3.emailowl.com252
63sitemail.everyone.net239
64mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk231
65mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk231
66mx5.name.com216
67mx3.name.com216
68mx4.name.com215
69mx2.flockmail.com214
70mx7.name.com214
71mx1.filterantispam.com214
72mx1.flockmail.com213
73mx8.name.com213
74mx2.filterantispam.com213
75mx3.volusion.com212
76smx4.web-hosting.com212
77mx6.name.com212
78mx4.volusion.com210
79mx30.aha.ru208
80mx07.register.com207
81mx-backup.serveriai.lt205
82mxs.ht-systems.ru202
83relay2.netnames.net197
84relay1.netnames.net196
85mail-s27.1gb.ru191
86nan189
87mx01.vargonen.net187
88mx1.inbox.co.il176
89inbound.registeredsite.com169
90mx.otenet.gr168
91cyber.mail.trdns.com168
92mx00.schlund.de165
93mx01.schlund.de165
94mx.usa.net164
95mail2.infomart2000.com163
96mx.ukrdomen.com159
97mx2.uh.com.ua157
98mx1.spamfilter.gr156
99mx0.spamfilter.gr155
100mx.unoeuro.com152

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com6 336
2webhostbox.net3 540
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com3 149
4_spfcls.natrohost.com3 113
5_spf.automattic.com2 587
6nicmail.ru2 380
7spf.flockmail.com2 163
8spf1.mailchannels.net2 157
9spf2.mailchannels.net2 127
10_spf.hoster.by1 619
11_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 219
12_spf.fastmail.gr1 155
13infusionmail.com1 108
14_spf.turhost.com1 085
15beget.ru1 084
16getcourse.ru1 045
17cmail1.com1 002
18outlook.com939
19spf.mail.intercom.io899
20spf.autopilothq.com872
21_spf.mx1.mirohost.net846
22hostmonster.com829
23_spf.trwww.com726
24spf.hes.trendmicro.com668
25_spf.nicegrup.com663
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.hostmar.com646
27spf.a2hosting.com613
28icpbounce.com597
29justhost.com548
30e2ma.net548
31hotmail.com508
32appriver.com496
33send.aweber.com460
34msgfocus.com440
35mailcontrol.com438
36_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com438
37_spf.act-on.net433
38spf.zixsmbhosted.com431
39google.com425
40netangels.ru421
41_spf.ps.kz415
42reflexion.net406
43spf.mailcluster.com.au391
44_spf.syrahost.com391
45webmail.ihs.com.tr390
46email.freshservice.com388
47_spf.emfwd.name-services.com385
48bmsend.com384
49datadrivenemail.com380
50spf.webapps.net378
51gmail.com368
52spf.masterbase.com361
53smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg358
54sharepointonline.com355
55smtp.groovehq.com348
56spf.serveriai.lt347
57email-od.com347
58spf.improvmx.com346
59ncfp.asia339
60outboundmail.convio.net333
61turbo-smtp.com320
62_spf.ofis.net314
63_spf.acquia.com314
64spf.migadu.com313
65smtp1.uservoice.com300
66mh.blackboard.com293
67smtp.servconfig.com292
68_netblocks.google.com292
69spf.mschosting.com291
70salesforce.com289
71_spf.embluemail.com287
72ncapp02.com281
73spf1.auinmeio.com.br277
74_spf.websupport.sk275
75spf2.auinmeio.com.br273
76spf.mindbox.ru271
77gridhost.co.uk271
78spf.protection.3dcart.com269
79_spf.megagroup.ru268
80spf.nl2go.com265
81spf.hostedmail.net.au265
82_spf.anpdm.com264
83spf.mywahosting.com259
84spf.maropost.com257
85_spf.cretaforce.gr257
86_spf.zdsys.com254
87mail.insales.ru253
88md02.com253
89_spf.site4now.net249
90spf.raiolanetworks.com241
91spf.whservidor.com241
92spfhost.messageprovider.com240
93spf.aserv.co.za238
94_spf.transip.email236
95spf.mailigen.com235
96spf.theeml.com234
97spf.get-n-post.ru234
98spf.securedserverspace.net232
99_spf.serviciodecorreo.es230
100_spf.bbnotify.net228

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-05-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:14:16Z.