Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-04-01.

859 917
Domains with MX
639 926
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
859 917
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted318 17337.0%
2Google Workspace166 26219.33%
3Microsoft 36566 6787.75%
4Unknown / Other58 6486.82%
5Yandex 36035 5314.13%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)27 1693.16%
7GoDaddy20 9962.44%
8Zoho Mail12 3971.44%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)11 7101.36%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 4030.98%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Beget (RU)7 9340.92%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding7 6040.88%
13Mimecast7 1990.84%
14Proofpoint5 9230.69%
15Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 8520.68%
16Rackspace Email5 7360.67%
17OVH Mail4 9090.57%
18Mail.ru for Business4 6420.54%
19QQ Mail (Tencent)4 4950.52%
20Hostinger4 4530.52%
21Ukraine.com.ua hosting4 4400.52%
22Barracuda3 5850.42%
23Timeweb (RU)3 2890.38%
24DreamHost2 8430.33%
25Reg.ru2 7850.32%
26Symantec MessageLabs2 5410.3%
271&1 IONOS2 3570.27%
28Amazon WorkMail2 3260.27%
29Mailgun (inbound)2 3040.27%
30Proofpoint Essentials2 1600.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.5%
98 908 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
35 975
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.02%
318 306 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp29 5634.62%
2Mandrill20 6423.23%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 6443.07%
4Zendesk15 5832.44%
5Mailgun15 3832.4%
6Amazon SES13 1482.05%
7MailChannels11 8261.85%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 9901.4%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 0211.25%
10Mimecast6 0380.94%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce4 9010.77%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 4160.69%
13Marketo (Adobe)3 5640.56%
14Elastic Email3 2330.51%
15Unisender (RU)2 8930.45%
16SendPulse2 7600.43%
17Postmark2 6140.41%
18Help Scout2 2560.35%
19Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 2400.35%
20SparkPost2 1560.34%
21MailHostBox1 8630.29%
22Barracuda Essentials1 6760.26%
23Zoho Campaigns1 5330.24%
24A Random Server (parking)1 5150.24%
25Emsd1 (transactional)1 5070.24%
26MailerSend1 4300.22%
27Freshdesk1 4210.22%
28Constant Contact1 3850.22%
29Exclaimer (signatures)1 2130.19%
30SMTP2GO1 2030.19%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 2640.82%
2Shopify2 3700.37%
3BigCommerce1 8150.28%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 4720.23%
5Trustpilot1 0200.16%
6CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0090.16%
7Qualtrics8430.13%
8NetSuite (Oracle)7950.12%
9ClickDimensions7240.11%
10Firebase (Google)6860.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree6570.1%
12Zendesk6250.1%
13KnowBe46160.1%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)4860.08%
15Squarespace4780.07%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)4060.06%
17RetailCRM3700.06%
18Greenhouse3640.06%
19Docebo (LMS)2730.04%
20ConnectWise2640.04%
21SchoolMessenger2300.04%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)2040.03%
23Recurly1500.02%
24Brightspace (D2L)1470.02%
25Sage Intacct1340.02%
26One.com (DK hosting)1250.02%
27Gannett (USA Today)1100.02%
28Umantis (Haufe HR)960.02%
29HappyFox800.01%
30pair Networks760.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com3 744
2smx1.web-hosting.com3 677
3smx3.web-hosting.com3 675
4mx01.1and1.com2 295
5mx00.1and1.com2 287
6mx1.netsolmail.net1 092
7mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 007
8mx-in04.natrohost.com919
9mx-in04b.natrohost.com916
10mx-in03.natrohost.com866
11mx-in03b.natrohost.com866
12mx01.1and1.co.uk770
13mx00.1and1.co.uk766
14mail.pickelhost.com614
15antispam1.ihs.com.tr592
16antispam2.ihs.com.tr592
17mx-in01.natrohost.com551
18mx-in01b.natrohost.com548
19mx00.1and1.es520
20mx76.mb1p.com519
21mx76.m2bp.com519
22mx01.1and1.es519
23mx01.1and1.fr508
24mx00.1and1.fr507
25mx7.webfaction.com482
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx8.webfaction.com480
27mx9.webfaction.com470
28asp.reflexion.net468
29mx-in02.natrohost.com448
30mx-in02b.natrohost.com448
31mail.net4india.com440
32mx247.in-mx.com407
33mx247.in-mx.net407
34mx-100.reflexion.net384
35mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua381
36mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua381
37mx-110.reflexion.net379
38mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua378
39mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk378
40smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net360
41rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr345
42ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr344
43mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr343
44smtp-fwd.wordpress.com326
45mx2.tmdhosting.com318
46mx1.tmdhosting.com315
47mx1.jimdo.com292
48mx2.jimdo.com291
49mail-s30.1gb.ru285
50igw5002.site4now.net252
51mx1.supremebox.com245
52mailgw.nic.in243
53mx2.supremebox.com243
54mxs.activeby.net238
55in.hes.trendmicro.eu226
56mx1.emailowl.com224
57webmail2.sitebuildit.com218
58mx2.emailowl.com217
59mx3.emailowl.com215
60sitemail.everyone.net213
61mx.unoeuro.com209
62mx4.volusion.com209
63mx3.volusion.com207
64mmxs.majordomo.ru206
65mx3.name.com202
66mx4.name.com201
67mx5.name.com200
68mx7.name.com199
69mx6.name.com199
70mx8.name.com197
71smx4.web-hosting.com194
72mx-backup.serveriai.lt193
73mx.usa.net193
74mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk190
75mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk189
76mx07.register.com187
77mxs.oml.ru182
78mx1.filterantispam.com181
79mx01.vargonen.net179
80mx2.filterantispam.com179
81cyber.mail.trdns.com178
82cluster.relay.agava.net178
83mx1.flockmail.com177
84mx2.flockmail.com176
85relay2.netnames.net175
86nan174
87relay1.netnames.net172
88inbound.registeredsite.com171
89mailme.enter-system.com169
90mx1.inbox.co.il163
91mail.b-io.co162
92ntvirus.url.com.tw157
93ntvirus2.url.com.tw157
94mxs.ht-systems.ru138
95mx01.schlund.de138
96mx30.aha.ru137
97mx.otenet.gr137
98mx00.schlund.de137
99mx.ukrdomen.com135
100mx2.uh.com.ua133

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com5 911
2webhostbox.net3 236
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 974
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 948
5_spf.automattic.com2 652
6spf1.mailchannels.net1 870
7spf2.mailchannels.net1 843
8nicmail.ru1 504
9spf.flockmail.com1 397
10_spf.hoster.by1 138
11_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 115
12_spf.fastmail.gr1 097
13_spf.turhost.com1 067
14infusionmail.com1 029
15cmail1.com952
16spf.mail.intercom.io869
17outlook.com866
18spf.autopilothq.com817
19getcourse.ru771
20beget.ru768
21hostmonster.com734
22_spf.trwww.com712
23_spf.mx1.mirohost.net641
24spf.hes.trendmicro.com604
25_spf.nicegrup.com554
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26icpbounce.com547
27spf.a2hosting.com538
28e2ma.net533
29spf.hostmar.com509
30justhost.com486
31hotmail.com456
32appriver.com448
33msgfocus.com445
34reflexion.net415
35mailcontrol.com413
36spf.zixsmbhosted.com413
37_spf.act-on.net406
38send.aweber.com377
39google.com375
40_spf.emfwd.name-services.com372
41bmsend.com369
42email-od.com364
43datadrivenemail.com364
44_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com359
45smtp.groovehq.com357
46sharepointonline.com357
47_spf.syrahost.com354
48email.freshservice.com347
49spf.mailcluster.com.au345
50ncfp.asia340
51webmail.ihs.com.tr335
52spf.masterbase.com327
53outboundmail.convio.net326
54mh.blackboard.com314
55_spf.acquia.com309
56gmail.com307
57turbo-smtp.com304
58spf.serveriai.lt302
59_spf.ofis.net300
60spf.migadu.com299
61netangels.ru294
62smtp1.uservoice.com293
63smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg289
64gridhost.co.uk289
65spf.webapps.net289
66spf.nl2go.com279
67salesforce.com278
68_netblocks.google.com276
69smtp.servconfig.com264
70ncapp02.com258
71spf1.auinmeio.com.br256
72spf2.auinmeio.com.br255
73_spf.zdsys.com253
74spf.hostedmail.net.au250
75_spf.mixhost.jp248
76_spf.ps.kz247
77_spf.anpdm.com246
78_spf.embluemail.com245
79spf.mschosting.com243
80_spf.site4now.net242
81spf.maropost.com237
82emailserver.vn233
83_spf.eee.tw231
84_spf.transip.email230
85spf.mindbox.ru227
86_spf.bbnotify.net226
87spf.protection.3dcart.com225
88_spf.heteml.jp225
89spf.securedserverspace.net223
90spf.mywahosting.com219
91_spf.websupport.sk219
92spf.get-n-post.ru215
93spf.linuxpl.com215
94mxlogic.net215
95_netblocks2.google.com214
96_spf.uni5.net214
97spf.digitalinsight.com213
98spfhost.messageprovider.com212
99jangomail.com210
100md02.com209

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-04-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:18:42Z.