Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2020-03-01.

780 292
Domains with MX
579 459
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
780 292
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted296 83238.04%
2Google Workspace143 28118.36%
3Microsoft 36554 2156.95%
4Unknown / Other51 3556.58%
5Yandex 36039 1865.02%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)24 2793.11%
7GoDaddy18 5862.38%
8Zoho Mail11 2731.44%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)10 5481.35%
10Beget (RU)9 3061.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 7490.86%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding6 4310.82%
13Mimecast6 1660.79%
14Mail.ru for Business5 6120.72%
15Ukraine.com.ua hosting5 2230.67%
16Proofpoint5 1550.66%
17Rackspace Email4 8450.62%
18Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 6320.59%
19OVH Mail4 4300.57%
20Timeweb (RU)4 0100.51%
21Hostinger3 9500.51%
22QQ Mail (Tencent)3 7460.48%
23Reg.ru3 0870.4%
24Barracuda2 7450.35%
25DreamHost2 4560.31%
26Symantec MessageLabs2 2360.29%
27NIC.RU Mail2 1060.27%
28Mailgun (inbound)2 0150.26%
29Amazon WorkMail1 9380.25%
301&1 IONOS1 8870.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.21%
87 481 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
32 759
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
38.06%
296 968 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp24 6904.26%
2Mandrill18 2373.15%
3SendGrid (Twilio)16 7312.89%
4Zendesk13 4532.32%
5Mailgun13 1882.28%
6Amazon SES11 5091.99%
7MailChannels10 3861.79%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 1901.24%
9Namecheap Forwarding6 7861.17%
10Mimecast5 1290.89%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Salesforce4 1730.72%
12Mailjet (Sinch)4 0380.7%
13Unisender (RU)3 3510.58%
14Marketo (Adobe)3 2020.55%
15Elastic Email3 0380.52%
16SendPulse2 8970.5%
17Postmark2 2580.39%
18SparkPost2 0370.35%
19Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 9870.34%
20Help Scout1 9730.34%
21MailHostBox1 8820.32%
22Barracuda Essentials1 2810.22%
23A Random Server (parking)1 2790.22%
24MailerSend1 2320.21%
25Emsd1 (transactional)1 2270.21%
26Freshdesk1 2220.21%
27Zoho Campaigns1 2000.21%
28Constant Contact1 0830.19%
29SMTP2GO1 0570.18%
30Exclaimer (signatures)1 0060.17%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 3300.75%
2Shopify1 7160.3%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)1 3510.23%
4BigCommerce1 2460.22%
5Trustpilot9350.16%
6CodeTwo Email Signatures 3658240.14%
7Qualtrics7510.13%
8ClickDimensions6470.11%
9NetSuite (Oracle)6230.11%
10PayPal Braintree5670.1%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Zendesk5530.1%
12Firebase (Google)5510.1%
13KnowBe44540.08%
14RetailCRM4120.07%
15Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)3920.07%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)3430.06%
17Greenhouse3280.06%
18Squarespace3100.05%
19Docebo (LMS)2320.04%
20ConnectWise1870.03%
21SchoolMessenger1760.03%
22Recurly1360.02%
23Brightspace (D2L)1350.02%
24Autotask (ConnectWise)1330.02%
25One.com (DK hosting)1070.02%
26Sage Intacct1020.02%
27Gannett (USA Today)900.02%
28Umantis (Haufe HR)860.01%
29pair Networks710.01%
30Oracle Cloud680.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com3 179
2smx1.web-hosting.com3 120
3smx3.web-hosting.com3 119
4mx01.1and1.com1 962
5mx00.1and1.com1 961
6mx1.netsolmail.net917
7mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net848
8mx-in03.natrohost.com756
9mx-in03b.natrohost.com756
10mx-in04.natrohost.com716
11mx-in04b.natrohost.com715
12mx01.1and1.co.uk658
13mx00.1and1.co.uk657
14antispam1.ihs.com.tr523
15mx00.1and1.fr522
16mx01.1and1.fr522
17antispam2.ihs.com.tr521
18mail.pickelhost.com507
19mx-in01.natrohost.com477
20mx-in01b.natrohost.com475
21mx-in02.natrohost.com445
22mx-in02b.natrohost.com444
23mail.net4india.com430
24mx00.1and1.es411
25mx01.1and1.es411
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua401
27mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua399
28mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua399
29mx7.webfaction.com397
30mx8.webfaction.com395
31mx9.webfaction.com386
32mx76.mb1p.com379
33mx76.m2bp.com379
34mx192.m2bp.com344
35mx192.mb1p.com344
36smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net333
37mail-s30.1gb.ru328
38asp.reflexion.net326
39mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk311
40mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr301
41mx247.in-mx.com297
42mx247.in-mx.net297
43mailgw.nic.in288
44mx-100.reflexion.net273
45mx2.tmdhosting.com270
46mx1.tmdhosting.com268
47mx-110.reflexion.net268
48mxs.activeby.net264
49rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr258
50ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr257
51mmxs.majordomo.ru250
52smtp-fwd.wordpress.com244
53mxs.oml.ru243
54mx1.jimdo.com239
55mx2.jimdo.com239
56igw5002.site4now.net224
57cluster.relay.agava.net223
58mx1.supremebox.com218
59mx2.supremebox.com218
60in.hes.trendmicro.eu207
61mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk190
62mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk189
63smx4.web-hosting.com181
64webmail2.sitebuildit.com180
65mx4.name.com173
66mx3.name.com173
67mxs.ht-systems.ru172
68mx3.volusion.com172
69mx4.volusion.com172
70mx5.name.com171
71sitemail.everyone.net169
72mx7.name.com169
73mx6.name.com168
74mx8.name.com167
75mx07.register.com164
76mail-s27.1gb.ru162
77mx1.flockmail.com161
78mx2.flockmail.com158
79nan158
80mx1.emailowl.com154
81mx.ukrdomen.com153
82relay2.netnames.net153
83mx2.emailowl.com153
84mx-backup.serveriai.lt153
85mx30.aha.ru153
86relay1.netnames.net152
87mx3.emailowl.com151
88mx1.filterantispam.com150
89mx2.uh.com.ua149
90mx01.vargonen.net148
91mx2.filterantispam.com148
92mail.b-io.co144
93cyber.mail.trdns.com144
94mx.unoeuro.com139
951-grid-mx01.co.za138
961-grid-mx02.com138
971-grid-mx03.co.za138
981-grid-mx04.com138
99mx.otenet.gr135
100mx.usa.net127

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com4 881
2webhostbox.net3 685
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 533
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 514
5_spf.automattic.com2 261
6nicmail.ru1 948
7spf1.mailchannels.net1 590
8spf2.mailchannels.net1 573
9_spf.hoster.by1 339
10beget.ru946
11_spf.fastmail.gr935
12_spf.protection.veridyen.com927
13infusionmail.com871
14cmail1.com854
15spf.flockmail.com851
16_spf.turhost.com841
17getcourse.ru784
18spf.mail.intercom.io776
19outlook.com759
20_spf.mx1.mirohost.net717
21spf.autopilothq.com708
22_spf.trwww.com650
23hostmonster.com637
24spf.hes.trendmicro.com510
25spf.hostmar.com495
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26hotmail.com464
27icpbounce.com461
28_spf.nicegrup.com424
29e2ma.net424
30msgfocus.com406
31ncfp.asia399
32justhost.com380
33mailcontrol.com362
34google.com349
35netangels.ru349
36appriver.com343
37spf.a2hosting.com335
38datadrivenemail.com329
39_spf.emfwd.name-services.com328
40bmsend.com327
41_spf.ps.kz323
42reflexion.net320
43_spf.act-on.net317
44_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com305
45send.aweber.com304
46smtp.groovehq.com302
47spf.masterbase.com297
48gmail.com297
49sharepointonline.com294
50spf.zixsmbhosted.com292
51email-od.com290
52ncapp02.com284
53email.freshservice.com284
54mh.blackboard.com283
55smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg282
56_spf.acquia.com278
57_spf.ofis.net272
58smtp1.uservoice.com272
59webmail.ihs.com.tr267
60spf.serveriai.lt263
61turbo-smtp.com263
62_spf.syrahost.com261
63outboundmail.convio.net257
64_netblocks.google.com256
65gridhost.co.uk251
66spf.mailcluster.com.au250
67salesforce.com247
68spf.webapps.net246
69spf.migadu.com246
70netcore.co.in242
71spf.mindbox.ru240
72spf.mschosting.com238
73spf1.auinmeio.com.br233
74_spf.megagroup.ru232
75spf.get-n-post.ru231
76spf2.auinmeio.com.br231
77_spf.embluemail.com230
78spf.theeml.com221
79_spf.cretaforce.gr219
80_spf.site4now.net218
81mail.insales.ru216
82smtp.servconfig.com214
83_spf.zdsys.com212
84spf.mailigen.com202
85_netblocks2.google.com201
86md02.com201
87spf.whservidor.com201
88_spf.websupport.sk198
89spf.hostedmail.net.au198
90spf.nl2go.com197
91spf.maropost.com193
92_spf.heteml.jp193
93_spf.uni5.net193
94_spf.anpdm.com192
95rnmk.com188
96emailserver.vn187
97_netblocks3.google.com186
98eblastengine.com185
99spf.digitalinsight.com184
100mxlogic.net183

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2020-03-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:22:51Z.